Timothy West’s heartbreaking final wish as actor’s cause of death announced

Timothy West, who appeared in shows like EastEnders and Brass over the course of his career, died, aged 90, last year and an inquest into his death took place today

It was announced last year that actor Timothy West had died(Image: Dave Benett/Getty Images)

The late Timothy West’s sad final wish has been revealed at an inquest into his death this week. The acclaimed actor is said to have died “peacefully with his family around him” at a care home where he was receiving palliative care.

It was announced in November that actor Timothy – who has been in shows such as Brass and EastEnders – had passed away, aged 90. Now, six months on, a hearing into his death was held at Westminster Coroner’s Court today.

Timothy is said to have been found by a nurse at Wandsworth Common Care Home, where he had been living in the days prior to his death. As reported by PA, he move there after being in hospital for three months following a fall.

The care home’s general manager Thomas Holden gave a statement for the inquest. Mr Holden said that Timothy was admitted with a view to trying to rehabilitate him enough so that he could go home “as he wished to spend his last days there” but that there was a “slow decline” in his health over the days he resided there.

Mr Holden said in a statement read out: “On 12 November his family were with him all day. They continued to stay with him in his room during the evening and he passed away peacefully with his family around him at 19:20.”

Details about his previous fall, months prior to moving into the care home, were also revealed at the hearing. Timothy was admitted to hospital in August last year after the fall near his home, with him later discharged to the care home.

Article continues below
Timothy West in a striped shirt and brown jacket.
An inquest into the death of actor Timothy West took place today(Image: Getty Images)

Assistant coroner Ellie Oakley said: “Timothy West had an unwitnessed fall near his home on 11 August 2024 which resulted in a significant traumatic brain injury. It is not possible to determine how the fall happened and there is no evidence of others being involved.

“He was treated in hospital for around three months before being discharged to a care home on 5 November 2024 for palliative care. Unfortunately he was not well enough to be discharged to his home despite receiving appropriate care in the care home. He died on 12 November 2024.”

The inquest heard that members of the public came across him unconscious on a footpath near Wandsworth Common after his fall and an ambulance crew attended. They are said to have taken him to St George’s Hospital in Tooting after a neurological assessment. He remained in hospital for around three months during which time the actor’s loved ones eventually decided to prioritise his “comfort and dignity” and arranged for him to be discharged to the private care home.

A cause of death was also disclosed at the inquest. The medical cause of death was given as a subdural haematoma and extra-axial haemorrhage, with a traumatic brain injury and non-convulsive status epilepticus, aspiration pneumonia and hypertension as contributing factors.

Timothy West and Prunella Scales in a black-and-white photo from 1976.
It was announced in November that Timothy, pictured with his wife Prunella Scales, had died, aged 90(Image: Getty Images)

The coroner addressed the family and close friends who viewed proceedings online at the conclusion of the inquest, telling them: “I would like to end by passing on my sincerest condolences to Mr West’s family and friends for this tragic loss of their loved one.”

As reported at the time, in a statement announcing his death last year, Timothy’s children Juliet, Samuel and Joseph West said through his agent: “After a long and extraordinary life on and off the stage, our darling father Timothy West died peacefully in his sleep yesterday evening. He was 90 years old. Tim was with friends and family at the end.

“He leaves his wife Prunella Scales, to whom he was married for 61 years, a sister, a daughter, two sons, seven grandchildren and four greatgrandchildren. All of us will miss him terribly. We would like to thank the incredible NHS staff at St George’s Hospital, Tooting and at Avery Wandsworth for their loving care during his last days.”

Article continues below

APC Adopts Progressive Governors’ Vote Of Confidence In Tinubu

The party leadership adopted their decision on Thursday, prompting the Progressives Governors’ Forum to cast a vote of confidence in President Bola Tinubu.

At the party’s national summit held in Abuja’s Banquet Hall under the All Progressives Congress (APC) banner, the governors who were elected in their place will be able to vote on their resolution.

Members of the Progressive Governors Forum are satisfied with the Renewed Hope Agenda’s midterm review and performance evaluation results, according to Hope Uzodimma, the governor of Imo State and the chairman of the Progressive Governors.

According to Uzodimma, “We recognize the governors’ resolution that Mr. President carries our flag in 2027 and that the governors assume responsibility for carrying out this mandate in their respective states.”

