Delap, extreme heat & money – Chelsea’s Club World Cup so far

Reuters

In order to reach the knockout stages of the Club World Cup, Chelsea have fought through extreme heat, weather warnings, and made four debuts.

The Blues have so far made an estimated £28 million, and they will soon make up the £30 million fee Liam Delap’s Ipswich signing for the club, which was earlier this month.

In addition to defender Mamadou Sarr, the new striker has made his debut in the competition with a goal and an assist in his first three games for the club on US soil.

Chelsea also lost 3-1 to Brazilian giants Flamengo in a tactical experiment, according to manager Enzo Maresca.

Los Angeles FC and ES Tunis, who are weaker in Group D, were held to a comfortable victory.

Chelsea will face Portuguese side Benfica, who defeated Bayern Munich 1-0 in their final group game.

Impressive Delap and Neto

Delap, who signed from Ipswich before the tournament, did a stellar job in the opening game against LAFC. His chipped cross helped the club score Enzo Fernandez’s second goal in a 2-0 victory.

The striker struggled to make an impact in his final Group D appearance against Flamengo, but he did so in the final game for Chelsea.

Delap’s skillful touch and spin allowed him to cut inside and fire past goalkeeper Bechir Ben Said.

We needed to win, and it’s a great feeling, Delap said, “and to get a goal is a special feeling.”

Maresca continued, “We anticipated a quick turn-around for Liam because we already know him and he knows our game.”

He had three clear chances to score goals against Flamengo. That already makes him feel good because it indicates that he is in the right frame of mind.

In both of his first two games, winger Pedro Neto scored with quick, powerful dribbles.

Jackson’s red and Brazilian opposition

Nicolas Jackson is sent offReuters

After a disastrous six-minute collapse, where Jackson was forced to take the field after a subpar 3-1 defeat to Flamengo’s Lucas Ayrton, goals from Bruno Henrique and Danilo, cancelled out Neto’s early strike.

The 24-year-old, who was only on the field four minutes after replacing Delap, had already opened the door for his rival to begin the final group game due to his suspension.

Jackson will miss the final-16 tie against Benfica because he was later given a new match ban by world governing body Fifa.

Flamengo’s victory over Chelsea was deemed a “wake-up call” about the opposition level in South America, which enters the Club World Cup in the middle of the season, according to one source.

Logistics and heat are two factors.

After booking a base at Philadelphia Union’s Subaru Park stadium and training ground, Chelsea have the unfortunate experience of unseasonably warm weather.

It is “impossible” to train in temperatures of 40C, which are the highest temperature in the area in 13 years, according to Manager Maresca.

Chelsea have conducted “very brief” training sessions with giant fans spraying cold water and drinks breaks after each drill because there have been health warnings for vigorous physical outdoor activity.

What kind of revenue has Chelsea generated?

Before the Club World Cup, Chelsea qualified for the Champions League, which is worth between £80 million and £100 million and should result in a new lucrative front-of-shirt sponsorship deal.

Given that the Club World Cup is the most lucrative competition in club football per match, according to Fifa, they are on to a double windfall.

The Blues qualified for the tournament with just under $ 38 million (£28 million).

They defeated LAFC and ES Tunis to claim an additional $2 million for each victory in the group stage. In the round of 16, they will also be able to make $7.5 million, which will increase their total to $49.50.

There are additional offers of $ 31 million for quarter-final, $ 21 million for semi-final, and $ 30 million for final entry. The winner will receive an additional $ 40 million.

What are the fans’ opinions?

What about the fans, though, given that the bank balance has improved so far? 32, 967 people showed up for Chelsea’s final group game at the 67, 000-capacity Lincoln Financial Field.

One of them, Bharat from the Philadelphia Blues, told BBC Sport, “I haven’t had any complaints about the organization.

“I get some of the complaints about the player’s welfare,” I said. It will be interesting to see if they make any adjustments as they prepare for the World Cup in 2015’s dry run.

