‘I knew these giants, Al Jazeera’s Mohammed Qreiqeh and Anas al-Sharif’

Deir el-Balah, Gaza – The first time I met Mohammed Qreiqeh was at al-Ahli Arab Hospital in Gaza City on January 31 when we had just returned from southern Gaza to the north.

I went to Al Jazeera’s media tent at the hospital, where he was. Photographer Abdel “Abed” Hakim and I introduced ourselves, and we all chatted – about the situation, the war and our displacement to the south.

At the time, Anas al-Sharif was doing a live report.

I felt a warm sense of familiarity. I was finally seeing Anas, whose reports we had followed throughout our displacement. He didn’t look different from how he did on screen, but he had a strong presence in person.

We approached Anas after he finished his report and spoke briefly. He knew Abed well, but it was the first time I met him. He spoke with humility and an easy smile during our short conversation – he had to go report across northern Gaza.

My brief meeting with Anas and Mohammed that day felt like standing before giants, powerful and unshakable. In their presence, I felt like nothing compared to their strength, determination and persistence despite the horrors that had unfolded in the north.

Those of us reporting from the south often marvelled at their strength, and we were always proud of them.

I met Mohammed and Anas several times after that.

On April 13 when al-Ahli Arab Hospital in the centre of Gaza City was struck by two missiles, the meeting was brief but warm – the kind that you could feel how ready they were to help at any moment.

That day, Mohammed advised me to focus on certain points and pointed me towards a place to get important interviews and information. Moments later, he excused himself to go live on air.

This was something Anas and Mohammed shared: tireless work and a willingness to help any journalist on the ground, especially as veterans who knew every inch of northern Gaza.

The last time I saw Anas was last week outside al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City. I had gone there to film an interview.

We exchanged a quick greeting because, as always, he was busy and getting ready for a live broadcast. I watched him gesture to his cameraman where to set up under the blazing sun.

For a moment, I observed him, his energy and professionalism, despite the wave of Israeli incitement and threats against him. My parting words to him were: “Stay safe,” because we all knew he could be a target at any moment.

When the news came of his assassination on Sunday night, it was a catastrophe, not only for journalists, but for all Palestinians who considered Anas a son, someone who told their stories.

The author first met Mohammed Qreiqeh at the end of January [Al Jazeera]

Everyone hoped the news was wrong, but it wasn’t. And it carried another blow: Mohammed, Mohammed Noufal and Ibrahim Zaher had also been targeted.

Al Jazeera Arabic’s entire northern Gaza crew had been wiped out – correspondents, cameramen and equipment – erased.

The charges against them were ready-made, fabricated. But everyone knows Israel fears only one thing: the truth.

It was a moment when I hated everything. I hated journalism – now a lie for a world that does not hear us or see us, a world that waits for our deaths, waits for us to become the news instead of delivering it.

It was a moment heavy with futility, with the shamelessness of the crime and yet heavier with the rage that the crimes go unpunished.

Why wasn’t Anas protected? Why was he left alone, facing death at any moment? Why did we have to watch this as just another news item?

Journalism has become a fear and a curse that shadows us all, every moment.

Fresh or fatigued – how rested is your Premier League team’s squad?

  • 76 Comments

It seems as if there is more football than ever.

Since the Champions League final some players have had two international games, played in up to seven Fifa Club World Cup matches and featured in some pre-season friendlies – all around the world.

That was after a season with the biggest European club campaigns ever – and it will be the same again this time.

Plus there is an Africa Cup of Nations in the middle of the season and a 48-team World Cup in North America at the end of it.

So which clubs’ players have featured in the most matches in the past year – and who should be the freshest on paper?

And which individual players could be exhausted before this season even starts?

Which teams have the freshest squads?

We picked 20 outfield players for each club who played the most league games last season – and then replaced ones who have left (or played the least last season) with new signings.

We have looked at their total minutes played for club and country since the start of last summer – 1 June 2024.

The freshest team this season in the Premier League should be Everton.

The players in Everton’s current squad played an average of just 1,847 minutes of football last season – the equivalent of about 21 full games.

Only one player – 35-year-old Senegal midfielder Idrissa Gueye – played more than 4,000 minutes (44 full games).

Only West Ham played fewer games last season than Everton among the current Premier League clubs, as both teams were knocked out of both domestic cups early.

Bournemouth’s squad is the second freshest in terms of minutes played.

