Former Spice Girl Victoria Beckham has revealed the part husband David Beckham played in her creating her steely pose in which she rarely smiles for the camera
View 2 Images
Victoria Beckham has revealed why she doesn’t smile(Image: PA)
Victoria Beckham’s trademark pout has become symbolic with her appearance over the years. The singer and fashion guru, 51, is well known for her steely look on the catwalks and red carpets and is rarely spotted cracking a smile.
However, while her trademark look has long been speculated, the former Spice Girl has finally revealed the real reason behind keeping her teeth under wraps. Sorry David, but she’s gunning for you.
Victoria’s latest project sees her appear in her self-titled Netflix docuseries and she spills the beans on a number of the family’s most personal details. And this also includes her lack of smiling.
READ MORE: Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz’s heartbreaking cameo in Victoria’s Netflix showREAD MORE: David Beckham told Victoria ‘This can’t continue’ during desperate money showdown
She insists her look was simply formed after husband David stood on her “good side”. She said: “Here’s a fact, I’ve looked miserable for all these years because when we stand on the red carpet, this guy has always [stood] on the left.
“Now I didn’t realise that when I smile – which I do! – I smile from the left, because if I smile from the right, I look unwell. So I’m smiling on the inside but no one ever sees it – so that’s why I look so moody.”
As well as the admission about David’s positioning, Victoria later revealed it may have been a confidence thing at times. She said she was left feeling as though she didn’t want to smile after losing her way following the split of the Spice Girls in 2000.
As her solo career failed to hit the same heights, Victoria said people questioning her next moves began to take a toll on her. “I’d be lying if I said I was the best singer or dancer,” she said. “But when people are mean and you’re hearing things and you’re seeing things and you’re constantly made to feel you’re not good enough, that really hurts. I became so self conscious.”
She later added: “The minute i see a camera, I change. The barrier goes up, my armour goes on and that’s when the miserable cow who doesn’t smile comes out.
“I’m so conscious of that and I don’t like that, I’d rather not be that person. I’d love to have the confidence to walk out of a restaurant and smile but I just can’t do it.'”
And her change in persona was also noted by David who said he could see her confidence and bubbly side slowly disappearing.
Elsewhere on the series, Victoria admitted she became “good at lying” as she revealed how she was able to hide an eating disorder. The mum-of-four explained that she stopped eating because she was felt unable to control what others were saying about her during the height of her fame, but “I can control my weight”.
She revealed how she tried to control the narrative about what was being reported about her: “I could control it with the clothing, I could control it with my weight and I was controlling it in an extremely unhealthy way.
“When you have an eating disorder you become very good at lying and I was never honest about it with my parents.”
Victoria Beckham is available to stream on Netflix now.
Article continues below
Like this story? For more of the latest showbiz news and gossip, follow Mirror Celebs onTikTok,Snapchat,Instagram,Twitter,Facebook,YouTubeandThreads.
READ MORE: Best Prime Day tooth whitening deal is 70% off – and isn’t actually on Amazon
Former footballer David Beckham and fashion designer wife Victoria were seen enjoying a cuddle with locals after they apparently napped into the pub to ‘use the toilet’. However, it didn’t take people long to realise the truth
View Image
David and Victoria Beckham are two of the UK’s biggest stars (file)(Image: Getty Images)
David and Victoria Beckham are two of the biggest stars around, so not many people expect to see them mingling with others down their local pub. However, that’s exactly what the pair were seen doing at The Royal Oak pub, based in Staffordshire – kind of.
The former footballer and fashion designer were seen enjoying a cuddle with locals after they apparently nipped into the pub to ‘use the toilet’. However, it didn’t take people long to realise that the photos were a mock-up of the stars, using AI.
The first snap saw David, 50, with his arm around a pub-goer as they sat in front of some drinks. While Victoria, 51, was seen giving another punter a cuddle.
The post was captioned: “You never know what will happen or who will be in The Royal Oak…
Tonight with the weather it’s been a little quieter but then in comes Posh & Becks to use the toilet and were happy to be in a photo… some happy fans.”
The post racked up more than 1,800 likes as people were quick to get the joke.
One person quipped: “I hope they bought a drink first.”
While another added: “When you order Posh & Becks off Wish.”
A third wrote: “Brilliant I love this. I love all the FB detectives excitedly declaring the pics are not genuine as if the Royal Oak wasn’t just posting it for a joke in the first place.”
While a fourth said: “People don’t see the ‘AI info’ under the pub name.”
