How Palace are fighting to keep European dream alive

Getty Images

Crystal Palace are anxiously waiting to hear whether their European dream is over before it even begins.

Winning the FA Cup – the Eagles’ first major trophy triumph – resulted in the south London club qualifying for the Europa League, the club’s only qualification into continental football in their 164-year history.

However, whether Palace can start planning for European football is in the hands of governing body Uefa, who must decide whether the Eagles have breached its rules on teams under one multi-club ownership structure competing in the same European competition.

Uefa’s final ruling will centre on American businessman John Textor, owner of Eagle Football – which holds a 43% stake in Palace.

Eagle Football also owns a 77% stake in French side Lyon, who – like Palace – have qualified for next season’s Europa League.

Palace deny operating multi-club model

Uefa’s regulations are in place to prevent collusion between clubs. At the heart of Palace’s argument is that their historic FA Cup win and consequential European qualification was an achievement accomplished entirely on their own merit.

Palace are insisting they are an entity that operates entirely independently, and not within the structures of a multi-club model.

Sources with knowledge of the situation have told BBC Sport that Textor’s personal share in the Selhurst Park side does not meet the 30% threshold – which is key in Uefa determining decisive influence – and that he has just 25% of the voting rights.

Uefa’s rules state that “no individual or legal entity” can hold a majority of shareholder voting rights at two clubs in the same European tournament.

Additionally, it is understood Palace have made clear they had no assistance in winning the FA Cup, in that they have not collaborated with Lyon since Textor’s original investment into the club in August 2021 and will have no connection with the French side during next year’s Europa League.

The Premier League side are believed to have pointed out that there have been no transfers between the clubs since Jake O’Brien, now at Everton, left Palace for Lyon in August 2023.

Palace also say there has been no employee, backroom staff or coach sharing, no dialogue, no collaborative strategy, no combined partnerships, sponsorships or commercial deals and no collective scouting, analysis or software collaborations.

It is accepted, and been widely reported, that chairman Steve Parish and his leadership team make all final decisions in relation to the management and operations at Palace.

That working structure has existed for a decade and is supported by fellow shareholders Josh Harris and David Blitzer.

Indeed, Textor, who only has one vote, has publicly spoken about his lack of influence at Selhurst Park.

“As proud as we are to have been a part of the resurgence of Crystal Palace, it remains true that Crystal Palace is an independent club, run by a man with a steady hand, who has achieved a level of sustainability that is incredibly uncommon in today’s Premier League,” said Textor in May 2024.

“An integrated sporting model, such as ours at Eagle, is simply not a perfect fit for Crystal Palace.”

It has been pointed out to Uefa that Textor is an individual and minority shareholder and, when he first invested into Crystal Palace in 2021, he owned no other clubs and his investment into other teams followed later.

Textor could resign as Palace director

John TextorGetty Images

Under Article 5 of Uefa’s rulebook, which relates to the integrity of the “competition/multi-club ownership”, a club is required from 1 March 2025 to have complied with the requirements necessary to prove they are not “simultaneously involved in any capacity whatsoever in the management, administration, and/or sporting performance of more than one club participating in a Uefa club competition”.

In the past clubs have sought to divest the stakes of key shareholders with a view to complying with Uefa’s regulations.

For example, the City Group, Ineos, Red Bull group and most recently Nottingham Forest owner Evangelos Marinakis have adapted their shareholdings in clubs accordingly to ensure their teams can compete in the same European competitions.

Last year Ineos, which owns Manchester United, put its shares in French club Nice into a blind trust to ensure both clubs could compete in the Europa League last season.

Ineos made a similar move earlier this season by placing its ownership of Swiss club Lausanne-Sport into a blind trust, before a potential conflict in the 2025-26 campaign.

Uefa’s rules regarding the 1 March deadline are clear – and clubs have sought to comply with the regulations and cut-offs. A template for Palace to follow is in place.

However, Palace are understood to have made clear that Textor’s position means he cannot be enforced by the club to place his shares into a blind trust, owing to a lack of legal authority, unlike previous precedents where a single entity owns multiple clubs.

Parish, as has been well documented, effectively holds the deciding vote at Palace with the backing of Harris and Blitzer, so existing shareholder agreements would need to be altered to enforce a blind trust scenario – which is not within the club’s power and infringes on Textor’s property rights.

There is also a sense that the chain of events that have left Palace’s position in European football in jeopardy were unforeseen and is a factor towards why they failed to meet the deadline for ownership restructuring.

