Two killed in Russian attacks on Ukraine before possible talks in Turkiye

At least two people have been killed in Ukraine as a result of Russian drone and missile attacks on Ukraine, according to officials, as Ukraine ordered the evacuation of 11 more Sumy-bordering Russian-area villages.

According to the Ukrainian air force, 109 drones and 42 drones were shot down in Ukraine on Friday and overnight, according to an estimate from the Russian military. Thirty other drones failed to reach their targets without causing any harm.

The attacks occurred as the world was unsure about Kyiv’s participation in a new round of peace talks in Istanbul for the first time starting this week.

According to Zaporizhia’s governor Ivan Fedorov, a child was killed in a rocket attack on Saturday in the front-line village of Dolynka in the Zaporizhia region and another was hurt in the same attack.

“One home was destroyed,” he said. Fedorov wrote on Telegram that the blast’s shockwave also caused damage to a number of other homes, cars, and outbuildings.

Governor Oleksandr Prokudin posted a tweet claiming that a man was killed by Russian shelling in the Kherson region of Ukraine.

Both attacks were not addressed by Moscow.

Authorities in the Sumy region of Ukraine reported that they were evacuating 11 villages that were located about 30 kilometers (19 miles) away from the Russian border.

The regional administration stated on social media that the decision was made in light of the ongoing threat to civilian life caused by border community shelling.

According to Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the president of Ukraine, about 50 000 Russian troops are stationed in the area in an effort to establish a buffer zone inside Ukrainian territory.

Oleksandr Syrskii, the country’s top military commander, claimed on Saturday that the main offensive against Russia was being conducted in Pokrovsk, Torets, and Lyman in the Donetsk and Sumy border regions.

Moscow has repeatedly refuted Syrskii’s claim that Ukrainian forces are still occupying the Kursk region of Russia.

Washington called on both countries to end the three-year war, so the evacuations and attacks came just two days before a potential meeting between Kyiv and Moscow in Istanbul.

Russia has confirmed that it will send a delegation, but Kyiv has not yet accepted the proposal, warning that negotiations would not succeed unless the Kremlin had agreed to terms of peace in advance.

Saudi Arabia says it will jointly fund Syria state salaries with Qatar

Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud has said that the kingdom and Qatar will offer joint financial support to state employees in Syria.

His statements came on Saturday during a joint press conference with his Syrian counterpart Asaad al-Shibani in Damascus.

The two Gulf nations have been among the most important regional supporters of Syria’s new authorities, who ousted longtime ruler Bashar al-Assad in December after nearly 14 years of war.

Saturday’s statement did not provide details on the exact amount of the support for Syria’s public sector. However, it comes after Syrian Finance Minister Mohammed Yosr Bernieh said earlier in May that Qatar was going to provide Syria with $29m per month for an initial three months to pay civilian public sector worker salaries.

The Reuters news agency had also reported&nbsp, that the United States had given its blessing to the Qatari initiative, which came a few days before President Donald Trump announced that sanctions on Syria imposed during the al-Assad regime would be lifted. The European Union has since also lifted sanctions on Syria.

Further evidence of Saudi Arabian and Qatari support came in mid-May, when it was announced that the two countries had paid off Syria’s debt to the World Bank, a sum of roughly $15m.

International ties

Syria’s new government, led by interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa, has sought to rebuild the country’s diplomatic ties and convince wary Western states that he has turned his back on past ties with groups such as al-Qaeda.

The Syrian leader has repeatedly disavowed extremism and expressed support for minorities, but incidents of violence that has led to hundreds of deaths continue to cause international trepidation – even as the government and al-Sharaa denounce the killings.

Syria’s new government has also made a concerted effort to solidify ties to Gulf Arab states who have begun to play a&nbsp, pivotal role in financing the reconstruction of Syria’s war-ravaged infrastructure and reviving its economy.

On Tuesday, the European Union announced it had adopted legal acts lifting all economic restrictive measures on Syria except those based on security grounds. It also removed 24 entities from the EU list of those subject to the freesing of funds and economic resources, including the Central Bank of Syria.

And after Saudi Arabia and Qatar cleared Syria’s debt to the World Bank, the US-based financial institution&nbsp, said that it would restart operations in the country following a 14-year pause.

The World Bank has begun to prepare its first project in Syria, which will focus on improving electricity access – a key pillar for revitalising essential services like healthcare, education, and water supply. It also marked the start of expanded support to stabilise Syria and boost long-term growth.