The couple, who married back in 1999, have a Grade II-listed townhouse in Holland Park, London, as their main UK residence, although they also own a country estate in the Cotswolds.
Article continues below
They also spend significant time in the US as well, owning a penthouse in Miami, Florida, where David is involved with the Inter Miami CF soccer team.
The post comes as Spice Girls star Victoria’s Netflix documentary launches today (October 9).
The Primark shoes bear a striking resemblance to a much more expensive pair from designer René Caovilla
View 3 Images
Primark is selling a pair of heels that look similar to a designer version(Image: Yau Ming Low via Getty Images)
Primark is currently selling a pair of shoes that are remarkably similar to a more expensive counterpart. The high street giant, renowned for its budget-friendly fashion and homeware, may have just launched a new latest crowd-pleaser.
The Spiral Diamante Heeled Sandals from Primark bear a striking resemblance to a style by luxury brand René Caovilla but at a fraction of the price. Shoppers can bag the Primark version for £22, while the designer alternative retails at £1,250 online.
Both pairs feature matching soles and spiral straps, which are decorated with sparkling diamantes. They both also have two straps over the front of the foot.
However, there are some differences between the two. The designer shoes feature black diamantes, while Primark’s are silver. The more expensive shoes also feature a higher heel.
Primark describes the shoes as “spiral diamante sandals with stiletto heel and rounded toe.” They are available in cream or black.
The full Primark description reads: “Step into sparkle with these black spiral diamante heeled sandals. The slim stiletto heel and round toe create a sleek base, while two slim front straps shimmer with hotfix rhinestones.
“The standout spiral ankle strap wraps elegantly around your leg, covered in sparkling crystals for a bold, eye-catching look. With no buckle closure, the coiling strap offers a unique fit and style. Perfect for adding drama to your evening outfit, these sandals bring a dazzling finish that’s sure to turn heads.”
The designer description states: “For a flirtatious finishing touch to your favourite after-dark ensemble, look no further than the Cleo sandals from René Caovilla. Adorned with delicate embellishments, this glittering pair guarantees to catch the light with every step – ensuring you sparkle and gleam from dusk ‘til dawn.”
Primark’s Spiral Diamante Heeled Sandalsretail for £10, while the René Caovilla Black Embellished Cleo Sandals 105 come in at £1,250. This means shoppers could save £1,228 by opting for the cheaper alternative.
Shoppers can now get their hands on the Primark shoes, in black or cream, in stores. Shoppers can check stock levels at their closest store here.
John Lennon’s sister has opened up on what would have been the Beatles star’s 85th birthday about the childhood experiences that shaped him into a global icon
Staff at the Strawberry Field children’s home in the 1950s were used to seeing a skinny lad sitting in a tree in their grounds. The boy who climbed their fence to escape a troubled home life was John Lennon – who would have been 85 today (October 9) – whose experience inspired him to write one of the best-known songs of all time.
Now, as the visitor attraction prepares to mark a major milestone in its history, Lennon’s sister Julia Baird is keen to explain why Strawberry Field’s success – and her brother’s legacy – really is forever. “This place has been a part of my life for a very long time and it meant a lot to John too,” Honorary President Julia, now 78, tells The Mirror.
“He had a rough childhood and to come into these grounds was his escape. Without really knowing it, he was another damaged child who was being taken care of here.”
Given to The Salvation Army in 1934, Strawberry Field opened two years later – 90 years ago next year – offering refuge for some of Liverpool’s most vulnerable children. Today it houses an exhibition tracing Lennon’s life and career – its star attraction being the world-famous piano on which he wrote and recorded Imagine .
It also operates a Steps to Work programme, providing training, skills and work placements for young adults with learning difficulties, or other barriers to employment. Beatles fans from across the globe still make pilgrimages to Strawberry Field in south Liverpool, but Julia says of the song that’s its namesake: “I get fed up with hearing it!
“My favourite track of John’s is actually Watching the Wheels. It reminds me of him lying on the bed, watching telly with Sean running around – and ignoring the pressure he was under to get back into the music industry. I love that. I saw an interview he did once and he was asked if he would consider writing his autobiography ‘Oh no,’ he sneered. ’I’d never do anything like that, what a stupid thing to do’.
“But I was laughing my head off. I thought ‘you’re writing it all the time through your songs.’ Strawberry Field is his psychoanalytical poem.”