Cathy, a British Chelsea fan, hasn’t missed a game away from home for 47 years and was one of the few to travel to the US to continue her run.

She claimed that the competition’s quality and pricing are “overly high.”

It has only been watched by fans of the competition’s participating teams, which is Fifa’s own goal.

For the game against Benfica, the club has revealed that the club’s fans can purchase 500 lower tier tickets for $ 153 and 466 value tier tickets for $ 35 respectively.

related subjects

  • Chelsea
  • Premier League
  • Football

Delap, extreme heat & money – Chelsea’s Club World Cup so far

Reuters

Chelsea have navigated extreme heat, weather warnings and given debuts to four players in reaching the knockout stages of the Club World Cup.

The Blues have earned £28m thus far and will soon cover the £30m fee paid to sign striker Liam Delap from Ipswich earlier this month.

The new striker has impressed with a goal and an assist in his first three matches for the club on US soil while midfielders Andrey Santos and Dario Essugo have made their debuts in the competition – along with defender Mamadou Sarr.

But Chelsea also suffered a disappointing 3-1 defeat when manager Enzo Maresca experimented tactically against Brazilian giants Flamengo.

However, they comfortably beat weaker Group D duo Los Angeles FC and ES Tunis.

After finishing second, Chelsea will face Portuguese side Benfica, who defeated Bayern Munich 1-0 in their final group game.

Delap and Neto impress

Delap, who signed from Ipswich before the tournament, made his debut in the opening game against LAFC and was impressive. His chipped cross was his first assist for the club as he set up Enzo Fernandez’s second goal in a 2-0 win.

The striker struggled to make an impact on his first start in the following game against Flamengo, but scored his first goal for Chelsea in the final Group D match.

Delap’s deft touch and spin gave him space to cut inside and place his shot past goalkeeper Bechir Ben Said.

“It’s a great feeling, we needed to win and to get a goal is a special feeling,” said Delap.

Maresca added: “We expected the process to be quick with Liam because we know him and he knows us with the way we play.

“Against Flamengo he had three clear chances to score goals. That is already a good feeling because it means he is in the right position.”

Winger Pedro Neto excelled in the first two matches, scoring in both after rapid, powerful dribbles.

Jackson’s red and Brazilian opposition

Nicolas Jackson is sent offReuters

Jackson’s late studs-up challenge on Flamengo defender Lucas Ayrton at the end of a disastrous six-minute collapse, where goals from Bruno Henrique and Danilo cancelled out Neto’s early strike, put him in the firing line after a poor 3-1 defeat in the Blues’ second match.

The 24-year-old, on his birthday, had only been on the field four minutes after replacing Delap, with his suspension opening the door for his rival to also start the final group game.

Jackson was subsequently banned for a further match by world governing body Fifa, so will miss the last-16 tie against Benfica.

Chelsea were well-beaten by Flamengo with one source describing it as a “wake up call” about the level of South American opposition, who arrive at the Club World Cup mid-season.

Heat and logistics play their part

Chelsea have been unfortunate to encounter unseasonably warm heat after booking a base at Philadelphia Union’s Subaru Park stadium and training ground.

Manager Maresca has described it as “impossible” to train in temperatures reaching 40C, which rank as the highest felt in the area in 13 years.

There have been health warnings advising against strenuous physical outdoor activity, so Chelsea have conducted “very short” training sessions with giant fans spraying cold water and drinks breaks after every drill.

How much money have Chelsea made?

Chelsea qualified for the Champions League – which is worth between £80m and £100m and should attract a new lucrative front-of-shirt sponsorship deal – before the Club World Cup.

But they are on for a double windfall, given the Club World Cup is the most lucrative competition in club football on a per match basis, according to Fifa.

The Blues made just under $38m (£28m) for qualifying for the tournament.

They earned another $2m for each win in the group stage, beating LAFC and ES Tunis. They will also earn $7.5m when facing Benfica in the round of 16, which takes their total to $49.5m.

