Slider1
Slider2
Slider3
Slider4
previous arrow
next arrow

Dozens of bodies found in militia-run sites in Libya’s Tripoli; UN alarmed

The United Nations has raised grave concerns following the discovery of dozens of bodies in areas of the Libyan capital Tripoli previously controlled by a powerful militia, the Stabilisation Support Apparatus (SSA), whose leader was slain in clashes last month.

United Nations rights chief Volker Turk said on Wednesday that his office was “shocked” by evidence of severe human rights violations at detention sites run by the SSA, a group once led by Abdel-Ghani al-Kikli, who was killed during an eruption of fighting in mid-May in Tripoli.

“Our worst-held fears are being confirmed: dozens of bodies have been discovered at these sites, along with the discovery of suspected instruments of torture and abuse, and potential evidence of extrajudicial killings”, Turk said in a statement.

Investigators were informed that 10 charred bodies were found at the SSA’s base in Abu Salim, while another 67 corpses were recovered from hospital refrigerators at Abu Salim and Al Khadra facilities. A suspected burial site was also reported at the Tripoli Zoo, which had been under SSA control. The identities of the victims remain unknown.

Turk called for the immediate sealing of all affected locations to preserve evidence, demanding international access to ensure accountability.

Al-Kikli, among Tripoli’s most influential militia commanders, had come into conflict with rival groups before his death. His SSA was officially tied to the Presidential Council under the UN-recognised Government of National Unity (GNU), formed in 2021.

His assassination last month triggered fierce fighting across Tripoli, where several were killed and dozens wounded. Schools closed, a citywide curfew was imposed, and the UN Support Mission in Libya urged all parties to halt hostilities and protect civilians.

Why did the Dutch government collapse and what’s next?

The Dutch government collapsed on Tuesday after far-right politician Geert Wilders pulled out of the right-wing coalition after a dispute over anti-immigration measures his party had proposed.

Wilders’ decision prompted the Dutch cabinet and Prime Minister Dick Schoof to resign.

Here is what triggered the government’s collapse, and what happens next:

Why did Wilders withdraw?

Wilders announced the withdrawal of his right-wing party, the Party for Freedom (PVV), from the 11-month-old right-wing Netherlands coalition government. Wilders said the other three parties in the coalition had failed to back his plans to crack down on asylum for refugees.

“No signature under our asylum plans. The PVV leaves the coalition,” Wilders wrote in an X post on Tuesday after a brief meeting in parliament with party leaders. Besides PVV, the coalition comprised People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), the Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB) and the New Social Contract (NSC).

On May 26, Wilders announced a 10-point plan to extensively slash migration, deploying army officials at the Dutch land borders and rejecting all asylum seekers. Wilders threatened, back then, that his party would pull out of the coalition if migration policy was not toughened.

The four parties cumulatively held 88 seats in the country’s 150-seat House of Representatives.

The PVV won the latest November 2023 election with 23 percent of the vote and 37 seats, the highest number of seats in the parliament out of all parties.

The majority mark in the House is 76 seats. The withdrawal leaves the coalition with only 51 seats.

When did Schoof step down?

After Wilders announced the withdrawal, an emergency cabinet meeting was called. After this, Schoof announced that he would step down, hours after the PVV withdrawal.

“I have told party leaders repeatedly in recent days that the collapse of the cabinet would be unnecessary and irresponsible,” Schoof said in the emergency cabinet meeting. “We are facing major challenges both nationally and internationally that require decisiveness from us.”

How did other Dutch leaders react?

Other leaders in the coalition called Wilders “irresponsible” and blamed him for putting his own political interests ahead of the country.

“There is a war on our continent. Instead of meeting the challenge, Wilders is showing he is not willing to take responsibility,” said Dilan Yesilgoz, leader of the VVD, which has 24 seats in the the House.

“It is irresponsible to take down the government at this point,” NSC leader Nicolien van Vroonhoven said about Wilders. The NSC has 20 seats.

