How did your Premier League club’s players do on international duty?

Getty Images

All 20 Premier League clubs had at least five players on international duty, with 59 different countries represented by top-flight stars.

Arsenal

Players on international duty: 17

Forward Mikel Merino is yet to get off the mark for the Gunners this season but scored in Spain’s World Cup qualifier against Bulgaria before netting a hat-trick in a 6-0 win over Turkey.

Winger Noni Madueke started both of England’s World Cup qualifiers and impressed Thomas Tuchel, scoring his first international goal in the 5-0 victory over Serbia, while midfielder Declan Rice netted in the 2-0 victory over Andorra.

Mikel Merino holds up three fingers after scoring a hat-trick for Spain against Turkey in the World Cup qualifiersGetty Images

Aston Villa

Players on international duty: 11

Poland full-back Matty Cash scored a late equaliser to earn a point against the Netherlands before finding the net again in a 3-1 win over Finland.

Cash came off injured at half-time but reports suggest it is nothing serious.

Bournemouth

Players on international duty: 13

Brentford

Players on international duty: 18

Brentford’s club record summer signing Dango Ouattara scored two goals in Burkina Faso’s 6-0 win over Djibouti.

Brighton

Players on international duty: 11

Yakuba Minteh scored his sixth international goal as Gambia beat Kenya, though fellow Seagulls winger Kaoru Mitoma was rested in Japan’s 2-0 defeat by USA, coming off the bench with half an hour to go.

Burnley

Players on international duty: 14

Midfielder Hannibal featured twice for Tunisia as they secured their place at next summer’s World Cup, beating Liberia and Equatorial Guinea.

Chelsea

Players on international duty: 14

Spain full-back Marc Cucurella scored in a 3-0 win over Bulgaria while Reece James’ fine cross set up Declan Rice’s England goal against Andorra.

Moises Caicedo receives red card during World Cup qualifying match against ArgentinaGetty Images

Crystal Palace

Players on international duty: 12

Marc Guehi was a stalwart in England’s defence across their two World Cup qualifiers, scoring and setting up Ezri Konsa’s first international goal in the 5-0 win over Serbia.

Everton

Players on international duty: Eight

Iliman Ndiaye and Idrissa Gana Gueye were part of the Senegal side who staged a dramatic 3-2 win over DR Congo, having fallen 2-0 down in Kinshasa, while striker Beto came off the bench to help Guinea-Bissau beat Djibouti and keep their slim hopes of qualifying for the World Cup alive.

Fulham

Players on international duty: 11

Nigeria defender Calvin Bassey scored his debut international goal in a 1-1 draw against South Africa while Mexico forward Raul Jimenez was on target in a 2-2 friendly draw against South Korea.

Leeds United

Players on international duty: Five

Liverpool

Players on international duty: 21

British record transfer Alexander Isak made his first appearance of the season following a transfer saga between former club Newcastle United and Liverpool – coming on as a substitute in Sweden’s 2-0 defeat by Kosovo.

Alexander Isak warming up for Sweden against Slovenia in World Cup qualifiersGetty Images

Manchester City

Players on international duty: 12

Positives and negatives for Manchester City as striker Erling Haaland scored five goals and set up two more in Norway’s 11-1 thrashing of Moldova but Egypt winger Omar Marmoush has been ruled out of Sunday’s Manchester derby after picking up a knee injury.

Marmoush scored in his country’s 2-0 win over Ethiopia on Friday but went off injured in Tuesday’s goalless draw against Burkina Faso.

Manchester United

Players on international duty: 14

Benjamin Sesko playing for Slovenia in World Cup qualifying matchGetty Images

Newcastle United

Players on international duty: 12

Summer signing Yoane Wissa scored two and assisted one across his two matches for DR Congo, though the new arrival was taken off after 74 minutes in the 3-2 loss to Senegal, while Anthony Elanga was on target for Sweden in their 2-2 draw with Slovenia.

Nottingham Forest

Players on international duty: 13

Striker Chris Wood perhaps has the furthest to travel for international duty and was on target in New Zealand’s 3-1 defeat by Australia.

Sunderland

Players on international duty: 14

Tottenham Hotspur

Players on international duty: 20

Senegal’s Pape Sarr scored an 87th-minute winner in a dramatic 3-2 victory over DR Congo.

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

West Ham

Players on international duty: 10

Despite West Ham’s tricky start to the season, Lucas Paqueta has scored two goals in three games for the Hammers and continued that fine form into international duty, netting for Brazil in a 3-0 win over Chile.

England midfielder Jarrod Bowen came on as a substitute against Serbia but was unused against Andorra while Czech Republic captain Tomas Soucek was a surprise omission from his country’s friendly against Saudi Arabia.