Syria’s gradual re-integration into the global economy is in large part due to Trump’s dramatic shift in Washington’s policies towards the country. After announcing the lifting of US sanctions on May 13, Trump also became&nbsp, the first US president in 25 years to meet with a Syrian counterpart.

The Syrian president has been able to meet world leaders in France and Saudi Arabia, where the US had already removed a $10 million reward for the capture of al-Sharaa.

There is still a lot more work to be done. According to a report released in February by the UN Development Programme (UNDP), Syria would need more than 50 years to recover from its economic pre-war state, and it called for significant investment to speed up the process.

India top general admits aerial ‘losses’ in recent conflict with Pakistan

India’s chief of defence staff says the country suffered initial losses in the air during a recent military conflict with neighbouring Pakistan, but declined to give details.

“What was important is, why did these losses occur, and what we will do after that”, General Anil Chauhan told the Reuters news agency on Saturday on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue security forum in Singapore.

India and Pakistan were engaged in a four-day conflict this month, their worst standoff since 1999, before a ceasefire was agreed on May 10. More than 70 people were killed in missile, drone and artillery fire on both sides, but there are competing claims on the casualties.

India says more than 100 “terrorists” were killed in its “precision strikes” on several “terror camps” across Pakistan, which rejects the claim, saying more than 30 Pakistani civilians were killed in the Indian attacks.

New Delhi, meanwhile, says nearly two dozen civilians were killed on the Indian side, most of them in Indian-administered Kashmir, along the disputed border.

The fighting between the two nuclear powers was triggered by an attack on tourists in Pahalgam in Indian-administered Kashmir on April 22 that killed 26 people, almost all of them tourists. New Delhi blamed Pakistan for supporting the armed group behind the attack, an allegation Islamabad denied.

During their conflict, Pakistan had also claimed to have downed at least five Indian military jets, including at least three Rafale fighters. But Chauhan on Saturday dismissed it as “absolutely incorrect”, confirming his country had lost at least one aircraft.

“I think what is important is that, not the jet being down, but why they were being down”, he told Bloomberg TV in a separate interview in Singapore.

On May 11, a day after the ceasefire, India’s Air Marshal AK Bharti told reporters in New Delhi that “all our pilots are back home”, adding that “we are in a combat scenario, and that losses are a part of combat”.

Chauhan said on Saturday India switched tactics after suffering losses in the air on the first day of conflict and established a decisive advantage.

“So we rectified tactics and then went back on the]May] 7th, 8th and 10th in large numbers to hit airbases deep inside Pakistan, penetrated all their air defences with impunity, carried out precision strikes”, he said.

Islamabad has denied it suffered any losses of planes but has acknowledged its airbases suffered some hits, although losses were minimal.

Chauhan said while the fighting had ceased, the Indian government had made it clear that it would respond “precisely and decisively should there be any further terror attacks emanating from Pakistan”.

“So that has its own dynamics as far]as] the armed forces are concerned. It will require us to be prepared 24/7”, he said.

Chauhan also said that although Pakistan is closely allied with China, which borders India in the north and the northeast, there was no sign of any actual help from Beijing during the conflict.

“We didn’t find any unusual activity in the operational or tactical depth of our northern borders, and things were generally all right,” he told Reuters as it was happening from [April 22] onward.

Enlightened Americans should stay and fight, not leave

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the president of Ukraine, has one unmistakable quality: courage despite his flaws and hubris.

That became clear during a memorable incident more than three years ago when Russia invaded Ukraine.

A pincer-like column of Russian tanks and other armored vehicles had crossed the border in a foreboding, never-ending pattern.

Destruction seemed in imminent danger in the halting presence of such a terrifying display of overwhelming force.

Kyiv appeared to be on the verge of collapse. As a lethal exclamation point, Zelenskyy and company would be detained or killed while Vladimir Putin, the puppet government, was installed to bow and obedient.

The unlikely wartime leader turned comedian had no flinch. On Ukraine’s holy soil, he stood his ground.

Zelenskyy posted a short&nbsp, video&nbsp on social media that featured him surrounded by a number of solemn-looking officials and cabinet ministers to reassure worried Ukrainians.

He claimed, “The president is here.” “We are all here, protecting] our independence,” the statement read.

As I read accounts from a diverse group of Americans, including artists and academics, leaving their beloved country in the agonizing wake of President Donald Trump’s startling return to the Oval Office, I was reminded of that remarkable scene.

I must make two instructive points before I can move on.

First of all, I don’t mean to say that enlightened Americans who choose to forgo living and working in the United States lack courage by referring to Zelenskyy’s pledge to remain in Ukraine despite the ominous risks.

