Afghan foreign minister in India: Why New Delhi is embracing Taliban now

New Delhi, India – As the Taliban returned to power in August 2021 following the chaotic withdrawal of US forces, which triggered the collapse of the Western-backed government in Kabul, India was forced to shut its embassy and hurriedly pull out its diplomats and citizens.

More than four years later, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu nationalist government has rolled out a red carpet for an Afghan delegation led by the Taliban administration’s Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi in the capital, New Delhi.

The Afghan foreign minister’s weeklong trip – the first official visit by a Taliban leader – is being billed as groundbreaking. Muttaqi, who remains on the United Nations sanctions list, arrived in India after receiving a temporary travel exemption from the world body.

India’s reset with the Taliban, experts say, is part of a policy of pragmatism, as New Delhi aims to counter Pakistani influence in Afghanistan, whose relationship with Pakistan, India’s arch foe, has been strained over cross-border attacks.

Some analysts, however, say India’s hosting of the Taliban leaders gives legitimacy and a de facto recognition to the Taliban administration, which has been struggling to boost its diplomatic legitimacy.

So, why is India embracing the Taliban now? What happened at their meeting – and what is New Delhi expecting from the Taliban? What is in it for the Taliban?

Taliban administration’s Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi with his team in New Delhi, India, October 12, 2025 [Anushree Fadnavis/Reuters]

What happened during the India-Taliban meet?

Muttaqi, accompanied by Afghan trade and foreign ministry officials, is meeting Indian officials to discuss diplomatic, trade, and economic ties during his visit.

After he met Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar on Friday, New Delhi said it will reopen its embassy in Kabul.

“Closer cooperation between us contributes to your national development as well as regional stability and resilience,” Jaishankar said. He also affirmed India’s “full commitment to the sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of Afghanistan”.

Muttaqi has called India a “close friend”. In a joint statement, New Delhi and the Taliban committed to maintaining “close communication and continue regular engagement”.

The Afghan leaders also invited Indian companies to invest in its mining sector, which the statement said “would help strengthen the bilateral trade and commercial relations”.

New Delhi also stated that it is committed to furthering its humanitarian assistance and other development projects in Afghanistan, one of the world’s poorest countries.

Modi’s government also facilitated Muttaqi’s visit to Deoband, in Uttar Pradesh, which hosts the Darul Uloom Deoband, one of the most influential Islamic seminaries in South Asia.

On Monday, Muttaqi announced that direct flights would soon start between Kabul and Indian cities, including Amritsar in Punjab.

Why is India embracing the Taliban now?

Historically, India has viewed the Taliban as a proxy for Pakistan’s intelligence agencies. Many Taliban members had studied in conservative religious schools in Pakistan, which also provided crucial support to the mujahideen movement against the Soviet Union in the 1980s. It was from the mujahideen that the Taliban emerged.

India shuttered its Kabul embassy in 1996 when the Taliban first took control of Afghanistan. Instead, India backed the Northern Alliance – Afghan groups fighting the Taliban – providing diplomatic support, aid, and training to counter Pakistani influence and protect its regional interests. The Northern Alliance also had backing from other countries, primarily Iran and Russia.

Pakistan was one of only three countries that recognised the Taliban administration until it was dislodged from power in a US-led invasion in 2001.

When the US and NATO forces invaded the country and the Taliban lost power, India reopened its embassy but continued to treat the Taliban as a Pakistani ally. India blamed the Taliban and its allies for a series of bombings at its diplomatic missions across Afghanistan.

Islamabad, meanwhile, was accused by US leaders of giving safe haven to Taliban leaders and fighters as the group waged a deadly armed rebellion against the US-led NATO forces for 20 years.

After Kabul’s fall in 2021, when the US-led forces withdrew and the Taliban captured power, India once again shut its embassy and consulates in Afghanistan, stopped issuing visas to all Afghans, including students, traders, and even former government officials.

India started making diplomatic overtures to the Taliban a year after the group’s return to power, re-establishing diplomatic presence in the country, tasked with overseeing the distribution of humanitarian aid. In the past two years, India has allowed the Taliban to quietly take over the Afghan consulates in Mumbai and Hyderabad.

