Top court revives lawsuits against Palestinian authorities from US victims

As plaintiffs seek monetary damages for violence years ago in Israel and the occupied West Bank, the US Supreme Court has upheld a law that was passed by Congress to facilitate lawsuits brought against Palestinian authorities by Americans killed or injured in attacks abroad.

The Palestinian Authority and Palestine Liberation Organization’s right to a fair trial was violated by the US Constitution’s 9-0 ruling overturned a lower court’s ruling.

According to the ruling’s author, conservative Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts argued that the 2019 legal system adhered to the Fifth Amendment’s requirements for due process.

According to Roberts, it is permissible for the federal government to create a “clearly narrow jurisdictional provision” that ensures that Americans who have been injured or killed by terrorist acts have a legitimate forum to file a lawsuit against their rights under the Anti-Terror Act of 1990.

The lower court’s decision to downturn a law provision had been challenged by the US government and a group of American victims and their families.

Families who were named in the plaintiffs’ lawsuit in 2015 won a $655m judgment in a civil lawsuit alleging that the Palestinian organizations carried out a number of shootings and bombings in Jerusalem between 2002 and 2004. Additionally, there are relatives of Jewish settler Ari Fuld, who was fatally stabbed by a Palestinian in 2018.

Jewish settlements on Palestinian-owned land are regarded as illegal under international law, even as this decision is made.

According to Kent Yalowitz, a plaintiffs’ attorney, “the plaintiffs, US families who had loved ones killed or maimed in PLO-sponsored terror attacks, have been waiting for justice for many years.”

Yalowitz continued, “I’m very hopeful that the case will be settled without these families having to go through any more drawn-out and unnecessary litigation.”

The case was framed by Israel’s ongoing conflict with Iran and Gaza. More than 55 000 people have died and 130 000 have been wounded since the start of the Gaza war in October 2023, according to Gaza’s health ministry.

For years, US courts have been debating whether they have jurisdiction in cases involving the Palestinian Authority and PLO for legal actions taken abroad.

The PLO and the Palestinian Authority automatically “consent” to jurisdiction if they engage in certain activities in or pay Americans who attack them, according to the language at issue in the 2019 law.

In a comprehensive legal response to “halt, deter, and disrupt” acts of international terrorism that threaten the life and limb of Americans, Roberts wrote in the ruling on Friday that Congress and the president enacted the jurisdictional law based on their “considered judgment to subject the PLO and PA (Palestinian Authority) to liability in US courts.

In 2022, US District Judge Jesse Furman of New York declared that the law violated the Palestinian Authority and the PLO’s due process rights. The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals, which is based in New York, upheld that ruling.

The government’s appeal was initiated by President  Joe Biden’s administration, which later received support from President  Donald Trump’s administration.

Putin says Russian recession must not happen ‘under any circumstances’

Russia’s economy must not slide into recession, President Vladimir Putin said, after economists warned for months of a slowdown in growth.

Putin told attendees, including government ministers and central bankers, at the St Petersburg International Economic Forum on Friday that some specialists and experts were “pointing to the risks of stagnation and even a recession”.

“This must not be allowed to happen under any circumstances”, he said.

“We need to pursue a competent, well-thought-out budgetary, tax and monetary policy”, he added.

Economy Minister Maxim Reshetnikov said on Thursday that the economy was on the verge of slipping into a recession, and monetary policy decisions would determine whether it falls into one or not.

In October, the Bank of Russia increased its key interest rate to the highest level since the early 2000s to curb high inflation, only to cut it by one percentage point to 20 percent earlier this month.

Moreover, economists warned for months of a slowdown in the economy, with the country posting its slowest quarterly expansion in two years during the first quarter of 2025.

However, the Kremlin said it expected the slowdown due to two years of rapid expansion as it increased military expenditure to fund its war against Ukraine.

Yet, Putin denied that the defence industry was solely driving the economy. “Yes, of course, the defence industry played its part in this regard, but so did the financial and IT industries”, he said.

He added that the economy needed “balanced growth”, calling on officials to keep a “close eye on all indicators of the health of our industries, companies and even individual enterprises”.