Head of the opposition GreenLeft-Labour alliance Frans Timmermans said he could “see no other way to form a stable government” than early elections.

What’s next?

Schoof will now formally submit his resignation to the head of state, Dutch King Willem-Alexander. After this, elections are expected to be called. It is likely that the election will be held sometime in October or November, based on previous cycles.

As of May 31, polls show that Wilders’ PVV has lost a little of its support, from 23 percent in the 2023 election to 20 percent.

This brings the party almost at par with the GreenLeft-Labour alliance, which has 19 percent of support and 25 seats in the lower house of parliament, the second highest number of seats after the PVV.

The fragmented politics of the Netherlands makes it difficult to predict which party will win the election. It is unlikely for a single party to win the 76-seat majority and it takes months for a coalition to form. According to the Dutch election authority’s data, no single party has ever won a majority since the first direct elections in 1848.

What happens until elections?

Schoof has said he and the other ministers of the coalition will continue with their positions in a caretaker government until a new government is formed after elections.

The political crisis comes as the Netherlands is scheduled to host a summit of NATO leaders at The Hague on June 24-25. Mark Rutte, the current secretary-general of NATO, was the prime minister of the Netherlands from 2010 to 2024. Rutte was affiliated with the VVD.

At least 11 dead in stampede outside cricket stadium in southern India

In a stampede outside a cricket stadium in the state of Karnataka to celebrate the home team’s victory in the Indian Premier League (IPL), the most well-known Twenty20 cricket tournament, at least 11 people have been killed and many more have been injured.

Siddaramaiah, India’s chief minister of Karnataka, stated on Wednesday that “no one expected such a large crowd.” “The stadium has a capacity of only 35, 000 people, but 200, 000-300, 000 people came”.

He claimed that 33 people had been injured and 11 have died.

As thousands of fans gathered outside Bengaluru’s M Chinnaswamy Stadium earlier on Wednesday, the incident occurred.

At least 11 people have died, according to the Indian broadcaster NDTV. The injured and those who fell into the ambulances were captured on local TV news channels.

The crowd was “very uncontrollable,” according to Karnataka deputy chief minister DK Shivakumar.

The occasion was held to celebrate Bengaluru’s first IPL title win on Tuesday.

UK prepares for war: How much will it cost?

The United Kingdom has announced a major investment in defence in response to a “new era of threats” driven by “growing Russian aggression”.

The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR), unveiled on Monday, includes new investments in nuclear warheads, a fleet of new submarines and new munitions factories. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the SDR would bring the country to “war-fighting readiness”.

“The threat we now face is more serious, more immediate and more unpredictable than at any time since the Cold War,” Starmer said as he delivered the review in Glasgow, Scotland.

The SDR described Russia as an “immediate and pressing” threat, and referred to China as a “sophisticated and persistent challenge”.

European nations have rushed to strengthen their armed forces in recent months, following Trump’s repeated demands that Europe must shoulder more responsibility for its security.

What are the key features of the UK’s Strategic Defence Review?

The defence review, the UK’s first since 2021, was led by former NATO Secretary-General George Robertson. Among the 62 recommendations in the SDR, all have been accepted by the government.

Starmer said the measures recommended in the review would bring “fundamental changes” to the armed forces, including “moving to war-fighting readiness”, re-centring a “NATO first” defence posture and accelerating innovation.

“Every part of society, every citizen of this country, has a role to play because we have to recognise that things have changed in the world of today,” he said. “The front line, if you like, is here.”

Boosting weapons production and stockpiles

Based on the recommendations in the review, the government said it would boost stockpiles and weapons production capacity, which could be scaled up if needed.

A total of 1.5 billion pounds ($2bn) will be dedicated to building “at least six munitions and energetics factories”, with plans to produce 7,000 long-range weapons.

In turn, UK ammunitions spending – just one component of overall military spending – is expected to hit 6 billion pounds ($8.1bn) over the current parliamentary term, which ends in 2029.

