Explosions hit Kabul as Taliban make diplomatic push to India

Islamabad, Pakistan – A series of explosions and bursts of gunfire rattled Afghanistan’s capital late Thursday evening, according to local media. The cause of the blasts and the extent of casualties remain unclear.

Taliban government spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid confirmed that an explosion had been heard in Kabul, saying the cause was under investigation.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

“An explosion was heard in Kabul city,” he posted on social media platform X in Pashto. “But don’t worry, it’s all good and well. The accident is under investigation, and no injuries have been reported yet. So far there is no report of any harm done.”

The incident came amid worsening relations between Afghanistan and its western neighbour Pakistan, which has accused the Taliban government – in power since August 2021 – of providing safe havens to armed groups, particularly the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which Islamabad blames for a surge in attacks on its security forces.

The explosions also coincided with the arrival of the Taliban administration’s foreign minister, Amir Khan Muttaqi, in India for a six-day visit, the first such trip since the Taliban’s return to power.

Following the Kabul explosions, speculation swirled on social media that Pakistan was behind the attack, allegedly targeting senior TTP leaders, including its chief, Noor Wali Mehsud.

However, the Taliban have not levelled any accusations yet. Pakistani security officials, speaking on condition of anonymity as they were not authorised to talk to the media, neither confirmed nor denied involvement in the Kabul explosions. “We have seen the media reports and statements from Afghan officials about explosions in Kabul. However, we have no further details on this,” one official told Al Jazeera.

Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs also did not respond to Al Jazeera’s queries.

While neither the Taliban nor the TTP has commented on Mehsud and whether he is safe, Mujahid’s comments suggest that no one was killed in the explosions.

Once seen as heavily backed by Pakistan, the Afghan Taliban have been trying to recalibrate their foreign policy, engaging regional powers such as India, their former adversary, in a bid to secure eventual diplomatic recognition.

Pakistan, meanwhile, has accused India of supporting armed groups operating on its soil, a charge New Delhi denies.

Fragile thaw between Kabul and Islamabad

After a bloody 2024, one of Pakistan’s deadliest years in nearly a decade, with more than 2,500 people killed in violence, both countries tried to reset their relationship.

Pakistan’s deputy prime minister Ishaq Dar visited Kabul in April, with senior leadership on both sides holding a series of meetings, often mediated by China. That process led to upgraded diplomatic ties and a brief lull in violence over the summer.

Yet, according to the Pakistan Institute of Conflict and Security Studies (PICSS), an Islamabad-based think tank, violence in the first three quarters of 2025 nearly matched the entire toll of 2024.

TTP remains the singular cause for the increasing attacks since 2021, according to US-based Armed Conflict Location & Event Data (ACLED).

“Our data show that the TTP engaged in at least 600 attacks against, or clashes with, security forces in the past year alone. Its activity in 2025 so far already exceeds that seen in all of 2024,” a recent report by the ACLED pointed out.

And in recent days, Pakistan has witnessed a further escalation in violence. A string of assaults has killed dozens of soldiers, mostly in the northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, which shares a long and porous border with Afghanistan. The Pakistani military on Friday said it killed more than 30 fighters involved in a recent attack in the tribal district of Orakzai.

In September alone, at least 135 people were killed and 173 injured. After visiting wounded soldiers following raids that killed 19 personnel, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif issued a stark warning to Afghanistan.

“Choose one of two paths. If they wish to establish relations with Pakistan with genuine goodwill, sincerity and honesty, we are ready for that. But if they choose to side with terrorists and support them, then we will have nothing to do with the Afghan interim government,” Sharif said on September 13.

On Thursday, Defence Minister Khwaja Asif also accused Afghanistan of enabling violence in Pakistan while speaking on the floor of the parliament

“Despite years of negotiations with the Afghan government and delegations coming and going to Kabul, the bloodshed in Pakistan has not stopped. Daily funerals of military personnel are being held. We are paying the price of 60 years of hospitality to 6 million Afghan refugees with our blood,” he said.

Pakistan has hosted millions of Afghan refugees since the 1980s, first after the Soviet invasion, then during the Taliban’s initial rule in the 1990s, and again after their 2021 takeover.

Since November 2023, Islamabad has been carrying out a mass expulsion campaign, forcing Afghans – many of whom have lived in Pakistan for decades – to return home. Government figures say nearly a million have been sent back so far.

Deepening mistrust

The tensions between Pakistan and the Taliban in recent years have also escalated into military clashes.