Not at all.

To stay or to leave, each of us has encountered or will face in the future.

Can be sparked by answering the wry question to make people feel uncertain. Making a choice, regardless of the direction, is a brave decision. The familiar must be replaced by the unknown, in a way that requires resolve.

Second, I have avoided using the word “flee” to explain why some Americans choose to immigrate because of Trump’s egregious tactic. Instead of thoughtful, thoughtful decision-making, “Flee” evokes impulsive panic or self-preservation.

Zelenskyy provides a compelling illustration of why staying is necessary in order to avoid fleeing to Canada or Europe when a bully threatens your values and beliefs: fairness, truth, empathy, tolerance, justice, diversity, and intelligence.

So I ask you to insist like Zelenskyy did, educated Americans: We are all here.

You have a duty and responsibility to defend America’s promise.

You can create an unbreakable, immovable buttress in opposition to Trumpism’s vile rhetoric, defiance of democratic norms, acceptance of authoritarianism, and corrosive division and fear.

Far from the decisive moment of the conflict, this contest is unattainable. It must be fought face-to-face with a steadfast adversary and with other wise Americans who are underprivileged and lacking in the resources that have allowed your exit.

When the opposition retreats, Trumpism thrives. Absence opens the door for extremism to spread even more deeply and widely into America’s already discordant and frail fabric. Trumpists’ desire to overthrow opposition through edicts, threats, and coercion only serve as comfort for those who withdraw.

A country that has been wracked and divided can also be seen as a declaration of defeat by a departed nation as a concession that there is no way to redeem itself.

Dynamic governance is not self-sustaining; it requires people to continue to fight, especially when necessary. Some enlightened Americans forfeit their ability to influence both the present and the future by leaving the arena.

Standing alongside and against the restless, enlightened Americans confirms that all of its citizens are Americans, not just those who demand the most attention or are loudspeakers.

Trump, who is president, welcomes the idea of despondent Americans relocating to new communities. It’s a source of pride, in my opinion, because it suggests his vindictive agenda is successful.

The exodus of “liberal elites” or “out-of-touch” entertainers, in Trump’s opinion, shows that the old establishment, who never accepted his conceit of America’s “greatness” is losing its authenticity.

Of course, this response is a sign of Trump’s wider political strategy, which is to draw a line between “real” Americans, his supporters, and everyone else.

He promotes the conceited notion that protest is a necessary component of a mature, confident nation by celebrating the phenomenon of Americans parting in protest.

Trump doesn’t care about persuasion or unity. He sees his presidency as a sign of faithfulness because of it. You are encouraged to join the despondent diaspora and, in his jaundiced opinion, good riddance if you don’t worship him.

Americans face an uncomfortable reality: despite their             , arguments , and reservations about resettling to avoid the depressing capitulation of major

In the classrooms, on the airwaves, and in town halls, scholars and intellectuals with the will to challenge obstinate power should resurrect.

Even though they are poignant, declarations from abroad can’t substitute for speaking out in person repeatedly to show how much kindness, resiliency, and decency matter.

Few people more than celebrities comprehend the power of spectacle, which is how Trumpism thrives.

Many bidding America adieu did it in self-righteous fashion while armed with a righteous pulpit from foreign shores. Even so, meaningless symbolism is hollow.

Returning means confronting the mess, contradictions, and tarnished ideals of a battered country head-on, which is still worthwhile effort and imagination.

Public figures should use their popular media platforms to galvanise, not just to condemn, but also to acclaim opposition as elitist scorn rather than as a shared obligation. That would stand out more than a blatant opinion piece in the New York Times or a thread of disparaging tweets would ever be able to do.

Zelenskyy is aware that work is always carried out on-site. Returnees can make a real difference in this by acting as like-minded collaborators who do the work without giving a damn about it.

Trumpism may have ascendant status, but it is not unstoppable. It is most concerned about solidarity that transcends class, racial, and background; solidarity that affirms that Donald Trump is not intended to define or disfigure America.

If they return home, the wounded and disillusioned exiles can reclaim their rightful place in that agonizing conflict.

Iran increases stockpile of enriched Uranium by 50 percent, IAEA says

Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched, near-waffen-grade uranium has increased by 50% in the last three months, according to the UN nuclear watchdog.

The United States and Iran are currently negotiating a nuclear deal, according to the report released by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on Saturday, with Tehran insisting that its nuclear program is only for peaceful purposes.

