All posts by 234Radio

Where Popstars winners Hear’Say are today – from Dancing On Ice champ to Coronation Street role

By in Entertainment News, News

Hear’Say were the original reality TV pop band who shot to fame when they won the reality show Popstars in 2001 with hit single Pure and Simple, but where are they now?

Where are the stars of Hear’Say are today

Hear’Say catapulted to stardom in 2001 after clinching victory in the popular singing contest Popstars, but have since gone their separate ways.

Back in 2000, thousands of aspiring singers flocked to auditions for ITV’s talent show, Popstars. The hopefuls were evaluated by Nigel Lythgoe, Paul Adam and Nicki Chapman, who had previously worked with the Spice Girls.

The five selected vocalists formed Hear’Say, while the five runners-up went on to create the band Liberty X. The pop group’s achievements set the stage for success for its members – Danny Foster, Myleene Klass, Kym Marsh, Suzanne Shaw and Noel Sullivan.

During their time together, they dominated the charts with their hit single Pure and Simple and their album titled Popstars – both the single and the album secured the number one spots at the time.

READ MORE: Where the cast of Baywatch are today – from tragic deaths, cancer battles and jail time

Hear'Say (from left to right) Noel Sullivan, Suzanne Shaw, Kym Marsh, Myleene Klass and Danny Foster in 2001
Hear’Say (from left to right) Noel Sullivan, Suzanne Shaw, Kym Marsh, Myleene Klass and Danny Foster in 2001(Image: PA)

2001 saw the band achieve so much, going from strength to strength and garnering an impressive fan base. Due to Kym’s unwavering popularity, she fast became the most famous member – which was partly down to the fact that she was dating EastEnders’ actor Jack Ryder at the time.

Article continues below

Everything fell apart for the band when Kym announced she was leaving in 2002 – but what have the Hear’Say members been up to since they went their separate ways?

Kym Marsh

Kym
Kym Marsh in March 2022(Image: Getty Images)

As we discovered earlier on, Kym left the band in 2002 to ‘pursue solo ventures’ – but she later revealed that not all was what it seemed. Rumours have often swirled around whether or not there were feuds among the bandmates, and apparently, this was the case.

Kym apparently clashed with Myleene Klass and Noel Sullivan – which is part of the reason the band split. Jumping ship from music to acting, Kym moved to the cobbled streets and joined the cast of Coronation Street in 2006.

Kym
Kym and Myleene in 2006

Fans will remember the brunette beauty joining the soap as Michelle Connor, where she was a part of some huge storylines. She ended up staying in the soap for 13 years and announced her departure in 2019.

Myleene Klass

Myleene
Myleene’s career has been full of highlights

Mylene is another successful former member of Hear’Say and has gone on to have a glowing career since the band broke up. One year after the band split, she signed a five-album deal with Universal Classics and Jazz, with a classical music album being released a year later in 2003.

She’s had number ones and number twos in the UK chart – going from strength-to-strength as a classical music artist. Myleene has also had a glowing career on TV and has often popped up on our screens.

Myleene
Mylenne is the reason we have iconic shower scenes in I’m A Celeb

Most will remember the stunning brunette star for appearing on I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here in 2006 – yes, she was responsible for the slew of iconic shower scenes! In 2010, she also hosted Popstar to Operastar – keeping her work within the realm of her classical music expertise. And you may recognise her dulcet tones from presenting her own radio show on Smooth Radio.

Suzanne Shaw

Suzanne
Suzanne ended up winning Dancing On Ice

Suzanne Shaw was just 21 when Hear’Say split, but this didn’t prevent her from making a name for herself and hitting the big time. She went on to perform on the West End and was the narrator in Joseph and the Amazing Technicolour Dreamcoat in 2005.

After that, she starred as Janet in The Rocky Horror Show national tour. A couple of years after her theatre stin,t she went on to star in The Bill in 2007.

Fans of the band or those who love the soaps might recognise her from her role of Eve Birch in Emmerdale, or from when she won Dancing on Ice in 2008. More recently,y she’s dipped her toe into panto and in 2021 she played Belle in Beauty and the Beast at Chesterfield’s Pomegranate Theatre.

