The Killing Field

Fault Lines investigates the killings of Palestinians seeking aid at GHF sites in Gaza.

After months of blockade and starvation in Gaza, Israel allowed a new United States venture – the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) – to distribute food. Branded as a lifeline, its sites quickly became known by Palestinians and dozens of human rights groups as “death traps”.

Fault Lines investigates how civilians seeking aid were funnelled through militarised zones, where thousands were killed or injured under fire.

Attackers target ship off Somalia’s coast amid piracy resurgence

Attackers firing machineguns and rocket-propelled grenades have boarded a ship off the coast of Somalia, United Kingdom officials say of the latest assault, likely by resurgent Somali pirates, in the region.

“The Master of a vessel has reported being approached by 1 small craft on its stern. The small craft fired small arms and RPG’s towards the vessel,” the British military’s UK Maritime Trade Operations centre said in an alert issued on Thursday. It warned ships in the area to “transit with caution”.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The private security firm Ambrey also said an attack was under way, saying it targeted a Malta-flagged tanker heading from Sikka, India, to Durban, South Africa.

Ambrey added that it appeared to be an assault by Somali pirates, who are reported to be operating in the area in recent days and who seized an Iranian fishing boat to use as a base of operations. Iran has not acknowledged the seizure of the fishing boat, called the Issamohamadi.

Details of the vessel attacked on Thursday correspond to the Hellas Aphrodite, which changed its track and slowed down at the time of the attack. The ship’s owners and managers could not immediately be reached for comment.

Another maritime security firm, the Diaplous Group, said the attacked tanker had a crew of 24 mariners, all of whom reportedly locked themselves into the ship’s citadel for safety during the attack. The vessel did not have an armed security team on board it, the firm added.

The European Union’s Operation Atalanta, a counterpiracy mission around the Horn of Africa, has responded to other recent pirate attacks in the area and issued a recent alert to shippers that a pirate group was operating off Somalia and assaults were “almost certain” to happen.

Thursday’s attack came after another vessel, the Cayman Islands-flagged Stolt Sagaland, found itself targeted in a suspected pirate attack that involved both its armed security force and the attackers shooting at each other, the EU force said.

Piracy off Somalia peaked in 2011 when 237 attacks were reported. Somali piracy in the region in 2011 cost the world’s economy about $7bn with $160m paid out in ransoms, according to the Oceans Beyond Piracy monitoring group.

The threat was diminished by increased international naval patrols, a strengthened central government in Somalia and other efforts.

However, Somali piracy has surged again since late 2023. According to Solace Global Risk, a travel risk management company, the decline in antipiracy patrols and the relocation of funds to counter Houthi rebels activities contributed to the rise in attacks.

Trump claims California election was rigged. Is he correct?

As Californians voted on Tuesday for a new congressional map, United States President Donald Trump falsely said the process was rigged.

“The Unconstitutional Redistricting Vote in California is a GIANT SCAM in that the entire process, in particular the Voting itself, is RIGGED,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

“All ‘Mail-In’ Ballots, where the Republicans in that State are ‘Shut Out,’ is under very serious legal and criminal review. STAY TUNED!”

A reporter asked White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt for Trump’s evidence that the election was rigged.

“It is just a fact,” Leavitt said. “They have a universal mail-in voting system, which we know is ripe for fraud, … fraudulent ballots that are being mailed in, in the names of other people and the names of illegal aliens who shouldn’t be voting in American elections.”

Democratic state officials in California, including Governor Gavin Newsom and Secretary of State Shirley Weber, challenged Trump’s assertion. “Where exactly is this fraud? Ramblings don’t equate with fact,” Weber said.

When PolitiFact contacted the White House, a spokesperson responded with several points, many of which had also been shared in an X post. These points criticised California’s voting system but included only one case of a person charged with voter fraud. The White House also misrepresented the numbers on voter registration and voter removal to support its claims.

Trump has repeatedly spread falsehoods about “rigged” elections, including in California. Rigging a state election would require election officials across the state to work together to commit felonies. There is no evidence that happened.

What did happen: The largely Democratic-voting state overwhelmingly approved a proposition to redistrict its congressional map to increase the chance of adding five Democratic seats to the US House of Representatives to negate a similar redistricting in Texas aimed at adding Republican seats.

White House evidence does not prove the election was rigged

Vote by mail system: Much of the White House’s evidence criticises California’s system of mailing ballots to all active registered voters. It is one of eight states that conduct elections by such a system. Millions of ballots are sent to Californians and not returned, as the White House noted, but that doesn’t prove fraud. Election workers verify voter identities by matching signatures on the mail ballot envelopes with registration records.

