Slider1
Slider2
Slider3
Slider4
previous arrow
next arrow

NCS seizes N125m worth of smuggled petrol in largest bust in recent times

About 125, 000 litres of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), valued at about 125 million, have been seized in Kebbi State by Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) agents in a significant blow to fuel smugglers.

According to Persecondnews, this massive seizure, which was carried out as part of “Operation Whirlwind,” is the largest fuel bust since the initiative’s inception.

Fuel smuggling poses a significant economic threat, according to ACG Hissaini Ejibunu, the national coordinator of Operation Whirlwind, on Tuesday, contributing to revenue losses, artificial scarcity, and security risks.

According to Ejibunu, “We are committed to dismantling these smuggling networks,” “Fuel smuggling is a major economic threat.”

4 375 jerrycans, each 25 litre, and 54 200 litre drums, each contained the confiscated fuel.

Prior to being intercepted in Tsamiya, officers had been watching the trucks being loaded with the fuel. They were registered in the Republic of Benin.

The collaboration between the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) and the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA) was credited with the operation’s success.

The officers’ vigilance was commended by Customs Comptroller-General Bashir Adeniyi, who also thanked Mr. Nuhu Ribadu, the country’s top economic crime advisor, for his leadership.

Adeniyi urged Nigerians to report suspicious activity in support of Customs’ anti-smuggling efforts.

“This operation demonstrates the effectiveness of inter-agency collaboration. We are still holding economic saboteurs accountable and destroying smuggling networks, Adeniyi said.

World Athletics Approves Swab Test To Determine Female Gender

The introduction of a cheek swab test to determine an athlete’s biological makeup was approved by World Athletics on Tuesday, according to a statement released on Tuesday.

The decision-making Council of the international track and field federation, according to Sebastian Coe, was a “really important” way to safeguard the female category.

In a press conference following the World Indoor Championships in Nanjing, China, Coe said, “It’s important to do it because it keeps everything that we’ve been talking about, especially recently, about actually guaranteeing the integrity of female women’s sport.”

We believe that this will give consumers confidence and keep the competition’s absolute focus on integrity.

Coe claimed that the decision was made following extensive discussion of the proposal.

Although he noted that the swab test was not deemed to be excessively intrusive, “overwhelmingly, the view has come back that this is absolutely the way to go.”

You acknowledge the fact that this is the world we live in, he said, confident that the policy would be upheld by legal challenges.

If I had been anything other than prepared to face the challenge head-on, I would never have chosen to pursue this path.

“Our DSD (difference of sex development) regulations have us going to the Court of Arbitration.”

They have been upheld, and after appeal, they have once more been upheld. So we will continue to fight for the female category and take all necessary steps to protect it.

Just in: Judge hands off Natasha’s case, cites Akpabio’s petition

With the resignation of Justice Obiora Egwuatu of the Federal High Court in Abuja, the legal dispute between suspended senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and the Nigerian Senate has taken a dramatic turn.

The judge announced that he would be stepping aside as a result of a petition that the judge filed against the judge, which alleged the judge was impartial, when the case was scheduled for hearing on Tuesday.

Egwuatu made a statement stating that he would turn over the case file to the Chief Judge, who would then designate a new judge.

The judge effectively halted the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions from pursuing disciplinary actions against Akpoti-Uduaghan on March 4 according to Persecondnews’ previous reporting.

The senator is accused of breaking the Senate’s code of conduct and rules.

Egwuatu also provided the defendants with 72 hours to explain why the court shouldn’t launch an investigation into the Senator without violating the provisions of the 1999 Constitution, Senate Standing Order 2023, and Legislative Houses (Powers and Privileges) Act.

He gave the defendants’ attorneys permission to use substituted means to serve legal documents on them.

The court ordered that the legal documents be delivered either by posting them on the National Assembly’s premises or by handing them over to the clerk of the assembly.

Additionally, the court mandated that the documents be made available for public viewing through at least two national newspapers.

Following Akpoti-Uduaghan’s urgent application, the interim order was issued.

The Senate Committee convened in spite of the court’s ruling, which led to Akpoti-Uduaghan’s six-month suspension.