Indian officials and diplomats have also held several high-level engagements abroad. In January this year, Muttaqi also met India’s Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri in Dubai, the United Arab Emirates.

At the same time, Pakistan’s ties with the Taliban have plummeted. Islamabad has accused Afghanistan’s rulers of sheltering armed groups, including the Pakistan Taliban, or TTP, which have carried out dozens of deadly attacks on Pakistani soil in recent years. The Taliban deny those charges.

It is in that changed regional geopolitical landscape that India is welcoming Muttaqi, said analysts.

“The costs of avoiding engagement with the Taliban [by ceding a regional ally to Pakistan] in the past compelled the Indian government to strengthen relations with Kabul this time,” said Praveen Donthi, a senior analyst at the International Crisis Group in New Delhi.

“It’s a strategically vital relationship that can’t be ignored on ideological grounds,” Donthi said, referring to the lack of common ground between the conservative Taliban and the Hindu nationalist government in India. “Or left to India’s primary strategic rivals to exploit,” he added, speaking on the Chinese exchanges and investment with Kabul.

“The visit demonstrates India’s willingness to rise above ideological concerns and optics and to engage pragmatically with the Taliban,” Donthi told Al Jazeera.

Gautam Mukhopadhaya, a retired Indian diplomat and former ambassador to Afghanistan, told Al Jazeera that, unlike the Taliban of the 1990s, when Pakistan wielded complete control over it, regional dynamics have changed.

“The new Taliban is slightly more worldwide [in its overview] and more savvy. And they have to see the larger interests of Afghanistan,” said Mukhopadhaya.

India has shared deep-rooted cultural and trade ties with Afghanistan for centuries, dating back to the Mughal era. “That sense of kinship with India has always been there,” Mukhopadhaya said. “And India has goodwill on the ground due to its humanitarian assistance. Hindustan, as a concept, is a big thing in the Afghan mind.”

And India’s non-engaging phase with the Taliban’s first rule was an “aberration” in bilateral ties, added the former diplomat, who reopened the Indian embassy in Afghanistan after the Taliban’s removal from power in 2001.

muttaqi
People hold banners welcoming Amir Khan Muttaqi at Darul Uloom Deoband in the northern state of Uttar Pradesh, India, October 11, 2025 [Anushree Fadnavis/Reuters]

What is India expecting from the Taliban?

To India, it is clear that the Taliban regime is not going to go away soon, said Ajai Sahni, executive director of South Asia Terrorism Portal, a platform that tracks and analyses armed attacks in South Asia. “You can’t simply walk away because the regime is not to our liking.”

“You have to deal with the reality of the political dynamics in the region,” he added. “And this situation demands greater outreach [to the Taliban] on India’s part and establish relations with regimes that are willing to go along with the Indian position in the subcontinent.”

Kabul’s growing conflict with Islamabad is an important factor in India’s calculations.

The tensions spilled over the weekend as Pakistan and Afghanistan traded heavy fire in the border areas. Dozens are believed to have been killed on both sides. The fighting coincided with Muttaqi’s ongoing visit to India.

The deportation of tens of thousands of Afghan refugees by Pakistan has further strained the ties between the two neighbours.

In terms of regional relationships, Afghanistan was also among the few countries that strongly condemned the Pahalgam attack in Indian-administered Kashmir in April earlier this year. The attack that New Delhi blamed on Pakistan – a charge it denies – brought the South Asian rivals to the brink of an all-out war in May as they traded missile and drone attacks.

Mukhopadhaya, the former envoy, says the Taliban and India have a common enemy. “We both have grievances and problems with Pakistan,” he added. “That also makes us natural allies.”

In their joint statement, the Indian Ministry of External Affairs expressed “deep appreciation” to the Taliban for its “strong condemnation of the terrorist attack in Pahalgam … as well as for the sincere condolences”.

“Both sides unequivocally condemned all acts of terrorism emanating from regional countries,” the statement noted, without naming Pakistan.

