‘Putin will fool Trump’: Why Ukrainians are wary about Alaska talks

Kyiv, Ukraine – Taras, a seasoned Ukrainian serviceman recovering from a contusion, expects “no miracles” from United States President Donald Trump’s August 15 summit with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin.

“There’s going to be no miracles, no peace deal in a week, and Putin will try to make Trump believe that it is Ukraine that doesn’t want peace,” the fair-haired 32-year-old with a deep brown tan acquired in the trenches of eastern Ukraine, told Al Jazeera.

Taras, who spent more than three years on the front line and said he had recently shot down an explosives-laden Russian drone barging at him in a field covered with explosion craters, withheld his last name in accordance with the wartime protocol.

Putin wants to dupe Trump by pandering to the US president’s self-image as a peacemaker to avoid further economic sanctions, while the Russian leader seeks a major military breakthrough in eastern Ukraine, Taras said.

“Putin really believes that until this winter, he will seize something sizeable, or that [his troops] will break through the front line and will dictate terms to Ukraine,” Taras said.

As the Trump administration trumpets the upcoming Alaska summit as a major step towards securing a ceasefire, Ukrainians — civilians and military personnel — and experts are largely pessimistic about the outcomes of the meeting between the US and Russian presidents.

This is partly because of the facts on the ground in eastern Ukraine. Earlier this month, Russia intensified its push to seize key locations in the southeastern Donetsk region, ordering thousands of servicemen to conduct nearly-suicidal missions to infiltrate Ukrainian positions, guarded 24/7 by buzzing drones with night and thermal vision.

In the past three months, Russian forces have occupied some 1,500sq km (580 square miles), mostly in Donetsk, of which Russia controls about three-fourths, according to Ukrainian and Western estimates based on geolocated photos and videos.

The pace is slightly faster than in the past three years.

Within weeks after Moscow’s full-scale invasion began in February 2022, Russia controlled some 27 percent of Ukrainian territory. But Kyiv’s daring counteroffensive and Moscow’s inability to hold onto areas around the capital and in Ukraine’s north resulted in the loss of 9 percent of occupied lands by the fall of 2022.

Russia has since re-occupied less than 1 percent of Ukrainian territory, despite losing hundreds of thousands of servicemen, while pummelling Ukrainian cities almost daily with swarms of drones and missiles. Russia’s push to occupy a “buffer zone” in Ukraine’s northern Sumy region failed as Kyiv’s forces regained most of the occupied ground.

Ukraine also controls a tiny border area in Russia’s western Kursk region, where it started a successful offensive in August 2024, but lost most of its gains earlier this year.

The scepticism in Ukraine over the Alaska meeting is also driven by reports of what the US might offer Putin to try to convince him to stop fighting.

Reports — not denied by Washington — suggest that Trump might offer Moscow full control of Donetsk and the smaller neighbouring Luhansk region. In exchange, Moscow could offer a ceasefire and the freezing of the front line in other Ukrainian regions, as well as the retreat from tiny toeholds in Sumy and the northeastern Kharkiv region, according to the reports.

But to give up Donetsk, Kyiv would have to vacate a “fortress belt” that stretches some 50km (31 miles) along a strategic highway between the towns of Kostiantynivka and Sloviansk.

Donetsk’s surrender would “position Russian forces extremely well to renew their attacks on much more favorable terms, having avoided a long and bloody struggle for the ground,” the Institute for the Study of War, a US think tank, said on Friday.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said that Ukraine will not “gift” its land, and that it needs firm security guarantees from the West.

“We don’t need a pause in killings, but a real, long peace. Not a ceasefire some time in the future, in months, but now,” he said in a televised address on Saturday.

Some civilian Ukrainians hold a gloomy view on the prospects of peace, believing that Kyiv’s tilt towards democracy and presumed eventual membership in the European Union, and Moscow’s “imperialistic nature” set up an equation that prevents a sustainable diplomatic solution.

“The war will go on until [either] Ukraine or Russia exist,” Iryna Kvasnevska, a biology teacher in Kyiv whose first cousin was killed in eastern Ukraine in 2023, told Al Jazeera.

But the lack of trust in the Alaska summit for many Ukrainians also stems from a deep lack of faith in Trump himself.

