What have countries said about Iran’s strike on a US base in Qatar?

In retaliation for US strikes on several important Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend, Iran has launched an attack on a US military base in Qatar.

After Iran fired a missile barrage at Qatar’s Al Udeid Air Base on Monday, which had been evacuated and was under the control of Qatari air defenses, no injuries have yet been reported.

Numerous nations have vehemently condemned the attack, despite the fact that some analysts believe the Iranian response’s relatively small response indicates a desire to calm tensions with the US.

Some of the responses made by various nations are listed below.

United States

US President Donald Trump wrote in a post on the Truth Social platform, “Iran officially obliterated their nuclear facilities with a very weak response, which we anticipated and have successfully countered. 14 missiles have been fired, of which 13 were knocked down and 1 was ‘set free’ because it was heading in a safe direction. No Americans were hurt, and hardly any harm was caused, is a good thing. Most importantly, they have completely eliminated their “system,” and there can, at least, be no more dread. Iran has provided us with timely notice, which prevented any injuries and lost lives. I’m likely to support Iran’s efforts to achieve Peace and Harmony in the Area, and I’m sure that Israel will do the same. I appreciate you paying attention to this issue! ”

Qatar

The Minister of Foreign Affairs’ official spokesperson, Dr. The Iranian Revolutionary Guard’s attack on Al-Udeid Air Base was condemned by the State of Qatar, according to Mahed bin Mohammed Al Ansari, who viewed this as a flagrant violation of Qatar’s sovereignty, its airspace, international law, and the United Nations Charter.

He stated that Qatar has the right to respond immediately in accordance with international law in a manner equivalant to the nature and scale of this violent aggression. ”

Saudi Arabia

The aggression by Iran against the brotherly State of Qatar, which is a flagrant violation of international law and the principles of good neighborliness, and is inexcusable, and cannot be justified under any circumstances, is condemned and condemned by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. ”

United Arab Emirates

The Iranian Revolutionary Guard’s attack of Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, the sister state of Qatar, was viewed as a flagrant violation of Qatar’s airspace and sovereignty, and a flagrant violation of international law and the UN Charter, by the United Arab Emirates. The UAE reaffirmed its unwavering opposition to any attack that threatens Qatar’s security and safety and threatens the region’s stability and security. ”

Bahrain

Following the Iranian attack on its territory, the Kingdom of Bahrain pledges its full support to Qatar, its sister state.

In these difficult circumstances, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries make the necessary efforts to exercise self-restraint, prevent escalation, and settle all disputes peacefully with the sisterly State of Qatar, as required by the bond of brotherhood and blood. ”

Kuwait

The Iranian Revolutionary Guard’s attacks on Al Udeid Air Base in the sisterly State of Qatar are strongly condemned and denounced by the State of Kuwait. This attack violates international law, Qatar’s airspace, international law, and the United Nations Charter in a flagrant way. It constitutes a perilous escalation that threatens the region’s stability, security, and peace.

The State of Kuwait pledges its full support for the brothers who live in Qatar’s sister state, Qatar’s leadership, government, and people, as well as its full support for all efforts to safeguard its sovereignty, security, and stability, including its right to respond directly to a direct threat that is proportionate to the magnitude of this flagrant aggression. ”

France

Qatar, which has been struck by Iran on its soil, is shown France’s solidarity, according to President Emmanuel Macron’s statement. I keep in touch with the regional partners and the country’s authorities. I urge everyone to restrain themselves, de-escalate, and return to the table of negotiations. This chaotic spiral must end. ”

Iran

What to know about New York’s mayoral primary and ranked choice voting

Voters in New York City have already begun to cast their ballots, where the upcoming Democratic Party primary has attracted national attention.

Following nine days of early voting that ended on Sunday, polls will open on Tuesday.

The Democratic Party’s leadership in the race, which includes former governor Andrew Cuomo’s son, a former mayor with established experience, and young Democratic socialist state assembly member Zohran Mamdani, who has promised to address cost-of-living issues, has sparked a debate over the party’s future in New York and beyond.

The Democratic primary winner is regarded as the clear favorite to win the city’s November general election, with the incumbent mayor firmly leaning toward the left and the Republican candidate a long shot at winning.

Democratic incumbent mayor Eric Adams announced earlier this year that he would withdraw from the primary.

The city’s ranked-choice voting system, which allows voters to rank several candidates based on their preference rather than voting for just one candidate, has also been highlighted by the race.