Palace faced Millwall in the FA Cup fifth round on 1 March. Since then they beat Champions League clubs Aston Villa and Manchester City en route to winning the trophy.

French side Strasbourg conceded a 90th-minute goal on the final day of the season to hand Lyon the final Europa Conference League spot, before Paris St-Germain later won the French Cup to elevate Lyon into the Europa League.

If Uefa rules that Lyon and Palace cannot both compete in the Europa League, regulations state that the French side will play in the competition because of their higher league finish.

In that scenario Palace could play in the Europa Conference League, but even then there is the added complication that Danish club Brondby, who have qualified for the Conference League, are owned by Harris and Blitzer.

Having missed the deadline, Palace have expressed to Uefa that they are prepared to take immediate steps to comply with their requirements.

‘Europa League ban is disproportionate’

It is understood Palace are arguing that banning them from the Europa League would result in a disproportionate sanction and unfairly punish the club, players, staff, fans and local community.

Their thoughts are that preventing the club from competing in the Europa League next season would result in an injustice, particularly given their breach is technical and that no competitive harm has transpired.

It is believed Palace also feel that refusing them a place would contradict the promotion of football’s development that ensure that “sporting values always prevail”, as per Article 2 of Uefa’s statutes.

Therefore, sources are indicating that Palace believe a fine or temporary oversight measures – for example the monitoring of transfers – would appropriately punish a breach, without harming stakeholders who have no involvement in the ownership issue.

Related topics

  • Europa League
  • Premier League
  • Crystal Palace
  • Football

Wollaston denies GB’s Ferguson to win Tour of Britain

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Ally Wollaston overturned a three-second deficit to win the Tour of Britain Women and deny British teenager Cat Ferguson victory.

The New Zealander won all three intermediate sprints on the final stage in Glasgow to draw level with 19-year-old Ferguson, before gaining another four bonus seconds by finishing third behind stage winner Lorena Wiebes and Charlotte Kool.

Wollaston, of FDJ-Suez, beat Movistar’s Ferguson by four seconds overall, with UAE Team ADQ’s Dutchwoman Karlijn Swinkels finishing third.

“I’m a little bit overwhelmed – sorry. I’m so happy, first of all. A massive ‘thank you’ to my team-mates, I couldn’t have done it without them. This means the world to me – it’s my first World Tour victory in GC [general classification],” said Wollaston.

“I knew I needed to get every second I could in the bonus sprints, and unfortunately Cat was right in my wheel every time.

“So it came down to the last sprint, and there was a moment of doubt halfway through that last lap where I thought ‘I just cannot do this today’. My team-mates really helped me pull it together and pulled me to the front for the final.”

Ferguson looked like claiming the first of three time bonuses for the intermediate sprints at the end of the fourth lap of the 8.4km city-centre circuit, but Wollaston squeezed past her with just metres remaining.

Wollaston then beat the Briton in the second intermediate sprint to trail the overall leader’s green jersey by one second.

The 24-year-old moved into the lead with victory on the third intermediate sprint to set up a thrilling finale.

European champion Wiebes launched her attack at the 300m mark before powering over the line first, followed by Kool and Wollaston, who took the last bonus seconds to win the overall classification.

Getty Images

Stage four results

General classification after stage four

Related topics

  • Cycling

Evans’ WRC lead cut as Ogier secures Italy record

Getty Images

Elfyn Evans’ World Rally Championship lead has been cut further, as Sebastien Ogier made it back-to-back wins with victory at Rally Italia Sardegna.

Welshman Evans finished fourth, more than five minutes behind Toyota team-mate Ogier who became the most successful driver in the Italian event’s history with a fifth success.

The French eight-time world champion has cut his series deficit to Evans from 30 points to 19, with another GR Yaris Rally1 driver, Kalle Rovanpera, a further one point back.

Rovanpera was fourth in the baking heat of Sardinia, behind Hyundai’s Ott Tanak – who finished runner-up to maintain his own championship challenge.

Ogier’s victory was his third of the season and came 12 months after losing out to Tanak by 0.2 seconds following a heartbreaking final-stage puncture in this event.

He also had a scare on Sunday’s finale, when an overshoot in the final kilometres slashed his lead over the Estonian from 17.2s to 7.9s.

“In the ruts, I just couldn’t turn the car,” said Ogier.

“There was no speed at all, so I didn’t try to force it and hit it, I preferred to stop and reverse.

“Yeah, not ideal, still, it was enough to win.”

