Category News

Emma Watson’s comments, as J.K. Rowling claimed she still loved the author despite having very different viewpoints, were scorned by J.K. Rowling.

View 2 Images

JK Rowling has responded to Emma Watson after the actress seemingly offered an olive branch to end their feud. Watson, 35, rose to fame as Hermione Granger in the on-screen adaptions of Rowling’s Harry Potter books.

But the pair have had an on-going fallout in recent years with Watson fiercely disagreeing with the 60-year-old authors views on the transgender community. Since 2019, Rowling has been very vocal about her beliefs when it comes to the topic, with many of her Twitter/X posts being described as transphobic.

A number of the cast members of the well-known movies have distanced themselves from the director as a result of her remarks. Watson previously said on social media that “trans people are who they say they are and deserve to live their lives without being constantly questioned or told that they are not who they say they are.”

READ MORE: Thomas Skinner makes huge lifestyle change as he gets ready for Strictly live showREAD MORE: Jessie J issues savage response to very awkward fan question in gym

View 2 Images

Rowling said she would never forgive them because of the criticism and backlash the cast members caused. Watson has admittedly having a negative outlook on things, but it appears she has at least offered to help.

Watson recently stated in an interview with the On Purpose With Jay Shetty podcast that she will always “cherish” Rowling’s past. I really don’t think that having that experience and having those feelings and opinions don’t make me feel bad about Jo and the people I’ve had personal experiences with,” she said.

“I will never think that one contradicts the other, and that my personal experience with that person is unheard and valued.” These things simply don’t fit the definition of either or.

I believe that I have a deep desire to love those who disagree with my feelings and to continue to love those who don’t necessarily share my opinion.

And she continued, “A conversation was never made possible, which is what I was most upset with.” However, it seems like something could possibly occur in the future.

Rowling reshared a post on social media while not directly mentioning the comments. A satirist who went by the name Intel Lady posted a video of the latter posing as Watson in the clip.

The mockup said, “Of course, I will never forget the opportunity she gave me when it comes to my relationship with Jo,” according to the mockup. She recognized the significance of my presence and knew she had to incorporate me into her creative vision.

She continued, “I’ll be grateful forever. She altered my life’s course completely, and I’ll never forget that.] But I also stand shoulder to shoulder with those who hate her and wish the worst for her in their lives.

“Those seemingly incompatible two [views] can exist at the same time, which is why I love this incredibly diverse world that we live in.”

And Rowling shared the clip with the caption: “I’m already missing @intel_lady’s Angela Rayner, but I’m here for ALL the spoofs.”

READ MORE: Boots fans bag £37 No7 Christmas set that ‘reduces wrinkles in days’ for £10

After organizing for the Loose Women actress to receive sulphuric acid, the possessive and domineer Daniel Lynch has completed his minimum 16-year term.

View 4 Images

The stalker who arranged for acid to be thrown in Katie Piper’s face is making his first bid for parole with a rare three-day hearing.

Daniel Lynch, 49, was imprisoned for life in 2009 for organizing “pure, calculated and deliberate evil.” However, after serving his minimum of 16 years in office, the violent and obstinate rapist will now be considered for release for the first time.

After a fourth delay lasting two years, a new hearing has been set for March next year. Katie’s victim impact statement is expected to be read at the hearing but it is not known if she will attend. Loose Women star Katie was just 24 in March 2008 when Lynch plotted the acid attack that left her face severely burned in March 2008.

She said two years ago that she wanted to release him, and she is now 41 and a mother-of-two. I turned 40 this year, Katie said. In ten years, will I pass away? Actually, I’m not sure. I’ll be free of the attackers. Will they murder me? I’m not sure”.

When she was read to the court, she said, “It felt like I was burning in hell when the acid was thrown at me.” It was a torturous, unrecognisable pain that was unrecognisable. I have lost my dignity, my job, my spirit, my body, my appearance, and my future. the list goes on.

I have an empty shell, all I have. I’ve passed away that will never be able to recover. There is no such thing as death. She appeared on a number of TV shows, including a documentary about the impact of the attack in 2009, and Strictly Come Dancing in 2018, but she has since rebuilt her life.

After suffering horrific burns in the attack, Katie needed 400 operations to rebuild her life. She competed in Strictly Come Dancing in 2018 and appeared on TV in 2018, including a documentary about the impact of the attack.

After being found guilty of rape, having been convicted of GBH, and having admitted ABH, Lynch was sentenced to life in London’s Wood Green crown court in March 2009.

View 4 Images

Stefan Sylvestre, then 19, who threw the acid, was given a life sentence with a minimum of six years after he admitted GBH. He was released in 2018.

The victim had a face that was unmatched in beauty, according to Judge Nicholas Browne, QC. The face of pure evil is yours, Danny Lynch, and Stefan Sylvestre.

In February 2008, Lynch and Katie started dating, but he attacked and abused her in a hotel. He was on the phone when Sylvestre threw sulphuric acid in Katie’s face in a street in Golders Green, North London, in March 2008 after she finished it and called her.

The Secretary of State for Justice referred Daniel Lynch’s parole review to the Parole Board, according to a spokesperson for the Parole Board, and it is proceeding according to law.

“Parole Board decisions solely focus on the risk a prisoner poses to the public if released, and whether that risk can be managed in the community. A panel will examine a wide range of evidence carefully, including details of the original crime and any changes in behavior, as well as the harm done and the harm suffered by the victims as a result of the crime.