What are the status of the race as voters turn out for the polls, and what are the ranked choice voting’s advantages and disadvantages? We examine that and more in detail.

Andrew Cuomo, the former governor of New York, addresses the media following his speech at a New York City event on June 22, 2025. [Photo: AFP]

When is the last day to vote?

On June 24, the New York City Democratic mayoral primary will be held with voting open from 6am to 9pm. Between June 14 and June 22, early voting took place.

The candidates are who?

Cuomo and Mamdani are in a battle to take the top spot in the country’s largest city, while others are running for the top spot as well.

After a report revealed that he had sexually harassed at least 11 women while serving as governor, Cuomo, a 67-year-old centrist former governor from a political dynasty in New York, launched an effort to resurrect. He eventually succumbed to this demand in 2021.

At a time when the federal government is under greater scrutiny from the administration of US President Donald Trump over issues like immigration enforcement, the former governor has positioned himself as the most experienced figure capable of leading the city.

Mamdani, a 33-year-old Democratic socialist and state legislator with an immigrant background, has started a campaign with low success rates but has risen steadily as the young lawmaker makes an unflinchingly progressive pitch to voters. He has pledged to reform the political structure of the city and pass laws imposing a freeze on rent increases and free public transportation.

Cuomo and Mamdani are among the candidates running, despite the country’s attention currently favoring them.

They include New York City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, New York City Council member Adrienne Adams, New York City Council member Whitney Tilson, investor Michael Blake, political consultant, and former state senator Zellnor Myrie.

Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani speaks during the New York City Democratic Mayoral Primary Debate at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in the Gerald W. Lynch Theater on June 12, 2025 in New York City.
Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani addresses the Gerald W. Lynch Theater’s June 12, 2025, debate at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

What makes this race so notable?

The race for mayor has been filled with drama, fitting New York’s reputation as one of the best cities in the world.

A stark contrast between competing visions for the city’s future has been drawn between Cuomo’s attempt to retake office after a previous governor’s attempt to do so in addition to Mamdani’s young, vibrant campaign with strong appeals to the city’s pluralistic identity.

Centrist figures like former president Bill Clinton have supported Cuomo, while progressive figures like Senator Bernie Sanders and Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have endorsed Mamdani.

The Middle East conflict has also had a significant impact on the race. Cuomo, a fervent supporter of Israel, has pledged to combat anti-Semitism. Mahmudani, a vocal supporter of Palestinian rights, has mentioned receiving anti-Muslim death threats during the campaign.

The Trump administration’s aggressive policy toward immigration enforcement has also been a turning point. When federal immigration agents temporarily detained Lander, the city’s comptroller, while he was escorting a man outside of immigration court, city officials and candidates reacted with fury last week.

What can we infer from the most recent polls?

Recent polls indicate that Mamdani and Cuomo are in a close fight.

In an Emerson poll conducted on Monday, Cuomo received 35 percent of the vote, Mamdani received 33 percent, Lander received 13 percent, and Adrienne Adams received 8 percent.

In a prior Emerson poll in late May, Cuomo received 34 percent, Mamdani received 22 percent, Lander received 10 percent, and Adrienne Adams received 8 percent.

In the final round, Cuomo defeats Mamdani by 45 percent, according to a Marist poll from June, while Emerson poll shows Mamdani with 52 percent, Cuomo with 48 percent, and Mamdani with 45 percent.

When will the outcomes be available?

Polls close at 9:00 p.m. on Tuesday (GMT, Wednesday), and some preliminary results should be made soon. Due to the city’s ranked-choice voting system, the final result will take longer to be tabulated.

Since the city is awaiting all mail-in ballots until July 1, ranked choice tabulation will not begin. On July 15, the official results will be released, but they may already be known.

How does ranked choice voting work?

People rank several candidates based on their preferences in ranked choice voting rather than just picking a single candidate.

Supporters claim that this is more complicated than a traditional election because it allows voters to express their preferences without casting an all-or-nothing vote.

Voters in New York order as many as five candidates according to their favorability. Only the first choices are counted during the first round of voting. A candidate’s overwhelming majority of more than 50% of the vote determines their candidacy.

If not, the candidate with the fewest first-choice votes is eliminated, and the second-choice pick is chosen based on the votes cast by the voters who placed them first.

The process continues until there are only two candidates left, with the winner based on the number of votes cast.