Addressing India’s security concerns, the Taliban foreign minister also “reiterated the commitment that the Afghan government will not allow any group or individual to use the territory of Afghanistan against India”.

muttaqi
Members of the media attend a news conference of Amir Khan Muttaqi in New Delhi, October 12, 2025 [Anushree Fadnavis/Reuters]

What does the diplomatic engagement mean for the Taliban?

The meeting in New Delhi means a world for the Taliban and its standing both at home and abroad, said Sahni, as the group has been making efforts for diplomatic recognition. The Taliban administration is only recognised by Russia, and several senior leaders remain under UN sanctions.

While rolling out the carpets for the Taliban leader, the Modi government is facing uncomfortable questions at home, including on women’s rights, broader human rights violations, and the killing of Reuters photojournalist Danish Siddiqui in July 2021.

The exclusion of female journalists from Muttaqi’s first news conference at the Afghan embassy in New Delhi last week caused an uproar, with opposition leaders and journalists slamming the government for its silence on the issue.

The next day, the Afghan officials conducted another news conference that included women, seated in the front row of seats.

Visiting Taliban officials have used the Afghan embassy in New Delhi, which still flies the flag of the previous Western-backed government, for these events, but do not have control over its premises since India has not formally recognised the Taliban government as yet.

Gaining that recognition and control of the embassy would be a major diplomatic victory for the Taliban.

For Afghanistan, deeper engagement with India could open doors to trade, education, and healthcare partnerships, analysts noted, as reflected in the joint statement put out by the two ministries. Last year, the annual bilateral trade was nearly $900m.

Muttaqi on Monday also met a delegation of Afghan Sikhs and Hindus, who had left Afghanistan over the past few decades and are currently living in Delhi. Muttaqi told them they were welcome to return and restart their businesses.

Thousands of Afghan students study in Indian universities, traders depend on Indian markets, and Indian-backed projects — from hospitals and dams to humanitarian aid — have been lifelines for many Afghan communities.

Cameroon’s Issa Tchiroma Bakary claims presidential election victory

Cameroon opposition leader Issa Tchiroma Bakary has unilaterally declared victory in the country’s presidential election.

Tchiroma made the statement in a nearly five-minute speech posted to social media early on Tuesday. Although official channels have not declared results, he urged long-term incumbent, 92-year-old President Paul Biya, to call him to concede.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

“The people have chosen, and this choice must be respected,” Tchiroma demanded in the video.

However, the government warned earlier this week that only results announced by the Constitutional Council can be considered official. The body has almost two weeks to make the announcement.

A former government spokesman and ally of Biya for 20 years, Tchiroma was considered the top contender to unseat Biya in Sunday’s elections.

After he resigned from the government in June, his campaign drew large crowds and key endorsements from a coalition of opposition parties and civic groups.

But Biya – in power for 43 years and the world’s oldest serving head of state – has been widely expected to secure another seven-year term in office, given his tight grip on state machinery and the fragmented nature of the opposition.

Cameroon’s government has not responded officially to Tchiroma’s declaration.

However, Minister of Territorial Administration Paul Atanga Nji warned recently that only the Constitutional Council has the authority to announce the winner, and that any unilateral publication of results would be considered “high treason”.

Cameroon’s electoral law allows results to be published and posted at individual polling stations, but final tallies must be validated by the Constitutional Council, which has until October 26 to announce the outcome, the Reuters news agency reported.

Issa Tchiroma Bakary casts his vote in Garoua, Cameroon, on Sunday [File: Desire Danga Essigue/Reuters]

‘Honour’ the ballot box

In the video, filmed in his northern hometown of Garoua in front of the national flag, Tchiroma urged Biya to “honour the truth of the ballot box”, and to concede and offer congratulations.

Doing so, he said, would be a mark of Cameroon’s political maturity and the strength of its democracy.

The election results, he said, represent “a clear sanction” of Biya’s administration and marked “the beginning of a new era”.

Tchiroma also thanked rival candidates “who have already congratulated me and recognised the will of the people”.

He called on government institutions and the military to recognise his victory and “stay on the side of the republic”.