Although voters are mailed ballots, they can choose to cast a ballot in person instead. Voters generally don’t have to provide an ID. Election workers can ask for an ID if the person is voting for the first time and didn’t provide an ID when registering to vote.

The White House cherry-picked one sentence from a 2005 bipartisan report that said: “Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.” Although the report generally communicated a dim view of absentee voting, it didn’t call for its elimination. It recommended ways to improve security and further study.

Noncitizen voters: The White House said, “San Francisco allows noncitizens to vote in local elections, which creates a high risk of fraud in federal elections,” and acknowledged noncitizens aren’t allowed to vote in federal elections. The city allows noncitizens to vote only in school board elections.

The US Department of Justice sued Orange County, California, in June after it redacted personal identifying information when it provided records to the department about 17 noncitizens on the voter rolls.

Bob Page, the county registrar of voters, said the 17 people self-reported that they wanted to cancel their voter registrations, including eight who voted before they cancelled their voter registration.

Duplicate registrations: “California reported 2,178,551 duplicate registrations in the 2024 election cycle – 15.6 percent of total registered voters,” the White House said.

The statement misleadingly gives the impression that those people appear on the voter rolls more than once. “Duplicate registrations” refer to the number of registration applications that California election officials received but didn’t process because they were identical to existing registrations. Duplicate registration can happen by accident; some people register and forget they did so or submit registrations both through the mail and online.

The number the White House cited represents the number of times California election officials caught the mistake, not made one.

The number comes from a 2024 national survey on voting activity and election administration from 2022 to 2024 by the bipartisan US Election Assistance Commission.

The national average for duplicate applications is 12.7 percent.

Removing voters after death: The White House said, “California only removed 378,349 registered voters for death (11.9 percent), which was well below the national average,” between the 2022 and 2024 elections.

This figure is cherry-picked. The White House cited voters removed because of death, which is just one reason for striking a voter from the rolls.

From 2022 to 2024, California removed more than 3.177 million voters from its rolls for all reasons, including death, according to the same election survey. That’s a 12.4 percent removal rate of all registered voters, compared with the national average of 9.1 percent.

California removed a larger proportion of voters for reasons other than death, such as moving or failure to return a confirmation notice.

Voter fraud: The White House pointed to one woman charged with voter fraud.

In September, authorities charged a woman from Costa Mesa, California, with five felonies for illegally registering her dog to vote. The dog’s vote was counted in the 2021 gubernatorial recall election but rejected in the 2022 primary. The Orange County District Attorney’s office said the woman “self-reported that she had registered her dog to vote”.

Laura Lee Yourex, 62, said she wanted to prove a point about flaws in the state voting system, according to her lawyer.

The conservative Heritage Foundation’s voter fraud database shows 69 cases in California from 1982 to 2025. The database shows dozens of cases in states that vote primarily Republican, such as Florida, which does not send a mail ballot to all voters.

Our ruling

Trump said voting in California is “rigged”.

The White House’s explanation misrepresented data about duplicate registrations, cherry-picked data about dead voter removals from registration rolls, pointed to one woman charged with voter fraud among about 23 million registered voters and baselessly blamed San Francisco’s allowance for noncitizen voting in school board elections.

The White House did not prove California voting is “rigged”. We rate Trump’s statement false.

India’s Bihar elections start with 74 million voters: What’s at stake?

Millions of voters in India’s third most populous state, Bihar, are voting on Thursday in the first phase of elections that could not only shape the state’s future but also serve as a bellwether for the broader mood of the nation, 17 months after Prime Minister Narendra Modi returned to power in New Delhi with a diminished mandate.

The elections for the Bihar Legislative Assembly will determine who governs Bihar for the next five years. The state is India’s poorest. But its 130 million people – more than any European nation – give Bihar hefty political clout.

Roughly half of Bihar’s constituencies vote on Thursday. The second phase of the elections will be held next week.

Here is what’s at stake.

Which constituencies are voting in phase one in Bihar?

Bihar has 243 assembly constituencies, 121 of which are up for voting on Thursday. Some of these constituencies are reserved for members of the Scheduled Castes (SC), communities that have been historically marginalised.

The Legislative Assembly, or the Vidhan Sabha, is the lower house of the bicameral Bihar Legislature. The last elections were in November 2020.