What are its advantages?

Those who support ranked choice voting claim that it gives people the freedom to cast their ballots in favor of the candidate they like the best without worrying about their chances of winning.

You could place Lander first and Mamdani second if you like Mamdani and think he has the best chance of winning, for example.

People can choose to support the candidate they most strongly with the exception of when the other candidates you ranked lose out on the race’s outcome.

Some argue that a candidate’s ranked choice makes it difficult to win if they don’t have a lot of broad support, since candidates gain if they perform well with both their own core supporters and those of several other candidates as well.

A ballot box
In the SoHo neighborhood of New York City on June 14, 2023, absentee ballots are positioned inside a sealed ballot box.

What are its shortcomings?

The complexity of the system is one of its drawbacks. Even those who have previously cast ballots using ranked choice voting can be confused about the implications of their rankings, despite the obvious simplicity of the idea of choosing a group of candidates based on preference.

Some people also think that the voting process is less transparent because a computer is assigned the task of tabulating and redistributing votes in each round, making it harder for traditional news organizations to follow developments.

India’s Pant, Rahul score centuries to set England 371 to win

England had a fighting chance of winning the first Test at Headingley with a score of 21-0 in their second innings at the close of play on day four, chasing 371 to win.

With three wickets in four balls, Josh Tongue made it 31 runs for the visitors on Monday, matching his first innings form.

The dangerous Jasprit Bumrah had the opportunity to attack England before the game was over because India was 36 for 36 as a result of the collapse. However, neither the opener’s opponent, Zak Crawley, nor Ben Duckett, appeared uneasy as they fought back until stumps.

More than the Ben Stokes-inspired heroics on the same field against Australia in 2019, reaching 371 would be England’s second-highest successful Test run chase, and the second-highest at Headingley.

Tongue told Sky Sports, “Ducky]Ben Duckett] and Zak [Crawley] batted really well to get them all out and not lose a wicket in the final half hour.”

“I thought we were unlucky the first session because we really batted really well.” The point was to “hit the pitch as hard as we can.” In the second session, it flattened out. Simply put, we needed to be patient.

India’s captain Shubman Gill, who had already scored his highest Test score in the first innings, chopped onto his stumps to fall for eight to Brydon Carse, who finished day four 90-2 ahead of the hosts.

After returning to the Test on Sunday, England saw an opportunity. However, KL Rahul and Rishabh Pant’s 195-run middle-order partnership gave India a boost.

Josh Tongue of England celebrates taking Mohammed Siraj’s wicket on day four [Ed Sykes/Action Images via Reuters]

Pant Rally, Rahul

The normally box office Pant relaxed and watched as Rahul completed his ninth Test series, which included eight international appearances, with a relatively conservative opening inning.

After crashing two sixes in three balls after lunch, Pant hit the accelerator and unleashed his trademark flamboyant shots from every angle of the field, with the result of his 100th score, the first time ever in a Test match for India.

Pant eventually attempted one shot too many before being caught by Crawley for 118 chasing another six before Rahul, who had just finished tea for 137, cut back once more onto the stumps from Carse’s bowling.

The fast bowler then took three wickets and the catch that saw India’s innings come to an end after losing their final six first-innings wickets for 24 runs.

As Crawley continued to record unbeaten on 12 and Duckett will start a enthralling Tuesday on 9 while Bumrah, the world’s top-ranked Test bowler, took five wickets in the opening innings.

On the final day, England faces a tough competition, but there is at least hope. India only lost once in 59 Tests against opponents who had over 350 winning combined. However, that was in 2022 against England.

Rahul told Sky Sports, “Someone has got to win tomorrow, it will be an interesting day.”

The first innings were not as straightforward as the wicket. They won’t be as quick to hit the ball up. We’ll be in the game just fine if they get a significant partnership and a few wickets.

KL Rahul in action.
[Ed Sykes/Action Images via Reuters] KL Rahul led India in the second innings with 137 runs.

How extensive are Israel’s intelligence operations inside Iran?

The Israeli press reported that Israel’s recent targeting of key military positions and leaders in Iran was the result of intelligence operations.

An Israeli intelligence agency, which is alleged to have infiltrated much of Iran’s security apparatus, is responsible for the strikes that destroyed a large portion of its key defensive infrastructure and killed military commanders.

