Paul “Bonehead” Arthurs, an oasis musician, has been diagnosed with prostate cancer. He shared the news with his fans on X: “I was first diagnosed with prostate cancer earlier this year.
The good news is that I’m receiving treatment so well that I could participate in this incredible tour. I’ll be missing the gigs in Seoul, Tokyo, Melbourne, and Sydney because I have a planned break for the next phase of my care right now.
*This is a significant piece of showbiz news. Follow The Mirror on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, Twitter, Apple News, TikTok, Follow The Mirror on Facebook, Follow Us on Twitter, and Follow The Mirror on Twitter.
The United States has launched a fourth “lethal, kinetic strike” on a boat in the Caribbean Sea, accusing the vessel of carrying narcotics, according to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
Hegseth identified the attack as occurring close to Venezuela in a video posted on the social media platform X on Friday.
A small, narrow boat is captured on video clipping across the waves before the air strike stops and totes the ship’s flames.
Hegseth stated that he was in charge of the attack. No U.S. forces were hurt in the operation, according to he wrote, “Four male narco-terrorists aboard the vessel were killed in the strike.”
The vessel was delivering significant amounts of narcotics to America to poison our people, according to the statement from the strike, which was carried out in international waters just off Venezuela’s coast.
The most recent attack comes after three other similar US airstrikes occurred last month, the first of which occurred on September 2. In that initial attack, eleven people died. Three people were killed in a second and third strike, on September 15 and 19, respectively.
No supporting supporting evidence has been provided for those claims, and the suspects have not yet been identified. In each case, President Donald Trump’s administration has argued that the boats’ occupants were narcotics traffickers heading to the US.
Hegseth, who claimed the US intelligence community had located the most recent target, made the same claim in his announcement on Friday.
He also made a pledge to continue conducting airstrikes on ships in the Caribbean region until the end of drug trafficking.
According to Hegseth, “Our intelligence unquestionably demonstrated that this vessel was operating on a known narco-trafficking transit route, that the people on board were narco-terrorists,” according to Hegseth. “These strikes will continue until the American people’s attacks are over,” he declares. “!
However, legal experts have cautioned that the attacks appear to be in violation of international law, which largely forbids extrajudicial killings when carried out in isolation.
Lamine Yamal, a winger for Barcelona, will miss next week’s World Cup qualifying games against Georgia and Bulgaria because he injured his groin. He will miss “two to three weeks.”
The 18-year-old, who was first injured on international duty in September when the problem first appeared on international duty in September, made his first appearance since coming off the bench to help Barcelona defeat Real Sociedad 2-1 on Sunday.
After Yamal played in Barcelona’s Champions League defeat on Wednesday against Paris St-Germain, the injury started to rekindle.
Following the game against PSG, Barcelona stated: “Lamine Yamal’s groin issue has returned.
Yamal’s second layoff marks the latest in a long-running dispute between the club and the nation regarding care of the youngster, who has made four assists and two goals this season in five Barcelona appearances.
After Yamal was initially ruled out, Barcelona manager Hansi Flick said, “Spain, they have the best team in the world, best players in the world.”
They may want to take care of our young players, but it seems like they are doing this to them.
What if… is a question that has been pondered for a long time. Over the next few months, Al Jazeera will explore some of the biggest challenges of our time and ask leading experts: “What if…”
According to Donald Trump, the president of the United States has given Hamas a Sunday deadline to reach a deal that would allow Israel to stay in some of Gaza’s regions and put an end to its war with Gaza.
Recommended Stories
list of 3 itemsend of list
Critics question whether the ceasefire agreement, which was reached last year, will actually stop Israel and bring peace to Gaza. They point to Israel’s continued attacks on Lebanon and its ongoing raids on the occupied West Bank.
Many people anticipate that Israel will continue its military assault on Gaza, killing more than 66, 000 Palestinians, if it succeeds.
That’s despite global condemnation of Israel.
