Man Utd, Newcastle… or neither? Sesko’s choices and why striker is in demand

Images courtesy of Getty
  • 965 Comments

The transfer saga involving Benjamin Sesko needs to come to an end quickly, and it’s not clear how that will end.

Both Manchester United and Newcastle United are awaiting an answer after making high-dollar bids for the Leipzig striker.

Sesko is alleged to have informed both clubs that he is his first choice, but BBC Sport has been informed that he wants to join the Red Devils.

However, each team has advantages and disadvantages, including whether either of the Premier League clubs are willing to sign him.

And where would he spend more time playing video games?

The Slovenian could make a difference wherever he ends up, but one thing seems certain: he could be big, strong, quick, and clinical.

Should he join Manchester United?

Do they actually make a bid? Do they exist?

On Tuesday, Sesko received Manchester United’s first official offer.

Simon Stone, the head of BBC Sport’s football news program, reports a starting fee of £65.2 million that will increase to £73.8 million.

Before making their move, they were assumed to want to make sure Sesko wanted to follow them.

According to Old Trafford sources, they do not need to sell players before making more signings, but they do acknowledge that Ruben Amorim’s desire to finance several players will need to be funded.

Sesko would like to join them, but why?

If Sesko signed for Manchester United, he would likely start at one of the biggest clubs in the world.

Since leaving Atalanta for the club for £64 million, Rasmus Hojlund, also 22, has only scored 14 Premier League goals in the last two years.

Sesko, who moved from Salzburg to Leipzig in the summer, has since scored 27 Bundesliga goals.

Ruben Amorim complained about his team’s inability to score enough frequently during the majority of the season, but many outside United observers believe any extra money would be better spent on a physical, energetic central midfielder, according to Stone.

“Clearly, he thinks Rasmus Hojlund needs to be upgraded at the top of the pitch. In order to do that, United are willing to take Hojlund’s offers into consideration when negotiating with RB Leipzig.

And he could join Matheus Cunha, a Wolves signing this summer, and former Nottingham Forest man Mbeumo, who will both be signing for about £130 million this summer.

If he were the main attraction, he could receive a lot of service from the three closest players.

In his team-mates’ ten chances, Bruno Fernandes scored more chances than any other Premier League player last season, a total of 91.

Mbeumo and Cunha were in fifth place, with 57 chances for Wolves players, while Mbeumo and Cunha were in fifth place.

Why might Sesko object against joining them?

Sesko might decide Old Trafford would not be the best place to pursue his career, which is clearly evident from the start.

For one, they haven’t competed in any European competition this year. In three of his previous four seasons, Sesko has participated in the Champions League and the Europa League in the other.

And he would be a member of a team that finished 15th overall last year, which was their worst campaign since 1973-74 when they were promoted.

Boss Amorim has had the opportunity to rebuild this summer despite only taking over halfway through the previous campaign. However, a poor start could also lead to managerial change.

Should he join Newcastle United?

Do they actually make a bid? Do they exist?

Sesko has been offered around £70 million by Newcastle, and they are still negotiating with Leipzig.

They want him despite Alexander Isak’s departure as the club’s star striker, who had previously attempted to sign Hugo Ekitike from Eintracht Frankfurt to join the Swede.

Instead, Ekitike moved to Liverpool, who coincidentally want Isak and have rejected their £110 million bid.

Sesko would like to join them, but why?

Sesko would return to the Champions League if he were to join Newcastle, who finished fifth last season.

After completing their 56-year trophy drought with the Carabao Cup, he would be joining an apparently upwardly mobile club.

Lois Openda, who was the second-quickest player in the Bundesliga last year, is the other player who has made the most of Sesko’s time playing in the front two at Leipzig.

If he stays with the Magpies, he would relish the chance to form a strike partnership with Isak.

Additionally, he might have plenty of opportunities thanks to the second and third top assisters in the Premier League last season providing him with wing support.

