Dominican Republic boosts security on border with crisis-ridden Haiti

In response to the growing hostility in neighboring Haiti, the Dominican Republic has announced a number of measures to improve border security and strengthen immigration control.

Despite calls for his country to relax stringent policies as Haitians seek refuge from the wracking country, President Luis Abinader announced on Sunday that security would be increased.

The Dominican leader, who was re-elected last year on promises to reduce immigration, said in a speech that “we will step up surveillance of the borders with 1, 500 additional troops, on top of 9, 500 already deployed.”

The two nations, which share the second-largest island in the Caribbean after Cuba, are now in agreement on the construction of a new section of a wall, according to Abinader.

The border between the two nations is 186 miles long and has more than 300 kilometers of separation. The border wall’s completion spans roughly 54 kilometers (33 miles).

According to the president, his most recent decree would “speed up the construction of the border wall” by adding an additional 13 kilometers (8 miles).

According to Abinader, legal reforms are also on the horizon in order to deter those who facilitate the entry and stay of immigrants.

Abuse

The Dominican Republic is now looking at Haiti’s growing crisis as the border measures are increased.

An alliance of gangs seized control of the nation’s largest city of Port-au-Prince last year as violence broke out dramatically, causing chaos.

The transitional government in Haiti has been unable to stop the violence, which has resurgence over the past month or so, despite the efforts of a Kenyan peacekeeping force, which is made up of roughly 1, 000 people.

More than 5,600 people died in 2024, according to the UN, and more than one million people have been displaced, many of whom are refugees in the Dominican Republic’s neighbor.

In recent months, the Dominican Republic has implemented stringent deportation measures, with the intention of repatriating up to 10,000 Haitians per week.

In response to these reports of human rights violations, advocates urge nations in the Americas, particularly the United States and the Dominican Republic, to put an end to deportations in Haiti because of the grim conditions there.

Palestinian Bedouins say Israeli settlers terrorising them off their land

When Israel began bombing Gaza on October 7, 2023, Fayez Atil sensed his community in the occupied West Bank would soon come under attack too.

Atil is from the Palestinian village of Zanuta, a traditional herding community in the Jordan Valley.

Settlers from illegal Israeli settlements had harassed and attacked his village for years. Still, the violence escalated sharply after Israel launched what many describe as a “genocidal” war on Gaza.

“It suddenly felt like a war,” he told Al Jazeera by phone.

“Every day and every night, the illegal settlers would try to steal our sheep or vandalise our village by destroying our property and cars,” the 45-year-old added.

Zanuta’s 250 inhabitants gradually left their village – and way of life – due to the constant settler attacks and harassment.

Atil packed his belongings and left with his family after Israeli settlers beat up a 77-year-old Palestinian shepherd at the end of October 2024.

“They beat the old man, his wife and children,” said Atil. “It was the first time we ever saw that level of aggression from settlers.”

Easy targets

The villagers of Zanuta are one of 46 Palestinian Bedouin communities in the occupied West Bank expelled from their land by state-backed Israeli settlers since October 7, 2023, according to Al-Haq, a Palestinian nonprofit.

“What is happening [to Bedouin communities] is not simply an issue of violent and radical settlers. This is state violence,” explained Shai Parnes, spokesperson for Israeli human rights group B’Tselem.

At the start of Israel’s war on Gaza, Israel called up thousands of reservists who were serving in the West Bank to fight in Gaza, and replaced them with “extremist settlers”, Parnes said.

“Settlers … suddenly got weapons, ammunition and military uniforms [after October 7],” Parnes told Al Jazeera.

These settlers suddenly possessed the legal power to kill and arrest Palestinians.

All the expulsions occurred in Area C, which is sparsely populated and rich in agricultural resources.

Comprising 60 percent of the occupied West Bank, it is the largest of three zones created in the West Bank as part of the 1993 Oslo Accords between then-Palestinian and Israeli leaders.

The Oslo Accords aimed to ostensibly create a Palestinian state in the West Bank alongside Israel.

But over the last 32 years, the size of illegal Israeli settlements there steadily increased, with their population rising from about 200,000 to more than 750,000.

Area C is also under the complete control of the Israeli army, making it easier for settlers – supported by soldiers – to surround vulnerable Palestinian herder communities and expel them from their lands, say Palestinian and Israeli human rights groups.