Evans once again found the gravel roads tough on the opening day, as he did in Portugal last month.

He never challenged for overall victory and also lost time on the top three when he punctured on Saturday’s stage 11, though ironically he gained a place to fourth with Toyota team-mate Sami Pajari taking even longer over a wheel change.

Josh McErlean’s Rally Italia was over almost before it started. He was one of six drivers caught out by the newly introduced Telti – Calangianus – Berchidda loop, ripping the entire rear-left corner off his M-Sport Ford Puma on stage two.

The Northern Irish driver was forced to retire with suspension damage before restarting, out of contention, on Saturday and finishing 11th in class.

He remains 10th overall.

Rally Italia Sardegna result

1. Sebastien Ogier (France), Toyota, 3 hours 34 minutes 25.5 seconds

2. Ott Tanak (Estonia), Hyundai, +7.9secs

3. Kalle Rovanpera (Finland), Toyota, +50.5secs

4. Elfyn Evans (Great Britain), Toyota, +5min 05.7secs

5. Takamoto Katsuta (Japan), Toyota, +7min 29.6.secs

Selected

FIA World Rally Championship drivers’ standings

1. Elfyn Evans (Great Britain), Toyota, 133 points

2. Sebastien Ogier (France), Toyota, 114

3. Kalle Rovanpera (Finland), Toyota, 113

4. Ott Tanak (Estonia), Hyundai, 108

5. Thierry Neuville (Belgium), Hyundai, 83

6. Takamoto Katsuta (Japan), Toyota, 63

Selected

10. Josh McErlean (Ireland), Ford, 12

Related topics

  • Motorsport
  • Wales Sport

Kaduna Anglican Bishop Criticises Tinubu, Govs Over Early 2027 Election Campaigns

Most Reverend Timothy Yahaya, the bishop of the Anglican Diocese of Kaduna, has urged the governors of the state to prioritize the areas of governance over their election rather than focusing on campaigning for re-election in 2027.

The cleric criticized political leaders for placing a premium on power retention over addressing the country’s numerous socio-economic issues, noting that it was too early to launch election campaigns just in the current administration.

“They started politicking before this regime was two years in power,” said one critic of our nation’s governance. And I want to make the case that let’s play down politics with the authorities. We are already campaigning for a second circle, so how can we win an election before it is already full? How did governance fare?

If it is possible, I want to plead with the President and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces and INEC, and I want to do the same for all political activities. That ban should be lifted after nine months of the election so that those who are elected to lead this nation can deliver what is required.

“To be honest, I don’t believe that the lack of good governance and the presence of billboards all contribute to a positive development. Other civilized countries will perceive us as jokers in this country because of how insulting and degrading it is.

Read more about ACF’s criticism of Tinubu for prioritizing the 2027 campaign over national issues.

Bishop Yahaya also attacked opposition politicians who resigned from the All Progressives Congress (APC), branding them as merely opportunists whose actions were motivated by ego and not ideological convictions.

He urged politicians to ask themselves, “Do these politicians even know where they are coming from and where they are going?” I can confirm without a shadow of a doubt that 70% of them are currently members of the APC. Therefore, there are the same individuals. Who are they, exactly? They are all opportunists, and they will eat anything from the National Cake.

FIFA Club World Cup: Why is Yamal, Salah, Ronaldo, Barcelona not playing?

A new-look FIFA Club World Cup, featuring 32 teams, kicks off in the United States on June 14 and runs through to the final on July 13.

In advance of the tournament, Al Jazeera takes a look at the top five talking points:

1. Cramped schedule raises concerns over player welfare

FIFA’s decision to expand the Club World Cup from a six- or eight-team tournament to a supersized 32-team edition has been criticised by FIFPRO, the global football players’ union, and the World Leagues Forum (WLF).

Legitimate questions have been raised about the extra workload on players due to the increased number of matches, and the corresponding reduction in rest and recovery time for players in a shortened off season.

“The FIFA Council’s decision to schedule the first edition of the 32-team FIFA Club World Cup between 15 June and 13 July 2025 without implementing further player workload safeguards demonstrates a lack of consideration for the mental and physical health of participating players, as well as a disregard for their personal and family lives,” FIFPRO said in a statement in December.

A report released by FIFPRO and Football Benchmark in April found that several Club World Cup-bound players are among the most overworked for the 2024-25 season.