A UN commission echoed the conclusions of international human rights organizations that Israel’s war was a genocidal war. Soon after, the European Union suggested that Israel’s trade agreements with the bloc be suspended. And a UN-backed body concluded in August that Israel had inflicted a man-made famine on the enclave.
In September, several of Israel’s traditional allies, including France, the UK, and Canada, recognized Palestine as a state, following Norway, Spain, and Ireland, who did the same last year.
Israel has also been decried by individual lawmakers. Last month, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez called for Israel to be expelled from global sporting bodies “until the barbarity ends”. Natasa Pirc Musar, Slovenia’s president, referred to Israel’s actions as “genocide” in May.
What if these nations collaborated to stop attacking and leaving Gaza, even with US support, and proceeded further?
We asked four experts: Michael Lynk, a professor in international law at the University of Western Ontario, Michael Becker, a professor of international human rights law at Trinity College Dublin, who has previously worked at the International Court of Justice, Nick Cull, a historian and authority on cultural boycotts at the University of Southern California, and Daniele Bianchi, an economist and expert on sanctions at Queen Mary University of London.
The UN could do what, exactly?
There is precedent for this, and the UN is still the most effective way to stop Israel’s actions in Gaza.
” Israel is in breach of the UN Charter, the 1948 UN Convention against Genocide and the 1998 Rome Statute, which many members signed up to. In all of these agreements, states are legally required to take action when there is genocide or atrocity committed.
Only the Houthis in Yemen, one of the poorest nations in the world, are currently using drones, cutting cables, and blocking shipping.
” In 1950, the UN General Assembly passed the Uniting for Peace Resolution to intervene in Korea. The USSR had vetoed every previous attempt to take action through the Security Council. After receiving the unanimous support of the General Assembly, the United Nations was able to intervene legally in the Korean conflict, restore South Korea’s independence, and help end the world’s longest war.
“Seventy-five years later, that precedent can still be used. It might appoint a military force to attack Gaza, a place where the UN has previously declared that Israel has no place to be in like other occupied areas. A UN force would be able to begin humanitarian aid, begin reconstruction, restore utilities like water and electricity, and engage in negotiations for some form of interim rule.
” It is also possible for the UN, under Article 6 of the UN Charter, to eject members who have persistently violated its principles, but that requires the support of the Security Council (and the United States). The US, France, and the UK vetoed numerous attempts to remove South Africa from the UN in the 1970s.
“Unfortunately, the General Assembly passed a resolution that effectively forbade South Africa from its position for 20 years. It is time for the Assembly to consider undertaking the same action with regard to Israel”.- Michael Lynk
Without the UN, what could individual states do?
“This has no good responses,” he said. Concepts like humanitarian intervention and the responsibility to protect have generated a lot of interest since the 1990s, but it remains the mainstream view that the lawful use of force requires UN Security Council authorisation or a valid claim of self-defence.
All parties are required to refrain from genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention, but this does not establish a separate legal framework for forced intervention.
“Collective self-defense or the comparable concept of “intervention by invitation” are other considerations.” This possibility depends on Palestine being recognised as a state that can exercise its sovereignty by inviting third states to participate in a campaign of self-defence against Israel.
The majority of instances don’t involve state-to-state armed conflicts, but rather non-international armed conflicts (such as when State A requests State B to conduct military operations on its territory against an insurgent group).
The DRC and Uganda had a disagreement over the invitation when it withdrew it in the 1990s, which led to the resignation of Ugandan troops and the DRC’s refusal to accept it.
The US-led coalition conducted extensive operations against the Islamic State within Iraq at the government’s invitation]Thaier Al-Sudani/Reuters]
The US-led coalition against ISIL (ISIS) in Iraqi territory, which was run with Iraq’s consent, is one more recent examples. The legal justification for ISIL’s prosecution was much more complex in Syria.
“Could Palestine invite a state to come to its aid tomorrow? If Palestine itself asserts that it is acting in self-defense under Article 51, I suppose it could.