Before making his £55m move to Tyneside, Anthony Elanga contributed 11 assists for Nottingham Forest.

Why might Sesko object against joining them?

Isak’s decision to stay or leave might be seen as a win-win situation for Sesko.

Sesko would almost certainly have the opportunity to start every game if he leaves. However, he might be concerned about the club’s ambitions since they recently lost a key player.

If Eddie Howe chooses against a front two, or it fails, Isak is unlikely to be shoved out the wing to make room for Sesko, as he does if he stays.

He joins a team that has never competed in the tournament properly in consecutive seasons and has never advanced to the knockout stages if winning the Champions League is a priority.

JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to play this video.

Should he remain in Leipzig?

Could Leipzig still have him?

Due to the high price Leipzig are asking for, as well as the alleged desire for add-ons, they do not need to sell Sesko.

However, they are undergoing a summer rebuild under Ole Werner, a new 37-year-old head coach.

Six signings totalling £80 million have been made, but they haven’t yet completed a significant sale to make more money.

Chelsea are, however, attempting to sign Leipzig attacking midfielder Xavi Simons for a significant sum.

Sesko wants to stay, but why?

Sesko might not be opposed to a third Bundesliga season at Leipzig, where he could play every game and make improvements over the previous campaign, which saw him score 13 goals against 14 in the process.

The only thing to keeping might be to wait another season to see if any reputable Champions League clubs would want to sign him.

Due to his fee, few sides are currently able to afford him.

However, Robert Lewandowski and Harry Kane, the frontman for Bayern Munich, are both 32. So they might begin looking forward to the season ahead.

Sesko has previously been linked to both sides.

The central striking options at Real Madrid depend on Kylian Mbappe and Kylian Mbappe, so they may have to make adjustments.

He has also been linked with Chelsea and Arsenal this summer, before they signed Viktor Gyokeres.

So could Sesko decide to wait and see what’s on the table for the summer?

Why might Sesko choose not to stay?

Sesko may well feel that his Red Bull clubs and Leipzig have served him well given that he started his apprenticeship there in Salzburg.

This season, they won’t compete in any European competition.

Given that he is only 22 years old, he has been linked to Premier League clubs consistently in each transfer window.

This might be the right time to leave Leipzig, if they have a new-look team and manager.

What data are gathered from this quiz?

related subjects

  • Manchester United
  • RB Leipzig
  • Transfers of football
  • Newcastle United
  • Football

Man Utd, Newcastle… or neither? Sesko’s choices

Getty Images
  • 218 Comments

With the start of the season fast approaching, the Benjamin Sesko transfer saga needs to reach a conclusion one way or the other fairly soon – and it remains unclear which way it will end.

Manchester United and Newcastle United have both made big-money bids for the Leipzig striker – and are waiting for an answer.

German newspaper Bild claims Sesko has told both clubs they are his first choice – but BBC Sport has been told he is keen on a move to the Red Devils.

But there are pros and cons for each team – namely whether either of the Premier League sides are actually in a position to sign him.

And where would he be more likely to get game time?

One thing seems sure – big, strong, quick and a clinical finisher – the Slovenian could be a difference-maker wherever he ends up.

Should he go to Manchester United?

Have they actually made a bid? Can they?

Manchester United made their first formal offer for Sesko on Tuesday.

BBC Sport chief football news reporter Simon Stone reports it is an initial fee of £65.2m, rising to £73.8m.

They had been thought to want to be sure Sesko wanted to join them before making their move.

Old Trafford sources say they do not have to sell players before making more signings – but do accept finance will have to be generated by several players unwanted by Ruben Amorim.

Why would Sesko want to join them?

Sesko would be a likely starter at one of the world’s biggest clubs if he joined Manchester United.

Rasmus Hojlund, also aged 22, has only scored 14 Premier League goals in two seasons since his £64m move from Atalanta.

By contrast Sesko has scored 27 Bundesliga goals in that time, having joined Leipzig from Salzburg in the same summer.