There is a further $13.1m on offer for reaching the quarter-final, $21m for the semi-final and $30m for reaching the final. A further $40m is reserved for the winner.

What do the fans think?

It’s been a good tournament so far for the bank balance, but what about the fans? A total of 32,967 attended Chelsea’s final group game at the 67,000-capacity Lincoln Financial Field.

Bharat from the Philly Blues was one of them, and told BBC Sport: “I haven’t had any complaints about the organisation.

“I can understand some of the complaints about player welfare. It feels like they are using this competition as a dry run for next year’s World Cup and it will be interesting to see if they make any changes.”

UK-based Chelsea fan Cathy hasn’t missed an away game for 47 years and was one of the few to travel to the United States to continue her run.

“The pricing is too high considering the quality of some teams in the competition,” she said.

“It has left only fans of the teams involved in the competition interested in watching it and that is an own goal by Fifa.”

The club has revealed the club’s fans have access to 500 lower tier tickets priced at $153 and 466 value tier tickets priced at $35 for the game against Benfica.

Related topics

  • Chelsea
  • Premier League
  • Football

Delap, extreme heat & money – Chelsea’s Club World Cup so far

Reuters

Chelsea have navigated extreme heat, weather warnings and given debuts to four players in reaching the knockout stages of the Club World Cup.

The Blues have earned £28m thus far and will soon cover the £30m fee paid to sign striker Liam Delap from Ipswich earlier this month.

The new striker has impressed with a goal and an assist in his first three matches for the club on US soil while midfielders Andrey Santos and Dario Essugo have made their debuts in the competition – along with defender Mamadou Sarr.

But Chelsea also suffered a disappointing 3-1 defeat when manager Enzo Maresca experimented tactically against Brazilian giants Flamengo.

However, they comfortably beat weaker Group D duo Los Angeles FC and ES Tunis.

After finishing second, Chelsea will face Portuguese side Benfica, who defeated Bayern Munich 1-0 in their final group game.

Delap and Neto impress

Delap, who signed from Ipswich before the tournament, made his debut in the opening game against LAFC and was impressive. His chipped cross was his first assist for the club as he set up Enzo Fernandez’s second goal in a 2-0 win.

The striker struggled to make an impact on his first start in the following game against Flamengo, but scored his first goal for Chelsea in the final Group D match.

Delap’s deft touch and spin gave him space to cut inside and place his shot past goalkeeper Bechir Ben Said.

“It’s a great feeling, we needed to win and to get a goal is a special feeling,” said Delap.

Maresca added: “We expected the process to be quick with Liam because we know him and he knows us with the way we play.

“Against Flamengo he had three clear chances to score goals. That is already a good feeling because it means he is in the right position.”

Winger Pedro Neto excelled in the first two matches, scoring in both after rapid, powerful dribbles.

Jackson’s red and Brazilian opposition

Nicolas Jackson is sent offReuters

Jackson’s late studs-up challenge on Flamengo defender Lucas Ayrton at the end of a disastrous six-minute collapse, where goals from Bruno Henrique and Danilo cancelled out Neto’s early strike, put him in the firing line after a poor 3-1 defeat in the Blues’ second match.

The 24-year-old, on his birthday, had only been on the field four minutes after replacing Delap, with his suspension opening the door for his rival to also start the final group game.

Jackson was subsequently banned for a further match by world governing body Fifa, so will miss the last-16 tie against Benfica.

Chelsea were well-beaten by Flamengo with one source describing it as a “wake up call” about the level of South American opposition, who arrive at the Club World Cup mid-season.

Heat and logistics play their part

Chelsea have been unfortunate to encounter unseasonably warm heat after booking a base at Philadelphia Union’s Subaru Park stadium and training ground.

Manager Maresca has described it as “impossible” to train in temperatures reaching 40C, which rank as the highest felt in the area in 13 years.

There have been health warnings advising against strenuous physical outdoor activity, so Chelsea have conducted “very short” training sessions with giant fans spraying cold water and drinks breaks after every drill.