Danny Foster

Danny Foster
Danny Foster looks unrecognisable from his days in the band(Image: Instagram/@mrdannyfoster)

Danny Foster hasn’t really stayed in the public eye since the breakdown of the super band, but he’s doing pretty well. He’s thought to still be singing, while in the band, Danny Foster & The Big Soul Corporation, which has a focus on performing Motown songs.

His dream of making it big has never gone away though and in 2013 he auditioned for The Voice but sadly didn’t make it through. Danny’s social media presence is very low-key, and he has just under 4K followers on Instagram.

Posting snippets of his life with wife Victoria Goddard, Danny appears to be incredibly spiritual and his bio says he’s, “on a mission – creating life of well-being” along with “spreading love”.

Noel Sullivan

Noel is the Hear'Say singer turned West End star
Noel is the Hear’Say singer turned West End star

Noel Sullivan is a Welsh singer and actor who has gone on to have a brilliant career since his stint in the band and its subsequent downfall. Like Suzanne, he has gone on to star in many stage productions, including Fame and as Danny in Grease on the West End.

Article continues below

In 2010, he appeared in the hit rom-com TV series Gavin and Stacey. Noel announced he got hitched in 2017 to his husband James.

READ MORE: Myleene Klass just found the perfect summer work dress and its under £60

Will 48-team Women’s World Cup be good for the game?

By in News, Sports News
Getty Images
Emily Salley
BBC Sport journalist
  • 253 Comments

“Fifa was right.”

That’s how president Gianni Infantino described his organisation’s decision to expand the Women’s World Cup from 16 teams to 32 for the 2023 tournament.

Less than two years later Fifa has announced plans for further expansion.

The women’s tournament will follow the lead of the men’s World Cup and become a 48-team competition from 2031.

Was expansion a success in 2023?

The 2023 World Cup in Australia and New Zealand, which featured eight new teams, threw up plenty of surprises.

It was a successful tournament for African nations, with underdogs Morocco, South Africa and Nigeria – ranked 72, 54 and 40 in the world respectively – reaching the last 16.

Morocco’s progression came at the expense of two-time champions Germany, who went out at the group stages a year after reaching the Euro 2022 final.

Zambia, ranked 81st, were the lowest-ranked team to qualify.

While they suffered 5-0 losses to Japan and Spain, they finished third in their group thanks to a 3-1 win over Costa Rica, who were ranked 44 places higher.

Nigeria, 40th in the rankings, lost to eventual runners-up England in a penalty shootout in the last 16.

Of the 32 teams, only three failed to earn a single point – Costa Rica, Haiti and Vietnam – and only Vietnam failed to score.

What are the benefits?

Only 44 nations have played in a Women’s World Cup.

With the tournament expanding by 16 teams, there will be more qualifying places allocated to each of the six Fifa continental zones.

That could provide an extra incentive for governments and national football associations – particularly from smaller nations who have not competed on the world stage – to invest in the women’s game.

US Soccer chief executive JT Batson said the expansion of the 2031 tournament – set to be held in the US – would be “incredible for growing the women’s game”.

“One of the things we hear from folks who lead federations around the world is they view the Women’s World Cup as an opportunity for them to, one, make a World Cup and, two, really go compete in a way that conceivably they wouldn’t be able to on the men’s side,” Batson said.

England manager Sarina Wiegman said she had reservations about expanding from 24 teams to 32 for the 2023 edition.

However, she changed her mind after the tournament, saying more teams “made it more competitive”.

“It will grow the game again in different countries because they have other opportunities to come and still have challenges to overcome,” Wiegman said.

“Some countries are at different stages of their development, so it will empower women in sport, women in football and women in society.”

From a UK perspective, more qualifying places would give the home nations a better chance of reaching a tournament on home soil in 2035.

While England have established themselves as one of the world’s best teams, Scotland and the Republic of Ireland have played in only one World Cup, and Wales and Northern Ireland have never qualified.

Jess Fishlock of WalesGetty Images

What are the downsides?

When it was announced that the men’s World Cup would expand to 48 teams, the immediate concerns were that the competition would be diluted.