“Although many external United observers feel any spare income would be better spent on a physical, energetic central midfielder, Ruben Amorim spent most of last season moaning about his side’s inability to score often enough,” said Stone.

“Clearly he feels an upgrade is required on Rasmus Hojlund at the top of the pitch. To that end, United are willing to listen to offers for Hojlund, which may end up being part of their negotiations with RB Leipzig.”

And he could be part of an all-new front line with Matheus Cunha, a summer signing from Wolves, and ex-Brentford man Mbeumo joining for about £130m in total this summer.

He could get plenty of service from the three players nearest him if he was the focal point up top.

Bruno Fernandes created more chances than any other Premier League player last season – 91 – with his team-mates scoring 10 of them.

Mbeumo was fifth on the list, creating 70 chances for Brentford team-mates, and Cunha was 15th, with 57 opportunities laid on for Wolves players.

Why might Sesko not want to join them?

There are some fairly obvious reasons why Sesko might decide Old Trafford would not be the best destination to keep his career on this upward trajectory.

For one, they are not in any European competition this season. Sesko has played in the Champions League in three of the past four seasons, and the Europa League in the other.

And he would be joining a team who finished 15th last season, their worst campaign since they were relegated in 1973-74.

Boss Amorim has been given the opportunity to rebuild this summer, having only taken over midway through last season – but a bad start could see a managerial change too.

Should he go to Newcastle United?

Have they actually made a bid? Can they?

Newcastle have made an offer of about £70m to sign Sesko and are still in discussions with Leipzig.

They want him even if star striker Alexander Isak stays at the club – having previously tried to sign Hugo Ekitike from Eintracht Frankfurt to play with the Swede.

Ekitike instead joined Liverpool, who incidentally want Isak and have had a £110m rejected by the Magpies.

Why would Sesko want to join them?

For one Sesko would be back in the Champions League if he were to join Newcastle, with the Magpies finishing fifth last season.

He would be joining a seemingly upwardly mobile club – having ended their 56-year trophy drought by winning the Carabao Cup.

Sesko has spent most of his time at Leipzig playing in a front two with Lois Openda – who was the second quickest player in the Bundesliga last season.

So he would relish the opportunity to build a strike partnership with Isak – if he stays with the Magpies.

And he could get plenty of chances too, with the second and third top assisters in the Premier League last season supplying him from the wings.

Jacob Murphy had 12 assists with Anthony Elanga providing 11 for Nottingham Forest before his £55m move to Tyneside.

Why might Sesko not want to join them?

Whether Isak stays or goes could be seen as win-win or lose-lose for Sesko.

If he goes, Sesko would be pretty much guaranteed the chance to start every game. But he may worry about the ambition of the club if they have just lost a key player.

Likewise, if Isak stays, there is the danger he struggles for game time if Eddie Howe decides against a front two, or it is not successful, with Isak unlikely to be shoved out to the wing to make room for Sesko.

Also if playing in the Champions League is a priority, he joins a team who have never been in the tournament proper in consecutive seasons – and never reached the knockout stages.

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Should he stay at Leipzig?

Could Leipzig still keep him?

Leipzig do not need to sell Sesko – hence the high fee they are asking for, plus the reported desire for add-ons.

They are having a summer rebuild, however, under new 37-year-old head coach Ole Werner.

Six signings have come in so far for a combined £80m – but they are yet to make a major sale to free up funds.

However, Chelsea are trying to sign Leipzig’s attacking midfielder Xavi Simons in what would be a big-money move.

Why would Sesko want to stay?

Sesko might not be opposed to a third season at Leipzig, where he could play every game and try to improve on last season – where he scored one Bundesliga goal fewer than he did the previous campaign (13 v 14).

But the major upside to staying might be waiting another season to see whether any established Champions League clubs could sign him.

His fee means not many sides can afford him right now.

