Slider1
Slider2
Slider3
Slider4
previous arrow
next arrow

ICC Champions Trophy 2025 final: India have ‘no advantage’ over New Zealand

India playing all their Champions Trophy matches in Dubai was a pre-tournament decision, and talk of it giving India an unfair advantage is baseless, the team’s batting coach says as he blasts back against the criticism.

Rohit Sharma’s India face New Zealand in the title clash on Sunday at the Dubai International Stadium, where the tournament favourites have been unbeaten in their four matches.

India refused to tour hosts Pakistan in the eight-nation tournament due to political tensions and were given Dubai as their venue in the United Arab Emirates.

“The draw that happened, it happened before”, batting coach Sitanshu Kotak told reporters before the final. “After India winning four matches, if people feel that there is an advantage, then I don’t know what to say about it”.

The tournament’s tangled schedule with teams flying in and out of the UAE from Pakistan while India have stayed put has been controversial.

South Africa batsman David Miller said “it was not an ideal situation” for his team to fly to Dubai to wait on India’s semifinal opponent and then fly back to Lahore in less than 24 hours.

Even nominal hosts Pakistan had to jump on a jet and fly to Dubai to play India rather than face them on home soil.

India’s Virat Kohli salutes the crowd in Dubai after achieving a century against Australia in the semifinal]Christopher Pike/AP]

The pitches have been vastly different in the two countries. Pakistan tracks produced big totals in contrast to the slow and turning decks of the Dubai stadium.

“End of the day, I think in a game you have to play good cricket every day when you turn up”, Kotak said. “So the only thing they]critics] may say is that we play here. But that is how the draw is”.

“So nothing else can happen in that. It is not that after coming here, they changed something, and we got an advantage”, he added.

India have been the team to beat after they topped Group A, in which they faced New Zealand, Pakistan and Bangladesh. They then beat Australia in the first semifinal.

New Zealand, led by Mitchell Santner, lost the last group game to India by 44 runs before they beat South Africa in the second semifinal in Lahore.

India's Varun Chakravarthy, centre, celebrate the wicket of New Zealand's Glenn Phillips , right, during the ICC Champions Trophy cricket match between India and New Zealand at Dubai International Cricket Stadium in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Sunday, March 2, 2025. (AP Photo/Altaf Qadri )
India’s Varun Chakravarthy, centre, celebrates the wicket of New Zealand’s Glenn Phillips, right, in Dubai during the final Champions Trophy group-stage match]Altaf Qadri/AP]

Kotak said the previous result between the two teams will have no bearing on their mindset going into the final.

“That depends how the New Zealand team thinks, but I think we should not think that”, Kotak said.

“We should just try and turn up and play a good game of cricket because there is no use thinking about the last match”.

New Zealand head coach Gary Stead said they are not too worried about India’s advantage.

“I mean, look, the decision around that’s out of our hands”, Stead said.

“So it’s not something we worry about too much. India have got to play all their games here in Dubai. But as you said, we have had a game here, and we’ll learn very quickly from that experience there as well”.

Victoria Beckham shares sweet message to family as they support her at Paris Fashion Week

Emotional Victoria Beckham was feeling the love at Paris Fashion Week, as she posted a gushing tribute to her family.

Her brood came out to support her, including daughter Harper, who shared a sweet moment with her dad David during the outing. After Victoria’s famous family stepped out to support her, she took to Instagram to gush about her brood. “I love you so much.. Thank you all for coming out to support me xx”, she penned, alongside a snap of hubby David, Harper, 13, Cruz, 20, and Romeo with their respective girlfriends and Vogue editor-in-chief Anna Wintour, in her trademark dark sunglasses.

Fans couldn’t get enough of the latest family photo, with one fan commenting, “Beautiful supportive family” while another noted,
“Funny how this has been the Vic Beckham show sitting arrangement for as long as I can remember”! And another commented, “I’m waiting for the day Harper has a significant other. What will D do”?

VB at Fashion Paris week 2025
Victoria looked overcome with emotion as she waved and blew kisses to attendees on the runway (Getty Images)
VB walking in paris in black
It’s three years since VB’s first Paris show (Getty Images)

Spice Girl-turned-top designer Victoria’s emotional post came after the triumphant showing of the 50-year-old’s latest collection on the Paris Fashion Week runway on Friday night, showing her Fall/Winter 2025-2026 women’s ready-to-wear collection including dresses with daring sheer panels over the bodice, a nod to the nude fashion trend.

Post-show at Château de Bagatelle, a beaming Victoria hit the catwalk herself, to rounds of applause as she waved at the crowds and blew kisses, her family – bar eldest son Brooklyn, 26 – sat in the front row watching on proudly. Victoria seemed overcome with emotion at the reception of her new collection, which comes three years after her appearance at the fashion week in the French capital.