Despite Trump’s recent change in rhetoric and growing public dissatisfaction with Moscow’s reluctance to end the hostilities, the US president has a history of blaming Ukraine – for the war and its demands of its allies – while some of his negotiators have repeated Moscow’s talking points. It is also unclear whether Zelenskyy will be invited to a trilateral meet with Trump and Putin in Alaska, or whether the US will go ahead and seek to shape the future of Ukraine without Kyiv in the room.

“Trump has let us down several times, and the people who believe he won’t do it again are very naive, if not stupid,” Leonid Cherkasin, a retired colonel from the Black Sea port of Odesa who fought pro-Russian rebels in Donetsk in 2014-2015 and suffered contusions, shrapnel and bullet wounds, told Al Jazeera.

“He did threaten Putin a lot in recent weeks, but his actions don’t follow his words,” he said.

He referred to Trump’s pledges during his re-election campaign to “end the war in 24 hours”, and his ultimatums to impose crippling sanctions on Russia if Putin does not show progress in a peace settlement.

Trump’s ultimatum to Putin, initially 50 days long, was reduced to “10 to 12 days” and ended on Friday, one day after the Alaska summit was announced.

Military analysts agree that Putin will not bow to Trump’s and Zelenskyy’s demands.

Meanwhile, the very fact of a face-to-face with Trump heralds a diplomatic victory for Putin, who has become a political pariah in the West and faces child abduction charges that have led the International Criminal Court to issue an arrest warrant against him. Putin last visited the US for bilateral meetings in 2007, only coming for UN summits after that, but not visiting the country since the warrant was issued.

“What’s paramount for Putin is the fact of his conversation with Trump as equals,” Nikolay Mitrokhin, a researcher with Germany’s Bremen University, told Al Jazeera.

“I think the deal will be limited to an agreement on cessation of air strikes, and Putin will get three months to finalise the land operations – that is, to seize the [entire] Donetsk region.”

An air ceasefire may benefit Russia, as it can amass thousands of drones and hundreds of missiles for future attacks. The ceasefire will also stop Ukraine’s increasingly successful drone strikes on military sites, ammunition depots, airfields and oil refineries in Russia or occupied Ukrainian regions.

Nvidia, AMD to pay 15% of China chip sales to US government, reports say

Nvidia and AMD have agreed to give the United States government a share of revenues from chip sales in China as part of a deal to secure export licences for their products, US media have reported.

Under the agreement reached with US President Donald Trump’s administration, Nvidia will share 15 percent of revenues from sales of its H20 AI chip, while AMD will pay the same percentage of MI308 chip revenues, multiple outlets reported on Sunday.

The unorthodox agreement, which has no known precedent, comes after the Trump administration last month agreed to reverse a ban on the sale of Nvidia’s H20 chips to China.

The Financial Times, which first reported the news, said the Trump administration had yet to decide how it would use the collected revenues.

AMD did not respond to a request for comment.

Nvidia neither confirmed nor denied the deal, but said it follows US government rules for doing business in overseas markets.

“While we haven’t shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide,” a company spokesperson said.

“America cannot repeat 5G and lose telecommunication leadership. America’s AI tech stack can be the world’s standard if we race.”

Following reports of the deal, which was confirmed by The New York Times, Bloomberg, The Wall Street Journal and the BBC, trade experts expressed concern about the implications of linking controls on sensitive technology to monetary payments.

Christopher Padilla, the former head of the US Commerce Department’s International Trade Administration, called the agreement “astonishing”.

“If the Trump administration is allowing companies to buy their way past export controls imposed to protect US national security, we are in very dangerous waters,” Padilla said in a post on LinkedIn.

“A mix of bribery and blackmail that is certainly unprecedented and possibly illegal.”

Peter Harrell, a nonresident fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said the deal set a worrying precedent.

“The Chinese would pay a lot for F35s and advanced US military technology, too,” Harrell said in a post on X.

Magnitude 6.1 earthquake hits western Turkiye, killing one

A magnitude 6.1 earthquake struck northwestern Turkiye’s Balikesir province on Sunday evening, killing at least one person and causing more than a dozen buildings to collapse, according to Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya.

Four people were pulled from the rubble of a collapsed house, three of whom are being treated in hospital, while one man died of his injuries. Yerlikaya said the lone victim was an 81-year-old person who died after being rescued from the rubble.

