Constitution Review: North-West Fixes New Dates For Public Hearing 

The Senate’s zonal public hearing on the ongoing constitution review process will take place on July 18 and 19th according to the geopolitical zone in the Senate.

On 4 and 5 July, the review’s remaining five geopolitical zones held zononal public hearings.

However, the Senate’s plenary session for the North West, which was originally scheduled to take place in Kano, the state capital, was postponed on Tuesday, last week.

The delay was made in response to Alhaji Aminu Dantata’s passing, who passed away on Saturday, June 28, in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, and was buried in Madina, Saudi Arabia, on June 30.

Senator Barau Jibrin, the deputy president of the Senate, made the announcement during Wednesday’s plenary.

A Just Federation, According to Akpabio, can be guaranteed by Constitutional Review.

Senator Barau, who presided over the session, urged all senators from the zone’s 21 senatorial districts to actively participate and mobilize their constituents to attend the public hearing, citing it as a crucial opportunity for citizens’ input.

‘No ceiling’ on talent of ‘unstoppable’ James

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

  • 9 Comments

“There’s no ceiling on her talent – we’re looking at a potential global star.”

The plaudits were many for Lauren James following England’s brilliant 4-0 Group D win over the Netherlands, but the words of Brighton striker Nikita Parris summed up how highly she is rated.

When the defending European champions had their backs against the wall at Euro 2025, the Chelsea forward stepped up to deliver.

James dazzled against the Dutch, scoring the Lionesses’ first and third goals as they went from a potential early exit to the cusp of the quarter-finals.

Following criticism in their opening-game defeat by France, she provided much-needed inspiration for England to claim a vital first victory in the tournament.

Her first strike was superb as she finished off a sweet counter-attack with three tight touches to get the ball out of her feet and finish with a dreamy drive into the top corner from the edge of the box.

The second on the hour mark was effectively the moment that sealed the success at 3-0 – a calm sweeping first-time finish into the bottom corner from 10 yards out after Ella Toone’s effort had been saved.

James’ nonchalant celebration of pretending to put her hands in her pockets and staring down the camera almost does her performance a disservice.

The goals were far from routine and in a pressured environment with so much at stake for her team.

Tactical tweak leads to ‘assured performance’

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

James was also described as “unstoppable” and a “massive talent” by England team-mate Toone after the impressive showing.

Defender Jess Carter added the 23-year-old was a “phenomenal player” who “thrives under pressure”, while Georgia Stanway called her “class”.

The England camp love James, who responded superbly to a below-par performance from her and the team against France on Saturday.

She had the fewest amount of touches in that game of all the starting players, before being substituted with England 2-0 down after 60 minutes.

Undeterred, manager Sarina Wiegman gave James even more attacking freedom against the Dutch, allowing her to roam in the inside-right channel and often making late darts forward to overload the box.

Those runs often led to confusion in the Dutch defence with who should have been marking James when she skipped between the lines? A midfielder dropping back or a defender pushing up and leaving space in behind?

“The variety of threat James provides for this England side is tremendous,” former England goalkeeper Karen Bardsley told BBC Radio 5 Live. “If I was facing her I would have broken my ankles from being turned inside and out.”

James took the joint-most shots in England’s win (five), all while having the game’s best passing accuracy (93.8%) and regularly carving out chances for team-mates.

“We want James in our starting 11. That is her position coming off that right-hand-side,” added ex-England captain Steph Houghton on BBC One.

“Having that defensive responsibility is not her game. We need her on the ball, we need her to make things happen.

Getty Images/Opta

‘She has a wonderful aura’

Well done if you remembered we’ve been here before.

James was also England’s creative force in their run to the World Cup final two years ago, even if she did miss two matches through suspension and was often limited to appearances off the bench.

She has now been directly involved in eight goals in just five starts at major tournaments (World Cups and European Championships – five goals, three assists), the most of any player who has appeared at both Euro 2025 and the 2023 World Cup.

And, after England’s record goalscorer Ellen White, James is only the second Lioness to net twice in both a World Cup and European Championship match.

“Lauren James has a wonderful aura. She is cool, calm, and collected,” White said on BBC One.

Hampton’s ‘exquisite’ pass

Hannah HamptonGetty Images

While James may rightfully claim the headlines, England goalkeeper Hannah Hampton deserves far more than just a paragraph.

The Chelsea stopper is her country’s definitive number one after Mary Earps retired from international duty earlier this year.

