Category World News

In response to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s alleged request, US President Donald Trump has stated that he will take action to resolve the conflict in Sudan.

Trump made the announcement on Wednesday that he would intervene twice, once at the Saudi Investment Forum in Washington, DC, and once more on Truth Social, his website.

Trump wrote that “Arab leaders from all over the world, particularly the renowned Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, who has just left the United States,” have asked me to use the power and influence of the presidency to put an end to what is happening in Sudan.

It is regarded as a “Great Civilization and Culture,” which, regrettably, can be improved through international cooperation and coordination.

Trump recalled how the crown prince personally contacted him for assistance during the investment forum.

He mentioned Sudan and Sudan yesterday and said, “Sir, you’re talking about a lot of wars, but there’s a place on Earth called Sudan, and it’s horrible what’s happening,” Trump said.

Within a half-hour of the crown prince’s request, the US president added that his administration had “already begun working” on the matter.

Prince Mohammed, who is better known as his initials MBS, made his first official appearance since 2018, this week in Washington, DC. The two leaders’ mutual praise and the promise of more US-Saudi investments helped to fuel the trip.

Following the business forum, Prince Mohammed wrapped up his two-day trip on Wednesday.

Trump, who has long supported the Nobel Peace Prize, stated that he would work with Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries to resolve Sudan’s conflict.

Trump stated in his post that “we will work with Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and other Middle Eastern partners to end these atrocities while stabilizing Sudan.”

In April 2023, Sudan’s government-controlled Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) clashed to take control of areas including Khartoum, prompting the government’s government-controlled civil war.

As a result, there has been widespread famine, displacement, and bloodshed. The country is on pace to surpass the civilian death toll for all of 2024, which reached 4, 238, with the United Nations documenting at least 3, 384 civilian deaths between January and June of this year.

El-Fasher and Kadugli, two cities hit by the war, are experiencing famine this month, according to a UN-backed analysis. As a result of the conflict, about 45 percent of the population is suffering from acute food insecurity.

More than four million people have fled Sudan as a result of the fighting, which has increased regional instability. The UN has found evidence of widespread slayings, ethnic cleansing, and sexual violence being used as a means of conflict in Sudan.

The top UN official for humanitarian affairs and emergency relief, Tom Fletcher, recently described El-Fasher as a “crime scene” after it fell to RSF forces last month in a post about his trip.

Sudan has experienced three internal conflicts in just 40 years, with the most recent ones spanning 1955 to 1972 and 1983 to 2005.

Despite a growing bombing campaign in the Caribbean Sea and the eastern Pacific Ocean, Trump has aimed to brand himself as the “peace leader.”

In his second inaugural address in January, he declared, “My proudest legacy will be that of peacemaker and unifier.”

Trump and his supporters claim that the US president has “eight wars in eight months,” but some question whether the agreements he has reached will last.

Attacks have continued in some instances, as has the UN’s “genocide” in Gaza case. Critics claim that there was no end to the conflict between Egypt and Ethiopia, despite the two nations’ long-standing hostility.

Yet, leaders of several of the participating nations, including those from Israel, Armenia, and Azerbaijan, have pledged to nominate Trump for his highly sought-after Nobel Prize.

Trump made a point about the humanitarian needs of the civilians who were engulfed in the conflict in Sudan.

According to several news reports, the US has a new proposal to put an end to Russia’s conflict with Ukraine, which requires that Kyiv give up some weapons and territory, and has told President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that he must accept it.

Numerous publications reported on Wednesday that the framework was created in consultation with Russian officials, citing unnamed sources with knowledge of the draft.

Russia, on the other hand, denied that there was a new peace plan.

As Ukraine continues to lose territory in its east and has urgently called on allies for more military support, the news of the proposal, which comes ahead of Zelenskyy’s scheduled meeting with US military officials in Kyiv on Thursday, would be a blow.

Unidentified official, who was quoted by The Financial Times as saying the proposal was “very comfortable for Russian President Vladimir Putin” and “heavily tilted toward Russia”

According to Ukrainian officials who were provided with information on the plan, the requirements closely matched those of Russia in terms of ending the conflict and would be “non-starter” for Kyiv without significant modifications.

Zelenskyy argued that US President Donald Trump’s administration must “main effective” in order to end the nearly four-year conflict with Russia.

Zelenskyy wrote on Telegram that the key to stopping the bloodshed and achieving lasting peace is that we work together with all of our partners and that the American leadership is still strong and effective.

Military downsizes after granting territory, military downsizes

According to two people with knowledge of the discussions, US envoy Steve Witkoff met with Ukrainian National Security and Defence Council secretary Rustem Umerov this week in Miami, Florida, in the US.

According to the proposal, Ukraine would have to renounce its military presence in the eastern region of Donbas, including territory under Kyiv’s control, and reduce its overall military presence by half, according to the proposal.

According to Reuters news agency, the proposal would reduce the size of Ukraine’s military, citing a source with knowledge of the situation.

According to the Times, the proposed reforms would require Kyiv to abandon particular gun categories and result in a reduction in US military assistance.

According to the report, the Ukrainian division of the Russian Orthodox Church would receive official status as well as Russian as an official state language in Ukraine, according to the report.

Russia stated that despite ongoing US contacts, there are no new developments regarding a potential peace agreement to end Ukraine.

Russian state news agency TASS spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that while Moscow has followed numerous publications “decrivant various processes,” such reports should be evaluated based on official communication rather than media narratives.