Iran, the only non-nuclear weapon state, had accumulated 408.6 kg (900.8 pounds) of uranium as of May 17 according to the IAEA, and had increased by almost 50% to 133.8 kg since its last report in February.

Tehran was advised to change its course in a broad-based, secretive report spotted by several news organizations that claimed Iran engaged in secret nuclear activities at three locations that have long been the subject of an investigation.

Abbas Araghchi, the country’s foreign minister, said Tehran deems nuclear weapons “unacceptable.” He later reiterated the country’s longstanding position.

In a televised speech, Araghchi, Iran’s lead negotiator in the nuclear negotiations with the US, said, “Yes, we too consider this type of weapon unacceptable.” On this point, “We concur with them.”

“Both sides building leverage”

The 35-nation board of governors of the IAEA requested the report in November, which will allow the US, Britain, France, and Germany to press for an international declaration that Iran is in violation of its non-proliferation obligations.

Donald Trump, the president of the United States, stated on Friday that Iran “cannot have nuclear weapons.”

They oppose being blown up. Trump continued, “It would be great that we could have a deal without bombs being dropped all over the Middle East,” adding that they would prefer to make a deal.

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action was reached by Iran with the United Kingdom, the US, Germany, France, Russia, China, and the European Union in 2015. Tehran was subject to sanctions that were lifted in exchange for restrictions on its nuclear development program.

However, US President Trump renounced the deal and reinstituted severe sanctions in 2018. Then, Tehran rebuilt its enriched uranium stockpiles.

Iran’s uranium was rapidly increased to 60 percent purity, according to the IAEA in December of last year, making the 90 percent mark for weapons-grade material more likely.

Iran insists it is not developing weapons, despite the claims that Western countries oppose such extensive enrichment.

Iranian professor of political science Hamed Mousavi claimed that the IAEA’s findings could provide an opportunity for Iran to negotiate while its ongoing nuclear negotiations with the US are ongoing.

“I believe that each side is attempting to use leverage against the opposing side.” A breakthrough in Iran’s nuclear program will give them more leverage in the negotiations with the Americans, he said.

He added that the US might impose additional sanctions and may refer the Iran case to the UN Security Council because it violated the non-proliferation agreement in 2006, among other things. He continued, adding that Iran has not yet “made the political decision” to build a potential bomb.

Nigeria floods death toll crosses 150 as thousands displaced

Local authorities reported that as rescue teams continue to search for the missing and recover bodies from parts of central Nigeria, where more than 150 people have been killed and thousands have been displaced as a result of the floods’ devastating effects.

Following torrential rain that started late on Wednesday and continued into Thursday, flooding swept the rural town of Mokwa in the Niger State.

More bodies were recovered close to 10 kilometers (6 miles) from Mokwa, according to Ibrahim Audu Husseini, a spokesman for the Niger State Emergency Management Agency (NSEMA), whose death toll has increased to 151.

He claimed that 265 homes were “completely destroyed” in the floods, with at least 3, 018 people displaced, while 265 others were reportedly swept down the Niger River, raising concerns that the death toll may still rise.

With the assistance of Nigeria’s security forces, President Bola Tinubu declared his condolences over the weekend and that search-and-rescue operations were ongoing.

He stated in a social media post that “relief supplies and temporary shelter assistance are being immediately deployed.”

The families were lost, too. The property has vanished, according to Mohammed Tanko, a local, to Al Jazeera. “We don’t have anywhere else to go.” “This house lost at least 15 people.”

Another survivor remarked, “I escaped with only my nightdress.” I can’t even remember the location of our house right now.

Fear of more rain

Meteorologists warn of additional rain coming in the near future, putting fears that the area will become even more flooded.

Despite Nigeria’s six-month rainy season, experts claim that climate change, unrestricted construction, and poor drainage infrastructure are all contributing factors to the increase in the severity and frequency of these disasters.

Between April and October, flood risk analyst at the University of Nigeria, Ugonna Nkwunonwo, told Al Jazeera, “Flooding has become an annual event.”

He remarked that while flood risks have been identified for a while, “there hasn’t been much political power to implement this change.”

He claimed that climate change is a factor in the frequency and intensity of rain, which is a cause of this flooding. People aren’t prepared for that kind of rainfall, according to the saying “the amount of rain you can expect in a year could probably come in one or two months.”

Similar tragedies that occurred in Nigeria last year left over 1,200 people dead and up to 2 million people displaced.

The National Emergency Management Agency stated in a statement that “this tragic incident serves as a timely reminder of the dangers associated with building on waterways and the crucial importance of keeping drainage channels and river paths clear.”