KL Rahul, India defeat West Indies in second Test to sweep series

A dominant India completed a 2-0 series sweep against West Indies following their seven-wicket victory in the final test at New Delhi’s Arun Jaitley Stadium on Tuesday.

Chasing 121 for victory against a modest West Indies attack, the home side achieved the target in the final day’s morning session with KL Rahul making 58 not out and B Sai Sudharsan contributing 39.

Recommended Stories

list of 2 itemsend of list

“It’s a really big honour and I would say I’m getting used to it,” said home captain Shubman Gill, who registered his first series victory since taking over as test skipper earlier this year.

“Managing all the players and leading this team is a great honour.”

India won the series opener in Ahmedabad inside three days and put themselves in the box seat in the second match when they amassed 518-5 before declaring their first innings.

West Indies folded for 248 in the first innings and were made to follow on.

The visitors delivered a much-improved batting display in their second innings and rode hundreds by John Campbell and Shai Hope to post 390 all out to stretch the contest to its final day.

Resuming on 63-1, India needed just an hour to complete the chase, but West Indies managed to grab a couple of wickets courtesy of two superb catches.

Touring captain Roston Chase dismissed Sudharsan with Hope diving to take a low catch in the slip.

Gill (13) hit a six and a four before miscuing a ball from Rose. Justin Greaves locked on to the swirling ball and ran from midwicket to take a brilliant catch.

That was the last of the drama, and Rahul hit the winning boundary to seal India’s win.

India spinner Kuldeep Yadav, who claimed a match haul of eight wickets, was named player of the match and teammate Ravindra Jadeja player of the tournament.

West Indies captain Chase said his side would take some positives from the defeat.

“The positives for us in this match was that Campbell and Hope played well and scored hundreds,” he added.

“We batted 100 overs after a long time, that was another positive. Taking the game to the fifth day, that was great for us.”

India’s tour of Australia begins on October 19 with the first one-day international (ODI) in Perth.

Rahul celebrates after scoring 50 runs on the fifth day of the second cricket test match between India and West Indies [Manish Swarup/AP]

Death toll from devastating Mexico flooding rises

Torrential rain battered several Mexican states over several days last week, turning streets into rivers, sweeping away roads and bridges and triggering landslides.

Rescuers scrambled on Monday to reach people cut off by the devastating flooding, with 64 people killed in central and eastern Mexico and another 65 reported missing.

Dozens of small communities remained inaccessible days after the deluge, with residents working tirelessly to clear paths for the delivery of food and other supplies.

Mexico has deployed some 10,000 troops alongside civilian rescue teams to try to deal with the emergency. Helicopters have ferried food and water to 200 or so communities still cut off by road, and have evacuated the sick and injured.

“There are sufficient resources; this won’t be skimped on… because we’re still in the emergency period,” President Claudia Sheinbaum said during her daily news briefing on Monday.

Parts of Veracruz state received 62.7cm (24.7in) of rain from October 6 to 9.

Sheinbaum acknowledged it could still be days before access is established to some places.

“A lot of flights are required to take sufficient food and water to those places,” she said.

Mexico’s Civil Protection agency said the heavy rain had killed 29 people in Veracruz state on the Gulf of Mexico Coast as of Monday morning, and 21 in Hidalgo state, north of Mexico City.

At least 13 were killed in Puebla, east of Mexico City. In the central state of Queretaro, a child died in a landslide.

Authorities have attributed the deadly downpours to two tropical systems – Hurricane Priscilla and Tropical Storm Raymond – that formed off the western coast of Mexico but have since dissipated.

Venezuela to close Norway embassy after opposition leader wins Nobel Prize

Venezuela says it will close its embassy in Norway, just days after Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado was announced the winner of the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo.

A Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson told the Reuters news agency that the Venezuelan embassy did not give a reason for shutting its doors for its decision on Monday.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

“It is regrettable. Despite our differences on several issues, Norway wishes to keep the dialogue open with Venezuela and will continue to work in this direction,” the spokesperson said.

The ministry also stressed that the Nobel Committee overseeing the prize is an independent body from the Norwegian government.

Corina Machado, who has been in hiding since 2024, was declared the Nobel Peace Prize winner on Friday for her “extraordinary examples of civilian courage in Latin America in recent times”.