However, this raises some complex problems. For one, it is not clear who speaks for the State of Palestine. A statement by Hamas, a non-state actor with governmental authority in Gaza, that it is engaged in self-defence may not have legal weight if this is the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah. I’m not entirely sure how the law of occupation might fit into this. “– Michael Becker
What might trade restrictions and sanctions accomplish?
Think of Russia. It has already been subject to sanctions by the world, but it is still surviving thanks to China’s support. I imagine that sanctions on Israel would be similarly undone by the US.
Sanctions or trade embargos may hurt Israel, but not stop it, according to the reality that sanctions or trade embargos might be implemented without the support of the US, which is Israel’s largest export partner.
“You’d be able to inflict some damage on the Israeli economy, but you’d be improbable to stop it, if you combined China, the EU, and perhaps India.”
“You also need to look at the type of exports Israel relies upon. It doesn’t really export goods like technology, which aren’t as easily replaced, but rather items like technology, which can be boycotted.
Israel’s economy is still prospering even after 22 months of war. Debt is a problem, and the economy is not growing at the rate it was, but all those people, including me, who predicted its collapse look to have been off the mark. – Daniele Bianchi
What might the general public do?
” Cultural and sporting boycotts work to both change public opinion in their subject country and rally opinion against it.
Cultural boycotts are a way to let the people in a country know that their behavior is so unacceptable that it should not be tolerated. It helps them avoid giving the impression that they are “just another country” or that every other nation has issues with human rights.
” For South Africa, the idea was first proposed by a man called Trevor Huddleston, who suggested a cultural boycott in 1954, but it was the UN General Assembly that established it a decade later in 1968.
The development of international relations is characterized by “a slow and steady component.” Academicians are aware that, unlike most people and governments, national reputations typically grow and develop over many years or even decades.
The Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement is working to end international support for Israel’s oppression of Palestinians and to pressure Israel to comply with international law]Martin Pope/SOPA Images/LightRocket]
“Cultural boycotts are conducted in accordance with the same guidelines. They serve for years as a drag on a national reputation, hiding the truth behind their status as a pariah, and denying normality.
“Mandela himself referred to the Apartheid state as the world’s skunk.
Lamine Yamal has a recurring groin injury that prevented him from playing for Spain against Georgia and Bulgaria this month.
The 18-year-old winger is expected to miss three weeks after the problem resurfaced following Wednesday’s 2-1 Champions League defeat to Paris Saint-Germain, the La Liga club announced in a statement on Friday.
Recommended Stories
list of 3 itemsend of list
Following the game against PSG, Lamine Yamal’s groin issue has returned. The player will miss [Sunday’s] game against Sevilla, according to Barcelona, and his recovery time is thought to be between two and three weeks.
Yamal, who had just returned from a three-week layoff to help Barcelona beat Real Sociedad last weekend, played the full 90 minutes against PSG, in a particularly cruel situation.
After missing four games while recovering from a groin injury, Yamal made his first start in that game since August. Barcelona coach Hansi Flick criticized him, who claimed it had been worsened by playing in the World Cup qualifiers in September.
After criticizing the national team’s handling of the teenager, Spain coach Luis de la Fuente earlier on Friday stated that he had no issues with Flick.
“Flick and I don’t have a conflict. Because he has been a national team coach, de la Fuente said after announcing his squad for the upcoming qualifiers, “I was simply surprised by those statements.”
You are aware that our two crucial matches, which are World Cup matches, are important. They appear to be playing in the background and discussing Flick.
The fact that we are competing in the World Cup is what really matters. The rest is unimportant. Everyone made up their minds, and that is it.
Flick claimed that he and de la Fuente had only exchanged a brief text message at the time, but their communication could have been improved.
De la Fuente tried to draw a line under the situation in an effort to make it clearer.
He complained that he felt uncomfortable when the game came to an end. But I’ve never felt pain while playing. He claimed that nothing had happened.