But Bayern Munich striker Harry Kane is 32 and Barcelona frontman Robert Lewandowski is 36. So next season they might start looking to the future.

Sesko has been linked to both sides before.

Real Madrid’s central striking options depend on less experienced options and Kylian Mbappe – so they may revisit things too.

And he has also been linked to Arsenal – before they signed Viktor Gyokeres – and Chelsea this summer.

So could Sesko take a ‘wait and see what is on the table next summer’ approach?

Why might Sesko not want to stay?

Of course Sesko may well feel his apprenticeship at Leipzig – and Red Bull clubs in general, having started at Salzburg – has been served.

They are not in any European competition this season.

He has consistently been linked to Premier League clubs in each transfer window for the past few years, despite only being 22, so the time might have come to take the plunge.

On top of that if Leipzig have a new-look team and manager, this might be the time to go.

What information do we collect from this quiz?

Related topics

  • Manchester United
  • RB Leipzig
  • Football Transfers
  • Newcastle United
  • Football

One year post Hasina: What’s next for Bangladesh?

The Stream examines Bangladesh’s handling of political uncertainty a year after Sheikh Hasina was ousted by youth protests.

One year after youth-led protests ended Sheikh Hasina’s long rule, we examine how Bangladesh is navigating political uncertainty. Young Bangladeshis demanded change and a political reckoning in the year 2024. The nation maintains a delicate balance a year later. Through the eyes of its young people, we examine the outlook.

Presenter: Stefanie Dekker

In oil-rich Angola, poverty, hunger and deadly unrest over fuel price hikes

Cape Town, South Africa – For Julio Candero, two moments stand out from the recent protests in Angola: the image of a woman being shot from behind by a policeman and the protest cry: “Temos fome – ‘We’re hungry.’”

Following days of demonstrations against the government’s reduction in fuel subsidies, which included looting and burning tyres in the streets, calm has returned to the capital, Luanda, and other parts of the country where protests raged last week.

However, amid the ruins of destroyed businesses and the presence of heavily armed police and the army, Candero believes this is only the beginning.

This is the worst upheaval he has seen in Angola in decades, comparable with the aftermath of a 1977 coup and the violence that followed elections in 1992.

Tens of thousands of Angolans died in both cases as the country suffered the grip of a civil war that started in 1975 and ended in 2002. This past month’s death toll is a fraction of that, but the outrage that followed it is palpable.

“Luanda is slowly regaining its usual rhythm, but obviously, it is a different city. All over the city, you see signs of what happened these last days,” said Candero, who is the director of the Luanda-based rights group, Mosaiko.

Thousands of people took to the streets of Africa’s third-largest oil-producing country last Monday to protest against a government decision to cut fuel subsidies and increase the price of diesel by one-third from July 1.

This followed a first round of protests on July 12 that was largely peaceful.

According to the government, at least 22 people died last week in clashes between the police and protesters, and 197 others were injured. More than 1,200 people were arrested.

The unrest was triggered by a three-day strike by minibus taxi associations to protest against the decision that the government says is part of essential budgetary containment measures.

‘The people live in misery’

Angola has been under increasing pressure from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to tighten its budget since 2023, when it last cut fuel subsidies.

President Joao Lourenco’s government says fiscal restraint is necessary, as subsidies account for about 4 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) and debt exceeds 60 percent of GDP.

Economic Coordination Minister Jose de Lima Massano said in April that last year’s fuel subsidies of about $3bn equalled the budget for 1,400 infrastructure and development projects. Of those projects, 500 had to be suspended due to fiscal constraints.

Angola’s President Joao Lourenco [File: Mateus Bonomi/Reuters]

Analysts say part of the problem is Angola’s heavy reliance on oil, which makes up about 60 percent of government revenue and 95 percent of exports. However, the country only produces about 30 percent of its domestic fuel consumption demand from its lone oil refinery, which dates to the colonial era.