She was barred from standing in last year’s election in Venezuela, which was won by President Nicolas Maduro in a widely disputed result.

Corina Machado dedicated her Nobel Prize win to United States President Donald Trump and the “suffering people of Venezuela”.

Venezuela has also decided to shutter its embassy in Australia, in addition to Norway.

Instead, it plans to open two new embassies in Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe, countries it described as “strategic allies in the anti-colonial fight and in resistance to hegemonic pressures”.

Neither Norway nor Australia has an embassy in Venezuela, and consular services are handled by their embassies in Colombia.

Both countries are longtime allies of the US, which, under Trump, has launched an official war against Latin American drug cartels like Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua.

The US military has since September carried out at least four strikes on boats operated by alleged drug traffickers in the Caribbean under orders from the White House.

Why is India prosecuting Muslims who said ‘I love Muhammad’?

New Delhi, India – For the last month, Indian police have raided multiple markets and homes, arresting Muslim men in states governed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu nationalist party. Some of their homes have been bulldozed.

The genesis of their alleged crime is common: writing, “I Love Muhammad”, a reference to Prophet Muhammad, on posters, t-shirts, or in social media posts. The authorities say the expression is threatening “public order”.

So far, at least 22 cases have been registered against more than 2,500 Muslims. At least 40 people have been arrested across multiple states governed by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), according to the nonprofit Association for Protection of Civil Rights (APCR).

So, what is happening? How and where did this start? And is it illegal to say ‘I Love Muhammad’ in India?

What’s happening?

On September 4, Muslims living in Kanpur city of the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh were observing Eid al-Milad al-Nabi, the celebration of the birth of Prophet Muhammad, when a neighbourhood put up an illuminated board saying, “I love Muhammad”.

But the board, mimicking the popular “I Love New York” signage that has been copied all over the world, drew criticism from some local Hindus. Initially, their complaint alleged that the illuminated board was a new introduction to traditional festivities on the occasion, when Uttar Pradesh’s laws bar new additions to public religious celebrations. About 20 percent of Kanpur’s population is Muslim.

However, based on complaints, the police filed a case against two dozen people on much more serious charges: promoting enmity on the grounds of religion. The charge carries a punishment of up to five years in jail if the accused individual is convicted.

The Kanpur episode drew widespread criticism from Muslim political leaders, and protests against the police action spread to other states, including Telangana in southern India, Gujarat and Maharashtra in the west, and in Uttarakhand and Jammu and Kashmir in the north. The  “I love Muhammad” hoardings and writings came up across the country – from people’s social media handles to t-shirts.

Nearly 270km (168 miles) away from Kanpur, in Uttar Pradesh’s Bareilly, a group of people participating in a demonstration called by a local imam against the Kanpur arrests, violently clashed with the police on September 26.

The police hit back with a crackdown, arresting 75 people, including the imam, Tauqeer Raza, his relatives and his aides. At least four buildings belonging to the accused individuals have been bulldozed by the local authorities.

In recent years, hundreds of Indian Muslims have lost their homes to such demolitions, which are often carried out without any notice issued by authorities, or any court order. India’s Supreme Court has observed that demolitions cannot be used as a form of extra-legal punishment, warning that state authorities must give prior notice before razing any property. Yet, on the ground, that order is often not followed, say activists.

Meanwhile, dozens of other Muslims have been arrested in different states – including some in Modi’s home state of Gujarat – for social media posts and videos carrying the “I love Muhammad” slogan.

A bulldozer demolishes the house of a Muslim man in Prayagraj, India, June 12, 2022. Authorities claim the house was illegally built [Ritesh Shukla/Reuters]

Is it illegal?

India’s constitution guarantees the freedom of religion and the right to express it. Article 25 protects every individual’s freedom to practise their religion. Citizens are also protected under Article 19(1)(a), which guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression, unless it directly incites violence or hatred.

In the cases of people arrested as part of the “I Love Muhammad” crackdown, the police have mostly charged them under legal provisions that bar large gatherings aimed at committing “mischief”, or for acts that allegedly provoke religious tensions. However, these provisions have been applied against those arrested for social media posts, or wearing t-shirts with “I Love Muhammad” emblazoned on them.