How much money have Chelsea made?

Chelsea qualified for the Champions League – which is worth between £80m and £100m and should attract a new lucrative front-of-shirt sponsorship deal – before the Club World Cup.

But they are on for a double windfall, given the Club World Cup is the most lucrative competition in club football on a per match basis, according to Fifa.

The Blues made just under $38m (£28m) for qualifying for the tournament.

They earned another $2m for each win in the group stage, beating LAFC and ES Tunis. They will also earn $7.5m when facing Benfica in the round of 16, which takes their total to $49.5m.

There is a further $13.1m on offer for reaching the quarter-final, $21m for the semi-final and $30m for reaching the final. A further $40m is reserved for the winner.

What do the fans think?

It’s been a good tournament so far for the bank balance, but what about the fans? A total of 32,967 attended Chelsea’s final group game at the 67,000-capacity Lincoln Financial Field.

Bharat from the Philly Blues was one of them, and told BBC Sport: “I haven’t had any complaints about the organisation.

“I can understand some of the complaints about player welfare. It feels like they are using this competition as a dry run for next year’s World Cup and it will be interesting to see if they make any changes.”

UK-based Chelsea fan Cathy hasn’t missed an away game for 47 years and was one of the few to travel to the United States to continue her run.

“The pricing is too high considering the quality of some teams in the competition,” she said.

“It has left only fans of the teams involved in the competition interested in watching it and that is an own goal by Fifa.”

The club has revealed the club’s fans have access to 500 lower tier tickets priced at $153 and 466 value tier tickets priced at $35 for the game against Benfica.

Related topics

  • Chelsea
  • Premier League
  • Football

Delap, extreme heat & money – Chelsea’s Club World Cup so far

Reuters

Chelsea have navigated extreme heat, weather warnings and given debuts to four players in reaching the knockout stages of the Club World Cup.

The Blues have earned £28m thus far and will soon cover the £30m fee paid to sign striker Liam Delap from Ipswich earlier this month.

The new striker has impressed with a goal and an assist in his first three matches for the club on US soil while midfielders Andrey Santos and Dario Essugo have made their debuts in the competition – along with defender Mamadou Sarr.

But Chelsea also suffered a disappointing 3-1 defeat when manager Enzo Maresca experimented tactically against Brazilian giants Flamengo.

However, they comfortably beat weaker Group D duo Los Angeles FC and ES Tunis.

After finishing second, Chelsea will face Portuguese side Benfica, who defeated Bayern Munich 1-0 in their final group game.

Delap and Neto impress

Delap, who signed from Ipswich before the tournament, made his debut in the opening game against LAFC and was impressive. His chipped cross was his first assist for the club as he set up Enzo Fernandez’s second goal in a 2-0 win.

The striker struggled to make an impact on his first start in the following game against Flamengo, but scored his first goal for Chelsea in the final Group D match.

Delap’s deft touch and spin gave him space to cut inside and place his shot past goalkeeper Bechir Ben Said.

“It’s a great feeling, we needed to win and to get a goal is a special feeling,” said Delap.

Maresca added: “We expected the process to be quick with Liam because we know him and he knows us with the way we play.

“Against Flamengo he had three clear chances to score goals. That is already a good feeling because it means he is in the right position.”

Winger Pedro Neto excelled in the first two matches, scoring in both after rapid, powerful dribbles.

Jackson’s red and Brazilian opposition

Nicolas Jackson is sent offReuters

Jackson’s late studs-up challenge on Flamengo defender Lucas Ayrton at the end of a disastrous six-minute collapse, where goals from Bruno Henrique and Danilo cancelled out Neto’s early strike, put him in the firing line after a poor 3-1 defeat in the Blues’ second match.

The 24-year-old, on his birthday, had only been on the field four minutes after replacing Delap, with his suspension opening the door for his rival to also start the final group game.