And which teams is the least fresh?

Manchester City have the least fresh squad in the Premier League according to our data.

While City did exit the Champions League early, they reached the FA Cup final and also took part in the Club World Cup in June and July.

Most of City’s players are also established internationals – and played an average of 3,780 minutes in the past 14 months, or exactly 42 full games of football. That is double Everton’s total.

And some of City’s summer signings actually increased their average.

Midfielder Tijjani Reijnders, who played for Guardiola’s side in the Club World Cup, has played an incredible 6,032 minutes for AC Milan, the Netherlands and City since last summer – the equivalent of 67 full games.

Our data found Arsenal have the second-least fresh squad, with an average of 3,552 minutes played.

The seven teams who played in Europe topped the list for most games played, along with Championship play-off winners Sunderland.

Chelsea actually played more games than anyone else last season – including on their way to winning the Club World Cup.

Is age a factor?

Youth could work in Chelsea’s favour too.

Enzo Maresca’s side have by far the youngest squad in the Premier League.

No player over the age of 27 played for the Blues in the league last season, and they had the youngest squad at the Club World Cup.

Their oldest summer signing is 23-year-old Joao Pedro. So does youth mean they might feel the minutes in their legs less?

By contrast, Chelsea’s west London rivals Fulham have the oldest playing squad in the top flight.

Which players have played the most football?

New Wolves signing Jhon Arias tops the list of most minutes played in 2024-25.

The 27-year-old winger played a remarkable 6,577 minutes for Brazilian club Fluminense and national side Colombia – the equivalent of 73 full games.

Brazilian clubs play in their national league and state competitions, plus cups and continental competitions.

Arias, who has joined Wolves for £15m, also played in the Club World Cup this summer with Fluminense, reaching the semi-finals.

Related topics

  • Premier League
  • Football

UN probe finds evidence of ‘systematic torture’ in Myanmar

United Nations investigators say they have gathered evidence of systematic torture in Myanmar’s detention facilities, identifying senior figures among those responsible.

The Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar (IIMM), set up in 2018 to examine potential breaches of international law, said on Tuesday that detainees had endured beatings, electric shocks, strangulation and fingernail removal with pliers.

“We have uncovered significant evidence, including eyewitness testimony, showing systematic torture in Myanmar detention facilities,” Nicholas Koumjian, head of the mechanism, said in a statement accompanying its 16-page report.

The UN team said some prisoners died as a result of the torture.

It also documented the abuse of children, often detained unlawfully as proxies for their missing parents.

According to the report, the UN team has made more than two dozen formal requests for information and access to the country, all of which have gone unanswered. Myanmar’s military authorities did not respond to media requests for comment.

The military has repeatedly denied committing atrocities, saying it is maintaining peace and security while blaming “terrorists” for unrest.

The findings cover a year that ended on June 30 and draw on information from more than 1,300 sources, including hundreds of witness accounts, forensic analysis, photographs and documents.

The IIMM said it identified high-ranking commanders among the perpetrators but declined to name them to avoid alerting those under investigation.

The report also found that both government forces and armed opposition groups had committed summary executions. Officials from neither side of Myanmar’s conflict were available to comment.

The latest turmoil in Myanmar began when a 2021 military coup ousted an elected civilian government, sparking a nationwide conflict. The UN estimates tens of thousands of people have been detained in efforts to crush dissent and bolster the military’s ranks.

Last month, the leader of the military government, Min Aung Hlaing, ended a four-year state of emergency and appointed himself acting president before planned elections.

The IIMM’s mandate covers abuses in Myanmar dating back to 2011, including the military’s 2017 campaign against the mostly Muslim Rohingya, which forced hundreds of thousands of members of the ethnic minority to flee to Bangladesh, and postcoup atrocities against multiple communities.

The IIMM is also assisting international legal proceedings, including cases in Britain. However, the report warned that budget cuts at the UN could undermine its work.

Illia Zabarnyi: PSG sign Ukraine defender from Bournemouth

Paris Saint-Germain have signed centre back Illia Zabarnyi from Premier League club Bournemouth on a five-year contract, with the 22-year-old becoming the French club’s first Ukrainian player in history.

Financial details were not disclosed but media reports on Tuesday said the transfer fee was worth about 63 million euros ($73m).

The Ukraine international was a key part of Bournemouth’s defensive lineup last season, making 36 appearances as the club achieved positive goal difference in a Premier League campaign for the first time, finishing ninth.