Justice Egwuatu revised and revised his initial order after receiving the defendants’ requests.

He lifted the bar that the Senate could not pursue the senator’s legal challenge while the case was pending.

The court’s authority to interfere with Senate affairs was challenged by the legal team representing Akpabio, led by Mr. Kehinde Ogunwumiju (SAN).

Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan’s heated argument sparked serious allegations of sexual harassment and defamation, which escalated to serious allegations of defamation and harassment against Akpabio.

Just in: Judge hands off Natasha’s case, cites Akpabio’s petition

With the resignation of Justice Obiora Egwuatu of the Federal High Court in Abuja, the legal dispute between suspended senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and the Nigerian Senate has taken a dramatic turn.

The judge announced that he would be stepping aside as a result of a petition that the judge filed against the judge, which alleged the judge was impartial, when the case was scheduled for hearing on Tuesday.

Egwuatu made a statement stating that he would turn over the case file to the Chief Judge, who would then designate a new judge.

The judge effectively halted the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions from pursuing disciplinary actions against Akpoti-Uduaghan on March 4 according to Persecondnews’ previous reporting.

The senator is accused of breaking the Senate’s code of conduct and rules.

Egwuatu also provided the defendants with 72 hours to explain why the court shouldn’t launch an investigation into the Senator without violating the provisions of the 1999 Constitution, Senate Standing Order 2023, and Legislative Houses (Powers and Privileges) Act.

He gave the defendants’ attorneys permission to use substituted means to serve legal documents on them.

The court ordered that the legal documents be delivered either by posting them on the National Assembly’s premises or by handing them over to the clerk of the assembly.

Additionally, the court mandated that the documents be made available for public viewing through at least two national newspapers.

Following Akpoti-Uduaghan’s urgent application, the interim order was issued.

The Senate Committee convened in spite of the court’s ruling, which led to Akpoti-Uduaghan’s six-month suspension.

Justice Egwuatu revised and revised his initial order after receiving the defendants’ requests.

He lifted the bar that the Senate could not pursue the senator’s legal challenge while the case was pending.

The court’s authority to interfere with Senate affairs was challenged by the legal team representing Akpabio, led by Mr. Kehinde Ogunwumiju (SAN).

Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan’s heated argument sparked serious allegations of sexual harassment and defamation, which escalated to serious allegations of defamation and harassment against Akpabio.

Actor Depardieu Tells France Sex Abuse Trial He Doesn’t ‘Grope’ Women

Gerard Depardieu, a star of France and facing sexual assault charges, testified before a court in Paris on Tuesday that he had no habit of “groping” women.

“I don’t understand why I would grope a woman, her buttocks, and breasts all at once. In his first statement at the trial, where he is accused of sexual assault on two women while filming a movie in 2021, he said, “I’m not someone who rubs himself against others on the metro.”

Depardieu responded to the accusations that he was “not like that,” adding that “there are vices that are alien to me.”

Depardieu, 76, who has appeared in more than 200 movies and television shows, is the first woman to go on trial for allegedly abusing another 20 women.

Read more about the police’s investigation into an Osun communal collision with three suspects.

He is the most well-known actor to be accused of being a part of French cinema’s response to the #MeToo movement.

The jury is charged with sexual assault in connection with Jean Becker’s film “Les Volets Verts” (“The Green Shutters”)’ 2021 filming.

A 54-year-old set dresser and a 34-year-old assistant director, Anouk Grinberg, a well-known actor who appeared in the movie, have supported the two plaintiffs. Both women make allegations of sexual abuse.

Depardieu was repeatedly accused of making “salacious remarks” while filming, according to Grinberg, who claimed producers knew they were “hiring an abuser.”

Due to the actor’s poor health, the trial was originally scheduled to take place in October 2024.

His attorney claimed then that Depardieu had diabetes and had undergone a heart bypass procedure, which the stress of the upcoming trial had made them more anxious.

The 54-year-old set dresser Amelie, one of Depardieu’s two accusers, reported in February of last year that she had experienced sexual assault, harassment, and sexist insults while filming in September 2021.