Nearly 30 people were wounded in the quake, which occurred at about 7:53pm (16:53 GMT), Turkiye’s AFAD disaster management authority said on Sunday. Tremors were felt in multiple provinces, including the country’s biggest city, Istanbul.

The disaster authority reported six aftershocks in the first hour, including one measuring 4.6, and urged citizens not to enter damaged buildings.

Yerlikaya, the interior minister, said search and rescue operations had ended and there were no other signs of serious damage or casualties. He stated that electricity and water service had not been disrupted.

AFAD said the quake, with an epicentre in the town of Sindirgi, struck at a depth of 11km (6.8 miles), while the German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ) registered the earthquake’s magnitude at 6.19 and a depth of 10km (6.2 miles).

A woman sits near the site of a building (not pictured) that collapsed following an earthquake in Sindirgi, in the western Balikesir province, Turkiye [Efekan Akyuz/Reuters]

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan issued a statement wishing all affected citizens a speedy recovery.

“May God protect our country from any kind of disaster,” he wrote on X.

Turkiye lies on multiple fault lines, making it highly prone to earthquakes. Istanbul, a metropolis home to 16 million, is particularly vulnerable. In April of this year, a strong earthquake of magnitude 6.2 rocked the city. No casualties were reported.

BREAKING: Biddy Baxter dead: Blue Peter legend dies as tributes paid to ‘formidable’ legend

Blue Peter star Biddy Baxter has died aged 92, it has been announced.

Biddy worked on the children’s show for more than 25 years and become renowned for her charity appeals, gymnastic displays and foreign travel reports.

She introduced millions of children to sticky-backed plastic thanks to her much-copied home made toys and played a big part in introducing the iconic Blue Peter badge after commissioning and working closely with young artist Tony Hart to design the famous ship logo.

Biddy also earned a reputation as a formidable figure – who fell out with presenters in her desire to guard the Blue Peter brand.






Biddy Baxter helped created the iconic Blue Peter badge
(
Getty Images)

The tragic news was confirmed on Facebook by Ten Acre Films who published her biography last year.

A statement read: “We are sad to report that longtime Blue Peter Editor Biddy Baxter has died at the age of 92. We salute a true pioneer, who navigated changing times in the television industry with instinct, tenacity and style,” they wrote. No cause of death has been given.

Born Joan Maureen Baxter in Leicester to Bryan Reginald Baxter and Dorothy Vera (nee Briers), she studied at St Mary’s College, Durham University, where she first encountered recruitment flyers for the BBC.

She joined the public broadcaster as a radio studio manager in 1955, and was promoted to producing Schools Junior English programmes and Listen With Mother, before making the transition to television.






Biddy


She made audience participation a crucial part of the much-loved show
(
Daily Mirror)

Taking over as editor of Blue Peter in 1965, several years after the programme’s launch, she introduced viewer engagement segments including the national appeals, encouraging children to send letters, pictures and programme ideas. 

She served as editor for more than two decades, winning two Bafta awards and receiving 12 nominations. Upon her departure from the show in 1988, she was awarded the programme’s highest honour, a gold Blue Peter Badge.

“I didn’t want to do anything other than Blue Peter,” she told The Guardian in 2013. “I certainly never wanted to be an administrator or in charge of anything. It was an absolute dream and I never wanted to do anything else. It was a terrific time to be in television.”

She continued to act as a consultant to BBC directors-general John Birt and Sir Michael Checkland after her departure, and received the special award at the Bafta Children’s Awards in 2013.

* This is a breaking showbiz news story. Join The Mirror’s WhatsApp Community or follow us on Google News , Flipboard , AppleNews , TikTok , Snapchat , Instagram , Twitter , Facebook , YouTube and Threads – or visit The Mirror homepage.

‘My wedding dress cost £350 was made in 24 hours – but the level of detail is insane’

A video has been viral of woman’s detailed wedding dress which only took a day to make at the price of £350 leaving viewers shocked at the speed such a detail dress could be made

The Tiktok has gone viral after the bride shared details(Image: Getty Images/Mint Images RF)

A TikTok bride has gone viral after her jaw-dropping wedding dress turned heads for its bold colour, beaded detail and the story behind it.

Benee, known as @Bkziah on TikTok, is Ghanaian and knew exactly what she wanted for her traditional wedding: a vibrant, intricately beaded Kente gown that reflected her culture. But it wasn’t just the design that had people talking – it was the speed, her dream dress was handmade in just 24 hours.