At the same time, Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak said on Friday that it was time to “cut the]interest] rate and start heating up the economy”.

German Gref, CEO of Russia’s largest lender Sberbank SBER. MM also called for faster rate cuts to incentivise companies to invest.

Growth of military industries

Putin has used the annual economic forum to highlight Russia’s economic prowess and encourage foreign investment, but Western executives shunned it since Moscow sent troops into Ukraine in 2022, leaving it to business leaders from Asia, Africa and Latin America.

The economy, hit with a slew of Western sanctions, has so far outperformed predictions. High defence spending has propelled growth and kept unemployment low despite fuelling inflation.

Large recruiting bonuses for military enlistees and death benefits for those killed in Ukraine have also put more income into the country’s poorer regions. But over the long term, inflation and a lack of foreign investments pose threats to the economy.

Economists have warned about the economy’s continuing downward pressure and the possibility that it will stagnate as a result of inadequate investment in other than the military.

Putin claimed that the expansion of military-related industries contributed to the development of modern technologies for the military.

He vowed to keep up the modernization of the military, drawing inspiration from the experiences of the conflict in Ukraine.

He declared, “We will use modern military infrastructure facilities, modernize the Russian armed forces’ combat capabilities, and equip them with the most modern technology, weapons, and equipment,” and use of new technology.

US Supreme Court lets fuel producers challenge California emissions rules

The&nbsp, United States Supreme Court has sided with fuel producers that had opposed California’s standards for vehicle emissions and electric cars under a federal air pollution law, agreeing that their legal challenge to the mandates should not have been dismissed.

The justices in a 7-2 ruling on Friday overturned a lower court’s decision to dismiss the lawsuit by a Valero Energy subsidiary and fuel industry groups. The lower court had concluded that the plaintiffs lacked the required legal standing to challenge a 2022 US Environmental Protection Agency decision to let California set its own regulations.

“The government generally may not target a business or industry through stringent and allegedly unlawful regulation, and then evade the resulting lawsuits by claiming that the targets of its regulation should be locked out of court as unaffected bystanders”, conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the majority.

Liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the decision.

The dispute centred on an exception granted to California during Democratic former President Joe Biden’s administration to national vehicle emission standards set by the agency under the landmark Clean Air Act anti-pollution law.

Though states and municipalities are generally preempted from enacting their own limits, Congress let the EPA waive the preemption rule to let California set certain regulations that are stricter than federal standards.

The EPA’s 2022 action reinstated a waiver for California to set its own tailpipe emissions limits and zero-emission vehicle mandate through 2025, reversing a 2019 decision made during Republican President&nbsp, Donald Trump’s&nbsp, first administration rescinding the waiver.

Valero’s Diamond Alternative Energy and related groups challenged the reinstatement of California’s waiver, arguing that the decision exceeded the EPA’s power under the Clean Air Act and inflicted harm on their bottom line by lowering demand for liquid fuels.

The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit threw out the lawsuit in 2024, finding that the challengers lacked the necessary standing to bring their claims because there was no evidence that a ruling in their favour might affect the decisions of auto manufacturers in a way that would result in fewer electric and more combustion vehicles to be sold.

Sceptical court

California, the most populous US state, has received more than 100 waivers under the Clean Air Act.

The Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has taken a sceptical view towards broad authority for federal regulatory agencies and has restricted the powers of the EPA in some important rulings in recent years.

Iran’s dual nationals caught between Israeli bombs and family ties

Tehran, Iran – Suitcases are passing through the city of Tehran this time, but not this time for family gatherings or holidays. They are being packed quickly out of fear, as evidence of the rising concern that the 10 million Iranians are feeling as they are facing Israeli missiles.

Dual Iranian-American nationals are caught in the crossfire of war and geopolitical uncertainty, just as Iranians search for shelter.

Amir, a dual-national and 36-year-old Tesla engineer, flew to Tehran from the United States just as Israeli airstrikes began to strike targets all over Iran. On Mount Damavand, which is located about 60 kilometers northeast of the capital, he had been spending time with his family and had been spending quiet days with them. Israel launched its attacks a few days before his scheduled return flight to the US, even though his return flight was already booked.