He requested that Kaduna State governor Uba Sani second the motion calling for the president’s 2027 presidential election to be approved.

Silk’n IPL device removes hair in 7 weeks for £1000 less than in-clinic treatment—but does it work?

Shopping Writer Meghan has been putting this Silk’n IPL hair removal device to the test for the last 10 weeks to find out if it really works – and if its better than in-clinic treatments

Silk’n IPL device removes hair in 7 weeks for £1k less than in-clinic treatment(Image: Meghan Coon)

It’s that time of year when many of us want smooth, hairless legs for the season of skirts and shorts. But shaving on a regular basis is an arduous task, and getting professional hair removal treatments in a clinic can cost a fortune. A typical full-leg season of laser hair removal at a beauty salon would normally cost around £200 to £300, with the possibility of costing more depending on the clinic.

While at-home IPL machines come with a hefty price tag, I’ve been trying this Silk’n 7 IPL device for the last ten weeks to see if the results make the cost worth it. Retailing for £499, this device is touted for producing results in just two weeks, with an ideal use period of seven sessions/seven weeks. This means the at-home device retails for under half the amount it would cost to get seven in-clinic treatments at £200 a go.

Now, I’m not saying this IPL device immediately abolishes the need to shave—you have to shave before every treatment. But it promises that after the treatments, you’ll be completely hair-free for up to eighteen months, making it an ideal choice for this time of year when most of us don’t want leg or underarm hair.

But of course, with a price tag that high, the real question is – does it work?

READ MORE: Spacious and sturdy greenhouse that’s touted as ‘every gardener’s dream’ as it lands on sale

READ MORE: Korean lilac tree that blooms twice a year gets slashed by £20 in spring sale

Silk'n 7 IPL
Meghan’s trusty Silk’n 7 IPL is available on Amazon(Image: Meghan Coon)

Retailing for £499 on Amazon, Boots, and Lookfantastic, this laser hair remover comes in a huge set that’s got you covered for all of your hair removal needs. It comes with various plugs to best suit your home outlets, three-sized heads for more precise treatments, a handy travel bag that makes it convenient to keep tidy and take away with you, and a razor in case you don’t have one to hand.

You have to shave beforehand so the gadget’s light therapy can target the hair follicle from the root, which does mean the process is relatively time-consuming, especially if you are tackling larger areas on the body like the legs. That said, you only have to do it for a few weeks before you’re spared the need to shave for the rest of the season.

Touted for offering results as soon as just two weeks after, this IPL machine doesn’t cause any discomfort or pain while it’s pressed to the skin, even at its highest setting. The gadget comes with five settings that range in intensity, so it’s recommended to start from the first and work up to five. However, I’ve used IPLS a lot in the last year, so if you’re familiar with the routine, you can start at a higher level without any problems.

This IPL machine has a cooling fan embedded to ensure you don’t feel any heat or burning sensation while in use. It is also easily manoeuvrable, with a head that rotates 180 degrees, so you can angle it to get to more difficult areas, such as under the arms or around the bikini line.

Meghan Coon
Before and after using the Silk’n IPL device for 10 weeks(Image: Meghan Coon)

For £499, is this at-home hair removal device worth it? I’d say absolutely. I can’t say that I noticed real results as soon as two weeks after I began using it on my legs, but I do have very fast-growing and relatively coarse hair that has always proven stubborn when it comes to hair removal methods.

By the seventh week, I had definitely noticed a big change in how fast the hair regrew and how much thinner it was. I decided to persist for a couple more weeks to ensure the best results, and by the tenth session, I was barely shaving any hair before the treatment.

Article continues below

This IPL gadget is truly the answer to my prayers, as I get to enjoy the whole summer without any regrowth on my legs or under my arms. Yes, £499 is expensive, but when you consider the thousands you’re saving by not going to expensive clinics, and the time saved from not needing to shave for months after, this Silk’n 7 definitely makes itself worth every penny.

Iran says will hold US responsible for any Israeli attack on nuclear sites

Iran’s foreign minister warned after CNN reported that Israel might be planning strikes that resulted in the United States being held accountable for an Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear sites.