The Pakistani military has previously conducted airstrikes inside Afghan territory, the most recent one in December 2024.

Analysts say that if the latest explosions were indeed linked to Pakistan, the implications could be serious.

Tameem Bahiss, a security analyst based in Kabul, said the Taliban have consistently denied harbouring TTP fighters, and any formal acknowledgement of strikes inside the capital could inflame tensions.

“We’ve seen before those previous Pakistani airstrikes inside Afghanistan yielded no concrete results. Instead, they only deepened mistrust and made cooperation on countering the TTP more difficult. This latest incident will likely harden positions further, making dialogue and coordination even more complicated,” he told Al Jazeera.

The last major targeted strike in Kabul took place in 2022, when al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri was killed in a US drone attack.

Ihsanullah Tipu Mehsud, an Islamabad-based security analyst, said that if Pakistan was involved in the attacks, they may have been intended as a warning following recent attacks on Pakistani soil.

Mehsud, who co-founded The Khorasan Diary, a security-focused news outlet, said the explosions could signal Pakistan’s intent to pursue high-value targets across the border.

“Pakistan could try and target individuals in Kabul, which is the political capital, as well as those in Kandahar, which is seen as the spiritual capital of Taliban, in case security situation in Pakistan remains dire and Afghan Taliban don’t rein in the TTP,” he cautioned.

Bahiss, however, warned that any cross-border strikes could backfire.

“If Pakistan continues to expand its strikes inside Afghanistan, more Afghans may begin to sympathise with the TTP. This sympathy could translate into new recruits, funding, and possibly even quiet support from some segments within the Afghan Taliban,” he said.

He added that if Pakistan indeed was targeting TTP leaders inside Afghanistan, that could provoke the group into escalating attacks inside Pakistan.

Geyoro ‘needs two or three months’ to adapt to WSL

Getty Images
  • Comments

It could take £1m London City Lionesses signing Grace Geyoro until December before she is up to speed in the Women’s Super League, says manager Jocelyn Precheur.

France midfielder Geyoro joined the newly promoted Lionesses on transfer deadline day on 4 September.

Geyoro has yet to register a goal or assist in four games for the Lionesses, who have six points from five league matches.

“She had a long break from the end of Euro 2025 to joining us. We knew when she arrived she needed to start conditioning from scratch.

“She wants to adapt as soon as possible to bring to the team everything she can.”

On the app? Tao the bell to get Women's Super League news sent to you. Signed in on a browser? Hit 'Follow' to stay up to date.

Related topics

  • Football
  • Women’s Football

Victoria Beckham reveals how she and David keep the spark alive

David and Victoria Beckham have been married for 25 years and she has detailed what keeps the fires burning – after revealing that his snoring has become a big problem!

Victoria Beckham says it’s the little things that keep her and husband David going strong.

Posh, 51, has detailed how they keep the spark alive after more than a quarter of a decade as a married couple – and the usually straight-faced star insists she’s the funny one in the relationship. David and Victoria’s love story is one of the focuses of her new Netflix documentary, which also covers her move from a singer to a successful fashion designer.

As the show hits screens, she has given a rare insight into her life with David and revealed she has to wear ear plugs because of his snoring. While she steered clear of referencing the very public feud with their son Brooklyn, Victoria had plenty to say about her husband.

READ MORE: Victoria Beckham reveals for the first time she has to wear earplugs to bedREAD MORE: ‘Spicy and sexy’ fragrance is the only scent Claudia Winkleman wears—and it’s on sale

Victoria, mum to Brooklyn, 25, Romeo, 21, Cruz, 19, and Harper, 12, believes it’s the small things that matter and said: “I think we just really care about each other, we leave notes and stuff like that. He’s going away tomorrow so I put all his little vitamin bags together, I assemble all the little bags for him.

“Sometimes he’ll cook dinner and does all these kind of things,” she said in an interview with The Sun. “We still have a lot of fun together; the other weekend we went to our local in the country and had a lovely lunch – we do normal things and he makes me laugh. I think this is the most important thing.”

David and Victoria’s love story has been in the headlines ever since they first started dating. From the original story of how they met, to David’s alleged affair with Rebecca Loos is hot topic still. At one moment during the documentary, Victoria says her husband is at least partly to blame for her looking so unhappy.

As they got ready to go out, she said: “Here’s a fact, I’ve looked miserable for all these years, because when we stand on the red carpet, this guy [Becks] has always gone on the left. Okay.