The 121 constituencies are: Alamnagar, Bihariganj, Singheshwar (SC), Madhepura, Sonbarsha (SC), Saharsa, Simri Bakhtiarpur, Mahishi, Kusheshwar Asthan (SC), Gaura Bauram, Benipur, Alinagar, Darbhanga Rural, Darbhanga, Hayaghat, Bahadurpur, Keoti, Jale, Gaighat, Aurai, Minapur, Bochaha (SC), Sakra (SC), Kurhani, Muzaffarpur, Kanti, Baruraj, Paroo, Sahebganj, Baikunthpur, Barauli, Gopalganj, Kuchaikote, Bhorey (SC), Hathua, Siwan, Ziradei, Darauli (SC), Raghunathpur, Daraundha, Barharia, Goriakothi, Maharajganj, Ekma, Manjhi, Baniapur, Taraiya, Marhaura, Chapra, Garkha (SC), Amnour, Parsa, Sonepur, Hajipur, Lalganj, Vaishali, Mahua, Raja Pakar (SC), Raghopur, Mahnar, Patepur (SC), Kalyanpur (SC), Warisnagar, Samastipur, Ujiarpur, Morwa, Sarairanjan, Mohiuddinnagar, Bibhutipur, Rosera (SC), Hasanpur, Cheria Bariarpur, Bachhwara, Teghra, Matihani, Sahebpur Kamal, Begusarai, Bakhri (SC), Alauli (SC), Khagaria, Beldaur, Parbatta, Tarapur, Munger, Jamalpur, Suryagarha, Lakhisarai, Sheikhpura, Barbigha, Asthawan, Biharsharif, Rajgir (SC), Islampur, Hilsa, Nalanda, Harnaut, Mokama, Barh, Bakhtiarpur, Digha, Bankipur, Kumhrar, Patna Sahib, Fatuha, Danapur, Maner, Phulwari (SC), Masaurhi (SC), Paliganj, Bikram, Sandesh, Barhara, Arrah, Agiaon (SC), Tarari, Jagdishpur, Shahpur, Brahampur, Buxar, Dumraon and Rajpur (SC).

What is the turnout?

According to local media reports, the voter turnout in Bihar had reached 42.3 percent by 1pm (07:30 GMT). In 2020, the final turnout was 57 percent.

How many eligible voters does Bihar have?

There are more than 74 million eligible voters in Bihar, more than the entire population of the United Kingdom or France.

Who are the main contenders?

The incumbent government in Bihar is an alliance led by Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the regional Janata Dal (United) or JD(U). These two are allied with smaller parties.

The JD(U) is led by Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, who has ruled Bihar for most of the past 20 years.

On the other side of the divide is the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), also a regional political party, led by former Indian Railways Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav, who is currently released on bail after being convicted in corruption cases. In effect, the party is now led by his son Tejashwi Yadav. The RJD is part of another alliance, including the country’s main opposition party, the Indian National Congress, and smaller parties.

Jan Suraaj, a new party founded last year by political strategist-turned-politician Prashant Kishor, is also in the fray. In the past, Kishor has worked with both the BJP and Congress.

In the first phase of the elections, Tejashwi, the RJD leader, is contesting the Raghopur seat, which he won in 2015 and 2020. Running against him are the BJP’s Satish Kumar and the Jan Suraaj Party’s Chanchal Singh. Tejashwi’s father has also won the Raghopur seat twice in the past while his mother, Rabri Devi, has won it three times.

BJP candidate and Deputy Chief Minister Samrat Chaudhary is contesting the Tarapur seat. Also running on a  BJP ticket is folk singer Maithili Thakur, who is running for the seat in Alinagar.

What are the key issues in these elections?

Primarily an agrarian state, Bihar is suffering from a struggling economy and has the highest poverty rate in India, according to a report published by the Indian government think tank NITI Aayog last year.

Both major blocs – the BJP-JD(U) alliance and the RJD-Congress coalition – have pledged to create jobs to help the state’s economy.

The two alliances are also making appeals to women, who constitute nearly half of the eligible voters in Bihar. The state has seen a steady rise in women’s political participation with female voter turnout often exceeding that of men.

The Congress-led bloc has pledged welfare schemes such as a monthly allowance for women. The BJP has also implemented the Chief Minister’s Women Employment Scheme. Under this scheme, about $880m was distributed among 7.5 million women in September to help them start businesses.

Why are these elections significant?