On June 13, 2025, people in Tehran, Iran, gather near damaged vehicles. [Majid Asgaripour/West Asia News Agency]

Numerous people have reportedly been detained and accused of spying for Mossad, Israel’s intelligence agency, supporting Israel in the media, or infuriating the general public.

To prevent Israeli hackers from stealing sensitive communications, the Iranian government recently instructed senior officials and their security teams to avoid using smartphones connected to the internet. Meanwhile, it is believed that Iranian security services have reportedly asked the public to report any buildings they’ve rented to businesses or individuals over the past few years.

How extensive has the infiltration been, and how long has it been planning, and what has been characterized as an unprecedented Israeli intelligence operation that led to its recent strikes on Iran?

How significant a part did Israeli intelligence play in the country’s initial counterattacks?

a significant one.

Shortly after Israel launched its attacks on Iran, reports of intelligence operations that came before the “unprecedented” attack began to surface. Details about how both human intelligence and AI were used to carry out the attack, which senior members of Israel’s intelligence community claimed hampered a large portion of Iran’s air defenses, were revealed in interviews with senior officials.

The Associated Press published interviews with 10 Israeli intelligence and military officials who were aware of the strike on June 17 and shortly after.

Sima Shine, the former Mossad research director, told the AP, “This attack is the culmination of years of work by the Mossad to target Iran’s nuclear program.” Additionally, the article provided details on how Israeli agents were able to smuggle a number of drones and missile systems into Iran, which were then used to attack numerous targets created by a US AI model based on information that Israeli agents had provided to it from previous strikes.

Are there still intelligence operations?

They appear to be.

Saeed Izadi and Behnam Shahryari, two senior officers in Iran’s Quds force, were found dead over the weekend, according to Israel’s claim that its intelligence networks had located them.

Major-General Ali Shademani was found and killed by Israel on June 17; that was just four days after his predecessor was killed in a targeted airstrike.

A target would have to completely rid themselves of any electronic devices that could connect to the internet in order to avoid detection, according to Israeli military intelligence specialist Miri Eisin, who spoke to The Observer in the United Kingdom. She said that “most people don’t take themselves out of the grid.” You can reach anyone, they say.

According to defense analyst Hamze Attar from Luxembourg, “Israel likely has around 30 to 40 cells operating inside of Iran,” the majority of which are made up of collaborators, rather than Israeli agents, which also contributes to Iran’s weakening, he said, citing assembly instructions found on the hardware that was seized by authorities.

He said that some of those cells will be accountable for bringing weapons into Israel, others for carrying out attacks, and others for gathering intelligence.

How long has this been occurring?

Israeli intelligence operations inside Iran are not recent. According to analysts, operations designed to monitor, infiltrate, sabotage, and undermine Iranian defenses date back to the 1979 Iranian revolution.

Ali Larijani, a senior adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, acknowledged the scope of Israeli operations in Iran in a speech released in November 2024, telling ISNA news agency that the “problem of infiltration had become very serious in recent years.”

The former parliamentary speaker and nuclear negotiator continued, “There have been some instances of negligence for years.”

The Israeli-led Lebanese rebel group Hezbollah only gained access to its supply chain after its infiltration by Israeli intelligence in September 2024, allowing the group to detonate communication devices. Hassan Nasrallah, its leader, was killed in the same manner after Israeli agents found out where he was hiding. Similar plots were employed in the Hamas political leader’s assassination in Tehran in July of that year when an explosive device placed in his residence a few weeks prior to his death exploded.

Mohsen Fakhrizadeh was killed by a remote-controlled gun mounted on the back of a pick-up truck in the past 20 years by Israel. The Stuxnet computer virus, which was thought to have infected 30, 000 computers across at least 14 Iranian nuclear facilities, was also caused by Israel.

Does Iran have an Israeli spy agency?

Absolutely.

Seven Israeli citizens were detained in late October on suspicion of spying for Iran, according to Israel’s internal security agency, Shin Bet. Authorities in Haifa had earlier detained a further group of seven people on suspicion of aiding Iran’s intelligence ministry during the war.

According to Israeli police sources at the time, additional covert networks with Iran-linked connections may exist there.

Why do we know so much about this covert operation?

Because, in the opinion of analysts, publicity can also be a valuable addition to an intelligence agency’s toolkit.

While gaining points at home from other countries, revealing the extent to which a foreign nation’s security infrastructure can be compromised and infiltrated undermines that nation’s morale.