The same questions have been asked of an expanded Women’s World Cup and there are worries that one-sided scorelines and a gulf in quality would devalue the women’s game and turn off television audiences.

“There is the fear it might dilute some of the competition,” said former England goalkeeper Karen Bardsley.

She also highlighted player welfare and adding to an already busy football calendar as possible downsides to an expanded tournament.

“There’s probably also an element of will the tournament be longer? You’re going to see a massive increase in games,” she said.

“Will there be an increase in rest periods? How is that going to affect the domestic calendar? How is that going to affect the player loading and recovery?”

What is Fifa doing to help growing nations?

Bardsley said there must be a “real emphasis on developing the game” if the tournament expands to 48 teams.

“There is time but it’s going to have to really be prioritised and accelerated,” she said.

Fifa launched its Women’s Football Strategy in 2018 and set a goal of having 60 million girls and women playing football across the globe by 2027.

Within its objectives, Fifa aims to ensure all 211 of its members have comprehensive women’s football strategies.

Through its Women’s Development Programme, Fifa also offers its members the opportunity to apply for and access additional resources and specialist expertise to develop women’s football.

“It’s going to be a tall order, but if Fifa serious about this investing in the women’s game now, you’ll see a massive benefit by 2035,” Bardsley said.

How would a 48-team tournament work?

The first time we will see a 48-team tournament is next year’s men’s World Cup in Canada, Mexico and the US.

At first, Fifa suggested a group-stage format that included 16 groups of three teams, with the top two from each group going through.

But that caused controversy because the sides playing in the final group game could play out a result that enabled both to go through at the expense of the other team.

After widespread criticism and a thrilling four-team group stage in Qatar at the 2022 men’s World Cup, Fifa revised its plans.

The 48 teams will be drawn into 12 groups of four with the top two from each – along with the eight best third-placed nations – advancing to a 32-team knockout stage.

There has been no indication yet as to whether a women’s tournament would follow the same format.

The number of games will rise from 64 in a 32-team competition to 104 with 48 teams, which is likely to mean a longer tournament.

The 2026 men’s World Cup is set to last 10 days longer than in 2022.

Related topics

  • Football
  • Women’s Football

Taylor Swift issues scathing reply after being subpoenaed in Blake Lively case

By in Entertainment News, News

Taylor Swift has issued a scathing reply to Justin Baldoni’s legal team after she was subpoenaed to appear as a witness in his trial with her friend Blake Lively

Taylor Swift and Blake Lively are close friends(Image: Getty Images)

Taylor Swift has issued a scathing reply after she was officially subpoenaed to appear as a witness in Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni’s legal battle. Taylor, 35, was delivered a legal notice on Friday by Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman – a move which has been slammed by her team as a tactic to create clickbait.

A representative for the superstar said: “Taylor Swift never set foot on the set of this movie, she was not involved in any casting or creative decisions, she did not score the film, she never saw an edit or made any notes on the film, she did not even see It Ends With Us until weeks after its public release, and was traveling around the globe during 2023 and 2024 headlining the biggest tour in history.”

Taylor Swift Blake Lively
Taylor’s team gave a damning response(Image: GC Images)

They added that Taylor’s sole involvement in the movie was her track My Tears Ricochet from her 2020 album folklore being used. They then gave a damning verdict on why they believed Justin’s team had really subpoenaed Taylor dragging her into the legal row.

Her rep continued to DailyMail.com: “Given that her involvement was licensing a song for the film, which 19 other artists also did, this document subpoena is designed to use Taylor Swift’s name to draw public interest by creating tabloid clickbait instead of focusing on the facts of the case.”

Blake then shared her own response to Taylor being subpoenaed as her legal team also slammed Justin’s lawyers for their tactics. A statement said: “Mr. Baldoni, Mr. Sarowitz, and team continue to turn a case of sexual harassment and retaliation into entertainment for the tabloids…

Article continues below

“Going as far as suggesting that they sell tickets to a concert venue – Madison Square Garden – to witness Ms. Lively’s deposition, to subpoenaing Taylor Swift, a woman who has given a voice to millions all over the world. This is a very serious legal matter, not Barnum & Bailey’s Circus.”