Wolves

Players on international duty: 13

Jean-Ricner Bellegarde came through the academies in France but switched allegiance to play for Haiti and made his debut in a goalless draw against Honduras on Friday, impressing enough to earn a second start against Costa Rica.

Related topics

  • Football

Questions mount for rugby’s rebel R360 circuit

Getty Images
  • 38 Comments

For R360 – the rebel circuit head-hunting rugby’s top players for a divisive globe-trotting franchise league – questions are mounting.

Not least from World Rugby.

Which stadiums will host matches? Which doctors will be connected to the teams? What are their credentials?

When R360 submitted 120 pages of plans to the global governing body, World Rugby came back with these queries and more.

More than a year out from when they hope to kick off, R360 doesn’t have all the answers yet.

The Council’s next meeting, and therefore the next opportunity for RS60 to become an official part of the rugby calendar, is not until June – just four months before R360’s planned start date of October 2026.

“Everything remains on track,” said an R360 spokesperson over the weekend.

“We’ve been pleased to provide a significant amount of information to World Rugby in relation to regulatory matters and respect the confidentiality of their processes. We look forward to submitting our full plans ahead of their next session.”

But the hold-up has triggered more questions from outside.

Did R360 underestimate World Rugby’s requirements?

Can the league go ahead with such a major factor unresolved so close to kick-off?

If it doesn’t go ahead in 2026, surely 2027 – with the Rugby World Cup dominating attention and calendar space – won’t work?

Why does R360 want World Rugby on board?

R360 remains bullish.

A senior figure in the start-up claims that if the World Rugby Council’s September meeting was just a few weeks later, they would have all the information required.

They say background work continues apace on securing talent, venues and broadcasters.

Last month it was reported that more than 160 men’s players have signed to become part of the league, provided it realises it’s grand plans.

Since then R360 have closed further on their target of 200 men’s players. At least 10 of those signed up have played for England.

Roger Tuivasa-SheckGetty Images

A timeline to a tournament launch event is expected in a matter of weeks.

But whatever it contains, that launch won’t be able to claim World Rugby ratification.

World Rugby’s seal of approval comes with benefits; its absence will be a question mark for those pondering whether to take up an R360 offer, either as a player or host city.

Being part of World Rugby’s calendar would give R360 access to the governing body’s centrally-contracted group of elite officials, its established anti-doping infrastructure and legal and insurance framework.

It would lend legitimacy to the start-up and, perhaps most crucially, make it more likely R360’s recruits can continue their Test careers.

Each national union sets its own policy towards international selection.

New Zealand, England, Ireland and France are among those who favour or exclusively pick domestic-based players.

Any of their stars who switch to R360 would – barring a radical change in their union’s stance – be ineligible for Test selection.

However, South Africa, Australia, Scotland and Argentina’s sides are among those open to overseas stars, raising the possibility that, for them, a lucrative sideline in a ratified R360 could co-exist with a Test career.

The best business sense for R360 is to be able to assure players they can have both.

In this regard, World Rugby wants the same.

Such is the importance of the international game showing off its stars, World Rugby stipulates sanctioned club tournaments make players available for their countries at set times of the year.

However, those release windows leave little room in the calendar in which R360’s prospective all-star international roster of men’s and women’s players could all be available at that same time.

R360’s current plan is to run in two blocks: from April to June and August to September. These would clash with the Women’s Six Nations and the usual Rugby Championship window in which South Africa, New Zealand, Australia and Argentina meet.

Without a guarantee to release players for those Tests and others, ratification won’t be forthcoming.

R360 would prefer to earn World Rugby’s approval, but it has a parallel plan.

An all-out rebel approach – in which R360 operates as an independent competition outside World Rugby’s governance structure – is an option.

It would have full control over players and be able to pick and choose their dates, rather than working around the existing calendar.

What do R360’s backers see in it?

Nou CampGetty Images

R360 claims it is fully funded. With the franchise sale process closing at the end of September, it says it already has investors in place for each of its 12 teams: eight men’s and four women’s.

R360’s backers are interested in the missing millions – in both eyeballs and cash – between the international game and its club cousin.

The 2023 Rugby World Cup in France was the most viewed rugby event of all time and generated a record £475m in surplus revenue.

However, there is a steep drop-off in numbers below the international level, with the vast majority of clubs running at a loss and struggling to grow television revenues in a competitive market.

A report commissioned by R360 called Reinventing Rugby, estimated that while 200 million people watch the men’s Rugby World Cup, only 24 million are fully-engaged fans of the club game.

The launch of the Club World Cup in 2028 was announced earlier this year as a way to stimulate growth, while England’s top-flight Prem plans to restructure itself as a franchise league without on-pitch relegation to bring in new investors.

World Rugby’s own global calendar – years in the making – will begin in 2026, with the Nations Championship format building towards a year-end grand final.