This differs from Area A, which is technically under the full control of the Palestinian Authority, even though Israeli troops still raid it often, while Area B is under the joint control of the PA and the Israeli army.

‘A racist system’

Even Palestinian Bedouins who are citizens of Israel are being kicked off their land, human rights groups and activists say.

About 120,000 Palestinians live in so-called “unrecognised villages” across the Naqab Desert.

They are descendants of Palestinians who managed to stay on their land during the Nakba, when Zionist militias ethnically cleansed some 750,000 Palestinians to make way for the declaration of the State of Israel in 1948.

The Israeli government insists that Bedouin communities from “unrecognised” villages should simply relocate to cities, yet doing so would sever their connection with the land and threaten their way of life as herders.

Most Bedouin communities have held on to their right to stay on their land. Yet, Israel has long claimed that Bedouins are nomads who never really settle in one place.

However, Khalil Alamour, a Bedouin leader from the village Khan al-Sira, explains that Bedouins stopped migrating more than two centuries ago, and they always return to their land after migrating seasonally to search for food for their cattle.

“Bedouins are stuck to our land. We are an Indigenous community … we can’t just be flipped to another place,” he said.

But Israel has refused to provide services to “unrecognised villages”, instead evicting the inhabitants from their homes and confiscating their land, said Alamour.

In November 2024, Israeli police completed the demolition of Umm al-Hiran, even though the Bedouin inhabitants had agreed to live alongside Jewish settlers, as they told Al Jazeera in February 2024.

“The violence against us is part of a racist policy against all Bedouins and against the Palestinian community more generally. And Bedouins are part of the Palestinian community,” Alamour told Al Jazeera.

Many herder communities in the West Bank have been uprooted multiple times since the Nakba.

Abu Bashar, a Palestinian mokhtar (mayor) of Wadi al-Seeq, said his community has been uprooted four times since Israel came into existence.

The most recent incident occurred just days after October 7, when Israeli settlers stormed the community and began terrorising inhabitants.

About 187 people – 45 to 50 families – fled on foot, walking for hours until they reached Ramon village, where they have stayed until now.

“After October 7, the settlers went crazy. They surrounded our village and they came with the army, which protected them, and expelled us from our village,” Abu Bashar told Al Jazeera.

“We’re now living in tents and under trees in terrible circumstances in Ramon,” he said.

Over the last two years, the villagers of Wadi al-Seeq and Zanuta have filed suits with the Israeli Supreme Court.

Critics say going through Israeli courts – which do not have jurisdiction over occupied land, according to international law – effectively legitimises Israel’s occupation.

According to human rights groups, Israel’s Supreme Court has played a key role in legitimising policies that violate Palestinian rights, such as greenlighting the demolition of Palestinian homes and entire villages.

“The Supreme Court is another mechanism used to whitewash the Israeli occupation,” said Parnes, from B’Tselem.

No other recourse

Despite the Supreme Court’s historical role, several Palestinian Bedouin communities have filed cases with it.

Qamar Mashraki, a Palestinian lawyer representing Zanuta, as well as other Bedouin communities expelled from their lands since October 7, has won two cases so far.

In January 2024, the inhabitants of Zanuta and Umm Dharit were informed they had the legal right to return to their land.

“We have to exploit every tool we [as Palestinians] have,” Mashraki told Al Jazeera.

But Israeli settlers attacked families from Zanuta when they tried to return, preventing the community from rebuilding homes and herding their animals, pushing many to flee again in September 2024.

With the help of Mashraki, Zanuta’s inhabitants filed a second court motion which demanded that Israeli authorities protect the community from Israeli settlers.

Last month, the court issued a decision that the army and the police had to protect the people of Zanuta, said Atil. He added that families feel relatively safe to try and return to Zanuta again.

Dozens of other Bedouin communities that have been driven off their land don’t feel as fortunate.

Many fear that they will lose their land and way of life, even if they initiate a legal battle.

Abu Bashar, from Wadi al-Seeq, said his community is still waiting for the Supreme Court to decide whether they can return to their land.

Even if he can legally go back, he worries settlers will attack his community again.

“The settlers took everything from us: our homes, our tractors, our water supply and even our food,” he told Al Jazeera.

Police Fire Teargas At Protesters In Port Harcourt

At the Rivers State Police Command’s headquarters in Port Harcourt, the capital of the Rivers State, teargas was fired at protesters on Monday morning.