The report’s findings estimated that Real Madrid’s Federico Valverde, who made 43 back-to-back appearances up until April 1 with fewer than five days of recovery time before these matches, could potentially reach 65 back-to-back appearances for club and country by the end of the season, racking up close to 7,000 minutes and 78 games.

The WLF, an organisation representing 44 major professional leagues that is chaired by Premier League chief Richard Masters, said the organisation was unhappy that it had been overlooked in FIFA’s decision-making process.

According to the Reuters news agency, Masters accused FIFA of prioritising its own commercial interests, adding that the June-July schedule would affect player availability for national leagues at the start of the season in August.

An elongated FIFA Club World Cup schedule in 2025 has reduced the already-short off season for many top players in the tournament, increasing the chance of injury, according to FIFPRO [File: Jason Cairnduff/Reuters]

2. Will the matches be competitive?

While the expansion of the Club World Cup to 32 sides allows more teams a chance at testing themselves against some of the biggest names in global club football, it also raises questions about the competitiveness of the tournament.

With every group having at least two clubs from Europe or South America, teams from the other continental confederations, such as Asia or Africa, could find themselves having very little chance of glory against the heavyweights of the game.

For example, in Group G, Moroccan side Wydad AC and UAE Pro League Al Ain are pitted against Manchester City and Juventus, who have been supremely successful on the domestic and continental stage.

Teams from the European confederation (UEFA) have historically dominated the Club World Cup, winning 16 of the 20 editions played to date. The remaining four have all been won by clubs from the South American confederation (CONMEBOL).

So, history suggests that the presence of European or South American sides could lead to lopsided matchups in this year’s edition.

Real Madrid players react.
Real Madrid are the most successful club in the Club World Cup, having won a record five titles [File: Josep Lago/AFP]

3. Where are the superstars and superteams?

While Lionel Messi and Kylian Mbappe will play at the tournament, fans will be denied an opportunity to watch many of the elite performers from the 2024-25 season, such as Liverpool’s Mohamed Salah, the Premier League’s Golden Boot winner, or teenage prodigy Lamine Yamal, who won three trophies this year with Barcelona.

Salah created history as the first player in Premier League history to finish a season with the most goals and assists as well as win the Player of the Season award. But one of the most in-form forwards in the world will not be among the players in the US as Liverpool could not qualify for the tournament, with Manchester City and Chelsea earning spots from the English quota.

Further confusing the selection of teams was FIFA’s abrupt decision to give the host nation a spot and award it to Inter Miami, underlining the opaque nature of the qualifying criteria for the tournament which won’t feature Liverpool, Barcelona or Napoli, who have all just been crowned champions in three of the most prestigious leagues in Europe.

Inter Miami gained entry by topping Major League Soccer’s regular season standings, despite losing in the first round of the playoffs – a decision critics say shows FIFA’s desperation to have Inter’s Argentina great Messi at their inaugural showpiece.

Apart from the winners of each confederation’s premier club competitions, teams qualified according to a ranking based on their performances over a four-year period. Barcelona, the current La Liga champions, missed out on a spot due to the four-year club coefficient rankings and two-team restrictions, as their archrivals Real Madrid qualified for the Club World Cup alongside Atletico Madrid.

The Catalan giants, fielding some of the most exhilarating footballers on the planet, such as 17-year-old wonderkid Yamal or the goal-scoring genius of Raphinha, are a huge omission from the club-based tournament.

Prodigious talents like Romelu Lukaku and Scott McTominay, who ushered Napoli’s stunning 2024-25 Serie A title charge in Italy, will also not play.

Mo Salah reacts.
Liverpool’s Mohamed Salah will be one of many global football stars missing from the FIFA Club World Cup 2025 [File: Phil Noble/Reuters]

4. Introduction of a special transfer window

In the build-up to the tournament, FIFA announced the creation of a special transfer window, allowing participating clubs to make last-minute transfers before their teams board the flight to the US.

FIFA has said signings can be made from June 1 to June 10 as well as June 27 to July 3, explaining that the objective of the latter window is to encourage clubs and players whose contracts are expiring “to find an appropriate solution to facilitate the players’ participation”.

The introduction of this transfer window is unique as signings usually either take place in the close season or the middle of the season, known as the summer and winter windows for European clubs.

FIFA’s move has led to speculation that Cristiano Ronaldo could be one of those players to put pen to paper during the window on a short-term deal for one of the participating clubs. Spanish newspaper Marca reported in late May that a club in Brazil had submitted an offer to sign Ronaldo. Botafogo – one of four Brazilian clubs competing at the tournament – have been linked with the veteran forward.

