Match of the Day’s Nedum Onuoha and Guilleme Balague discuss what’s next for Arsenal after being knocked out of the Champions League and ending their season trophyless.
WATCH MORE: No better team in competition than Arsenal – Arteta
Match of the Day’s Nedum Onuoha and Guilleme Balague discuss what’s next for Arsenal after being knocked out of the Champions League and ending their season trophyless.
WATCH MORE: No better team in competition than Arsenal – Arteta
Mikel Arteta says there is “no better team in the competition than Arsenal” after being knocked out of the Champions League by Paris Saint-Germain.
WATCH MORE: Frattesi scores extra time winner to put Inter through to finals
The Professional Tennis Players’ Association (PTPA) has been partially successful in a legal challenge against the men’s ATP Tour.
The association alleged the ATP tried to pressure players into signing pre-prepared statements saying they had no prior knowledge of the wider legal action launched by the PTPA against several governing bodies in March.
It sought a court order preventing the ATP from engaging in “improper, coercive or threatening communications” with players on the matter.
In Wednesday’s ruling in New York, Judge Margaret Garnett found the ATP’s “conduct to date, regardless of intent, could readily have been viewed as potentially coercive, deceptive or otherwise abusive”.
In the wider lawsuit, against the ATP, the women’s WTA Tour, the International Tennis Federation and the International Tennis Integrity Agency, the PTPA cited “anti-competitive practices and a blatant disregard for player welfare”.
It had asked the judge to issue an order which would prevent all four defendants from communicating with players about their involvement in the process.
Judge Garnett’s ruling, however, was only directed at the ATP.
It states the ATP is prohibited from “retaliating, or threatening retaliation” against any player who is participating, or thinking of participating, in the action.
The ATP has also been ordered to preserve all past communications with players about the litigation. But the PTPA’s wish that the information should be disclosed was rejected by the judge, who also declined to issue a blanket ban on the tour communicating on the matter.
The banning of all communication would “harm the ability of the ATP to permissibly discuss and respond to this litigation in lawful ways,” the judge added.
An ATP spokesperson said: “ATP acknowledges the court’s ruling and will promptly comply with its directions. We remain committed to supporting our players, upholding the integrity of the game, and fully defending ourselves in the ongoing legal proceedings.”
The PTPA was co-founded by 24-time Grand Slam champion Novak Djokovic, who is not one of the players listed as a co-plaintiff in any official court document.
The Professional Tennis Players ‘ Association (PTPA) has been partially successful in a legal challenge against the men’s ATP Tour.
The association alleged the ATP tried to pressure players into signing pre-prepared statements saying they had no prior knowledge of the wider legal action launched by the PTPA against several governing bodies in March.
It sought a court order preventing the ATP from engaging in “improper, coercive or threatening communications” with players on the matter.
In Wednesday’s ruling in New York, Judge Margaret Garnett found the ATP’s “conduct to date, regardless of intent, could readily have been viewed as potentially coercive, deceptive or otherwise abusive”.
In the wider lawsuit, against the ATP, the women’s WTA Tour, the International Tennis Federation and the International Tennis Integrity Agency, the PTPA cited “anti-competitive practices and a blatant disregard for player welfare”.
It had asked the judge to issue an order which would prevent all four defendants from communicating with players about their involvement in the process.
Judge Garnett’s ruling, however, was only directed at the ATP.
It states the ATP is prohibited from “retaliating, or threatening retaliation” against any player who is participating, or thinking of participating, in the action.
The ATP has also been ordered to preserve all past communications with players about the litigation. But the PTPA’s wish that the information should be disclosed was rejected by the judge, who also declined to issue a blanket ban on the tour communicating on the matter.
The banning of all communication would “harm the ability of the ATP to permissibly discuss and respond to this litigation in lawful ways”, the judge added.
An ATP spokesperson said: “ATP acknowledges the court’s ruling and will promptly comply with its directions. We remain committed to supporting our players, upholding the integrity of the game, and fully defending ourselves in the ongoing legal proceedings”.
The PTPA was co-founded by 24-time Grand Slam champion Novak Djokovic, who is not one of the players listed as a co-plaintiff in any official court document.
Davide Frattesi scores a brilliant extra-time winner to give Inter a 7-6 victory on aggregate against Barcelona in their Champions League semi-final.
WATCH MORE: Raphina puts Barcelona in front to make late comeback in semi-finals
Watch highlights as Inter cruise to a thrilling 7-6 aggregate victory over Barcelona in one of the greatest Champions League semifinals ever.
Inter Milan vs. Barcelona MATCH REPORT