But R360 believes its bolder innovation, featuring cosmopolitan squads of the biggest names playing in cities around the world will be good for the game and for those who back it financially.

Unlike LIV Golf, which it has been frequently compared to, R360 does not have the brute force of Saudi Arabian state money behind it.

Will it happen?

Kieran Read and Schalk Burger Getty Images

Never mind billion-dollar claims, this is the million-dollar question.

Andrew Georgiou, president of broadcasting big-hitter Discovery’s European sports division, is sceptical. At best.

“I’ve been involved in sport for 25 years. I can’t tell you how many of these PowerPoint presentations have come across my desk with people who were absolutely certain that what they had on that page was going to be the new ‘thing’,” he said in June.

“If these folks believe that they are going to grow the revenue by putting this thing on, I think they’re delusional. I really do.”

He might not be the first broadcaster to cause R360 problems, either.

R360 officials will have to convince media bosses that a new series spread over many time zones, with fluctuating start times, will not get lost in the schedules.

Georgiou has an interest in the situation. The TNT Sports channel he controls broadcasts England’s Prem Rugby, one of the leagues that would be damaged by R360’s success.

But he can point to precedent.

The World 12s website is still online.

It intended a similar drastic shake-up to rugby, poaching top talent for a global short-form tournament.

It attracted heavyweight names, with former New Zealand captain Kieran Read and Springbok legend Schalk Burger enlisted as ambassadors, and promised hundreds of thousands of pounds and a lighter fixture schedule for its stars.

And it was supposed to begin in August 2022.

Despite defiant words from the World 12s in the aftermath, World Rugby’s October 2021 decision not to ratify the event torpedoed its plans.

Back in 1995, the professionalism of the men’s game was sped along by Australian mogul Kerry Packer’s World Rugby Corporation, which – like R360 – got players to commit, in theory, to a breakaway league.

That venture crumbled as Springbok stars backed out, saying their agreements with the WRC were unenforceable letters of intent, rather than contracts.

“We are moving ahead with full steam and we expect to be in a position to make important announcements favourable to WRC in the immediate future,” said Ross Turnbull, the man behind the start-up, reacting to the news.

It, like the World 12s, sunk without trace.

R360, with considerable money and momentum, may be different.

Related topics

  • Rugby Union

Why will September international break be longer from 2026?

September international breaks are getting longer from 2026, in a move that will bring the disappearance of the October international break.

The change is being made for a number of reasons.

These include the 2026 World Cup final having the latest date for a summer World Cup since 1966, with the match due to be played on 19 July.

Player welfare also featured in the discussions that took place with stakeholders and all Fifa’s confederations prior to approval.

Travel considerations are a factor in the change. The reduction in breaks will reduce the number of journeys where players from one continent have to travel to another for their international fixtures – such as African or South American players who play their domestic football in Europe and have to travel cross-continent to fulfil international fixtures.

There are currently five international breaks each year, lasting two weeks each – in March, June, September, October and November.

Each break means there is no league football in the top divisions for two weeks as countries play two matches each.

There are some exceptions, such as when there is a major tournament like the World Cup, Africa Cup of Nations or European Championship.

Starting next year, there will instead be an increased September break, with no October break and a regular November break.

There will be a three-week gap for domestic matches in September and countries will play four international matches instead of two.

The move to switch to an extended September break was approved by the Fifa Council in March 2023. The council is made up of representatives from all six Fifa confederations and is discussed with football stakeholders prior to making and approving changes.

Get in touch

What will the international calendar look like?

Getty Images

The extended September break and abolished October break mean the final round of Premier League fixtures will take place on the weekend of 19-20 September 2026 and resume on 10-11 October 2026.

The longer break will allow countries to play four matches in the window instead of two before players return to their clubs.

For European nations, this will be the first four group matches of the 2026-27 Nations League campaign.

Will there be extra international matches?

No, the number of matches countries play remains the same.

At present, nations play six matches across the September, October and November windows.

This will stay at six in 2026, but with four taking place in the first extended break and two in November, as opposed to three breaks of two matches.

What is Ask Me Anything?

Ask Me Anything is a service dedicated to answering your questions.

We want to reward your time by telling you things you do not know and reminding you of things you do.

The team will find out everything you need to know and be able to call upon a network of contacts including our experts and pundits.

We will be answering your questions from the heart of the BBC Sport newsroom, and going behind the scenes at some of the world’s biggest sporting events.

More questions answered…

Related topics

  • Football
  • FIFA World Cup

Pakistan and India: What’s the global cost of natural disasters?

Floods in Pakistan and India re-ignite the debate on the mounting cost of global disasters.