Jackson was subsequently banned for a further match by world governing body Fifa, so will miss the last-16 tie against Benfica.

Chelsea were well-beaten by Flamengo with one source describing it as a “wake up call” about the level of South American opposition, who arrive at the Club World Cup mid-season.

Heat and logistics play their part

Chelsea have been unfortunate to encounter unseasonably warm heat after booking a base at Philadelphia Union’s Subaru Park stadium and training ground.

Manager Maresca has described it as “impossible” to train in temperatures reaching 40C, which rank as the highest felt in the area in 13 years.

There have been health warnings advising against strenuous physical outdoor activity, so Chelsea have conducted “very short” training sessions with giant fans spraying cold water and drinks breaks after every drill.

How much money have Chelsea made?

Chelsea qualified for the Champions League – which is worth between £80m and £100m and should attract a new lucrative front-of-shirt sponsorship deal – before the Club World Cup.

But they are on for a double windfall, given the Club World Cup is the most lucrative competition in club football on a per match basis, according to Fifa.

The Blues made just under $38m (£28m) for qualifying for the tournament.

They earned another $2m for each win in the group stage, beating LAFC and ES Tunis. They will also earn $7.5m when facing Benfica in the round of 16, which takes their total to $49.5m.

There is a further $13.1m on offer for reaching the quarter-final, $21m for the semi-final and $30m for reaching the final. A further $40m is reserved for the winner.

What do the fans think?

It’s been a good tournament so far for the bank balance, but what about the fans? A total of 32,967 attended Chelsea’s final group game at the 67,000-capacity Lincoln Financial Field.

Bharat from the Philly Blues was one of them, and told BBC Sport: “I haven’t had any complaints about the organisation.

“I can understand some of the complaints about player welfare. It feels like they are using this competition as a dry run for next year’s World Cup and it will be interesting to see if they make any changes.”

UK-based Chelsea fan Cathy hasn’t missed an away game for 47 years and was one of the few to travel to the United States to continue her run.

“The pricing is too high considering the quality of some teams in the competition,” she said.

“It has left only fans of the teams involved in the competition interested in watching it and that is an own goal by Fifa.”

The club has revealed the club’s fans have access to 500 lower tier tickets priced at $153 and 466 value tier tickets priced at $35 for the game against Benfica.

Related topics

  • Chelsea
  • Premier League
  • Football

Will ‘sport’s best dressed officials’ be missed at Wimbledon?

Thomas Sweeney’s first incentive to become a line judge was the offer of a free sandwich.

For Pauline Eyre, who called the lines at Wimbledon for 16 years, some natty blazers and the chance to buy tickets for the tournament were the main recompense for work she had to take annual leave to do.

Nowadays the best officials might earn up to £200 a day plus expenses.

But line judging has never been about the money for those who spend hours leaning forward, hands resting on knees, staring intently at a line of chalk to determine in a split second on which side of it the yellow ball has bounced.

Being so close to Jana Novotna on Centre Court that she could see her foot shaking on the first point of a Wimbledon final or being “psyched out” by John McEnroe were priceless experiences for Eyre.

And then there were the outfits.

“There’s nothing quite like walking out on to the iconic grass courts at SW19, wearing the uniform of what many consider the best-dressed officials in all of sport,” Malgorzata Grzyb, chair of the Association of British Tennis Officials (ABTO), told BBC Sport.

But times have changed. Next week at Wimbledon there will be no line judges for the first time in its 148-year history, with electronic line calling being introduced.

Players and umpires have already got used to the new set-up as it has been at other tournaments for a while, but on the green grass at Wimbledon, where advertising logos are muted and the players are dressed in white, the emptier courts may feel that bit more noticeable.

“It’s all the tradition of Wimbledon – the people and the funny uniforms – and that’s a bit of personality that’s gone,” said Eyre. “I think it’s all of those little things that made Wimbledon Wimbledon.”

Traditionalists will miss them, but technology fans will point to progress.