What’s more, Angola based its 2025 budget on an oil price of $70 per barrel, but Brent oil futures fell below $60 in April after United States President Donald Trump announced a sharp increase in tariffs.

Carlos Rosado de Carvalho, a professor of economics at the Catholic University of Angola, said the volatility of the oil market leaves Angola in a precarious position.

“It’s a real problem, because the [fuel] subsidies cost annually about $3bn. This is more than the government spending on health and education together,” de Carvalho said, suggesting that the government’s hand was forced.

Nevertheless, he concedes that the timing of the new policy was far from ideal. It coincided with tariff increases in electricity and water bills of up to 50 percent and 30 percent, respectively.

De Carvalho estimates that in July 2025, the minimum wage also only covered 66 percent of the basket of goods and services it did in 2017 – the year Lourenco came to power.

At the same time, low wages and rising unemployment have left millions of Angolans facing poverty and hunger. “This is where we must look for the causes of the popular uprisings that have marked Angola, especially Luanda,” he said.

To make matters worse, government leaders failed to explain the motivation for the increases.

Commercial oil production in Angola started in the mid-1950s. In 2024, the government said, it generated $31.4bn from oil exports; that revenue is more than ten times the amount spent on fuel subsidies.

The government’s critics say most of the country’s 36 million people have yet to see the benefits of living in a country blessed with natural wealth.

“Ordinary Angolans are not benefitting from the country’s natural resources wealth because of high levels of corruption,” Candero said.

“And, as you see in all rich natural resources countries in Africa, particularly where this exploitation is happening, the people live in misery.”

A group of shops are targeted as looting erupted in the Kalemba 2 district of Luanda on July 28, 2025 during a general strike in the taxi sector declared for three days to protest against the rising prices of fuel.
Shops are looted in the Kalemba 2 district of Luanda on July 28, during a general strike in the taxi sector declared for three days to protest against the rising prices of fuel [AFP]

He does not accept the justification that President Lourenco gave in an interview following the protests, that Angola’s comparatively low fuel prices justify the reduction in subsidies. The government has also pointed out that the discounted prices have attracted illicit cross-border traders from neighbouring countries.

Candero insists this is no justification for increasing fuel prices. He blames the status quo on decades of mismanagement by the ruling People’s Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA) party and believes there are other means of bringing public spending under control.

“If the government really wants to cut spending, it should start by cutting spending on superfluous goods and services, extravagant perks for high public officeholders and stop running up debt to buy fleets of luxury cars, trips with numerous entourages, each person with extra perks,” Candero said.

‘Keep goods cheap’

Attiya Waris, a development expert based at the University of Nairobi, has called on Angola’s government to reconsider the reduction of subsidies.

“Fuel subsidies are important in Angola as they keep goods cheap. The government needs to make sure that any change in fuel prices does not affect movement and the cost of the basket of goods [for] people in the country,” said Waris, who reported to the United Nations Human Rights Commission in February this year as an independent expert on the effects of foreign debt on human rights in Angola.

In her report, Waris, who is Kenyan, warns that the subsidy cuts could push up food price inflation and negatively affect vulnerable groups. She points out that the price of basic staples like eggs had already increased by 400 percent.

The report recommends that the government conduct a comprehensive assessment of the economic and social impacts of cutting fuel subsidies and urges it to seek alternative support mechanisms to mitigate the negative impact it may have on low-income households.

World Bank researchers have also backed up Waris’s findings. They point out that removing subsidies could deepen poverty and inequality and may have dire consequences for specific sectors, such as fishing and agriculture; not to mention that it could lead to a nutritional crisis.

“To mitigate these effects, subsidies should be gradually eliminated and paired with targeted support for specific producers, cash transfers for affected households, and public awareness campaigns about the benefits of subsidy reform,” an article published in May on the World Bank blog site reads.

The authors point out, however, that fuel subsidies have drawbacks, too, including disproportionately benefitting wealthier households, straining public finances, limiting investments in physical and human capital and promoting the over-consumption of fossil fuels.