She claimed Depardieu boasted to be able to “give women an orgasm without touching them” on French investigative website Mediapart and that he “brutally grabbed” her an hour later.

The actor pinned her by “closing his legs” around her, before groping her, going up to her breasts, and then closing his legs.

Depardieu, according to her, made “obscene remarks.”

Were Ferrari at fault or unlucky with disqualifications?

Graphic image of, from left to right, Alex Albon, George Russell, Max Verstappen, Lewis Hamilton, Lando Norris, Jack Doohan and Oliver Bearman. It is on a blue background with 'Fan Q&A' below the drivers
  • 1013 Comments

Oscar Piastri converted pole position to win the Chinese Grand Prix, as McLaren made it two wins from two races at the start of the season.

Lando Norris finished second to make it a McLaren one-two, with George Russell’s Mercedes completing the top three.

Ferrari’s Lewis Hamilton won the sprint race on Saturday but he and team-mate Charles Leclerc were both disqualified from the main grand prix.

How long do you think Red Bull will give Liam Lawson to get up to speed before contemplating a switch? – Jon

It rather looks as if their patience has already run out. Red Bull are to discuss Lawson’s future this week, and there is a strong possibility he will be dropped for the next race in Japan.

If they go through with it, it will be regarded as a quite remarkable decision, which raises serious questions about the management at Red Bull Racing.

To understand why, let’s rewind.

In May last year, Red Bull team principal Christian Horner decided to re-sign Sergio Perez on a two-year contract taking him to the end of 2026.

This was despite the fact that the Mexican was struggling as Max Verstappen’s team-mate, and that the 2024 season looked to be going the same way as the year before – a bright start from Perez, and then an alarming slump in form.

Horner could have brought in Carlos Sainz, who was a free agent following Ferrari’s decision to sign Lewis Hamilton. But he remembered the tension between the Sainz and Verstappen camps when they were team-mates at Toro Rosso in 2015 and decided he did not want go there again.

Re-signing Perez, Horner’s theory went, would give him the confidence to recover his form.

The strategy failed spectacularly. Perez’s performances fell off a cliff, and the team slumped to third in the constructors’ championship despite Verstappen winning a fourth world title by 63 points.

Verstappen only won twice in the final 14 races of the year because the car lost competitiveness and became difficult to drive. Hence Perez’s struggles.

But Horner and Red Bull motorsport adviser Helmut Marko decided that Perez had had his day and they needed to make a change.

They paid him off – to the tune of many millions of dollars – and signed Lawson.

They picked the New Zealander over his much more experienced team-mate at the junior Racing Bulls team, Yuki Tsunoda, because they believed he had a mental toughness the Japanese lacked.

Lawson has had a dire start to the season. He qualified 18th at the season-opener in Melbourne, where he crashed out of the race, and last in both the sprint and grand prix in China, failing to make much progress in either event.

But Verstappen is also struggling – at least relatively. He is not hiding his belief that the car is the slowest of the top four teams – indeed he implied pretty strongly in China that he believed it may not be as fast as the Racing Bull.

The Red Bull is nervous on corner entry, has mid-corner understeer and is snappy on exits. And the team don’t seem to know how to fix it.

Verstappen likes a sharp front end, but he doesn’t want the car to behave like this. But he can cope, and get a lap time out of it. Lawson cannot, at least not yet.

Lawson was talking in China as if he already knew the writing was on the wall.

“It’s just (got) a very small window,” he said. “It’s hard, you know – it’s hard to drive, to get it in that window. I’d like to say that with time that’ll come – I just don’t have time to do that. It’s something I need to get on top of.”

If Red Bull drop him after two races, the management will have some serious explaining to do.

If signing him was the right decision in December, why is it the wrong decision now, they will be asked. If Tsunoda is the driver replacing him, the question becomes even starker.

And if instead they choose Frenchman Isack Hadjar, who has impressed as Tsunoda’s rookie team-mate in the first two grands prix, well, that’s surely too early.

Equally, if the first-order problem is the car – as it seems to be – why blame the driver?

Getty Images

Are Ferrari at fault for the double disqualification, or was it just unlucky and out of their control? – Ozan

Formula 1 lives on the edge. To win, teams have to push their cars as close to the limit of the technical regulations as possible – because that is what everyone is doing.