Challenges are ‘out’

“Mr Djokovic is challenging the call on the right baseline; the ball was called out.”

There was often a buzz of excitement when the umpire signalled there would be a video replay of a line judge’s decision.

The rhythmic clap-clap-clapping built up to the moment being shown on the big screen, and the obligatory “ooooooooh” followed when the split-second judgement of the human eye was laid bare to a packed arena and millions watching on TV.

More than 14,000 pairs of eyes on Centre Court could bore into the line judge who had been wrong by less than the width of a blade of grass. But when the official was shown to be correct, their poker faces had to fight the urge to look even mildly smug.

This year players can still ask for a replay on the screen, although fans’ gasps will be over the depiction of a ‘close call’ rather than a verdict on human instinct versus technology. And, if recent tournaments are anything to go by, their laughs may be at the delayed reaction for some of the “out” calls.

Paul Hawkins, inventor of the Hawk-Eye technology that was first introduced at Wimbledon in 2007, said the challenge system had probably “had its day” with fans.

“When it was new, there was certainly more excitement – people kind of got into it,” he said.

PA Media

Some line judges are still ‘in’

The absence of line judges now gives players fewer people to take out their frustrations on, with Eyre remembering being “yelled at” by players and being hit by many balls.

Djokovic was disqualified from the 2020 US Open for accidentally hitting a ball at a line judge, while last year Andrey Rublev was defaulted in Dubai for screaming in the face of one.

Not all of the 300 line judges who have been cut will be out of work at Wimbledon, with about 80 being used as ‘match assistants’ who are on hand in case the technology fails and will also undertake duties such as escorting players who need to leave the court.

But their opportunities to work at big tournaments are dwindling, with the French Open now the only one of the four Grand Slams not using electronic line calling.

The men’s ATP Tour and the combined ATP/WTA tournaments introduced the technology this year and WTA-only events are moving in that direction.

Eyre fears this could have an impact on the quality of umpiring in years to come since line judging is a pathway to becoming a chair umpire.

“Why would you go to call the lines at Finchley Tennis Club under-12s if you haven’t got that carrot of ‘maybe one day I can get to call lines at Wimbledon’?” said Eyre, who called the lines in 12 Wimbledon finals in the 1990s and 2000s and is now a comedian touring a show about her line judge experiences.

However, Grzyb says the development pathway for officials has evolved and stressed that line judges are still used at many events below the top tier of tennis.

“Instead of starting solely as line umpires, new officials now receive training in both line and chair umpiring from the outset, enabling them to progress more rapidly to chair umpire roles,” the ABTO chair said.

Andrey Rublev shouts at line umpireGetty Images

‘Out… I think’ – You cannot be serious!

Being a line judge usually means being able to stand for a long period of time and, crucially, bellow out the call in a way that makes it obvious what is happening.

As British number one Jack Draper found out at Queen’s, the automated calls cannot always be heard over a raucous crowd.

Set point to take his semi-final to a decider was met with confusion as neither Draper nor the crowd were sure whether there had been an “out” call.

With players also no longer able to rely on the line judges’ arm gestures to indicate if the ball is out, Eyre says the voices used at the grass-court tournament were not loud enough.

“They have used very calm voices – it sort of sounds like the voice isn’t sure,” she said.

“Sort of like it’s saying ‘out… I think’. It feels a bit awkward. That’s very different psychologically, not hearing something sharp.”

And while some prefer the technology – Briton Heather Watson recently said a bad experience with line judges’ calls at Birmingham “ruined the match” – others are unsure.

Compatriot Sonay Kartal said she struggled at the Australian Open as she could hear automated calls from the other courts, leading to confusion and even players stopping the point because they thought the call was on their court.

It is not yet known what the voices of the Wimbledon calls will sound like, with the tournament using the voices of some of its behind-the-scenes staff and tour guides. The All England Club will be using different voices on different courts to avoid confusion between neighbouring courts.

It would have been great if the booming voice of McEnroe himself had been one of the voices, Eyre suggests.