Iran’s closest allies, Israel’s allies, will hold a fifth round of nuclear talks on Friday amid intense disagreements over Iran’s uranium enrichment, which Washington claims could lead to the development of nuclear weapons.

Tehran has consistently disputed that it wants to bomb and that its nuclear program is intended for civilian use.

In a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, foreign minister Abbas Araghchi wrote that “Iran firmly warns against any adventurism by the Zionist regime of Israel and will stand ready to respond to any threat or unlawful act by this regime.”

“I have called on the international community to take effective preventive measures to stop Israeli threats that, if unchecked, would force Iran to take special measures to defend our nuclear facilities and materials,” Araghchi said.

Tehran, according to the minister, would view any such attack as “participating.”

According to him, “the nature, content, and scope of our actions will be in line with and be proportionate to preventive measures taken by these international organizations in accordance with their statutory duties and obligations.”

Following a CNN report released on Tuesday, which claimed the US had “new intelligence suggesting that Israel was planning to attack Iranian nuclear facilities”

Even though Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has threatened to strike Iran’s nuclear sites in advance of its decision to pursue one, Israel has not acknowledged any preparations.

In what could be their fifth round of negotiations, which would see Tehran curtail or end its enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions, are scheduled to take place on Friday in Rome between the US and Iran.

Israel has opposed a deal like this between the US and Iran on numerous occasions.

Separately, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which is under the direct command of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, warned Israel that an “devastating and decisive response” would be imposed if it attacked Iran.

According to IRGC spokesman Alimohammad Naini, “They are trying to frighten us with war, but are miscalculating because they are ignorant of the formidable popular support the Islamic Republic can muster in times of war.”

Trump’s Ramaphosa ‘ambush’: Key takeaways from heated White House meeting

US President Donald Trump ambushed South African President Cyril Ramaphosa during a meeting at the White House in Washington, DC on Wednesday when he claimed that a “genocide” against white Afrikaners is taking place in South Africa. This claim has been widely discredited.

Here are some of the key moments from the meeting.

Ramaphosa came bearing golfers and a book

The South African leader appeared to have arrived at the Oval Office with hopes of mending a tricky relationship between the United States and South Africa.

Trump started the meeting by referring to Ramaphosa as a man who is, “in some circles, really respected, other circles, a little bit less respected, like all of us in all fairness”.

Trump’s love for golf is no secret and, perhaps in the hope of defusing tension, Ramaphosa brought along two of South Africa’s top golfers, Ernie Els and Retief Goosen, both of whom are white. “These two guys are unbelievable,” Trump said.

Ramaphosa also presented Trump with a repository of South Africa’s golf courses, compiled in a book weighing 14kg (31 pounds) and featuring writing by Els. White businessman Johann Rupert — South Africa’s richest man — was also part of Ramaphosa’s delegation.

Trump accused South Africa of ‘white genocide’

During the meeting, Trump repeatedly claimed that genocide against white farmers is taking place in South Africa, an allegation denied by Ramaphosa.

Earlier this month, 59 white “refugees” were flown from South Africa to the US as part of a relocation plan for white South Africans devised by the Trump administration.

Trump told Ramaphosa that these were white farmers fleeing violence directed at them in South Africa. “We have many people that feel they’re being persecuted, and they’re coming to the United States,” said Trump. “People are fleeing South Africa for their own safety. Their land is being confiscated, and in many cases, they’re being killed.”

But Ramaphosa denied allegations of a “white genocide” in South Africa. “If there was Afrikaner farmer genocide, I can bet you, these three gentlemen would not be here,” the South African president said, referring to Els, Goosen and Rupert.

While murder is an issue in South Africa, a majority of victims are Black and are targeted by thieves, experts say, not for political reasons.

“There is no merit to Trump’s fantasy claims of white genocide,” South African historian Saul Dubow, professor of Commonwealth history at the University of Cambridge, told Al Jazeera. “South Africa is a violent country and, in economic terms, one of the most unequal societies in the world. The violence is criminal rather than political, though racial injustice inevitably forms part of the context.”

Dubow suggested that Trump may be more angry about South Africa’s genocide case against Israel, filed in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in December 2023 in relation to the war on Gaza.

While the Trump administration is welcoming “refugees” from South Africa, it is simultaneously removing protections for those from other countries. Since Trump’s inauguration in January, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has revoked protection from deportation previously granted to more than 800,000 people who escaped conflict zones or danger in Venezuela, Haiti, Afghanistan and Cameroon.