“Now I didn’t realise that when I smile, which I do! I smile from the left, because if I smile from the right I look unwell. So consequently I’m smiling. I’m smiling on the inside, but no one ever sees it, so that’s why I look so moody.”

Body language expert Judi James has now given us an insight into David and Victoria’s longstanding romance and how they’ve got through some of the toughest times together. Speaking about how the pair’s dynamic has shifted over the years, Judi exclusively explained to The Mirror: “One thing that has clearly endured throughout the Beckham’s long and chequered relationship is their ability to role-shift.

“Even at the height of both their fame she would act like his besotted fan when he was the star of an event, and he would do the same for her. There was never any sign of success envy and here we can see them complimenting each other and switching their body language signals of status and power up and down accordingly.”

Annabelle Knight, Sex and Relationships expert at Lovehoney, added: “David and Victoria Beckham’s love story has always felt like something out of a movie. He was the golden boy of football, she was Posh Spice – one of the most recognisable women in the world – and yet when they met, there was this instant spark and sense of partnership.

“You could tell they adored each other’s drive, ambition and humour. That early connection set the tone for everything that followed – a relationship built on mutual respect as much as attraction. What people love about their relationship is that it feels real. They’ve had their fair share of ups and downs, and yet they’ve always come out stronger.”

Despite the “set up” nature of Victoria and David’s chat in their Cotswolds home, Judi says one thing is clear about their bond and romance; that they compliment each other so well.

Article continues below

Copy Vicky Pattison’s Strictly rehearsals look with £22 slippers that look just like £115 Uggs

Vicky is always sharing pics and videos with her fans of the behind the scenes of her Strictly journey, and we’ve found an affordable alternative to her viral Ugg slippers

As the weather continues to turn darker and colder, we’re all starting to switch up our wardrobes for thicker sweaters and warmer shoes. And one shoe that’s guaranteed to be spotted throughout autumn and winter is the UGG Tasman slippers.

Boasting celerity approval, including from Strictly Come Dancing’s Vicky Pattison, who can often be seen wearing hers for rehearsals, the Tasman II Uggs do come with a relatively steep price tag, selling for £115.

And what’s more, these viral and versatile shoes sell out every single year, so if you are after a pair and have missed your chance to pick up your size or don’t fancy splashing out over £100, we’ve found the perfect pair of alternatives to get the look for under £25.

READ MORE: Kate Garraway’s The Traitors pearl detail jumper is under £30 and surprisingly still in stock

READ MORE: Claudia Winkleman’s exact The Traitor’s waterproof boots are a must-have for autumn styling

Exuding the same indoor-outdoor vibes as the viral Uggs, these Amazon slippers will keep your feet warm and snug even in winter, and they complement any outfit perfectly. Whether paired with a skirt and jumper or jeans and a jacket, these shoes are easily slipped on and ready to go.

Crafted from plush faux suede with a cosy faux sheepskin lining, these slippers offer a more vegan-friendly design than Uggs. They boast a lightweight sole that makes them perfect for all-day wear, plus a robust rubber sole featuring anti-slip properties, ensuring you can safely wear them through the colder, wetter weather both inside and outside.

The cushioned insole provides the same cloud-soft comfort that UGG is renowned for, and the Aztec-inspired pattern adds a bold, fashionable touch. These slippers blend fashion with functionality for a cosy and stylish look and cost the much more affordable price of £21.99 on Amazon.

If you’d prefer to buy the real thing, you can currently purchase a pair of Vicky’s Ugg Tasman II in Black at Schuh, available in most sizes, for their full price of £115.

Alternatively, for other, more affordable options, Tu Clothing offers these £12 Stitch Detail Platform Slippers in a classic tan shade. Meanwhile, Debenhams stocks these Where’s That From Aztec Detail Faux Fur Lining Mini Boots in a wide range of shades for £22.39.

Amazon shoppers adore these Ugg alternatives, as one 5-star reviewer raves: “These slippers are warm and cosy without feeling bulky. The faux fur lining is soft, and they’re easy to slip on and off. The sole has a good grip, so I feel safe walking on tile or wood floors. They’ve held their shape well after weeks of daily use. Good value for money.”

Article continues below

More adoration comes from this buyer who beams: “I love these slippers! They are very warm and comfortable, but at the same time very trendy! The sole is very durable, unlike the foam alternatives! They are very well made, and a great price!”

Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado wins Nobel Peace Prize

Maria Corina Machado, a key opposition leader in Venezuela, has been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for 2025 for her struggle to promote democratic rights in her country.

Machado, a 58-year-old industrial engineer who lives in hiding in Venezuela, was blocked by its courts from running for president against President Nicolas Maduro in the 2024 elections.

“She is receiving the Nobel Peace Prize for her tireless work promoting democratic rights for the people of Venezuela, and for her struggle to achieve a just and peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy,” said the Norwegian Nobel Committee, awarding the prize on Friday at the Norwegian Nobel Institute in Oslo.

Hailing Machado as one of the most extraordinary examples of civilian courage in Latin America, it added that Machado had been a “key unifying figure in a political opposition that was once deeply divided – an opposition that found common ground in the demand for free elections and representative government”.

Machado ran as the democratic opposition candidate in Venezuela’s 2024 presidential election but was disqualified by Maduro’s government and went on to support the opposition’s alternative candidate, Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutia.

Incumbent Maduro won re-election that year with 51 percent of the vote – his third win since he first took over as president in 2013 after the death of his mentor, former President Hugo Chavez.

But the opposition said the results were rigged, claiming Maduro had only won 30 percent of the vote and that Gonzalez was the real victor.

The opposition received global support when it publicised vote counts collected from the country’s election districts, showing that the opposition had won by a clear margin.

Protests erupted, demanding the release of election results by individual polling stations, and Maduro’s government responded with a brutal crackdown on opposition protesters and leaders.

Jorgen Watne Frydnes, chair of the Norwegian Nobel committee, praised Machado’s decision to remain in her country, having been “forced to live in hiding” after “serious threats against her life”. Her choice, he said, had “inspired millions”.

“When authoritarians seize power, it is crucial to recognise courageous defenders of freedom who rise and resist,” he said.

The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) congratulated Machado. “This recognition reflects the clear aspirations of the people of Venezuela for free and fair elections, for civil and political rights and for the rule of law,” said OHCHR spokesperson Thameen al-Kheetan.

‘Brave women and men’

The Nobel Peace Prize, worth 11 million Swedish kronor, or about $1.2m, is due to be presented in Oslo on December 10, the anniversary of the death of Swedish industrialist Alfred Nobel, who founded the awards in his 1895 will.

The committee said in its announcement of this year’s winner that it has always “honoured brave women and men who have stood up to repression, who have carried the hope of freedom in prison cells, on the streets and in public squares, and who have shown by their actions that peaceful resistance can change the world”.

Winners in recent history include Iranian human rights activist Narges Mohammadi in 2023, Congolese humanitarian Denis Mukwege in 2018,  and former United States President Barack Obama in 2009. Malala Yousafzai became the youngest recipient of the award in 2014 at the age of 17. The oldest laureate is Joseph Rotblat, honoured at 86 for his work against nuclear weapons.

The 2024 award was given to Nihon Hidankyo, the Japan Confederation of A- and H-Bomb Sufferers Organisations, “for its efforts to achieve a world free of nuclear weapons”.

The recognition honoured the organisation’s decades-long campaign to abolish nuclear weapons and preserve the testimonies of the survivors of the US atomic bomb attacks on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.

Disappointment for Trump

The lead-up to this year’s award had been dominated by US President Donald Trump’s repeated self-aggrandising public statements that he deserved to win the Nobel Peace Prize.

The committee took its final decision just before an Israel-Hamas ceasefire came into effect in Gaza under the first phase of Trump’s initiative to end the war.

“I don’t know what they’re going to do, really, but I know this: That nobody in history has solved eight wars in a period of nine months, and I’ve stopped eight wars,” Trump said on Thursday. “So that’s never happened before, but they’ll have to do what they do. Whatever they do is fine. I know this: I didn’t do it for that. I did it because I saved a lot of lives.”

The president was alluding to the 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran, which saw him intervene with bunker buster bombs on Iranian nuclear sites, as well as conflicts and tensions of varying levels of intensity, not all of which classify as wars, between India and Pakistan, Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, Cambodia and Thailand, Armenia and Azerbaijan, Egypt and Ethiopia, and Serbia and Kosovo.

Before the Nobel announcement, experts on the award had said Trump was very unlikely to win, as his policies were seen as dismantling the international world order that the Nobel committee cherishes.

That did not stop Trump’s cheerleaders from lobbying for a victory. Howard Lutnick, Trump’s commerce secretary, said in a post on X that Trump should “undoubtedly” receive the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts on ending the war in Gaza.