New attack submarines

There are also plans to build up to 12 new attack submarines by the late 2030s as part of the AUKUS military alliance with Australia and the United States – equivalent to a new submarine every 18 months.

This accounts for nearly half the projected spending outlined in the SDR.

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) also said it would invest 15 billion pounds ($20.3bn) in its own nuclear warhead programme.

New F-35 fighter jets

The SDR recommended procuring new F-35 fighter jets and the Global Combat Aircraft Programme, a sixth-generation fighter produced jointly with Japan and Italy.

Use of technology to improve the army

The target size of the army will remain roughly the same, but the SDR recommended a slight increase in the number of regular soldiers “if funding allows”. There are currently about 71,000.

Instead of a dramatic increase in troop numbers, the SDR recommends using technology, drones and software to “increase lethality tenfold”.

To do this, the MoD plans to deliver a 1 billion pound ($1.35bn) “digital targeting web”, an AI-driven software tool designed to collect battlefield data and use it to enable faster decision making.

Investment in defence companies

More details about the SDR will be provided in the upcoming Defence Industrial Strategy, expected in the coming weeks, but UK defence companies will be among the big winners from the new SDR.

Though supposedly a 10-year review, past SDRs suggest its shelf life might be more limited.

The last SDR was published in 2021 and recommended “a strategic pivot towards the Indo-Pacific region to counter China’s influence and deepen ties with allies like Australia, India, and Japan”, in line with strategic priorities of the time.

This SDR, undertaken in the wake of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, has re-oriented the UK’s geographical priorities. In the coming years, those could change again.

Can the UK afford this defence expansion?

Proposals to prepare the UK’s armed forces to be “battle ready” will cost at least 67.6 billion pounds ($91.4bn) through to the late 2030s, according to costings and estimates provided in the SDR.

Before Monday’s announcement, the government had already pledged to increase spending on defence from 2.3 percent currently to 2.5 percent by 2027, an increase of about 6 billion pounds ($8.1bn) per year. This would raise 60 billion pounds over 10 years – a bit shy of the cost projected by the SDR.

The government has said it will cut overseas aid to fund that 0.2 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) rise in defence spending.

Critics say this will not be enough and that the measures outlined by the SDR will cost more like 3 percent of gross domestic product (GDP).

James Cartlidge, the shadow defence secretary, said the “authors of the strategic defence review were clear that 3 percent [not 2.5 percent] of GDP ‘established the affordability’ of the plan.”

In February, the Labour government said it had “an ambition” to raise defence spending to 3 percent in the next parliament (after 2029), but Cartlidge said: “That commitment cannot be guaranteed ahead of the next general election.”

According to researchers at the Institute for Fiscal Studies – an independent, London-based research organisation – raising defence spending to 3 percent of GDP by 2030 would require an extra 17 billion pounds between now and then, which the government has not yet accounted for.

But the UK could be required to raise spending even more than this. In discussions taking place in advance of the NATO summit in The Hague later this month, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte is understood to be pushing for member nations to commit 5 percent of GDP towards defence-related spending.

Rutte has proposed that NATO’s 32 members commit to spending 3.5 percent on hard defence and 1.5 percent on broader security, such as cyber, by 2032.

“At this Ministerial, we are going to take a huge leap forward,” Rutte stated before a meeting of defence ministers in Brussels on Thursday this week. “We will strengthen our deterrence and defence by agreeing ambitious new capability targets.” He specified air and missile defence, long-range weapons, logistics, and large land manoeuvre formations as among the alliance’s top priorities, according to a briefing note from NATO on Wednesday.

“We need more resources, forces and capabilities so that we are prepared to face any threat, and to implement our collective defence plans in full,” he said, adding: “We will need significantly higher defence spending. That underpins everything.”

Will taxes have to rise in the UK?

On Monday, Starmer refused to rule out another raid on the aid budget to fund higher military spending, and signalled that he was hopeful the extra investment could be supported by a growing the economy and generating more taxes to pay for defence.