‘Turn the lights down’: Trump displayed a video showing attacks

Trump claimed he had video and photo evidence to back up his “white genocide” allegations.

At one point during the meeting, the US president flipped through a stack of printed news clippings. “Death, death, death,” he said, showing the cameras one news article after another.

He held up one particular article from a publication called American Thinker, titled “Let’s talk about Africa, which is where tribalism takes you”. While the article mentions South Africa, Trump said that the thumbnail image showed white farmers being buried. However, the thumbnail proved to be a screengrab from a news clip about violence against women in Democratic Republic of the Congo’s Goma.

Trump then asked for the lights in the Oval Office to be dimmed and a five-minute video montage was displayed on a screen. The videos included one of a South African opposition figure, Julius Malema, the leader of the left-wing Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) party, singing the anti-apartheid song Dubul’ ibhunu (“Kill the Boer”) at a rally. The title of the song is often also translated as “kill the white farmer”.

Dubow said some populists do promote “inflammatory songs” such as “Kill the Boers” in South Africa. “This may or may not be meant literally,” he told Al Jazeera. “President Ramaphosa and the ANC [Ramaphosa’s party, African National Congress] do not support such rhetoric.”

Next, Trump went on the attack again. “You do allow them to take land,” Trump told Ramaphosa.

“Nobody can take land,” Ramaphosa said.

“When they take the land, they kill the white farmer. And when they kill the white farmer, nothing happens to them,” Trump replied.

“There is criminality in our country. People who do get killed, unfortunately through criminal activity, are not only white people, majority of them are Black people,” Ramaphosa said. Trump cut him off, saying “the farmers are not Black”.

Talking about South Africa’s land reform law

In January, Ramaphosa signed a new land expropriation law aimed at righting apartheid-era wrongs in South Africa.

Under the new law, the government has the power to seize privately owned land from people of any race for public purposes and public interests. While the law provides for compensation payments, it also allows for seizure without compensation in certain instances. This law replaced a 1975 law which was criticised for lacking clear compensation plans and being legally ambiguous.

White South Africans are mostly either Afrikaans-speaking descendants of Dutch settlers or English-speaking descendants of British colonialists.

Until the 1990s, white Afrikaners controlled the country under the system of apartheid, a system which excluded the Black majority in South Africa.

Even though apartheid officially ended in 1994, several of the most successful business and farmland owners in South Africa are white and more than half of the country’s Black population is categorised as poor. White South Africans make up about 7 percent of the population but own more than 70 percent of the land.

“The long history of colonialism and land dispossession in South Africa has not been addressed. Historical racial injustice remains keenly felt. White farmers remain in possession of most of the productive land, 30 years after 1994,” Dubow said.

“White farmers, large producers in particular, have generally done well in the post-apartheid era. They are probably more vulnerable to American tariffs than physical attacks,” said Dubow.

In February, Trump froze aid to South Africa, saying the new land law permits the government to seize land from ethnic minority Afrikaners without compensation.

As of mid-May, however, no land had been forcibly taken by the South African government without compensation under the new law.

The Trump administration also extensively scaled back the operations of the US Agency for International Development (USAID), stripping aid organisations all over the world of foreign assistance. This put more than 8,000 workers in South Africa’s national HIV programme out of work.

“South Africans keenly feel the withdrawal of American support of HIV/AIDS programmes,” Dubow said. “A key question is the future of the AGOA [African Growth and Opportunity Act] agreement, signed in 2000, which allows tariff-free exports to the United States. South African manufactured motor cars and agricultural exports would be hit should AGOA not be renewed,” he added. As of 2024, 32 sub-Saharan countries are eligible for AGOA benefits.

“Another indicator will be whether Trump attends the upcoming G20 in South Africa.”

Angling for a trade deal

Ramaphosa had promised South Africans that he would present a trade deal to the US, so he talked about the history of economic cooperation between Washington and Pretoria, and dangled access to “rare earth minerals”.

“We’ve got critical minerals that you want to fuel the growth of your own economy and reindustrialise. So, we have that on offer, including rare earth minerals,” Ramaphosa told Trump.