When the protesters gathered at the protest site as early as 9am, heavy police officers greeted them.

The young demonstrators told the policemen, who had warned them not to hold the protest, that no one could tell them where to gather.

Some of the protesters were chased away by police, including journalists who were reporting the incident.

In a letter dated April 3, 2025, the protesters had previously informed the police command that they intended to stage the demonstration.

Read more about Youths’ Stage Protests in Lagos, Oyo, and Rivers Defy Police Warning.

One of the protesters claimed to be expressing their concerns to the government during the “peaceful protest.” He had stated, “We are not here for violence.”

The demonstrator cited the governor’s suspension and the repeal of the Cybercrime Act as some of their grievances.

“As it stands, we don’t have any government,” she said. Our people don’t associate with this unconstitutional, alien government in Rivers State. We are here to demand that our governor resign and take appropriate leadership. The governor is not the sole administrator, but we do so under a social contract. He claimed that this was democracy.

Similar demonstrations have already taken place in Lagos, Oyo, and other Federation states, with demonstrators calling for good governance.

On April 7, 2025, protesters from the Take-It-Back Movement arrived in Lagos.

On Sunday, police called on the organizers of the nationwide protest to put the plan on hold, citing a number of national issues.

Given that the protest was scheduled to coincide with the National Police Day celebration, Force spokesman Muyiwa Adejobi had criticised the timing of the demonstration.

The justification for holding a nationwide protest on the same day is, however, dubable and thought to be a deliberate attempt and unpatriotic act capable of defaming and demonizing the image of the Nigeria Police and the entire country.

Tanko Counters SDP’s Adebayo, Says Obi Remains In Labour Party 

Peter Obi, the party’s interim national coordinator, Yunusa Tanko, joined the organization on Monday until further developments.

The former governor of Anambra State has not formally joined the Social Democratic Party (SDP), according to Tanko, a campaigner for the Labour Party (LP) presidential candidate for 2023.

His Excellency, Peter Obi, is a Labour Party member, as far as I am aware. On Channels Television’s The Morning Brief, Tanko said, “It will stay that way until there is any other thing that might arise.”

Adewole Adebayo, the party’s 2023 flag bearer, claimed Obi and former vice president Atiku Abubakar had started discussions to join SDP, and the LP chieftain responded.

Olu Agunloye also claimed Obi’s supporters were lobbying his party ahead of the upcoming election, according to Olu Agunloye, SDP’s national secretary.

In line with the Supreme Court’s decision to fire Julius Abure as LP national chairman, Tanko added that the Labour Party leaders would make some statements clear to Nigerians in the upcoming days.

According to him, “As I speak to you right now, there will be a meeting by the party leaders to make fundamental points clear to everyone, and in accordance with the Supreme Court’s decision, which will of course put the entire situation to rest,” he said.

L-R: COMBO PHOTO OF Nasir El-Rufai, Atiku Abubakar, and Adewole Adebayo, Peter Obi, and Atiku Abubakar

Read more about Atiku, Obi, and other candidates’ plans to join SDP, according to former presidential candidate.

Talks about an inter-party alliance reached their height on Thursday, March 20, 2025, when opposition arrowhead Atiku, Obi, and former governor of Kaduna, announced a coalition to ouster All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate Bola Tinubu, whose administration has been accused of managing the economy with unprecedented inflation and unprecedented living costs.

The coalition relies on Atiku and Obi’s recent polls to prove their party’s numerical viability. With combined votes of over 12 million, Atiku of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Obi of the Labour Party (LOC) came in second and third, respectively, more than four million more than Tinubu’s total votes, who was chosen by INEC to be the winner.

FG To Deliver 75,000 Electricity Meters In April, 200,000 Units In May — Adelabu

The first batch of over 3.2 million electricity meters purchased by the federal government will be delivered to address the nation’s over 7 million metering gap. &nbsp, &nbsp,

Bolaji Tunji, the minister’s Special Adviser on Strategic Communications and Media Relations, stated in a statement on Sunday that the minister’s minister, Chief Adebayo Adelabu, anticipated delivery of 75, 000 meters under the International Competitive Bid 1 by April 2025.

In May 2025, there will be a second batch of 200 000 meters.

The Federal Government of Nigeria’s continued efforts, financial commitment, and structured implementation plans to close the metering gap are the facts, according to Tunji.

