Don’t judge Tuchel on ‘nonsense’ qualifiers – Rooney

Images courtesy of Getty

According to Wayne Rooney, England manager Thomas Tuchel shouldn’t be let down by “nonsense” World Cup qualifiers.

In Group K over the next five days, The Three Lions will host Andorra and travel to Serbia.

In Tuchel’s first three competitive games, England defeated Albania 2-0, Latvia 3-0, and Andorra 1-0.

On his BBC podcast, The Wayne Rooney Show, Rooney claimed, “I think he’s a top manager.”

“He might have a little bit of stick about how England played,” he said. Those games are utter nonsense.

You arrive, and you are certain that England will prevail. You have to break down the 10 men who are seated behind the ball, which is difficult when playing against any team.

Between 2003 and 2018, Rooney has won 120 goals in his country.

“I grew to enjoy playing for England.” You know England will win, but watching them win some games can be a little boring. You enjoy it the most when you enter the tournament, he said, “of course.”

“The last few games were against Andorra or something similar.” It caused pain.

Thomas Tuchel probably wants a respectable game where he can show off his skills because I feel sorry for him. Really, it’s a no-win situation.

Tuchel’s England contract runs until the United States, Canada, and Mexico’s 2026 World Cup is over.

With three qualifiers to spare, they would be on the verge of clinching their place there with two victories in the following week.

Rooney continued, “You want to see England having to sit back and defend and tactically break down teams,” according to Thomas Tuchel.

That chance [will be] given to the better teams. I believe that he will perform exceptionally well for England. You don’t know whether they will win the World Cup, but I believe he has a chance, doesn’t he?

related subjects

  • Football
  • Men’s football teams from England

Has India ‘weaponised water’ to deliberately flood Pakistan?

Islamabad, Pakistan – For the second time in three years, devastating monsoon floods have strewn a path of destruction through Pakistan’s north and center, particularly in Punjab province, submerging villages, drowning farmland, displacing millions, and injuring hundreds.

This year, India – Pakistan’s archrival and a nuclear-armed neighbour – is also reeling. Heavy monsoon rains swell rivers on both sides of the border, which has caused widespread flooding in northern states like Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and Indian Punjab.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Authorities in Pakistan claim that at least 884 people have died nationwide, including more than 220 in Punjab, since the monsoon season first started in late June. More than 30 people have died in Indian Punjab, compared to 100 on the Indian side.

Yet, shared suffering hasn’t brought the neighbours closer: In Pakistan’s Punjab, which borders India, federal minister Ahsan Iqbal has, in fact, accused New Delhi of deliberately releasing excess water from dams without timely warnings.

According to Iqbal, “India has started using water as a weapon and has caused widespread flooding in Punjab,” he claimed last month, citing releases into the Ravi, Sutlej, and Chenab rivers, all of which flow into Pakistan from Indian territory.

Iqbal added that India’s use of flood water was its “worst example of water aggression,” which he claimed threatened people’s lives, property, and livelihoods.

“Some issues should be beyond politics, and water cooperation must be one of them”, the minister said on August 27, while he participated in rescue efforts in Narowal city, his constituency that borders India.

The two countries’ growing tensions, as well as the collapse of a six-decade-old agreement that allowed them to share waters for rivers that both countries rely on, are at the center of those accusations.

However, experts contend that the evidence is insufficient to suggest that India deliberately attempted to flood Pakistan, and that even if New Delhi were to consider doing so, there are the risks associated with such a plan.

Weaponising water

On August 31, 2025, people who have been affected by the flood walk along the shelters of a makeshift camp in Chung, Punjab province, Pakistan. In eastern Pakistan, flooding caused nearly half a million people to flee after days of heavy rains flooded rivers.

Relations between India and Pakistan, already at a historic low, plummeted further in April after the Pahalgam attack, in which gunmen killed 26 civilians in Indian-administered Kashmir. India canceled the Transboundary Agreement that governs the Indus Basin’s six rivers, the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), leaving the country.

Pakistan refuted claims that it was involved in the Pahalgam attack in any way. But in early May, the neighbours waged a&nbsp, four-day conflict, targeting each other’s military bases with missiles and drones in the gravest military escalation between them in almost three decades.

The two nations were required to regularly exchange detailed water-flow data under the IWT. Fears have risen in recent months that New Delhi might try to stop the flow of water into Pakistan or flood its western neighbor with unexpected, large releases as India ceases to adhere to the pact.

After New Delhi suspended its participation in the IWT, India’s Home Minister Amit Shah in June said the treaty would never be restored, a stance that prompted protests in Pakistan and accusations of “water terrorism”.

The Indian High Commission in Islamabad has shared several warnings of possible cross-border flooding on “humanitarian grounds” in recent weeks while the Indian government has not officially responded to allegations that it has chosen to flood Pakistan.