After the SDR’s announcement, Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, warned that the prime minister will need to make “really quite chunky tax increases” to pay for the plans.

Alternatively, increased defence spending could be siphoned off from other parts of the budget – for instance, through reduced state spending on areas like transport and energy infrastructure.

Donald Trump’s 50% steel and aluminium tariffs take effect

Trump has increased tariffs on imported steel and aluminum in a move that has heightened trade tensions with important allies.

The new rates, which went into effect early on Wednesday, increase duties from 25% to 50%. Trump claims that the measure is intended to support the US metals industry, which is in decline.

We initially planned at age 25, but realized that it was important, but more assistance was required as we continued to study the data. At a Tuesday event for the steel industry in Washington, White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett explained that the 50-percent tariff will start tomorrow.

The United Kingdom, which has a 90-day pause on broader tariffs, has reached a provisional trade agreement with the United Kingdom, which is excluded from the executive order.

Up until at least July 9, British exports will be subject to a 25% rate.

Allies seek exceptions.

Two of the US’s closest economic allies and the biggest steel suppliers, Canada and Mexico, are expected to suffer a lot from the increase. According to Census Bureau data, Canada exports more aluminum to the US than the nation’s top ten neighbors combined. Importation accounts for almost half of the US’s aluminum consumption.

The office of Canada’s prime minister, Mark Carney, confirmed that “intensive and active negotiations” were taking place to remove the tariffs.

The imbalance in the two countries’ steel trade was highlighted by Mexico’s Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard, who criticized the decision as unreasonable.

He claimed that Mexico would request an exemption and that it makes no sense for the US to impose a tariff on a product with a surplus.

The European Union criticized the decision, saying it “strongly regrets” it and that it may take retaliation, accusing Washington of thwarting attempts at a settlement.

The US will bear the brunt of the effects, according to OECD chief economist Alvaro Pereira, who previously told the AFP news agency. The tariffs have already slowed global trade, investment, and consumption.

Iran’s Khamenei slams US nuclear proposal, vows to keep enriching uranium

A key point in a US proposal aimed at resolving Iran’s nuclear program has been rejected by Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has pledged that Tehran will continue to enrich its uranium.

As the US and Iran continue to bargain over details of a potential new nuclear deal, the comments were made in a speech on Wednesday. The US reportedly wants a complete stop or low-level enrichment in exchange for lifting Western sanctions against Tehran, but the issue of uranium enrichment has remained a sticking point in the talks.

In a speech addressed to the commemoration of the death of the Islamic Republic’s founder, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Khamenei said, “The US nuclear proposal contradicts our nation’s belief in self-reliance and the principle of “We Can.”

Khamenei claimed that Iran’s quest for energy independence remained crucial despite the controversy surrounding uranium enrichment.

He continued, “Independence means not waiting for the approval of America and the likes of America,” noting that the US proposal was “100 percent against” the ideals of the Islamic revolution of 1979.

He asserted that Tehran wouldn’t demand Washington’s consent before making any decisions.

This is not rationality, Khamenei said, because “some people believe that being a subordinate to America and giving to the oppressive power means bowing down to it.”

Why do you have an influence on Iran’s decision to enrich itself? You are invincible.

Tehran was reportedly ready to reject the most recent US proposal to end a decades-old nuclear conflict, according to an unnamed diplomat, who claimed the proposal was a “non-starter” that neither addressed Tehran’s interests or softened its position on uranium enrichment.

Tehran has long refuted claims made by Western powers that it wants to develop nuclear weapons, saying it wants to master it for peaceful purposes.

Steve Witkoff, the US envoy in Iran talks, has called for President Donald Trump to follow the country’s “red line” in a statement expressing his opposition to Tehran’s continued enrichment.

Iran’s production of enriched uranium close to nuclear weapons increased by 50% in the last three months, according to a report leaked from the UN. However, it falls short of the roughly 90% needed for atomic weapons, but it is still significantly higher than the roughly 4% needed for power production.