“These issues are discussed, resolved, and subject to negotiation processes in the United States.” Zakharova remarked that these channels must be used. The American side has not provided any information in this regard, according to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Prisoner exchanges are being conducted.

Since a meeting in Istanbul, Turkiye in July that failed to lead to a breakthrough, which did lead to prisoner-of-war (POW) exchanges between the two nations, no direct discussions have taken place between Kyiv and Moscow.

After Umerov claimed consultations mediated by Turkiye and the United Arab Emirates were taking place on the resumption of the POW swaps on Sunday, Zelenskyy declared on the matter that he was “counting on the resumption” of such exchanges.

Zelenskyy and Recep Tayyip Erdogan met with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Turkiye on Wednesday and demanded that the two countries go back to Istanbul to resume their negotiations.

Erdogan and Zelenskyy spoke at a press conference in Ankara, “We … stressed the need for the Istanbul process to continue with a pragmatic and results-oriented approach.”

We also anticipate that all of our partners who want to end the region’s bloodshed will take a constructive stand in the direction of the Istanbul process.

Russian missile and drone attacks targeting energy and civilian infrastructure across western Ukraine on Wednesday left at least 25 people dead and dozens injured.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) director James Comey’s grand jury did not receive a copy of the final indictment against him, according to the US Department of Justice.

Comey’s attorneys sought to have the indictment dismissed from court on Wednesday as a result of that revelation.

Comey’s attorneys argued at a 90-minute hearing in a federal court in Alexandria, Virginia, that the case should be completely dismissed because of both President Donald Trump’s interventions and the prosecution’s errors.

One of three well-known Trump critics who has been charged between late September and the middle of October is Comey.

Comey’s attorneys claimed that Trump was using the legal system as a tool for political retribution at the hearing, which took place before US District Judge Michael Nachmanoff.

Michael Dreeben, the attorney for the prosecution, described the indictment as “a blatant use of criminal justice to achieve political ends,” saying, “This is an extraordinary case and it merits an extraordinary remedy.”

The Justice Department argued that the indictment passed the legal test for trial hearing, as evidenced by prosecutor Tyler Lemons.

However, Lemons did acknowledge, under questioning, that the grand jury that decided the indictment had not seen the final draft.

The prosecutor responded, “That is my understanding,” when Judge Nachmanoff inquired if Lemons had never seen the final version.

It was the Justice Department’s most recent error in its investigation of Comey, who is accused of lying to senators under oath and obstructing a congressional investigation.

Comey has entered a not-guilty plea to the other charges, and his defense team has spearheaded a multifaceted legal fight to have the case dropped due to numerous irregularities.

Intolerance toward grand jury proceedings

Since last week, rumors had been rifling about the indictment and what the grand jury had seen.

US District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie posed questions on November 13 regarding a time when it appeared that the grand jury proceedings had been “no court reporters present.”

Then, on Tuesday, Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick demanded that the Comey defense team receive the grand jury’s materials, citing “a disturbing pattern of profound investigative missteps.”

The grand jury probably did not go over the final indictment in full, despite the use of false search warrants from the prosecution and the use of separate search warrants.

In a separate question, Judge Nachmanoff questioned acting US Attorney Lindsey Halligan on Wednesday during the hearing.

She acknowledged after receiving repeated questions that only the grand jury’s foreperson and a second grand jury were present when the indictment was returned.

Comey, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and former National Security Advisor John Bolton were the three people charged in the three indictments.

All three of them have argued that their prosecution is a step in the direction of political vengeance, and they have all denied any wrongdoing.

Spotlight on the Trump-Comey conflict

Comey’s attorneys pointed to statements Trump made that pushed for the indictments during Wednesday’s hearing, which aimed primarily at establishing that argument.

The tension between Comey and Trump, which dates back to the president’s decision to fire Comey from his position as FBI director in 2017, was raised by Comey’s defense team.

Trump’s victory in the 2016 election had drawn mixed reviews of Comey’s investigation into the FBI.

For instance, Trump called his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, a “slime ball,” a “phony,” and “a real nut job,” while also accusing the former FBI director of going easy on him.

In that he gave Hillary Clinton a free pass for many bad deeds, FBI Director Comey said in a tweet in May 2017, Trump wrote that the best thing that had ever happened to her.

Meanwhile, Comey quickly established himself as a prominent critic of the Trump administration.

He is not considered medically unfit to serve as president, he said. Comey told ABC News in 2018 that he believes he is morally unfit to serve as president.

A president must “embody respect” and adhere to fundamental principles, such as truth-telling, he added. Comey remarked, “This president is unable to do that.”

Comey’s defense also cited the string of circumstances that led to the former FBI director’s arrest at Wednesday’s hearing.

Comey and James were called “guilty as hell” by Trump in a message to Attorney General Pam Bondi last September, and Trump urged her to “delay any longer” in seeking their indictments on social media.

According to Dreeben, Comey’s attorney, that statement “effectively admitted that this is a political prosecution.”

Halligan was sworn in as the Eastern District of Virginia’s acting US attorney shortly after the message was posted online.

She reportedly replaced Erik Siebert, the prosecutor, who had reportedly declined to charge Comey and others due to lack of evidence. Trump had labeled him a “woke RINO,” an abbreviation for “Republican in name only,” when asked about it.

Dreeben argued that Switcheroo also spelled out Trump’s vindictive intentions and his involvement in the Comey indictment.

“We’ve already started putting that together.” Donald Trump, the president of the United States, stated that his administration is looking for a possible resolution to the Sudanese conflict. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman had a conversation with him about the issue, he continued.