Zabarnyi is the latest Bournemouth defender to depart this summer after Dean Huijsen joined Real Madrid and Milos Kerkez signed for Liverpool.

“I’m very happy to join Paris Saint-Germain, the best club in the world, with the best project. I am here to give everything I have on the pitch and I’m looking forward to making my debut and meeting the fans,” Zabarnyi said in a statement.

Zabarnyi made his senior debut at his hometown club Dyanmo Kyiv before joining Bournemouth in January 2023 on a five-and-a-half year contract.

The English club awarded Zabarnyi, known for his aggressive defending and dominance in aerial duels, with a contract extension until 2029 after an impressive 2023-2024 campaign.

“We’re delighted to continue the strengthening of our squad with the signature of Illia Zabarnyi. Illia is a talented international player and a great professional. He will make a major contribution to everything that we are building long-term at Paris Saint-Germain,” PSG President Nasser Al-Khelaifi said.

Champions League winners PSG, who also lifted the Ligue 1 and French Cup titles last season, face Tottenham Hotspur for the UEFA Super Cup on Wednesday.

Real reason Brooklyn Beckham renewed vows after tears at first wedding

Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz have renewed their wedding vows just three years after their 2022 bash was said to have been the catalyst for a major rift between David and Victoria

Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz.

Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz have renewed their wedding vows in a lavish ceremony, attended by members of the bride’s family.

As the Beckham feud hits an all time low, fans were shocked to see that neither David or Victoria, their other three children or extended family were invited to the ceremony. Sources have now revealed that the family were not even told about the vow renewal.

Brooklyn, 26, and Nicola, 30, have only been married three years. Their last $3million wedding hit the headlines for all the wrong reasons, after a series of revelations about their special day came to light.

Nicola was said to have been left in ‘tears’ by one upsetting moment. In a perceived dig at Victoria second time round, Nicola opted to wear her own mother’s wedding dress after u-turning on her decision to wear one of Victoria’s designs at her first wedding.

Drama was bubbling under even before Nicola and Brooklyns said ‘I do’ in 2022, when Nicola opted to wear a Valentino Couture gown in an apparent snub to her mother-in-law.

READ MORE: David and Victoria Beckham’s heartbreaking response to Brooklyn’s wedding says it allREAD MORE: Brooklyn Beckham snubs entire family from Nicola Peltz vow renewal in ‘upsetting’ move

Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz
Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz.

Tensions between the couple finally came to a head after Victoria, 51, allegedly ‘hijacked’ a dance at Brooklyn’s 2022 Palm Beach wedding to actress Nicola Peltz, 30. The move went down like a lead balloon in the room sources claimed, seeing as though it was the song the happy couple had planned to dance to together.

“Marc Anthony, who is a friend of the Beckhams, offered to perform as a gift at the wedding,” a source told People at the time. “Before the song began, Marc Anthony asked Brooklyn to come to the stage, and then announced, ‘The most beautiful woman in the room tonight, come on up…. Victoria Beckham!'”

The source claims that the new bride allegedly “felt that Victoria ruined her wedding, and couldn’t understand why.”

Victoria Beckham poses with her pals including Eva Longoria at Brooklyn's wedding
Victoria Beckham poses with her pals including Eva Longoria at Brooklyn’s wedding

A second insider said the entire room was so shocked that Anthony called Victoria’s name over Nicola’s that a complete silence followed.

“It was such a jaw-dropping moment that it left the whole room in absolute shock — you could hear a pin drop,” the second source adds.

Guests at the $3million bash went into a deeper tailspin when Victoria insisted on a slow dance with her son. It wasn’t appropriate,” the source says of the alleged moment, adding that everyone then saw “Nicola run from the room crying.”

Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz, both in white, on the cover of Vogue for their wedding.
(Image: Vogue)

“Nicola felt like Victoria did this on purpose, when she knew it was a pre-planned romantic dance meant for Brooklyn and Nicola. What she couldn’t understand was why.”

Another guest at the wedding had a differing version of events, saying the newly weds had their first official dance earlier in the evening to Elvis Presley’s Only Fools Rush In as they had wanted. While Nicola had a separate dance with her father later in the evening.

They say Marc Anthony – a close friend of David and Victoria – played a song as Brooklyn danced with his mum and ‘everyone had a great time.’

As the rumours about a wedding night upset continued to swirl, Nicola spoke out on the rumours herself – and defended the Beckham clan.