The 24-year-old had very few saves to make, but impressed with the ball at her feet to make an impact at the other end.

Hampton’s drilled line-breaking pass, from inside her own box forward to a counter-attacking Alessia Russo, led to England’s first goal.

The ball caught out the entirety of the Netherlands’ midfield, allowing Russo to drive upfield before slipping the ball to James for a fantastic left-foot finish.

“The bravery to play that pass in a game like this, for me, says everything you need to know about her mindset,” said Bardsley.

A graphic that reads 'Follow our women's football TikTok' with a picture of a mobile phone

Related topics

  • England Women’s Football Team
  • Football
  • Women’s Football

‘Never touched a gun’: Colombia fighters step up child soldier recruitment

Marta last saw her 14-year-old son three months ago when he marched down the street with the other children’s soldiers while wearing rebel army fatigues and a rifle.

She pleaded with the commander’s release of her 13-year-old boy, who had been abducted nine months earlier in the middle of the night from their home in eastern Colombia. The officer waved her away and threatened to shoot her if she didn’t leave the dissident branch of the now-demobilized Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC).

“I only pray and cry and cry and pray and ask God to remove my boy from there,” Marta said, who requested anonymity so she could share the story with her family safely.

The mother, who is 40, is not the only one. Similar armed groups have abused hundreds of Colombian mothers who have lost children through coercion or abduction.

Colombia’s worst humanitarian situation has been described in the International Committee for the Red Cross (ICRC) annual report for 2024 since the FARC rebel group’s 2016 peace deal. It attracted particular attention because it revealed that 58% of people in conflict zones cited it as their community’s highest risk, a finding that attracted particular attention.

Criminal organizations increasingly rely on underage soldiers to bolster their ranks as Colombia’s long-running and complex conflicts continue to escalate, with numerous ceasefires and dialogues between the state and armed groups collapsing this year.

And little is being done to stop them.

After the armed group made a clear threat to the authorities when they took her son, Marta said she is too afraid to report it to them. They will execute him and then drive away for the rest of the family.

He needs to be, I tell him. I keep telling myself that everything is in God’s hands so that I don’t put my other children in danger, Marta said. I don’t eat or sleep. I sometimes feel like I have no desire to act, but I also have three smaller kids. And they require me.

Gloria, a 52-year-old mother from eastern Colombia who also requested anonymity, shared a story that resembles Marta’s. Her 16-year-old son was kidnapped in the middle of the night and forced to join a different armed group in June.

She said, “I’m desperate and unsure of what to do.”

After a distressed family member called Gloria, she learned about her son’s abduction. They claimed that her son’s rebel fighters had forcibly entered and taken him away from the house.

She claimed that the boy had never even touched a gun, and that they had recruited him to fight. He says, “He is doing nothing because he doesn’t know what he’s doing.” We never had any weapons at home.

In the wake of fierce fighting between the National Liberation Army (ELN) and dissidents of the now-demobilized FARC, her family fled their rural hamlet in eastern Colombia earlier this year.

They found it difficult to make ends meet once they arrived at a refugee shelter in the nearby city.

Her son returned to their family home after unsuccessful attempts to find employment in Bogota and unable to join his mother at the shelter due to space constraints.

He had to return to our hometown, where he was forcefully taken, Gloria said.

Gloria’s son was brought back home in late June after intensive negotiations with local community members and the ICRC, unlike Marta.

Officially documented child recruitments increased by 1, 000% between 2021 and 2024, from 37 to 409, but the International Crisis Group (ICG) predict that the actual number will be much higher.

According to Elizabeth Dickinson, senior Colombia analyst at ICG, “we’re seeing a generation of children lost into these networks of criminality for whom they bear little significance.”

In a recent report, she described Colombia’s child recruitment problem. It found that minors are frequently provided with the least amount of fundamental instruction before being deployed on the front lines and used as cannon fodder to protect higher ranks.

According to Dickinson, “children have suffered a lot of casualties in combat over the past year.”

Since monitoring organizations do not distinguish between child soldier and civilian deaths when it comes to children, it is difficult to estimate how many children are killed each year.

However, at least 14 of the 262 children recruited in 2023 were killed, according to the 2024 UN Secretary-General’s Annual Report on Children and Armed Conflict, despite rights activists’ claims that this figure is much higher.

The majority of those children are still associated (136), and 14 of them were killed. 112 of those children were released or escaped. According to the report, “some 38 kids were recruited into combat roles,” according to which two children were recruited by various armed groups on separate occasions.