What information do we collect from this quiz?

Could umpires be next to go?

First it was a pencil, paper and a stopwatch. Then came an electronic scoring system and next Hawk-Eye.

As technology continues to develop, the need for human intervention diminishes.

So what will go next? Chair umpires?

Seven-time Grand Slam singles champion McEnroe, known for his on-court outbursts, has previously suggested getting rid of umpires and relying on the technology.

Sweeney – he of the free sandwich – is now a chair umpire who oversaw the 2023 women’s French Open final.

He has overseen numerous matches on Wimbledon’s Centre Court and cannot imagine time being called on umpires in top-level tennis any time soon.

“There will always be that need to have a human to facilitate at the end of where technology has its limitations,” Sweeney said.

“There are aspects to life that can’t be prepared for, and you need that human to be able to absorb pressure, provide the opportunity for understanding and empathy for a player, and to be able to help, guide and govern how the court itself operates.”

But with nine fewer people on court during matches, Sweeney said it “can feel a bit lonely out there” after the “tradition of living the match together and encouraging each other to stay focused”.

Ball kids and match officials are still on hand to assist with tasks like fetching towels for players or facilitating bathroom breaks, while one review official monitors the line technology.

Related topics

  • Tennis

Will ‘sport’s best dressed officials’ be missed at Wimbledon?

Thomas Sweeney’s first incentive to become a line judge was the offer of a free sandwich.

The main recompense for her work was taking annual leave of absence, for Pauline Eyre, who had been playing tennis for 16 years.

The best officials today could make up to £200 per day plus expenses.

But line judging has never been about the money for those who spend hours leaning forward, hands resting on knees, staring intently at a line of chalk to determine in a split second on which side of it the yellow ball has bounced.

For Eyre, having been so close to Jana Novotna on Centre Court that she could see her foot swaying in the Wimbledon final first point or being “psyched out” by John McEnroe was priceless.

The outfits followed, too.

“There’s nothing quite like walking out on to the iconic grass courts at SW19, wearing the uniform of what many consider the best-dressed officials in all of sport”, Malgorzata Grzyb, chair of the Association of British Tennis Officials (ABTO), told BBC Sport.

However, times have changed. Electronic line calling will be used for the first time in its 148-year history at Wimbledon, which will result in no line judges.

Players and umpires have already got used to the new set-up as it has been at other tournaments for a while, but on the green grass at Wimbledon, where advertising logos are muted and the players are dressed in white, the emptier courts may feel that bit more noticeable.

Eyre said, “It’s all the tradition of Wimbledon, with the people and the funny uniforms,” and that’s lost some of the personality. “I believe it’s all those little things that made Wimbledon Wimbledon,” she said.

Traditionalists will miss them, but technology fans will point to progress.

Challenges are “out.”

“Mr Djokovic is challenging the call on the right baseline, the ball was called out”.

When the umpire indicated that a line judge’s decision would be re-aired on video, there was frequently a buzz of excitement.

The rhythmic “ooooooh” followed when the human eye’s judgment was revealed to a packed arena and millions of viewers. The rhythmic “clap-clap-clap-clapping built up to the moment being shown on the big screen.

More than 14, 000 pairs of eyes on Centre Court could bore into the line judge who had been wrong by less than the width of a blade of grass. However, when the official was proven to be accurate, they had to resist the urge to appear even mildly arrogant.

Fans will gasp over the depiction of a “close call” rather than a verdict on human instinct versus technology, even though players can still request a replay this year. And, if recent tournaments are anything to go by, their laughs may be at the delayed reaction for some of the “out” calls.

The challenge system had probably “had its day” with fans, according to Paul Hawkins, the creator of the Hawk-Eye technology, which was first used at Wimbledon in 2007.

People “kind of got into it” when it was new, he said.

PA Media

Some line judges are still “in” with the judges.

The absence of line judges now gives players fewer people to take out their frustrations on, with Eyre remembering being “yelled at” by players and being hit by many balls.