The line between success and failure is so fine. And weight and ride height are two of the key performance differentiators.

One kilogram of extra weight in F1 costs approximately 0.035secs a lap. Multiply that by the 56 laps of the Chinese Grand Prix, for example, and it’s two seconds of race time. Not a lot, but it could be the difference between winning and not, or one place higher or lower.

That’s just to explain why cars are run to the edge. And when you run to the edge, mistakes can happen.

In the case of Ferrari on Sunday, Charles Leclerc’s car was found to be 1kg underweight.

Ferrari ascribed this to the fact that they had switched to a one-stop strategy, so the car finished the race with less rubber on the tyres than had they run the expected two-stop, and that was the difference between being over the minimum weight limit and under.

Of course, other teams also switched to a one-stop, without ending up underweight. But exactly the same thing happened to Mercedes with George Russell in Belgium last year when he was disqualified from victory.

As for Lewis Hamilton, his skid blocks had worn too much. Again, it’s the sort of thing that can happen – indeed, it happened to Hamilton when he was at Mercedes in the 2023 US Grand Prix, and Leclerc in the same race.

Again, it’s about pushing the margins. Generally with these current cars, the lower they can be run, the more downforce they can create, as long as teams can keep the aerodynamics stable.

But run them too low, and they risk wearing the floor excessively – and that’s what happened.

Aside from the McLaren, who has impressed you the most at this very early stage? – SJM

Racing Bulls have had a very strong start to the season. Tsunoda qualified fifth in Australia, and his team-mate Hadjar was seventh on the grid and Tsunoda ninth in China.

The races have gone a bit wrong so far, but the car looks strong – in China, Verstappen was even implying it was better than the Red Bull.

Racing Bulls use a fair few Red Bull parts but since Red Bull have started struggling that is not necessarily the boost it was in theory a year or two ago, when the close relationship between the two teams was causing concern among rivals.

In the cockpit, Hadjar, notwithstanding his crash on the formation lap in Australia, has made a strong first impression.

Racing Bulls' Isack Hadjar leads team-mate Yuki Tsunoda around a corner during the Chinese Grand PrixGetty Images

How was there such a big gap between Lewis Hamilton’s sprint pace and qualifying pace? Or how did the other drivers close the gap in such a short space of time? – Ash

There is a combination of reasons. Ferrari hit the ground running in China and landed on a decent set-up for sprint qualifying in the single practice session before it.

On top of that, Hamilton put in a brilliant performance on a track where he has always excelled to take pole.

But there was an element of underachievement from other teams involved.

The McLaren was the fastest car in China and Oscar Piastri was more comfortable in it than Lando Norris. Both made mistakes in sprint qualifying – so they ended up third and sixth on the grid.

Hamilton converted pole into a lead at the first corner and then used the benefit of free air to maximise his opportunity.

He drove superbly, but he was protected from Piastri for much of the race by Verstappen, who the Australian did not pass until four laps from the end, by which time Hamilton had built a lead too big to overhaul.

The teams can change their set-ups after the sprint and it looks as if, by the time of grand prix qualifying, a more natural order emerged.

As Hamilton put it: “We had a pretty decent car in the sprint, and then we made some changes to try and move forward and improve the car, but it made it quite a bit worse, basically, going into qualifying – and then it was even worse in the race.”

Among those changes seems to have been lifting the car slightly, which Hamilton more or less confirmed after the race: “I don’t know who said we lifted the car, but we made some other changes, mostly, as well as that, but not massively, just small amounts.”

They did not work – team-mate Leclerc was faster than Hamilton in the grand prix even though he had a damaged front wing. And the changes were not enough to stop Hamilton’s car wearing the skid blocks too much. Hence his disqualification.

Why do teams put a board out from the pit wall as the drivers go through; surely all information is passed by the radio or telemetry? – Phil

Pit boards are there to give non-essential information relating to the drivers – primarily laps remaining. The gap to the drivers in front and behind are often also included.

They’re also there as a back-up in case the radio fails.

Get in touch

Related topics

  • Formula 1