According to the report, 186 children were recruited by the National Liberation Army (ELN), 41 by the National Liberation Army (ELN), and 22 by the Gulf Clan (also known as Autodefensas Gaitanistas de Colombia).

The Colombian Family Welfare Institute reported that 213 children who were previously associated with armed organizations had enrolled in its protection program.

Families who lose children to recruitment deal with agonizing pain because they worry that their child may pass away or be hurt.

by coercion or force

Although forced recruitment is far too prevalent, according to Dickinson of the ICG, minors “voluntarily” enlist in the fight in the majority of cases.

We’re talking about armed and criminal organizations winding a fantastical tale to these children so badly that they leave on their own volition, Dickinson said.

According to Dickinson, groups sell a glitzy image of life in arms using TikTok, WhatsApp, and Facebook. Videos of flashy motorcycles, weapons, and money are used to target boys. Young girls are drawn to them by the armed groups, who lure them with schemas of romance, empowerment, education, and, in some cases, even cosmetic surgery.

However, children are used by senior-ranking members to do their dirty work after enlisting in a completely different reality. Minors are tasked with dismembering bodies or for days on end patrolling remote jungle areas when they are more pliable. Child sexual abuse is also a common occurrence.

According to Hilda Molano, coordinator of the Coalition Against the Involvement of Children and Young People in Colombia (COALICO), “all child recruitment is forced even if it wasn’t done using force or through coercion.”

COALICO assists in the compilation of official information on the phenomenon and offers assistance to families and children who have been impacted by recruitment. More than 10% of the cases, according to Molano, are likely not officially registered and verified.

She claimed that since 2009, when the ravaged FARC rebels sought to recoup lost labor, there has been no child recruitment.

According to Molano, “it is a cultural problem that transcends the boy and the girl of today,” Molano cited decades-long conflict in Colombia.

The COALICO coordinator described the normalization of violence and the acceptance of illegal behavior as a means of escaping poverty. Youth in Colombia often believe that joining an armed group is the only way to improve their quality of life and become more independent.

Young people in Colombia don’t have many spaces where they can express themselves and feel heard, Dickinson said.

Experts warn that stopping it is a mammoth task that would include addressing poverty, armed conflict, and cultural norms given that child recruitment is rising.

“We can’t save everyone,” he said. It’s a depressing reality, Molano said.

Molano believes that protecting children must begin at the local level, despite the fact that she has not stopped herself from battling recruitment whenever she can.

“Daily support is the solution, in the case-by-case, because otherwise, it is irrelevant. We become lost in society, Molano said.

As with Marta, who is still hopeful that her son will return, hundreds of mothers across the nation are still subject to the control of armed groups, praying for their children to be happy and well once more.

Napoli want Garnacho for £45m – Thursday’s gossip

Napoli hoping to sign Alejandro Garnacho for £45m, Manchester United optimistic of agreeing deal for Bryan Mbeumo, Arsenal’s negotiations for Viktor Gyokeres stall.

Napoli are back in for Manchester United and Argentina winger Alejandro Garnacho, 21, and hope they can sign the 21-year-old for £45m. (Mirror)

United remain optimistic of agreeing a deal to sign Brentford and Cameroon striker Bryan Mbeumo, 25, in time for the forward to be part of their pre-season tour of the United States. (Sky Sports)

Arsenal’s negotiations for 27-year-old Sporting and Sweden striker Viktor Gyokeres have stalled over a difference of opinion in overall value and terms. (Independent)

Newcastle United have rejected a third bid from Leeds United for 27-year-old English midfielder Sean Longstaff. (Northern Echo)

Al-Hilal want RB Leipzig and Slovenia forward Benjamin Sesko, 22, who is also a target for Arsenal. The Saudi Pro League side are also interested in Crystal Palace’s French forward Jean-Philippe Mateta, 28. (Sun)

Aston Villa and Brighton are following highly rated Benin attacking midfielder Rodolfo Aloko, 18, from Croatian side NK Kustosija. (Mail)

Manchester United are considering selling English winger Jadon Sancho, 25, for a significantly lower transfer fee. (Givemesport)

Nottingham Forest and Crystal Palace are among the Premier League clubs considering Manchester City and England Under-21s midfielder James McAtee, 22, this summer. (Sky Sports)

Liverpool could join Arsenal in the race to sign Real Madrid and Brazil winger Rodrygo, 24, if they end up losing Colombia winger Luis Diaz, 28, to Barcelona. (Sacha Tavolieri via Goal)

Portuguese winger Chiquinho, 25, has left Wolves to join Alverca in Portugal on a permanent deal, with the Premier League club maintaining a 40% sell-on clause. (Fabrizio Romano)

Related topics

  • Football

Keep your shoes on: What to know about the TSA rule change at US airports

The United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced on Tuesday that it was scrapping a policy requiring people to take off their shoes while passing through airport screenings.