Six-and-a-half years older than John, as a lad he had only sporadic contact with his seaman father, Alfred, and was raised mainly by one of his mum’s sisters, Mimi, in a house only yards away from Strawberry Field. His mum also had two daughters in a new relationship – Julia and her younger sister Jackie – but remained close to John, seeing him regularly.
She taught him to play the banjo and introduced him to Elvis Presley – dancing around the kitchen to the music. “Our mum was very arty, very creative and musical,” says Julia, who now lives in Cheshire. “She played the piano accordion and loved Judy Garland and Edith Piaf.
“And she was an excellent mother when she was given the chance; my father made sure she had that chance.”
Julia recalls John being an ‘awkward’ teen with a ‘chip on his shoulder,’ saying:“There he’d be, walking down the road with his guitar and his quiff, a cocky kid. “I was chatting to a former neighbour once and he said he remembered all the boys playing football in the street. John came along and kicked the ball into infinity so they all set on him and beat him up!
“People ask me what it was like to be John Lennon’s sister, but I didn’t know any different; he was just my older brother.”
When their mum was killed in a car accident in July 1958, John was just 17. “People say it was terrible for John and it was, but it was a lot worse for Jackie. She was only eight years old,” says Julia. “John’s childhood was far from plain sailing, but the result of that was John, the world icon. It made him the genius he was.”
Julia had a ringside seat when global fame hit her brother, together with Paul, George and Ringo, in the wake of The Beatles’ first single, Love Me Do, in 1962.
“There was no escaping it. I’d help open Beatles fan letters – some inviting them to leave their wives and girlfriends – and because fans kindly put in stamped addressed envelopes we’d reply. We’d pretend and say ‘we’ll meet you at the station?’” she says. “It was a full time job!”
Recalling a 1964 concert in London – part of a sold-out 16 night run – where, to John’s dismay, she and Jackie insisted on moving from a spot backstage out front, she says: “The front few rows were relatively empty and we thought we’d get a good view. He told us again and again to stay put but we pestered and he relented in the end.
“But then suddenly the opening bars for She Loves You started, the curtain went up and before the second bar everyone from the back was at the front – there was a huge surge. It was quite threatening, like a stampede. So John is singing and also going ‘get the girls, get the girls’; we were hauled on our stomachs back over the side of the stage. He just looked and said, ‘told you so’.”
Like most brothers, John could be embarrassing. “This was later during the anti-war protests – when he was in a bed or in a bag; it was awful,” says Julia. “I was married by then and living in Ireland and my in-laws said, ‘don’t worry love, we’ll keep it quiet that you’re related to him’.
“I mentioned it one day on the phone to John. I said, ‘you were in the ivory tower. We were dealing with it on the street’. He just said ‘sorry about that’.” John was murdered in 1980 in New York by Mark Chapman, who remains in prison.
Retired teacher Julia, who has three grandchildren, is convinced if he was alive today, her brother would be speaking out about global issues, including war and famine. “I can’t see him being able to keep out of it or keep quiet about what’s happening across the world. Life had been very unfair to him – as it is to so many people – and he hated injustice so whatever the cause he’d be saying ‘that’s not fair – we need to do something’,” she says.
Of his music, had he lived, she adds: “Maybe he’d have graduated to jazz. I don’t see him retiring at all. He’d be writing books although I worry that his eyesight might have caused him trouble using a computer. And I do wonder what he would look like now. I haven’t seen him for so long, and yet because he’s John Lennon I see him all the time. I wonder if he’d still have hair!”
But she believes John’s message and music are as relevant today as ever. “The Beatles were part of a cultural shift. They were an instrument for change – that birth of the teenager where young people no longer had to accept they’d simply leave school, get engaged, get married, have babies or work in an office,” she says. “That sort of change which challenges the norm still resonates.”
Article continues below
She believes he would have celebrated his birthday, adding: “Mum always made a big thing of birthdays, even when we were small, always made it a big celebration. John would have known that that was the order of the day.”
At Strawberry Field, Julia is surrounded by reminders of John, from engraved song lyrics to the famous red-painted entrance gates. But she has one very special keepsake that she treasures.
Louis Tomlinson has recalled the moment he was informed about the death of his former One Direction bandmate Liam Payne – and he said “we all looked up to” the singer
View 3 Images
Louis Tomlinson (right) has spoken about the loss of his friend Liam Payne(Image: FilmMagic)
Louis Tomlinson has revealed Niall Horan informed him about the death of the pair’s former One Direction bandmate Liam Payne, saying “we all looked up to him”.