Water experts contend that Pakistan’s floods are primarily due to dam-building in India, which raises the possibility of obscuring the urgent, shared challenges posed by climate change and the ageing infrastructure.

“The Indian decision to release water from their dam has not caused flooding in Pakistan”, said Daanish Mustafa, a professor of critical geography at King’s College London.

The rivers in India eventually flow into Pakistan through major dams. He told Al Jazeera, “Any extra water that will be released from these rivers will have a significant impact on India’s own states first.”

Shared monsoon strain

In the Himalayan and Karakoram ranges, glaciers provide food for both Pakistan and India. The Indus River basin provides life to Pakistan. It supplies water to most of the country’s roughly 250 million people and underpins its agriculture.

A view of houses submerged in floodwaters.
The death toll in Pakistan has surpassed 800, with hundreds of thousands of people being displaced from their homes as a result of the rising water levels.

India controls the three eastern rivers, Ravi, Sutlej, and Beas, while Pakistan controls the three western rivers, Jhelum, Chenab, and Indus.

India is obligated to allow waters of the western rivers to flow into Pakistan with limited exceptions, and to provide timely, detailed hydrological data.

The rivers it controls have seen a significant drop in the flow of the Ravi and Sutlej into Pakistan thanks to India’s construction of dams on the eastern ones. As long as the volume of water entering Pakistan is not impacted by it building dams on some of the western rivers, it is permitted to do so under the terms of the treaty.

But melting glaciers and an unusually intense summer monsoon pushed river levels on both sides of the border dangerously high this year.

In Pakistan, heavy rains and glacial outbursts caused levels in western rivers to rise, while rising flows severely damaged infrastructure on India’s eastern rivers.

According to Mustafa of King’s College, dams are typically designed to last about 100 years, just like other infrastructure is designed to have a safe capacity of water. But climate change has dramatically altered the average rainfall that might have been taken into account while designing these projects.

He claimed that the dams’ construction parameters are now meaningless and obsolete. Water must be released when dam capacity exceeds dam capacity, or the entire structure will be in danger of being destroyed.

Among the major dams upstream in Indian territory are Salal and Baglihar on the Chenab, Pong on the Beas, Bhakra on the Sutlej, and Ranjit Sagar (also known as Thein) on the Ravi.

With vast areas of  Indian territory between them and the border, these dams are located in Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab, and Himachal Pradesh.

A former Pakistani representative on the bilateral commission tasked with monitoring the implementation of the pact, Shiraz Memon, said that it makes no sense to blame India for the flooding in Pakistan.

“Instead of acknowledging that India has shared warnings, we are blaming them of water terrorism. By the end of August, reservoirs across the region were full, according to Memon, adding that it is a simple, natural flood phenomenon.

Spillways had to be opened for downstream releases because the water was running out. This is a natural solution as there is no other option available”, he told Al Jazeera.

Politics of blame

Rescuers search for missing flash flood victims in remote Kashmir village
The day after flash floods occurred in Chositi village, Kishtwar district of Indian-administered Kashmir, last month [Channi Anand/AP Photo]

According to September 3 data on India’s Central Water Commission website, at least a dozen sites face a “severe” flood situation, and another 19 are above normal flood levels.

The Indian High Commission’s message announcing a “high flood” on the Sutlej and Tawi rivers was referenced in a notification from Pakistan’s Ministry of Water Resources the same day.

India issued its fourth notice of this nature after three earlier warnings last week, but none of them contained detailed hydrological information.

Pakistan’s Meteorological Department, in a report on September 4, said on the Pakistani side, two sites on the Sutlej and Ravi faced “extremely high” flood levels, while two other sites on the Ravi and Chenab saw “very high” levels.

In a powerful monsoon, the volume of water frequently exceeds the capacity of any single dam or barrage. According to experts, controlled releases have become a necessary but dangerous component of flood control on both sides of the border.

They added that while the IWT obliged India to alert Pakistan to abnormal flows, Pakistan also needs better monitoring and real-time data systems rather than relying solely on diplomatic exchanges.

According to experts, the blame game can have short-term political effects on both sides, especially after the May conflict.

For India, halting the agreement serves as a strong defense of what it perceives as Pakistan’s state-sponsored terrorism. For Pakistan, blaming India can provide a political scapegoat that distracts from domestic failures in flood mitigation and governance.

Rivers are “living, breathing things,” they say. They always make the move because of this. You cannot control the flood, especially a high or severe flood”, academic Mustafa said.

Pentagon warns Venezuela as 2 military aircraft fly near US Navy ship

In a move described as “highly provocative,” two Venezuelan military aircraft flew close to a US Navy ship in international waters, according to the US Department of Defense.