In an interview with The Sunday Times, Peltz Beckham said: “It’s not a feud! I keep seeing everywhere that word, ‘feud, feud, feud’.

“I don’t know why they say feud. I mean, maybe they picked up on something? And now they’re labelling it ‘feud’?”

She added: “No family is perfect!”

Nicola also directly addressed the claims that she decided not to wear a dress specifically designed for her by Victoria

Peltz Beckham said: “I think it all started because I didn’t end up wearing Victoria’s wedding dress.

“But the real truth is, I really, really wanted to wear it and I thought it was so beautiful that Brooklyn’s mom got to make that for me! And I was really excited to wear it! And I didn’t end up wearing it.”

Article continues below

Skin-firming £10 serum-moisturiser called ‘alternative to Botox’ now down from £30

Boots’ popular £10 Tuesday deals are back for another 24 hours, and this two-in-one anti-wrinkle cream with hundreds of five-star reviews is our top pick to buy today

Save £20 on this popular face cream today(Image: Getty)

Beauty fans know that Tuesdays are the best days to shop for top-ups or new treats, because it means that Boots’ much-loved £10 Tuesday offers are running, with hundreds of products reduced down to £10 for one day only. And if you’re wondering what’s worth buying from the high street retailer today, we think this two-in-one, wrinkle-reducing moisturiser is one not to miss.

For today only, Boots has slashed the price ofOlay Regenerist 2in1 Anti-Wrinkle Active Firming Serum & Cream down from its usual £30 to a tenner – although as it works as your serum and moisturiser in one, you’re potentially saving even more compared to buying two separate products.

Why we think it’s worth adding to your shopping basket today is the vast number of impressive customer reviews, with many repeat customers, and one person even calling it “an alternative to Botox” and saying that it has them “looking a decade younger”.

READ MORE: Olivia Attwood’s Korean beauty moisturiser that ‘transforms’ skin is now on sale

READ MORE: ‘I found how to get a £42 Medik8 serum for £5 in a beauty deal that saves over £150’

Olay Regenerist Active Firming Day Face Cream and Serum
Currently a third of its usual price(Image: Boots)

This lightweight serum/moisturiser hybrid contains peptides to help to visibly reduce fine lines and wrinkles, niacinamide to boost surface cell renewal, and hydrating, moisture-locking glycerin. Olay reports that 97% of testers reported smoother feeling skin after one day, while over time fine lines and wrinkles are visibly reduced.

Remember that you’ve only got today (Tuesday 12 August) to buy it for £10 at Boots. If you do miss this deal, the next cheapest place you’ll find it is at Amazon, where it’s currently £15.50.

It’s the shopper testimonials, however, that really won us over, with many reporting how they always stock up on this when it’s in the Boots £10 Tuesday sale.

“I have been using Olay Regenerist Serum for years! I’m not sure if it can reduce wrinkles, but using it daily has certainly helped to protect my skin in the ageing process (I’m now 63, looking a decade younger),” one person wrote. “Definitely an alternative to Botox, which has worked for me!”

It’s worth flagging here that no topical product can replicate the muscle-freezing results of Botox, and the phrase ‘Botox in a bottle’ should be treated simply as a catchy marketing term. What skincare products can do is plump, smooth and soften the appearance of lines.

“So easy to apply, smells very pleasant,” another customer wrote. “It’s non-greasy and leaves skin feeling smooth, light and firmer. Noticed a difference after six days – less fine lines and skin is firmer.”

model
Testers reported firmer, smoother skin(Image: Boots)

“This is absolutely amazing, I’ve tried loads of different serums but this by far is the best. My skin is so soft now, I absolutely love it,” reads a third review.

One people, however, found it to not quite be a thick enough texture for their liking: “I liked this serum, not as good as my usual product so wouldn’t buy again. Feels a little sticky on my skin initially but once dry is smooth. I prefer a little thicker cream but does make skin look plump and even,” they wrote.

Article continues below

If you too would like a moisturiser with a slightly thicker consistency, there are two that our beauty editor Laura Mulley can’t recommend highly enough, and regularly rebuys: Medik8 Total Moisture Daily Facial Cream, from £20, and Skin Rocks The Moisturiser, £58. Although slightly pricier – and you possibly will also need to use a targeted serum underneath – Laura says they’re well worth the money, and as near to ‘perfect’ face creams as you’ll find.