The 33-year-old said Payne had been pushing for a reunion of the band, which also included Harry Styles and Zayn Malik. Payne died at the age of 31 in October last year after falling from a hotel balcony in Argentina.
Speaking to host Steven Bartlett on The Diary Of A CEO podcast, Tomlinson said he was in Los Angeles when he first heard of Payne’s death.
“In the car, in LA. I found out through Niall,” he said, telling Bartlett the news evoked a similar reaction to when his sister Felicite died of an accidental drug overdose in 2019.
“I had the same feeling that I had with Felicite, and I think anyone has this when they’re around someone who’s struggling; my 150 per cent wasn’t nearly enough.
“And that’s when it’s my own arrogance thinking that I could have helped really, because it was so much deeper than what I could have done for him. He was definitely struggling at that time in his life.”
READ MORE: Louis Tomlinson’s heartbreaking promise to dead mum – that still drives him todayREAD MORE: Cheryl Tweedy seen for first time since Liam Payne’s funeral and stalking hell
A post-mortem examination report said Payne died of multiple traumas and “internal and external haemorrhage” after falling from a third-floor balcony of the Casa Sur Hotel in Buenos Aires.
At the time, Tomlinson shared an Instagram post in which he said he was “beyond devastated” to have “lost a brother”. Tomlinson told Bartlett: “When I put up my post about him, I really wanted him to be remembered the way that he should be remembered. I could just go on and talk all day about how amazing he was, but I think we all looked up to him.”
Tomlinson also revealed that Payne had been campaigning for a One Direction reunion, but he said it would not feel “right”.
“Never say never… but I’m just not sure it would be right to (Payne). Say for the sake of argument, 25 year’s time, it’s like a f****** Oasis thing, they offer us an arm and a leg, and they’re like, ‘Come back and do this many shows’, I don’t know. (Payne’s death) just completely put a pin in all of that. And the irony is, there was no one campaigning for One Direction to get back more than Liam. I would say I came in a close second.”
Article continues below
A court in Argentina dropped charges in February of criminal negligence against three out of the five people who had been charged in connection with Payne’s death.
At the Brit Awards in March he was remembered with a video montage which showed him with his family and a clip from his time on The X Factor and then with One Direction, who won seven gongs at the music awards before they split up.
Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, was followed by the woman – described as a “fixated individual” – in London and even in Nigeria, but he left the Royal Family years ago
View 2 Images
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are now “mere celebrities,” it is argued(Image: Anadolu via Getty Images)
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are “not entitled to security” because they are now just “mere celebrities,” it is today argued.
The damning claim comes despite Harry being followed on several occasions, including twice in London, by a stalker, described as a “fixated individual”. She came “within yards” of the Duke of Sussex during his recent visit to the UK, it emerged this week.
His own private security “body blocked” the woman after she entered a “secure zone” at a hotel, and two days later, she came within just “a stone’s throw” from the duke when he visited Imperial College London’s Centre for Blast Injury Studies.
But it is argued today Harry and Meghan are just “celebrities” now and therefore should not receive security paid for by the British taxpayer, despite the scares. Jane Moore, a columnist and regular on Loose Women, said: “I sympathise. But the right (or not) to state-backed police protection is decided by executive committee Ravec, which decided that, as he is no longer a working royal, he’s not entitled to it. Indeed, thanks to their various commercial deals, it could be argued that Harry and Meghan are now classed as mere ‘celebrities.’”
READ MORE: Prince William and Kate Middleton’s non-negotiable parenting rules including strict banREAD MORE: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle offered sweet olive branch by King Charles
Jane shared her opinion in a column in The Sun this week, stating the couple have pursued commercial contracts since moving from the UK to the US five years ago. They announced they were stepping back as working members of the royal family in January 2020. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex were then told they would receive a “bespoke” security service, where they’d need to give 30 days’ notice of any plans to travel to the UK, with each visit being assessed for threat levels and whether protection is needed.
But Jane, 63, claimed Harry and Meghan should not be afforded such protection if they are now seen as celebrities. The journalist added: “With alarming frequency, the newspapers are full of stories about other celebrities (particularly women) whose lives are blighted by stalkers that they don’t get state-backed police protection from. So if Harry was to get it, then why not them?”
The publication referred to high-profile stalking cases, including that of Strictly Come Dancing judge Shirley Ballas who moved her mother to a different home due to the behaviour of 37-year-old creep Kyle Shaw. However, Shaw’s prison sentence was suspended for 20 months at Liverpool Crown Court earlier this year.