Former footballer Romeo, 22, brought along girlfriend, London DJ Kim Turnbull, 23, who stunned in a dramatic semi-sheer bodice. The pair went Instagram official with in November and Kim seems to have been warmly welcomed into the Beckham fold, joining the, at various events.

David and Harper Beckham at frow Paris fashion week 2025
A very grown-up Harper is starting to look more and more like her famous mother (Victoria Beckham Instagram)

Cruz, 20, held hands with Brazilian singer Jackie Apostel, 29, who he has been dating since last June. Jackie went for a beautiful stain VB gown in navy, seemingly not to match too closely to Harper. Meanwhile, it would seem Brooklyn wasn’t part of the family FROW, as he shared snaps on his Instagram Stories at an event for his new business venture, hot sauce brand Cloud23.

As for devoted hubby David, looking dapper in a black double breasted suit, he held hands with daughter Harper, who at 13 is starting to look more and more like her famous mother – and was even promoting mum’s fashion brand, in a brown satin gown from the Victoria Beckham line, teamed with a stylish clutch and white sandals.

Romeo and Cruz arrived in Paris on Thursday night, but big brother Brooklyn and his wife Nicola Peltz have thus far been conspicuous in their absence. It’s thought Brooklyn is learning how to become a racing driver in Miami as he is currently involved in a documentary which sees celebrities experience Formula E driving. He is with the Jaguar TCS Racing and has been learning to race a Jaguar I-TYPE 7 under a gruelling training regime.

* Follow Mirror Celebs on Snapchat, Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Threads.

International Women’s Day is for the few, not the many

Every March 8, the world is flooded with glossy campaigns urging us to “accelerate action” and “inspire inclusion”. International Women’s Day has become a polished, PR-friendly spectacle where corporate sponsors preach empowerment while the women most in need of solidarity are left to fend for themselves.

I can only hope that this year’s call to “accelerate action” means action for all women – not just those who fit neatly into corporate feminism, media-friendly activism, and elite success stories.

But if history is any guide, the only action that will be accelerated is the branding of feminism as a marketable commodity, while the women enduring war, occupation, and systemic violence face erasure.

Year after year, International Women’s Day is paraded as a global moment of solidarity, yet its priorities are carefully curated. The feminist establishment rallies behind causes that are palatable, media-friendly, and politically convenient- where women’s struggles can be framed as individual success stories, not systemic injustices.

When Iranian women burned their hijabs in protest, they were met with widespread Western support. When Ukrainian women took up arms, they were hailed as symbols of resilience. But when Palestinian women dig through rubble to pull their children’s bodies from the ruins of their homes, they are met with silence or, worse, suspicion. The same feminist institutions that mobilise against “violence against women” struggle to even utter the words “Gaza” or “genocide”.

In the UK, in the run-up to this year’s International Women’s Day, an MP and feminist organisations have hosted an event on “Giving a Voice to Silenced Women in Afghanistan”, featuring feminists who had spent months calling for boycotts of the Afghan cricket team. Because, of course, that’s how you take on the Taliban – by making sure they can’t play a game of cricket.

This is what passes for international solidarity: Symbolic gestures that do nothing for the women suffering under oppressive regimes but make Western politicians feel morally superior.

Let me be clear: Afghan women deserve every ounce of solidarity and support. Their struggle against an oppressive regime is real, urgent, and devastating – and yes, what they are enduring is gender apartheid.

But acknowledging their suffering does not excuse the rank hypocrisy of those who wield feminism as a political tool, showing up for Afghan women while staying silent on the Palestinian women being starved, bombed, and brutalised before our eyes.

The Taliban’s rise was not some act of nature – it was a direct product of UK and US intervention. After 20 years of occupation, after handing Afghan women back to the very men the West once armed and enabled, these same voices now weep over their fate.

Where were these women MPs, prominent feminists, and mainstream feminist organisations when pregnant Palestinian women were giving birth in the streets of Gaza because hospitals had been bombed? Where was the outcry when Israeli snipers targeted women journalists, like Shireen Abu Akleh? Where were the boycotts when Palestinian girls were pulled from the rubble of their homes, killed by US-made bombs?

Time and time again, we see the same pattern: Feminist outrage is conditional, activism is selective, and solidarity is reserved for those whose struggles do not challenge Western power. Afghan women deserve support. But so do Palestinian women, Sudanese women, Yemeni women. Instead, their suffering is met with silence, suspicion, or outright erasure.

International Women’s Day, once a radical call for equality, has become a hollow spectacle – one where feminist organisations and politicians pick and choose which women deserve justice and which women can be sacrificed at the altar of Western interests.