Andrey Rublev was defaulted in Dubai last year for screaming in the face of a judge, while Djokovic was disqualified from the 2020 US Open for hitting a ball accidentally.

About 80 of the 300 line judges who have been cut will no longer be employed at Wimbledon, serving as “match assistants” who are on hand if the technology fails. They will also take on duties like escorting players who need to leave the court.

But their opportunities to work at big tournaments are dwindling, with the French Open now the only one of the four Grand Slams not using electronic line calling.

This year, the technology was introduced by the men’s ATP Tour and the combined ATP/WTA competitions, and only WTA-only competitions are doing so.

Eyre worries that this will affect the standard of umpiring in the future because line judging is a way to become a chair umpire.

“Why would you go to call the lines at Finchley Tennis Club under-12s if you haven’t got that carrot of ‘ maybe one day I can get to call lines at Wimbledon'”? Eyre, who contested the lines in 12 Wimbledon finals in the 1990s and 2000s while currently touring as a comedian, described her line-jumping career.

Grzyb points out that line judges are still used at many events below the top level of tennis and that the development process for officials has changed.

“Instead of starting solely as line umpires, new officials now receive training in both line and chair umpiring from the outset, enabling them to progress more rapidly to chair umpire roles”, the ABTO chair said.

Andrey Rublev shouts at line umpireGetty Images

‘ Out… You can’t be serious, I believe!

Being a line judge typically requires being able to stand for a long time and, crucially, to bellow the call in a way that makes it clear what is happening.

As British number one Jack Draper found out at Queen’s, the automated calls cannot always be heard over a raucous crowd.

No one in the crowd was sure whether there had been an “out” call, so Draper’s attempt to take his semi-final to a decider was met with confusion.

The voices used at the grass-court tournament, according to Eyre, were not loud enough for the players because they were also unable to rely on the line judges’ arm gestures to indicate whether the ball was out.

“They have used very calm voices – it sort of sounds like the voice isn’t sure”, she said.

“Sort of like it says “out,” I believe. It’s a little awkward, I think. That’s very different psychologically, not hearing something sharp”.

And while some prefer the technology, some are unsure, as Briton Heather Watson recently remarked about how bad it had been with Birmingham’s line judges’ calls.

Sonay Kartal, a compatriot, claimed she struggled at the Australian Open because she could hear automated calls coming from other courts, which created confusion and even caused players to pause while imagining the call was coming from their court.

It is not yet known what the voices of the Wimbledon calls will sound like, with the tournament using the voices of some of its behind-the-scenes staff and tour guides. To avoid confusion between neighboring courts, The All England Club will use various voices on various courts.

Eyre suggests that it would have been great if McEnroe himself had a booming voice among the others.

What information do we collect from this quiz?

Could the umpires be the ones leaving?

A stopwatch, paper, and a pencil were all first. Then came an electronic scoring system and next Hawk-Eye.

The need for human intervention decreases as technology improves.

What will happen next, then? Chair umpires?

McEnroe, a seven-time Grand Slam champion known for his verbal outbursts, has previously suggested eliminating the umpires and using technology as a substitute.

Sweeney, the man behind the free sandwich, is now the chair umpire for the 2023 French Open final.

He has overseen numerous matches on Wimbledon’s Centre Court and cannot imagine time being called on umpires in top-level tennis any time soon.

At the end of any situation where technology has its limitations, there will always be a need for a human to assist, Sweeney said.

There are circumstances in life that cannot be anticipated, and you need that person to be able to handle pressure, provide opportunities for understanding and empathy for a player, and be able to advise and direct the operation of the court itself.

But with nine fewer people on court during matches, Sweeney said it “can feel a bit lonely out there” after the “tradition of living the match together and encouraging each other to stay focused”.

One review official monitors the line technology while one ball kid and match officials are still available to help with tasks like getting towels for players or facilitating bathroom breaks.

related subjects

  • Tennis