P Diddy’s trial verdict is looming, and there were some shocking events that occurred in court on Tuesday, from the rapper’s cryptic comment to his mother to unanticipated jury behavior.
The fate of Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs is expected to be revealed this week as the 12 jurors in his sex-trafficking trial continue their deliberations. The embattled rapper, 55, is charged with sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy and transportation to engage in prostitution.
Combs, who denies all charges, could spend the rest of his life behind bars if he is found guilty. Deliberations began on Monday, but things took an unexpected turn when the jury passed two notes to the presiding judge.
The jury heard from 34 witnesses, including former flames of Kid Cudi and Combs, during the trial that started on May 5 at the Federal District Court in Lower Manhattan.
As the disgraced star’s verdict looms, we take a look at the biggest bombshells from the second day of court this week.
Diddy’s five-word address to his mother
Before leaving the court, Diddy whispered to his children, who were behind him in the second row.
He said, “I’ll be alright, my mother,” after which he had leant in and asked him a question. Before tapping his chest, “Love you,”
Count 1 jury unable to reach a verdict
At 4.05 p.m. local time, the jury wrote to the judge: “We have decided on counts 2, 3, 4, and 5.” Because of jurors with unsupportable viewpoints on both sides, we are unable to reach a verdict on count one.
The judge should encourage the jury to continue deliberating, according to both the prosecution and defense attorneys. The defense, according to Marc Agnifilo, wants the judge to summon the jury and instruct them to continue their deliberations. They are currently modifying the instruction’s language.
The jury is unable to reach a decision on count one because it chose to decide on four of the five charges, which are counts two, three, four, and five. The charges against Diddy are:
- Count 1: Racketeering conspiracy
- Victim 1 (Cassie) is the subject of Count 2 – Sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion.
- Count 3 – Transportation to engage in prostitution in relation to victim 1 (Cassie) and professional sex workers
- Count 4 – Sex trafficking perpetrated by force, fraud, or coercion (victim 2).
- Count 5 – Transportation to engage in prostitution, relating to Victim 2 (Jane Doe) and professional sex workers
The maximum sentence for count one is life in prison. In addition, counts two and four serve a maximum sentence of life and a minimum sentence of 15 years. Three and five count for ten years in prison.
Judge demands that the jury continue to deliberate.
Judge Subramanian and the attorneys were discussing how to respond when the jury notes that they were unable to reach a verdict in whole.
When responding to the defense team’s suggested instruction, Subramanian said, “There’s not much there.” He added that quoting the jury to “keep deliberating” would not be in line with Count One’s note, which stated “unpersuadable opinions.”
Marc Agnifilo, Diddy’s attorney, claimed that the jury should have been more productive and efficient because they didn’t need any more encouragement to continue deliberating. Subramanian also asserted that the government’s proposal is not an Allen charge as such but reiterates a section of the jury’s instructions regarding the duty to deliberate.
What are the two notes that the jury accepted, and why it might bring good news for Diddy.
The jury’s two notes were passed to the presiding judge, giving the proceedings an unexpected twist that started on Monday.
Before the jury’s initial hearing, the judge’s lengthy 61-page instructions were difficult to understand, according to the first note. According to Mitch Epner, a New York-based attorney and former prosecutor, the jury’s note-passing may be a positive sign for Combs.
Speaking to the BBC, he said: “First, it is unusual for the jurors to send a note to the judge this early, other than asking for logistical help. Second, this note indicates that there may already be a breakdown in the deliberative process,”.
Juror number 25’s specific concerns and their difficulty following the judge’s instructions have not yet been made public, and a unanimous decision is required for a conviction.
Epner argued that while a jury can be dismissed for not participating in discussions, they cannot be removed simply for coming to a “fixed conclusion about the proper verdict.”
If you’ve been the victim of sexual assault, you can access help and resources via www.rapecrisis.org.uk or calling the national telephone helpline on 0808 802 9999