Global natural disasters are striking harder and more often, with climate emergencies now breaking records year after year.
The UN says a child born today faces a nearly nine in 10 chance of experiencing a catastrophic flood during their lifetime.
The financial toll is staggering, with more than $200bn a year.
That could rise to as much as $2.3 trillion, once knock-on effects are included.
But who will pay when the storms hit?

Breaking from colleagues, judge votes for annulment in Bolsonaro trial

Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Luiz Fux has called for the annulment of the case against former President Jair Bolsonaro due to what he called an “absolute lack of jurisdiction” for the five-judge panel hearing the case.

His vote on Wednesday is the third of five to be cast this week, as judges deliberate on the charges facing the former president, who stands accused of plotting a coup to remain in power after losing the 2022 election.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The high court still seems likely to convict Bolsonaro: Two judges have already voted to convict, and the remaining two were appointed by leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who defeated Bolsonaro.

The former president stands accused of taking part in an armed criminal organisation, attempting to violently abolish democracy, organising a coup, and damaging government property and protected cultural assets.

His lawyers have maintained his innocence on all counts.

Fux argued on Wednesday in the trial’s final deliberations that the case should have been heard by lower courts because Bolsonaro had left office.

“I vote … that the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to judge this case because the defendants had already lost their [political] positions,” Fux said.

Once involved, he added, the full Supreme Court should have handled the trial rather than the five-judge panel, because it involves crimes committed while Bolsonaro was president.

Fux also said the defence was not given enough time to prepare their case, noting that the investigation generated around 70 terabytes of documents, which he called a “tsunami of data” and “document dumping”.

“I’m not an expert in this area, but the volume reached 70 terabytes — I couldn’t believe it, because that’s billions of pages. Yet it was only on April 30, 2025, that a decision was issued granting access to the media and materials seized during the investigative phase,” he said.

If found guilty, the far-right, 70-year-old Bolsonaro faces up to 43 years in prison.

Seven co-defendants, including ex-ministers and army generals, face similar sentences.

Yesterday, when Justice Alexandre de Moraes cast his vote in favour of conviction, he noted that there was excessive evidence of plans to assassinate current President Lula, citing a document found at government headquarters.

The case has drawn widespread attention in Brazil, where tens of thousands of Bolsonaro supporters took to the streets on Sunday ahead of the verdict.

Such protests have raised concerns about the implications of a possible guilty verdict.

After Bolsonaro lost the election, his supporters stormed key government buildings on January 8, 2023, seeking to prevent Lula from taking office.

The attack caused millions of dollars in damage, and dozens of law enforcement officers and protesters were injured.

Bolsonaro’s supporters have called on United States President Donald Trump – a close ally of the Brazilian former leader – to intervene in the case.

After Qatar attack, Israel ambassador to US says ‘we’ll get them next time’

Washington, DC – Hours after United States President Donald Trump promised that Israel would not attack Qatar again, the Israeli ambassador to the US suggested that his country could repeat its attempt to kill Hamas officials within the Gulf country.

Speaking to Fox News late on Tuesday, Yechiel Leiter said if Hamas leaders had survived the Doha bombardment, Israel would target them again.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“If we didn’t get them this time, we’ll get them the next time,” the Israeli envoy said.

Israel launched air attacks in Doha targeting a Hamas delegation that was meeting to discuss Trump’s Gaza ceasefire proposal on Tuesday.

But Hamas said its top leaders – including its Gaza chief Khalil al-Hayya – survived the assassination attempt, which killed six people, including a Qatari security officer.

Countries across the world, including some of Israel’s Western allies, condemned the attack.

The Israeli air raids appear to have violated several provisions of international law, including the United Nations Charter’s prohibition on aggression against sovereign states.

Qatar described the strikes as “state terrorism” and called for a regional response against the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani accused Netanyahu of undermining regional stability and peace in pursuit of “narcissistic delusions” and personal gains.

“Working to violate the sovereignty of nations without any care must not be overlooked and must be confronted by all means,” he said.

Trump, a staunch supporter of Israel, also expressed misgivings with the attack, but stopped short of publicly condemning it.

“Unilaterally bombing inside Qatar, a Sovereign Nation and close Ally of the United States, that is working very hard and bravely taking risks with us to broker Peace, does not advance Israel or America’s goals,” he wrote in a social media post.

Qatar is a major non-NATO ally of the US, and it has helped mediate several international agreements involving Washington. The Gulf country also hosts one of the largest US military bases in the region.

The US president added on Tuesday that he spoke to Qatar’s emir and prime minister and “assured them that such a thing will not happen again on their soil”.

But Leiter dismissed the US and international concerns, saying that Israel – which attacked at least five Arab countries over the past month – is changing the region “for the better” and working to “defeat Islamic extremism”.

“Right now, we may be subject to a little bit of criticism. They’ll get over it,” he said.