The policy, long a source of ire for travellers, had its roots in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks on the US, when authorities sought to bolster security around air travel through a host of measures.

Many more rules have been added in the time since, some criticised as arbitrary and needlessly intrusive, and have been supplemented by the integration of measures such as facial scanning technology at airports across the country.

What’s behind the change, what rules remain, and could other policies change next?

What was the ‘shoes off’ policy?

The “shoes off” policy was first implemented by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in 2006 and required travellers to remove their shoes as they advanced through airport security screenings to check them for possible explosives.

Those enrolled in TSA PreCheck, a programme in which people who pass a basic security check are allowed to bypass certain airport security measures, had already been allowed to pass through screenings with their shoes on.

Why was it implemented?

The policy was the result of a failed December 2001 attack by a British man named Richard Reid, who packed explosives into his shoes and tried to detonate them during a flight from Paris to Miami.

The incident, like many attempted attacks carried out in the post-9/11 period, was highly amateur: Reid, a petty criminal who became an Islamic fundamentalist, was foiled after an airline worker noticed that he was trying to light his shoe on fire with a match.

But the failed attack played into fears that were prominent during the post-9/11 era. And, when it came to safety, why take a chance?

“TSA can’t just rely on the next attack being as incompetent as this one was,” Jay Stanley, a privacy advocate and senior policy analyst at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), told Al Jazeera.

The agency asked people, on a voluntary basis, to consider removing their shoes while passing through screening so they could be checked for explosives. TSA later made the policy mandatory in August 2006.

An FBI agent, left, sits next to a suspect identified by authorities as Richard Reid, right, as he is transported in a car from State Police barracks at Logan International Airport in Boston on Saturday, December 22, 2001 [Elise Amendola/AP Photo]

Why was the policy scrapped?

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement on Tuesday that eliminating the policy would remove a source of strain on travellers and reduce TSA wait times at airports, and was no longer necessary due to technological innovations.

“We expect this change will drastically decrease passenger wait times at our TSA checkpoints, leading to a more pleasant and efficient passenger experience,” she said.

The change was effective immediately.

What other policies remain in place, and could they change?

While the “no shoes” policy is gone, travellers expecting an easy, stress-free trip to the airport should temper their expectations as many other security measures remain in place.

Passengers will, for example, still have to remove their belts, coats, laptops, and certain items from their bags while passing through security. Rules limiting gels and liquids in carry-on items to 3.4 ounces (100 ml) still apply, and checked bags must also be subjected to X-ray screenings.

Canines used for detecting bombs and drugs are still frequently used, and full-body scanners were brought to airports after another failed attack in December 2009, in which a man tried to detonate explosives smuggled onto a plane in his underwear.

Noem has suggested that DHS is reviewing some rules, but did not offer further details.

Are those measures effective or just security theatre?

Travellers have long fumed about an ever-growing list of measures that can seem arbitrary and do not always have a clear utility.

While the government argues that the increases in airport security reflect efforts to patch up vulnerabilities exposed by the 9/11 hijackers and subsequent failed attacks, some experts say that certain measures provide the impression of security more than provable benefits.

“People are hesitant to push back against new rules because nobody wants to be seen as responsible if there’s another attack,” said Stanley.

“Security theatre has always been a part of this, where you make a big show of security in order to give people the impression of greater safety.”

A TSA checkpoint at the airport
A TSA security checkpoint in Pittsburgh International’s Landside terminal in Imperial, Pennsylvania, US on June 9, 2019 [Gene J Puskar/AP Photo]

But enforcing so many rules can be difficult for agency workers themselves, who have the industrial-scale task of screening around two million travellers per day.

A 2015 report from the agency’s inspector general found that TSA officers had failed to detect weapons, explosives and other prohibited items brought through security by undercover agents to test the effectiveness of the system in 95 percent of cases.