The elections are a key test for the popularity of Modi, who won a third term in the June 2024 elections. His party failed to win a majority and is reliant on regional allies, including the JD(U), to form the government.

The BJP has won most major state elections since the national vote and will be looking to continue that streak in Bihar. The state sends 40 members to the Lok Sabha, or lower house of the Indian Parliament. In the Lok Sabha elections in June 2024, the BJP won 12 of these seats while the JD(U) won another 12. Another BJP alliance partner, the Lok Janshakti Party (LJP), won another five seats.

But the RJD has a strong presence in the state too. In the last two state elections, in 2015 and 2020, the RJD emerged as the single largest party. In 2020, the two coalitions ended up almost neck-and-neck in vote share with 37 percent each, but the BJP-JD(U) alliance won enough seats to come to power.

These elections are also significant because they could mark the final political contest between Nitish Kumar, 74, and Lalu Prasad Yadav, 77. The two men have dominated politics in Bihar for nearly 40 years. They’ve often been allies and at other times have been bitter rivals.

But the elections are also vital because they come at a time when the credibility of India’s electoral politics is under rare question. The opposition, led by Rahul Gandhi of the Congress party, has accused the Election Commission of India (ECI) of revising the official voter list, or electoral rolls, in a way designed to benefit the BJP in the state.

The so-called Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls was carried out in recent months, and all voters were required to furnish a set of documents to prove they were Indian nationals and legal residents of the constituency where they vote.

As Al Jazeera reported in July, many of the poorest people in Bihar, like those across India, do not hold any of the several documents that the ECI listed as proof of identity. With Bihar having the country’s lowest literacy rate, for instance, many people in the state do not have education certificates, one of the documents that work as proof of identity. Bihar also has one of India’s lowest rates of birth registration, so millions do not have birth certificates, another valid document, per the ECI.

The poorest, people from vulnerable communities, like traditionally disadvantaged castes or Muslims, have historically voted more for the RJD-Congress alliance.

In September, the ECI released a list of 74.2 million voters after removing the names of 4.7 million people. In Seemanchal, where the Muslim population is especially high, the removal of voters from the list was higher than the state average.

This exercise also played out against the backdrop of a campaign led by Modi himself to portray Seemanchal as a bastion of undocumented Bangladeshi immigrants even though facts do not back up those assertions, as Al Jazeera reported in October.

In recent days, the ECI has announced it will implement the Bihar-style SIR exercise nationally.

When is the second phase of Bihar’s assembly elections?

The second phase of voting will take place on Tuesday when the remaining 122 constituencies will be at stake.

When will the election results be out?

Tigray fighters enter Ethiopia’s Afar region, stoking fears of new conflict

Ethiopia’s Afar region has accused forces from neighbouring Tigray of crossing into its territory, seizing several villages and attacking civilians, in what it called a breach of the 2022 peace deal that ended the war in northern Ethiopia.

Between 2020 and 2022, Tigray was the centre of a devastating two-year war that pitted the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) against Ethiopia’s federal army and left at least 600,000 people dead, according to the African Union.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

In a statement released late on Wednesday, Afar authorities said TPLF fighters “entered Afar territory by force today”.

The group, which governs the Tigray region, was accused of “controlling six villages and bombing civilians with mortars”. Officials did not provide details on casualties.

“The TPLF learns nothing from its mistakes,” the Afar administration said, condemning what it described as “acts of terror”.

The conflict earlier this decade also spread into neighbouring Ethiopian regions, including Afar, whose forces fought alongside federal troops.

According to Afar’s latest statement, Tigrayan forces attacked the Megale district in the northwest of the region “with heavy weapons fire on civilian herders”.

The authorities warned that if the TPLF “does not immediately cease its actions, the Afar Regional Administration will assume its defensive duty to protect itself against any external attack”.

The renewed fighting, they said, “openly destroys the Pretoria peace agreement”, referring to the deal signed in November 2022 between Ethiopia’s federal government and Tigrayan leaders, which ended two years of bloodshed.

While the fragile peace had largely held, tensions between Addis Ababa and the TPLF have deepened in recent months. The party, which dominated Ethiopian politics from 1991 to 2018, was officially removed from the country’s list of political parties in May amid internal divisions and growing mistrust from the federal government.

Federal officials have also accused the TPLF of re-establishing ties with neighbouring Eritrea, a country with a long and uneasy history with Ethiopia. Eritrea, once an Italian colony and later an Ethiopian province, fought a bloody independence war before gaining statehood in 1993.