The Venezuelan government issued a warning to stop further provocative moves in a statement released late on Thursday, blaming the Venezuelan aircraft’s alleged involvement with the guided-missile destroyer Jason Dunham as an attempt to “interfere with our counter-narco-terror operations.”

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

The Pentagon stated in a post on the X platform that two Maduro-style military aircraft flew close to a US Navy vessel today in international waters.

The Pentagon advised the cartel operating in Venezuela to refrain from further efforts to obstruct, deter, or interfere with US military counter-narcotics and counter-terror operations.

A US ship did not engage the aircraft, according to a US defense official who was cited by The New York Times as saying that two Venezuelan F-16 fighter jets flew over the guided-missile destroyer Jason Dunham in the southern Caribbean Sea.

Venezuelan state media did not mention the alleged US-Venezuela encounter because it covered President Nicolas Maduro’s announcement of the country’s National Militia’s first round of operation, whose ranks have been increased by new volunteers in recent weeks as Washington’s threats grow.

According to Maduro, Venezuela’s Noticias Venevision news outlet, it was the “first time in history that the communal units of the militia will be activated, spanning the national map from north to south, from east to west, down to the final community.”

The US has so far denied any evidence that Maduro is connected to or has any connections to drug trafficking cartels in Venezuela and the region.

Washington increased the reward in August to $50 million for information leading to Maduro’s arrest over allegations that he had been a part of a cocaine trafficking operation. In a move allegedly aimed at drug cartels, the US quickly deployed several ships and a nuclear-powered submarine to the Caribbean and Venezuelan waters.

Maduro has been expressing concern over the US’s recent naval deployment in the Southern Caribbean, claiming that it was “seeking a regime change through military threat” and promising that if Washington attacked, he would ” mobilize the nation and declare it a republic in arms” for weeks.

In a rumored airstrike in the Caribbean on Tuesday, US forces apparently launched a speedboat allegedly used for drug trafficking.

According to Trump, the boat belongs to a violent group linked to Maduro, and 11 people have been killed in the attack.

Washington allegedly carried out extrajudicial killings, accusing Caracas of killing 11 people without a trial. Legal experts have also raised questions about the attack’s legality because the Trump administration failed to provide any proof that the US was in imminent danger from those aboard the ship or that the passengers were even armed.

Where does Kazakhstan win leave Wales’ World Cup hopes?

FAW
  • 1 Comments

When Wales makes their eight-hour return from Kazakhstan, there will be plenty of time to reflect on a challenging night in Astana.

But Ashley Williams’ analysis was simple when the ultimate destination is the United States, Canada, and Mexico in the summer of 2010.

He once said, “For games like this, it’s just that you get the three points, board the plane, and drive home.”

What it currently looks like

Wales lead the group with 10 points, two points ahead of North Macedonia, who have a game in hand, after Kieffer Moore’s goal in Kazakhstan was sufficient to earn an uncomfortable win.

However, Belgium should be on your radar. With two games in hand, Wales are now three points clear of them thanks to their 6-0 victory over Liechtenstein in Vaduz.

Group J table

What will Wales do next?

A hold up.

Before returning to qualifying action, Wales now have back-to-back friendly games against Canada in Swansea on Tuesday (5:00 BST) and England at Wembley on the first day of the month.

Belgium, on the other hand, plays three home games on Sunday against Kazakhstan and North Macedonia on October 10.

With a win, Wales would be three points clear of Wales at the start of a defining game on October 13 when Wales welcome Belgium to Cardiff City Stadium.

After winning in Astana, captain Ben Davies summed up the biggest game they had ahead of them, but we had to put ourselves in a position where it is crucial. “We had to put ourselves in a position where it is important,” he said.

JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to play this video.

What must occur?

Wales simply needs to win to be considered automatic. and triumph. and triumph.

Wales’ wriggle room was eliminated by the dramatic defeat in Brussels and the draw in March in Skopje against North Macedonia. With two games left, the Red Devils are likely to be ahead by six points if they lose to Belgium in Cardiff.

And a home tie with Liechtenstein is one of those final games for Belgium, following their lengthy trip to Kazakhstan.

A point from either of those would be sufficient to defame Wales’ direct qualification in that situation.

In contrast, Bellamy’s side could potentially end their season against Belgium on points with the former world number one ranked side in their final two games.

Former Astana striker Nathan Blake remarked, “If we can get three points off them, they must come to a place like this and get three points with the pressure on.”

Wales striker Kieffer Moore celebratesFAW

What happens if Wales and Belgium finish second?

It depends on the difference between goals and not the opposing team.

With two games in hand, Belgium is already two goals better than Wales.

In other words, Wales must hope that Belgium also loses points elsewhere if they defeat Belgium at home.