Both our medical staff and I have explained it. Nothing more. After the game, did he experience any discomfort? I’m not sure, I suppose.
Yamal’s future is uncertain due to his most recent injury, which also leaves him unsure of his ability to play against Real Madrid on October 26.
Next week, Spain will also be without Nico Williams and Dani Carvajal, and Alvaro Morata will not be included in the squad due to Como’s slow start to the season.
Williams, an athletic Bilbao winger, hasn’t played since picking up a groin injury in the 6-0 win over Turkiye. His team reportedly requested that his playing time be managed because he was sore.
“Sports and football always have a risk.” He assumes those risks if he plays for his club. De la Fuente said, “We are talking about completely normal situations.”
Ally McCoist, the ex-Ibrox manager, made a point during a television broadcast about Rangers’ Europa League defeat by Sturm Graz.
“Why do you get rid of Giovanni van Bronckhorst?” is the question that is obvious. He said something unexpectedly.
Why should you get rid of a man who won the penalty-heavy European final?
They have a significant backwards, I tell them, but it hurts me to say that.
Van Bronckhorst’s dismissal in November 2022, after only 12 months in charge, was a reference to McCoist’s statement.
He had won the first Scottish Cup in 13 years and had already helped Rangers reach the Europa League final when they agonized over Eintracht Frankfurt.
Following Thursday’s 2-1 defeat, McCoist’s point gave people pause to consider. It’s easy to disagree with his claim that, under Michael Beale, Philippe Clement, and now in the early stages of Russell Martin’s tenure, there hasn’t been much progress at Ibrox.
Rangers have come a long way from where they were after hiring and firing in recent years. Repeating the process with the same result.
The lesson from McCoist’s point, perhaps unintended, may be that, especially when it is very early in a project, change isn’t always the right choice.
Van Bronckhorst only received a year’s worth of awards despite achieving European glory. Martin’s bank has far less fan goodwill than Martin.
Similar issues with the new regime
Rangers are now, of course, under new leadership following the US-led acquisition by Chairman Andrew Cavenagh and 49er Enterprises.
They are very much responsible for Martin’s appointment, but they cannot be held accountable for previous decisions.
Rangers’ CEO Patrick Stewart stated at the unveiling that “we wanted a coach who will excel in terms of how we want to play, improve our culture, develop our squad, and ultimately win games.” Russell made a strong choice.
We think Russell can enhance on-pitch performance while also fostering the culture and infrastructure necessary for consistent and long-term success, Cavenagh said.
SNS
Van Bronckhorst’s demise is where many people wanted him, but not with the same ferocity as Martin does.
How many people would welcome him back today or wish to travel to a time when the European finals seemed feasible?
After a brief spell at Besiktas, Dutch manager Arne Slot appointed him as Anfield assistant manager this summer, showing that his credentials are highly valued by English Premier League-winning manager Arne Slot.
However, Steven Gerrard’s long-awaited Scottish title and uninspiring domestic displays balanced his high points.
Although Rangers were unprepared for that stage at the time, and the financial boost was most appreciated, it only added to their woes.
There is no denying that former Heart of Midlothian and Dundee United head coach Robbie Neilson had a say in the Scottish Football Podcast when he said, “We are starting to spiral and we’re getting to that point where the players’ negative attitude is definitely having an impact.”
“Wining football games is the only way to turn that,” he said. The only way they can win is if they can get the squad to win six, seven, and eight consecutive victories.
Russell Martin appears to have put “a lot of pressure” on himself to try to discredit the players.
“But I believe it’s starting to hurt the players as well right now because it’s at an extreme stage.”
However, Martin and the board are disputing previously unobserved levels of negativity. The support is encircled by an all-consuming crescendo of evil will that extends far and wide.
Despite the growing consensus over the past few weeks that even an extended run of positive results won’t change a support that appears to be turning, those in charge have remained firm so far.
Despite the lack of evidence at the moment, might McCoist’s point give cred to the notion that sticking with Martin might yield longer-term benefits?