For many, the idea of pulling off a wedding dress in a few days sounds impossible. Weddings are often synonymous with hefty costs and long planning timelines especially when it comes to the dress. But Benee’s journey flipped the script completely, it comes after a woman claimed ‘My friend is naming her baby after a fish – she can’t see how ugly it is’.

Content cannot be displayed without consent

READ MORE: Warning to parents over fines for breaking new school rules from SeptemberREAD MORE: The Summer I Turned Pretty has major twist and fans are on the edge of their seats

In her video, she explains how she designed her dream gown herself and found a dressmaker in Ghana to bring the vision to life. But she quickly found out the process isn’t easy.

“Getting your outfit made back home is not for the faint-hearted,” she warned, adding that while it’s worth it for the cultural meaning, some of the quotes she received were way over budget.

Eventually, Ghana-based designer @Dashis_label agreed to make the dress for £350 which worked out to roughly GH 7,000 in Ghanaian currency.

A few weeks before the wedding, Benee flew from London to Ghana to get fitted – only to arrive and find out the dress hadn’t even been started. “You can imagine my bewilderment,” she said, adding that the delay left her ‘unleashing her bridezilla.’ But within 24 hours, the dress was done and all that had to be done was the final beading.

For more stories like this subscribe to our weekly newsletter, The Weekly Gulp, for a curated roundup of trending stories, poignant interviews, and viral lifestyle picks from The Mirror’s Audience U35 team delivered straight to your inbox.

By the next day, Benee was fully glammed up in her orange, purple and pink masterpiece, covered in glistening beads and traditional detailing. “I was blown away and so impressed by the work they had done.”

A little over a month later, the dress was done and it came exactly how she designed it and Benee explained it made her enjoy the day more saying “there’s nothing quite like feeling good about how you look.”

Article continues below

Videos of her wedding dress has gained huge traction on Tiktok, with people stunned by the design and just how quick it was to make.

How important is a fast start to the season?

Getty Images

The Premier League starts on Friday, with every team dreaming of getting a few early wins under their belt.

Champions Liverpool get the campaign under way at home to Bournemouth, with everyone else involved in the following three days.

How important is a quick start to the season in the first few games? And do any teams have a particularly difficult or relatively easy start?

How much can we read into a quick start?

Last season the top eight in the Premier League after five games ended up finishing as the top eight (albeit not all in the same positions).

If that repeated itself this season it would mean that with 33 games to go we could rule 12 teams out of qualifying for Europe through the league.

Some 12 teams finished within two places of where they were after five games.

Do eventual champions start quickly?

Only 36% of teams who are top at the end of September win the title – including Liverpool last season.

So how much does a good start indicate who will win the league?

The record amount of points after 10 games is 28 (nine wins and a draw). All those four teams – Manchester City (2011-12 and 2017-18), Chelsea (2005-06) and Liverpool (2019-20) went on to win the title.

Newcastle were top after 10 games in three consecutive seasons and did not win the title in any of them.

There are plenty of examples of teams picking up 26 points in their opening 10 games and not going on to win the title.

However, seven teams have not even been on 20 points after 10 games and still won the title.

Manchester City came back to win the title by a clear 12 points in 2020-21. They were sixth, sitting on 18 points and three points off top, after 10 games.

How about promoted teams?

For promoted trio Leeds, Burnley and Sunderland, the concern will be much lower down the table in their bid to avoid relegation.

Especially after two seasons in a row where the promoted trio went straight back down.

For promoted teams, getting 11 points in the first 10 games seems to be the magic mark.

And yet the 86% survival rate from 11 points drops to an astonishing 25% for teams who secure 10 points from their opening 10 matches.

Who has the toughest start?

Opta's fixture difficulty ratings for the first five gamesOpta

Which team can be hopeful of a flying start?

Statisticians Opta have rated the difficulty of each side’s first five games.

Manchester United and Arsenal, who meet on the opening day, are judged to have the two most difficult starts.

United also play Manchester City and Chelsea in their next four games, while Arsenal take on Liverpool and City.

Probably not ideal for United boss Ruben Amorim, who many think needs a good start to the campaign after last season’s 15th-placed finish.

Aston Villa are deemed to have the easiest start, followed by Crystal Palace and West Ham.

Related topics

  • Premier League
  • Football