Angola
Angolan anti-riot police officers stand in formation as protesters gather in Luanda on July 26 during a protest over high living costs [Julio Pacheco Ntela/AFP]

‘The fight will continue’

The government’s handling of the subsidy reforms has been widely criticised, especially after the crackdown on protesters.

Human Rights Watch accused police of using excessive force after they fired tear gas and rubber bullets at protesters on July 12 during the first round of protests against the reduction of subsidies.

Ashwanee Budoo-Scholtz, deputy Africa director at Human Rights Watch, said the use of force was part of a broader trend of security force problems in Angola. She cited a protest in 2023 by 400 women traders in Luanda, which was met with tear gas and police beatings.

When Lourenco was elected for a second term in August 2022, Human Rights Watch made a series of recommendations to place human rights at the centre of his government’s policies, including investigating repeated allegations of rights violations by Angola’s state security forces, such as summary executions, excessive use of force against peaceful protesters, and arbitrary detentions.

“Angolans should be able to peacefully protest government policies without being met with excessive force and other violations of their basic rights,” Budoo-Scholtz said in a statement last month.

Despite the criticisms, President Lourenco on Friday praised the police for “acting within the scope of their duties”.

In a national address, he reminded Angolans that this year marks five decades of independence, nearly half of which were marked by civil war. “[We] cannot accept or tolerate any more pain and mourning among Angolans,” he said.

He ended his address with the words: “Long live Angola.”

Meanwhile, Candero and other civil society groups feel nowhere near as triumphant.

Overnight, transport costs have doubled to about 4,000 kwanza ($4.36) a day for workers who rely on public transport such as minibus taxes, exceeding the daily wages of 53 percent of Angolans, who earn less than $3.65 per day, and 31 percent who live on less than $2.15 per day, according to the World Bank.

Candero said it is almost inevitable that the rising costs of living will lead to more protests.

And with economically desperate people out in the streets, this can also lead to looting, observers note.

“Some people do not agree with destruction of businesses or other public goods. Others think that causing economic and financial consequences is a payback to the government that [harms many] by allowing corruption,” Candero said.

“For others, especially young people from poor suburbs, the fight will continue until the improvement of their social conditions, especially hunger reduction.

Why did Liverpool play twice in a day in pre-season?

As Liverpool, Bournemouth, and Crystal Palace prepare for the upcoming season, they all hosted double-header friendlies.

On Monday, the Premier League champions squared off with Athletic Bilbao twice, giving Arne Slot the chance to play his entire squad for the maximum number of minutes.

As Liverpool prepares for the Community Shield at Wembley on Sunday, they featured 32 players.

Darwin Nunez scored in the first game after an hour of play and the Uruguay striker finding the net in a 4-1 victory.

Florian Wirtz, Milos Kerkez, and Hugo Ekitike made their home debuts with a 3-2 victory, and Slot then assigned a different starting XI and bench for the second match.

Contact us.

A trend that is expanding?

Getty Images

In the pre-season, Crystal Palace plays twice in a day against German side Augsburg, a format that other clubs have followed.

Manager Oliver Glasner expressed his delight with the results of this double exam. We had good tests and made a big step forward at the conclusion of a really challenging training camp.

Before flying to the United States for the Premier League Summer Series, Bournemouth also played two times against Championship side Bristol City in hinter-closed-doors friendlies.

The Ask Me Anything team at BBC Sport has just released this article.

Ask Me Anything: What Is It?

A service called Ask Me Anything is dedicated to responding to your inquiries.

We want to reward your time by educating you on topics you may not otherwise understand.

The team will be able to connect you with a network of contacts, including our experts and experts, to provide you with all the information you require.

We’ll respond to your inquiries right in the BBC Sport newsroom and visit some of the world’s biggest sporting events from the backstage.

More inquiries answered…

related subjects

  • Liverpool
  • Premier League
  • Football