Particularly when you consider that Liechtenstein’s final home game is against them.

Rudi Garcia’s side could only manage a draw in Skopje, but the optimism of Wales fans will be heightened by their encounter with North Macedonia.

If Wales participates in the play-offs, what happens?

Fans will be anxious for the first few weeks in March.

The format was used similarly to the format in recent years, and that is how Wales won the previous World Cup in Qatar.

When two teams are split into four paths, they will encounter a one-legged semi-final and one-legged final. If both teams win, they will qualify.

What would happen if Wales placed third?

North Macedonia will still have a say in this group, and they will be hoping to take the helm in Cardiff in November, as former striker Sam Vokes pointed out.

Wales are in complete control of the Play-Offs as one of the Nations League group winners in the event of a worst-case scenario.

Wales would likely win the play-off spot if Spain, Germany, Portugal, France, and England finished first or second overall in their group.

Although it comes with a warning, it is a useful safety net.

The Nations League contenders are placed in the pot four automatically, with the playoffs starting on September 1st, 2016. In other words, if Wales came in third place, they would face a top-ranked opponent in the semi-final.

Simply put, it signifies Bellamy’s side’s only source of inspiration heading into each of their final three games.

related subjects

  • Men’s football teams from Wales
  • Football

Jade Goody’s widower Jack Tweed weighs in on her mystery ‘missing money’ riddle

Just before she passed away in March 2009, Jack Tweed and Jade Goody got married on the banks of the Thames. Following the tragedy, the TV personality’s finances suffered a major blow.

Jack Tweedy had been in a relationship with Jade Goody from 2006 to her death in March 2009, by which time they had married(Image: sunday mirror)

Jade Goody’s widower has demanded to know what happened to the TV personality’s £200,000 ring and houses she had bought for her sons.

Jack Tweed, who married Jade weeks before she died of cancer in March 2009, said he is “sad” to see the 27-year-old star’s impressive fortune seemingly vanish since then. Jade had worked work throughout her treatment for cervical cancer to reportedly be able to leave £3million for sons Bobby and Freddy Brazier in a trust fund.

However, it has been claimed that the boys, who were then five and four, did not receive full benefits. Jade and Jack started dating each other in 2006, and Jack today declared, “I don’t know what happened at all.” There was a lot of money there, along with a ton of jewelry, which someone had. Around 200 or something was one of the rings.

“It’s sad. I’ve been told that she had a few homes, some of which were for Bobby and Freddy when they were 18 years old, and some of them never came. “

READ MORE: Freddy Brazier gives update on his love life as he prepares to become first-time dadREAD MORE: Jackiey hits back at Freddy Brazier’s drug claims with scathing rebuke

Concern for the finances Jade Goody had seemingly left her children has re-emerged
Concern for the finances Jade Goody had seemingly left her children has resurfaced(Image: PA)
Jack and Jade are pictured in early 2008 at a film premiere
Jack and Jade are pictured in early 2008 at a film premiere(Image: Richard Young/REX/Shutterstock)

Jack claims Prince Azim of Brunei gave Jade the £200,000 ring but Jack told the Daily Mail he didn’t concern himself with Jade’s finances before she died, confirming she left the matter to trustees. There is no suggestion that any wrongdoing has occurred with Jade’s finances.

I didn’t want to get involved in any of that at the time… One more thing, I wanted to know for sure that Jade would pass away. I didn’t want to even talk about it because I always believed she would just pass it by, so I didn’t want to talk about it,” Jack continued.

“And it wasn’t really me, it was Jade’s money, wasn’t it, so it wasn’t anything to do with me,” Jade said. I have no idea what actually happened. “

Two years after Jade’s passing, it was reported her £3million estate had taken a huge hit due to a £1.8million tax bill – allegedly as a result of four years worth of unpaid income tax. Her sons’ father Jeff Brazier later claimed there were later more tax issues related to her beauty salon in Essex.

Floral tributes were left outside Jade's family home in Essex after the tragedy
Floral tributes were left outside Jade’s family home in Essex after the tragedy(Image: AFP/Getty Images)
Jack and Jackiey Budden - Jade's mum - are pictured at the funeral
Jack and Jackiey Budden – Jade’s mum – are pictured at the funeral(Image: AFP/Getty Images)
Continue reading the article below.

Concerns around Jade’s finances have come to light again recently as Freddy, who turns 21 this month, prepares to become a father at that tender age. Reflecting on this, Jack said: “I’m pleased for him… I’m hoping – along with everyone else – that it might do him the world of good. It makes you grow up..”

Freddy recently told how he has battled addiction in his teens. He alleged his nan Jackiey Budden – Jade’s mother – was the one who got him “hooked” on drugs at the age of just 12.