Feminism has long been wielded by the powerful as a tool to justify empire, war, and occupation – all under the pretence of “saving women”. During the Algerian War of Independence, the French launched a campaign to “liberate” Algerian women from the veil, parading unveiled women in propaganda ceremonies while simultaneously brutalising and raping them in detention centres.

The French, of course, were never concerned about gender equality in Algeria, they readily restricted education and employment for Algerian women. Their actions under the guise of helping women were about domination.

This same narrative of the helpless brown woman in need of white saviours has been used to justify even more recent Western military interventions, from Afghanistan to Iraq. Today, we see the same playbook in Palestine, as well.

The West frames Palestinian women as victims – but not of bombs, displacement, or starvation. No, the real problem, we are told, is Palestinian men. Israeli officials and their Western allies rehash the same Orientalist trope: Palestinian women must be saved from their own culture, from their own people, while their actual suffering under occupation is ignored or dismissed.

The systematic slaughter of women and children is treated as an unfortunate footnote to the conflict, rather than its central atrocity. We see the same pattern again and again – concern for women’s rights only when it serves a political agenda, silence when those rights are crushed under the weight of Western-backed airstrikes and military occupation. This is not solidarity. It is complicity wrapped in feminist rhetoric.

So, who will actually benefit from International Women’s Day this year? Will it be the women whose oppression fits neatly into Western feminist narratives, allowing politicians, feminist organisations, and mainstream women’s advocacy groups to bask in their self-congratulatory glow? Or will it be the women who have been silenced, erased, and dehumanised – those for whom “accelerate action” has meant 17 months of genocide and 76 years of settler colonial violence?

Is this just another “feel-good” exercise, where you can claim to support women across the world without confronting the fact that your feminism has limits? Because if this is truly about accelerating action, then after 17 months of bombing, starvation, and displacement, we should finally hear you stand for Palestinian women.

But we know how this goes. The speeches will be made, the hashtags will trend, the panel discussions will be held – but the women of Gaza will remain buried under the rubble, their suffering too politically inconvenient to mention.

As for me, I am joining the feminist movement’s march today – but let’s be clear, our agendas are not the same. I will march for every Palestinian woman who not only struggles to be heard but has been so brutally dehumanised that her suffering amid a genocide is being broadcast live to blind eyes and deaf ears.

I – along with countless other women who refuse to stay silent – will think of each mother cradling the lifeless body of her child, each daughter forced to become a caretaker overnight, each sister searching through the rubble with her bare hands. And we – women who believe in real feminist solidarity and reject selective outrage – will not just “hope” that this call to action means something, we will make sure it does.

We will make sure Palestinian voices are heard. We will make sure to boycott those who profit from Palestinian oppression. We will make sure to challenge every platform and every feminist who normalises Palestinian suffering, holding them accountable for their complicity.

To our Palestinian sisters: We feel your pain. We have carried your struggle in our hearts for the last 17 months, and we know your fight did not begin there – it has been 76 years of defiance, of survival, of refusing to disappear.

And know this: Next year, on March 8, we will not just mourn your suffering – we will celebrate your victory. Not your so-called “liberation” from your own men, as Western feminists like to frame it, but your liberation from settler-colonial occupation. We hear you. We see you. And we will not rest until the whole world does, too.

Jeremy Clarkson takes drastic action as thieves target Diddly Squat farm

TV personality Jeremy Clarkson has disclosed that he had to involve the police after his farm was targeted by thieves.

The former Top Gear presenter, 64, bought Diddly Squat Farm in Oxfordshire back in 2008 and it has since became a well known piece of land thanks to becoming the focus of his popular Amazon Prime series, Clarkson’s Farm.

Following the growing popularity of his farm, Jeremy has still seen himself became the target of thieves looking to take some of his wealth for themselves. The 64-year-old has revealed robbers in the area have been eyeing up his farm and livestock and even utilised drones to survey the area.

“Two weeks ago, five men in a van came into the farmyard. They checked out the security cameras and asked Kaleb]Cooper] how many dogs were on the site”, Jeremy writes in his latest newspaper column. After reporting the incident to the police, Jeremy says he was informed that the van’s plates had been cloned. More alarmingly, he noted that a drone had been spotted on two separate nights in the past week, scouting the house and the farmyard.

Jeremy Clarkson is ready for any intruders ((Image: Instagram))

Following advice from the police to ensure his security measures were ‘ up to scratch’, Jeremy claimed to have the perfect solution to deter any robbers – guinea fowl. In his column for The Sun, he shared that his daughter and son-in-law gifted him 12 of these birds at Christmas as payback for the consistently noisy toys he buys for his granddaughter.