South Africa holds large reserves of gold, platinum group metals, chrome ore, manganese ore, zirconium, vanadium and titanium.

Critical minerals are important for the manufacturing of clean energy and machinery and for the production of technology including mobile phones, solar panels and electric vehicles. In March, Trump invoked wartime powers to direct federal agencies to identify mines and government-owned land that could be exploited to boost the production of critical minerals.

South Africa is one of many countries eager to forge a new trade deal with the US in order to avoid Trump’s threat of punishing tariffs. On April 2, which Trump called “liberation day,” he slapped a 31 percent reciprocal tariff on South Africa, currently on a 90-day pause. The US’s universal 10 percent tariff on overseas goods remains in place, including for South Africa.

In 2023, 7 percent of South Africa’s exports went to the US and 6.4 percent of its imports came from the US, according to data from the Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC).

While the two countries did not confirm a trade agreement at Wednesday’s meeting, Ramaphosa told reporters afterwards that the discussion was “a great success”. He added that he presented a framework for a trade deal to Trump, and the two agreed to continue having discussions to figure out the specifics of this deal.

Not the first such ambush

This was not the first time a foreign leader has faced a hostile atmosphere in the Oval Office.

Kanu Trial: ESN Illegal, Amotekun Backed By Law – Witness Tells Court

The Eastern Security Network (ESN), established by Kanu, is an illegal organization, in contrast to Amotekun, which is supported by the law, according to the second prosecution witness in Nnamdi Kanu’s ongoing trial.

The witness made the claim while being reexamined by the prosecution attorney, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), who asked him to compare Amotekun and ESN’s activities under the codename “BBB.”

The ESN has no legal standing, despite the witness’ claim that Amotekun was established through laws passed by the six South-West states.

He further testified that the Director-General of the Department of State Services (DSS) had once advocated for community-based policing initiatives to combat insecurity, provided guidance and approval from reputable security organizations.

The court accepted the fact that three video recordings from a flash drive were presented to defense counsel Paul Erokoro (SAN) earlier during the hearing.

After that, the three videos were played in an open court.

The DSS’s General Manager was spotted speaking at a public event in one of the recordings urging local communities to build a first line of defense against bandits and other external threats.

[Alleged Terrorism:] DSS denies involvement in Nnamdi Kanu’s Kenya arrest.

He was said to have said, “To mobilize people is to get everyone involved. That’s what we do.” Security forces cannot be deployed in every region of the nation.

The key thing we need to do is to establish communities as the first line of defense. Under the direction and consent of security agencies, we must allow the communities to rise and defend themselves first. It needs to start right away.

The witness clarified that the DSS DG had specifically stated that such efforts must be conducted under the supervision of security agencies when asked by Erokoro whether the DSS DG was not effectively calling for communities to arm themselves.

General Theophilus Danjuma, the former defense minister, was spotted speaking in a court video.

Danjuma claimed in the video that some armed forces officers were not impartial in the ongoing killings in the nation.

Erokoro asked the witness to explain what Danjuma’s remarks meant when he was identified as the speaker.

The witness objected, saying Danjuma should be the subject of the inquiry.

Hope Uzodinma, the governor of Imo State, lamented the state’s ongoing killings and attributed them to the actions of unnamed politicians in the third video.

Erokoro questioned whether Uzodinma’s statement was in conflict with the witness’ earlier claim that members of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) were responsible for the killings in Orlu, Imo State.

The witness argued that the DSS’s position was based on the findings of its investigation.

We named the people who were killed by alleged IPOB members in our investigation. The witness claimed that the governor did not name the victims who he claimed were killed.

He confirmed that Kanu remained a member both before and after the group’s proscription, and that IPOB had been ordered by a judge.

The witness claimed that the protests were a response to calls for the police’s Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) to be disbanded when questioned about his knowledge of the EndSARS protests.

He added that he was aware of the establishment of commissions of inquiry into the protests and related incidents in several states, including Lagos and the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC).

He and Erokoro both agreed that IPOB was not listed as a participant in the Lagos State panel’s report and that it did not classify the protests as terrorist acts.

The Lagos State Commission’s report was later submitted, which was accepted as evidence by Erokoro.

Justice Omotosho ordered the prosecution to finish its case within six days and gave the defense nine days to make its argument before adjourning the proceedings for the day.