Despite such concerns, TSA has continued to grow in size and scope each year. The agency has a workforce of nearly 63,000 people and a budget that is set to reach more than $11bn in 2025. In 2006, when “shoes off” was first implemented, it was around $6bn.

What new technologies are being used in airport security?

In her statement, Noem said that one of the reasons that the “shoes off” policy could be safely discarded is that “cutting-edge technological advancements” have rendered it unnecessary.

One that travellers may have noticed is the greater use of facial recognition technology, a development some privacy advocates have viewed with concern.

What are the privacy concerns?

Petra Molnar, a lawyer and author of the book, The Walls Have Eyes: Surviving Migration in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, told Al Jazeera that in an era of heightening restrictions on movement, airports have become testing grounds for new technologies, with civil liberties a largely secondary concern.

“With increasingly more digital technologies used at borders, airports have become epicentres of surveillance tech, with facial recognition and biometric technologies augmenting to physical surveillance practices,” said Molnar.

“Airports and borders are often one of the first places where new surveillance technologies are tested out, often with little regulation and oversight. Airports are the true testing grounds where unregulated technology experiments can run unchecked.”

While the decision to scrap the “shoes off” policy is a rare example of airport security measures being dialed back in the name of efficiency and convenience, it also comes at a time when those traveling or returning to the US are increasingly wary of being pulled aside and questioned about their political views on topics such as Israel’s war in Gaza.

The administration of President Donald Trump recently warned, for example, that international students entering the US must make their social media profiles available for inspection by authorities.

I’ll be 100% for semi-final, says Sinner – but will Djokovic after slip?

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Wimbledon 2025

Dates: 30 June-13 July Venue: All England Club

World number one Jannik Sinner says he will be “100%” for Friday’s Wimbledon semi-final against Novak Djokovic after injuring his elbow earlier in the week.

The 23-year-old Italian fell during the first game of his fourth-round tie with Grigor Dimitrov on Monday and took a medical time-out to receive treatment.

He was two sets down against Dimitrov but ultimately progressed after his opponent retired through injury.

Sinner only had a light 20-minute hit with his coaches on Tuesday and wore strapping and a protective sleeve on his racquet arm during Wednesday’s quarter-final victory over Shelton.

The only sign of discomfort he showed was when he grimaced and shook out his arm after returning one of Shelton’s huge serves in the second set.

“The pain is getting better,” Sinner told BBC Sport. “I played today with some painkillers which helped me to get through.

“Returning fast serves is not easy. But yes, it’s not something crazy serious because if not I would be much more concerned.

Djokovic, bidding for a standalone record 25th Grand Slam singles title, lost to Sinner in the French Open last four just five weeks ago.

The two have also met twice before at Wimbledon – in the quarter-finals in 2022 and the semi-finals in 2023, with Djokovic winning on both occasions.

However, three-time Grand Slam champion Sinner has won their past four meetings.

“Me and Novak, we know each other better because we have played quite a lot,” Sinner said.

“I’ve never won against him here in Wimbledon so it’s going to be a very, very tough challenge.”

Sinner also said he decided to play in new shoes for his match with Shelton to reduce the chances of slipping again.

“I played with completely new shoes to have more grip,” he added.

“I haven’t even played practice [in them]. It was completely new, which usually on other surfaces I don’t do.

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

It’s going to take best of me to win – Djokovic

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Seven-time champion Djokovic beat Italian Flavio Cobolli in four sets to secure his semi-final spot but also suffered an injury scare himself during the match.

Leading 5-4 in the fourth set and serving for the match, he slipped and fell awkwardly as he attempted to move for a shot.

It prompted concern from the crowd and Djokovic initially appeared in discomfort when he got up, but shook it off to win the next two points and secure victory.

“There is a concern, but we’ll see in the next 24 to 48 hours. It was an awkward, nasty fall,” Djokovic told BBC Sport.

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Djokovic has now broken the record for most Wimbledon men’s singles semi-final appearances with 14, moving one clear of eight-time champion Roger Federer.

It is also a 52nd Grand Slam semi-final appearance for Djokovic, extending his all-time record in the men’s game.

But regardless of his impressive record, he knows he will need to be at his very best against Sinner.

“I am just trying to focus on my recovery right now and getting my body in shape for very physical battle,” he said of his preparations for the match.

“Hopefully I can deliver the level and be able to stay with him because it’s going to take the best of me at the moment to beat Jannik.

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Related topics

  • Tennis