Nadeem Khan, the national coordinator of APCR, the nonprofit that has been tracking these cases, has fought previous lawsuits against government officials for similarly targeting Muslims for social media expressions, or when their homes have been bulldozed.

Khan told Al Jazeera that authorities were carefully using legal provisions that focus not on the “I Love Muhammad” expression itself, but on alleged offences carried out by those who used the expression or protested against related police crackdowns.

“They know that there is no law that criminalises just the mere expression of ‘I Love Muhammad’,” Khan said.

Khan noted that across India, images of Hindu gods wielding their traditional weapons have long been commonplace. “These images are at every corner of the country; should it also offend or threaten all Muslims then?” he asked. “Everyone should understand that the government cannot criminalise a religion like this,” he added, referring to Islam.

Since 2014, when Modi took over the power in New Delhi, India has consistently slid in a range of international democratic indices.

Criminalising people’s right to freedom of expression and religious belief sets a deeply troubling precedent, said Aakar Patel, the chair of Amnesty International India’s board.

“Targeting people for slogans such as ‘I Love Muhammad’, which is peaceful and devoid of any incitement or threat, does not meet the threshold for criminal restriction under either Indian constitutional law or international human rights law,” Patel told Al Jazeera.

“Public order concerns must be addressed proportionately and cannot justify the blanket suppression of religious identity or expression,” he added.

“The role of the state is to safeguard rights equally, not to police expressions of belief,” said Amnesty’s Patel. “Upholding constitutional and international commitments is not optional; it is a legal obligation.”

THANE, INDIA - SEPTEMBER 25: Members of the Muslim community take out march carrying
People carrying “I Love Muhammad” posters after the Friday prayer) outside a Mosque near Mumbra railway Station on September 25, 2025 in Thane in the western Indian state of Maharashtra [Praful Gangurde/Hindustan Times via Getty Images]

Is there a pattern?

Critics say that the crackdown is only the latest instance of Indian Muslims facing marginalisation, violence or the targeted brunt of the law since Modi came to power in 2014.

In the past 11 years, the incidents of hate speech targeting religious minorities have skyrocketed. Documented instances of hate speech jumped from 668 in 2023 to 1,165 last year, a rise of about 74 percent. A significant majority of these incidents happened in BJP-governed states, or places where elections were upcoming.

Increasingly, local Hindu-Muslim disputes now rapidly transform into national issues, said Asim Ali, a political analyst based in Delhi.

“There is an entire ecosystem in place, from pliant media to social media organisation, to spread this hate rapidly,” said Ali. “And the law is read in such a way that any expression of religious identity, especially of Muslims, can be seen as inciting religious hatred,” he added.

After the “I Love Muhammad” episode in Kanpur, BJP leaders in Modi’s own constituency, Varanasi, put up posters saying, “I Love Bulldozer” at major intersections of the city, in a reference to the bulldozing of houses of the accused.

Protesters from Shaheen Bagh hold placards as they take part in a demonstration against India''s new citizenship law at Jantar Mantar, in New Delhi on January, 29, 2020. (Photo by Sajjad HUSSAIN / AFP)
Protesters take part in a demonstration against India’s controversial amendments to citizenship rules in New Delhi on January, 29, 2020. The rules have widely been criticised as discriminatory against Muslim asylum seekers [Sajjad Hussein/AFP]

How does it affect young Muslims?

Rasheed Kidwai, a political analyst, said that the row over “I Love Muhammad” is “overtly very political, and not religious”.

And in India, there is growing frustration among Muslims, especially youth, where they see that one set of rules is not applied for all, when it comes to matters of cultural identity and eating habits, said Kidwai.

Several of the accused, or arrested, as part of the “I Love Muhammad” crackdown, include young adult Muslims, according to data from APCR, including those who were arrested for social media posts.

The crackdown on “I Love Muhammad” expression risks alienating young Muslim adults even more, said Ali. “In theory, everyone is already guilty and can face action for just being,” he told Al Jazeera.