Jeremy is confident that the guinea fowl, with their incredibly loud calls (which he likened to Nasa testing their 37million horsepower Space Shuttle engines), would be enough to scare off any potential thieves. When asked about the adequacy of his security measures, he confidently asserted: “Oh trust me on this. They are. Anyone who tries to burgle us is going to have their eardrums turned into a blood-speckled gooey mush”.

Last year, Jeremy angrily reacted to being reminded he once said he bought his farm in 2008 in order to avoid a hefty inheritance tax bill. The controversial TV presenter snapped at Victoria Derbyshire during a tense interview at the fraught farmers ‘ rally in Westminster in November.

Amid a fleet of tractors and incensed farmers, Jeremy stood firmly with his agricultural allies, which have become central to his life following the success of his hit series. But when probed by the BBC journalist Victoria about whether his attendance was self-serving, Jeremy retorted irritably: “Typical BBC. You people”! Tensions flared as Victoria queried the motive behind his protest, asking: “So it’s not about you, your farm and to avoid inheritance attack”? Jeremy sarcastically remarked, rolling his eyes, “Classic BBC there. Classic”.

To which Victoria quipped, “Is it”?, referencing a Sunday Times piece where the father-of-three discussed the tax advantages of owning a farm. Challenging the insinuation that his Oxfordshire farm purchase was driven by tax reasons, Jeremy defended his motives as grounded in his passion for country pursuits such as shooting.

An exasperated Clarkson then repeated his critique, “Typical BBC. You people”, and uttered to the onlookers, “Are you listening to this”? after Victoria reiterated Rachel Reeves ‘ statement that the inheritance tax would help fund public services.

Like this story? For more of the latest showbiz news and gossip, follow Mirror Celebs on TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Threads.

Pete Wicks ‘glad to be away from Maura Higgins’ after her kiss with Danny Jones

Reality TV star Pete Wicks is said to be “pleased” to no longer be seeing ex Maura Higgins following her kiss with married singer Danny Jones last week.

Former Love Island star Maura, 34, and McFly guitarist Danny, 38, who is married to Georgia Horsley, were caught on camera sharing a boozy smooch with at a BRIT Awards afterparty on March 1st. Neither star has addressed the kiss yet but it’s reported King of the Jungle Danny held crisis talks with his wife earlier this week.

Prior to locking lips with her I’m a Celebrity campmate at the BRITs, Maura had been dating Strictly Come Dancing star Pete, 37, but the pair called it quits just weeks before the star-studded music event. Irish beauty Maura reportedly ended the romance amid fears Pete had a wandering eye.

Friends of Pete, who attended the BRITs with Olivia Attwood and avoided an awkward run-in with Maura, have previously denied the former TOWIE star was texting other women while dating Maura. Now, as the country awaits Maura and Danny to break their silence on their kiss, Pete’s pals have revealed that his ex’s scandal has confirmed their romance just wasn’t meant to be.

Pete Wicks and Maura Higgins ended things for good on Valentine’s Day (GC Images)
I’m a Celebrity 2024 - Danny Jones with wife Georgia arrive at the Marriott hotel
Danny Jones is said to have held crisis talks with his wife following the kiss (Tim Merry/Staff Photographer)

“This sort of attention is exactly what Pete doesn’t want”, a source close to Pete told OK! magazine when discussing Maura’s drama. “He’s seen this sort of media circus happen when he was on TOWIE and it’s not the sort of relationship he wants. It’s a shame because it will probably bring his guard back up and he just wants to find someone he can genuinely love”.

Danny returned to the small screen on Friday night in a pre-recorded segment for The One Show. He joined bandmate Tom Fletcher to present a short story as part of the BBC programme’s 500 Words competition. The episode, which was taped on February 26, featured hosts Roman Kemp and Alex Jones celebrating the creativity of children who submitted their stories to the contest.

The pre-recorded TV appearance came as the Mirror disclosed disheartening news about Danny’s wife Georgia, who appears to be struggling and feels “humiliated” following her husband’s intimate moment with Maura. She is reportedly prioritising their son’s well-being amid her husband’s scandal.

Georgia, a former Miss England beauty and podcast co-host on Mum’s the Word, has been removed from forthcoming appearances, including the Baby Show, as an insider shared with the Mirror her desire to protect her seven year old son Cooper from the scandal’s repercussions.

“Georgia is struggling at the moment. She isn’t just having to navigate the circumstances, but doing it publicly”, revealed the source. “She has been humiliated. People are quick to forget there is a child in the middle of this mess”.

Amid the tumultuous time ensuing the drunken kiss debacle, the couple is said to be engaged in crucial discussions, eager to put this chapter behind them. “This saga has been embarrassing and Danny had a lot of explaining to do”, another source confided.

Like this story? For more of the latest showbiz news and gossip, follow Mirror Celebs on TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Threads.