Ronaldo, 40, has hinted he could leave Al Nassr after declaring that a “chapter is over” hours after the Saudi Pro League finished. Al Nassr have not qualified for the Club World Cup, unlike fellow Saudi side Al Hilal, and FIFA President Gianni Infantino recently said “there are discussions” over Ronaldo playing at the Club World Cup.

The Portugal star confirmed on Saturday that he had received “quite a few” offers from participating clubs to play for them at the tournament, but had decided against accepting any.

Should a Ronaldo transfer ultimately occur, the Club World Cup could see Messi and Ronaldo face-off in the US market, greatly boosting media interest, ticket sales, TV viewership figures, and enhancing the overall appeal of the tournament. The duo, who are arguably the greatest players of their generation, last played in the same competition at the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar.

A club which has already benefitted from this special transfer window is Real Madrid, which was able to reach an agreement with Liverpool to sign defender Trent Alexander-Arnold early and make him available for the tournament.

The right back was scheduled to join the Spanish giants on a six-year deal as a free agent after his Liverpool contract expired on June 30, but according to The Athletic, Real paid Liverpool 10 million euros ($11.4m) to fast-track the process and get him on board for the Club World Cup.

Al Nassr's Cristiano Ronaldo before the match
Cristiano Ronaldo, who plays for Saudi club Al Nassr, is out of contract this month, leading to rampant speculation that he might use the special transfer window to join another team participating in the FIFA Club World Cup [File: Hamad I Mohammed/Reuters]

5. Dress rehearsal for next year’s FIFA World Cup

Fans in the US will get a glimpse of what the 2026 FIFA World Cup on home soil will look like when they attend the Club World Cup matches this year.

The 2026 FIFA World Cup will be co-hosted by the US alongside Canada and Mexico, running for more than a month with 100+ matches.

Among the 12 stadiums that will host the new-look Club World Cup, some have also been chosen as venues for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, which will have 48 participants for the first time.

MetLife Stadium, an 82,500-seater in New Jersey, will host the semifinals and the final of the Club World Cup as well as the final of next year’s prestigious World Cup.

Atlanta’s Mercedes-Benz Stadium, Philadelphia’s Lincoln Financial Field, Seattle’s Lumen Field and Miami’s Hard Rock Stadium are the other venues which will be involved in both tournaments.

The venues, though, might not be filled to their full capacity as organisers have struggled to sell tickets, with club fan tickets, general public tickets, and hospitality sections all still up for sale on the official FIFA site, nearly two weeks out from the start of the event.

The FIFA World Cup 26 trophy is displayed during the UEFA Preliminary Draw at FIFA headquarters in Zurich, Switzerland, Friday, December 13, 2024. (AP Photo/Martin Meissner)
The FIFA World Cup 2026 trophy is coming to the US next year, as the final will be held at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey [File: Martin Meissner/AP Photo]

Jones ‘agreed’ to fight Aspinall – White

Getty Images

UFC president Dana White says he cannot stop Jon Jones from retiring, despite the American having “agreed” to fight Tom Aspinall.

White was responding to the social media activity of the UFC heavyweight champion, who suggested he was retired before calling out ex-UFC fighter Francis Ngannou.

Speaking at the UFC 316 post-fight news conference, White said 37-year-old Jones had said nothing about retiring to him and that he was only interested in matching him with Aspinall.

“Tom Aspinall is the guy. If the guy wants to retire and doesn’t want to fight, there’s nothing you can do,” White said.

“I didn’t want Khabib [Nurmagomedov] to retire, I thought [Daniel Cormier] should’ve stayed in it longer, so it’s none of my business.

“I’ll do what I can to make the fight, if we can, if he’s talking that crazy, I didn’t realise that.”

With Ngannou fuelling speculation he might be open to a return to the UFC, White played down the chances even if it was to fight Jones.

A graphic showing where Jon Jones and Tom Aspinall aim their significant strikes.  Jones: Head 49%, Body 24%, Legs 27%.
Aspinall: Head 71%, body 12%, Legs 17%.

Aspinall, 32, has been the interim champion for 18 months and has publicly said he believes Jones is retired.

White has been insisting since last November, when Jones last fought, the bout with Aspinall would happen next and clarified that – while Jones had agreed to the fight – he had not signed a contract.

“John agreed to fight Tom,” he said.

What information do we collect from this quiz?

Related topics

  • Mixed Martial Arts