Amir was ensnared by fear when the bombs started falling, not just fear of war but also fear of being drafted and falling victim to politics beyond his control.

“I didn’t first feel scared,” she said. Amir, who opted not to use his last name for security reasons, said that being with my family helped me find peace. He recalled that while watching from afar in the US, he had been more concerned for his family’s safety during the anti-government protests in Iran in 2022. I was constantly worried, glued to the news, and concerned for my family when I was younger. However, he said, “I could see that life was still going on” because he was in Tehran and Damavand.

But he soon realized Iran’s continued existence was too risky. Amir, a US citizen, feared that Iranians who have permanent residency would also be affected by President Donald Trump’s growing possibility of reimposing a travel ban. Amir made the decision to leave with an air of urgency.

leaving loved ones behind, crossing borders

Amir began a lengthy overland journey in fear for his future and his life. He took an 11-hour bus ride from Urmia, western Iran, to the city of Urmia on Monday. After that, he traveled by road to Van, in eastern Turkiye, for another six hours. He then boarded a domestic flight to Ankara, where he made his Thursday US flight.

For Amir, fleeing was more than just a logistical and emotional traumatic experience. I would have stayed close to my loved ones, he said, “If it weren’t for the fear of being conscripted and the possibility of a new Trump-era travel ban.” In the US, “it’s harder.”

A 41-year-old postdoctoral researcher with a San Francisco base had to make a similar choice. One of Israel’s longest-range missile attacks struck Mashhad, which he was visiting while there.

He recalled that he made an effort to remain calm for the first two days. “But then, I had to confront the reality that this conflict is unlike anything I’ve seen in the past. The sky won’t be clear or open, at least for the upcoming months.

Behrouz would typically end his trips to Iran by taking his colleagues back home in the US for a walk through the Imam Reza Holy Shrine’s courtyard to pick up sweets and saffron. However, he flew in a rush this time. The journey was exhausting, taking 10 hours by car from Tehran to Urmia, then crossing the Razi border into Turkiye. He claimed that the checkpoint was “about 20 minutes long,” but the lengthy 22-hour bus ride to Istanbul followed.

Behrouz stated that his job forced him to resign. He said, “But my heart is still with my family, and with the people,” his voice piercing.

He continued, “We oppose both the Iranian regime and Israel.” “We are millions of ordinary Iranians who are entangled in political decisions that aren’t our own.”

Behrouz’s words echoe many others’ quiet apprehensions. According to reports from the US embassy in Azerbaijan, about 600 Iranian-American dual nationals with support crossed into southern Azerbaijan from northwestern Iran via the Astara border. Iranian-American Facebook groups were thriving online for traveling coordination. One user inquired, “My flight was scheduled for late June. Should I attempt to leave Turkiye or Armenia? Bring additional fuel, another advice. Purchases are restricted to 10 liters per car at gas stations. Some even bundled up resources to rent a van to cross the Turkish border.

The logistics are complicated for those who are able to leave, but they frequently fare less than the emotional strain.

Getting cut off and staying behind

Not everyone leaves, though. Before the war broke out, Afsaneh, a 43-year-old mother who lives in northern California, flew to Iran with her daughter, who is seven years old. She stated on Instagram that she had no intention of returning despite US State Department warnings that citizens should leave.

In a recent post, she stated, “This is where I want to be.” “With my family at this time.”

Others have had to watch from a distance as their loved ones endure the strikes.

Just two weeks before the airstrikes began, Iranian-Canadian woman, 38, who lives in Toronto, had sent her parents and sister to Iran. Bombs went off in Tabriz, a city in the northwestern of Mexico, shortly before their habitation.

Mortazavi said, “I was on a blurry video call with them, hearing explosions and air defense systems.” Her family escaped to safety in Urmia, which is close by. The Iranian government had suspended internet access by Wednesday afternoon. Mary and them lost all communication.

She broke down and said, “I can’t even get out of bed. I’m worried.” I just hope they can reach me using a functioning VPN.