Metering installations have continued to advance steadily despite claims of stagnation. 5, 502, 460 customers were metered as of December 2024, or 55% of the 10, 114, 060 active electricity customers in Nigeria.

” In 2024 alone, 572, 050 meters were installed. The government is actively working to close the current metering gap as quickly as possible, despite acknowledging it. According to Adelabu, “the fact is that a sizable portion of active electricity users already have meters,” refuting the exaggerated portrayal of an industry in crisis.

Although installation rates have fluctuated over time, the sector has still managed to install about 668, 000 meters on average each year, according to the statement.

The minister added that centralized financing and government-backed initiatives are anticipated to expedite deployment beyond the current rate, ensuring that the metering gap is effectively addressed.

The government has taken significant steps to significantly improve metering across the nation to close this bind. By 2026, the Distribution Sector Recovery Programme (DISREP) will have delivered 3,205, 101 meters.

“This will be accomplished through various procurement models,” according to 1 437, 501 meters through International Competitive Bid 1, 217, 600 meters through National Competitive Bid (NCB), and 1, 550, 000 meters through International Competitive Bid 2 (ICB2).

The first batch of 75, 000 meters under ICB1 is anticipated to arrive in April 2025, followed by the second batch of 200, 000 meters in May 2025.

The N700 billion Presidential Metering Initiative (PMI) is another significant step toward accelerating metering, in addition to the DISREP. The Minister continued, “The initiative is structured to ensure large-scale meter procurement and deployment,” adding that it has already secured N700 billion from the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC).

Read more about NNPCL’s plans to ship first-class cargo on a Delta tanker to Europe.

According to him, a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) has been set up to oversee the initiative’s implementation. The government wants to deploy two million meters every five years, with the first batch of two million meters scheduled to be available by the third quarter of 2025.

According to the minister, these well-planned interventions provide a clear strategy for closing the metering gap.

Further, the statement goes on to say that while the metering gap is still a problem, the idea that it will take more than ten years to fix is misleading.

Hong Kong stock market plunges most since ’97 crisis amid tariffs panic

Hong Kong’s stock market has suffered its steepest single-day decline in nearly three decades amid a wave of panic selling brought on by United States President Donald Trump’s tariff announcements.

The financial hub’s benchmark Hang Seng Index closed down 13.22 percent on Monday, after plunging as much as 13.74 percent during the day.

It was the sharpest plunge for Hong Kong stocks since the index tumbled 13.7 percent in a single day during the 1997 Asian financial crisis.

On the worst day for Hong Kong stocks during the 2007-09 global financial crisis, the index fell 12.7 percent.

The rout came after Trump doubled down on his sweeping tariffs overnight, likening the measures to “medicine”, and following China’s announcement last week that it would retaliate with a 34 percent tariff on US imports.

“Friday was a public holiday in Hong Kong, so what we are seeing is the reaction to Trump’s tariffs and China’s retaliation. So it’s a double whammy,” Carlos Casanova, a senior economist with UBP in Hong Kong, told Al Jazeera.

“To put this into context, previous retaliatory measures targeted less than 1 percent of China’s total imports. The magnitude of the last measures is unprecedented,” Casanova said.

“We’re in uncharted territory.”

Alicia Garcia-Herrero, chief economist for Asia Pacific at Natixis, said the dip in Hong Kong offered a more accurate gauge of the market’s expectations for how the tariffs will affect China’s economy than the stock markets on the Chinese mainland.

“The point is, you cannot trade freely in China. You cannot short Chinese stocks. You can do all of that in Hong Kong. So it’s obviously reflecting what is going on much better than Chinese stocks,” Garcia-Herrero told Al Jazeera.

Hong Kong stocks were by far the worst performers on a dismal day overall for Asia’s markets, with equities in mainland China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia and Singapore all suffering steep declines.

Global stock markets have shed trillions of dollars in value since Trump unveiled sweeping tariffs on almost all countries on Wednesday.

US customs authorities began imposing a baseline tariff of 10 percent on imports on Sunday, with steeper duties of between 11 percent and 50 percent set to go into effect on Wednesday.

US stocks have shed more than $6 trillion in value since Trump’s “Liberation Day” announcement.

Further steep losses are expected when Wall Street reopens on Monday, with futures tied to the benchmark S&P500 and the tech-heavy Nasdaq-100 – which are traded outside usual market hours – down 2.7 percent and 3.55 percent, respectively.