They added: “The defendants continue to publicly intimidate, bully, shame and attack women’s rights and reputations. Including in the past month seeking to strike down for all, a powerful California victims’ rights law, calling it ‘unconstitutional’.

“The disturbing actions by a billionaire, men who made their careers as ‘female allies’ and their team continue to show their true colours.” The development comes after Blake’s attorney Mike Gottlieb confirmed that she is expected to “be a witness at her trial.”

Blake Lively Justin Baldoni
Blake Lively is set to battle it out in court with Justin Baldoni(Image: AP)

He told People: “The ultimate moment for a plaintiff’s story to be told is at trial. We expect that to be the case here. Of course she’s going to testify.”

Gottlieb also addressed rumours that stars such as Hugh Jackman may also be subpoenaed in the case. He said: “It’s completely unclear what claims or defences in the case any of these celebrities… have any relevance to at all.

“This is a case about what happened to Blake Lively when she raised claims of sexual harassment on the set. It’s not a case about how songs were chosen for the movie. It’s not a case about fictional Marvel characters in Deadpool movies,.

“You have to ask the question, then, why are these people being subpoenaed? Do they have any actual relevance to the case at hand? You can’t just go around subpoenaing people because they’re famous and you think it will generate a bunch of headlines. And the federal courts don’t tolerate that kind of behaviour.”

The Mirror has contacted Justin Baldoni’s representative for comment.

Article continues below

Iraq look to former Australia coach Arnold to boost 2026 World Cup hopes

By in News, World News

Former Australia manager Graham Arnold has been confirmed as the new head coach of Iraq by the country’s football federation ahead of next month’s World Cup qualifiers against South Korea and Jordan.

Arnold’s appointment was announced on social media by the Iraq Football Association, which published photographs of the 61-year-old being welcomed in Baghdad by officials from the national body.

“We are delighted to announce Graham Arnold as the new head coach of the Iraq national team,” the federation said in a post on Instagram. “Welcome to the Lions of Mesopotamia!”

Arnold replaces Jesus Casas at the helm after the Spaniard’s departure in the wake of a 2-1 loss to Palestine in March during the third round of Asia’s qualifiers for the 2026 World Cup.

That result left the Iraqis in third place in the standings in Group B, four points adrift of leaders South Korea and one behind the Jordanians.

The top two finishers in each of Asia’s three qualifying groups advance automatically to the World Cup, while the teams in third and fourth place progress to another round of preliminaries.

Arnold’s first game in charge will be in Basra on June 5 against the South Koreans before he takes his new team to Amman to face Jordan five days later. Iraq are attempting to qualify for the World Cup for the first time since 1986.

The appointment sees Arnold return to international management more than seven months after standing down as Australia’s head coach.

Arnold, who led the Australians to the knockout rounds of the 2022 World Cup during a six-year spell in charge, quit after an uninspired start to the current phase of qualifying when his side lost to Bahrain and drew with Indonesia in September.

Pakistan launches Operation Bunyan Marsoos: What we know so far

By in News, World News

Islamabad, Pakistan – India and Pakistan fired missiles at each other’s military bases on Saturday morning, the latest escalation in their rapid drift towards an all-out war.

Pakistan accused India of carrying out attacks inside its territory for the fourth consecutive night, launching ballistic missile strikes on at least three air bases. Islamabad said that in response, it launched a major military campaign, “Operation Bunyan Marsoos” (Arabic for “a structure made of lead”) targeting at least six Indian military bases.

India, in turn, accused Pakistan of being the aggressor. Indian military officials claimed Pakistan had targeted several Indian military bases and that its missiles into Pakistani territory were in response.

Yet, regardless of who hit the other first on May 10, the very fact that India and Pakistan had struck each other’s military bases over such a wide swath of territory, well beyond Kashmir – the disputed region that they each partly control – means that the conflict has now veered into almost unknown territory.

Never have the South Asian rivals attacked each other on this scale outside the four wars they have fought.

Here is what we know so far about India’s attacks, Pakistan’s response, what both countries and global powers like the United States are saying, and the background to this intensifying conflict.

(Al Jazeera)

What happened on the morning of May 10, according to Pakistan?

Pakistan said that India launched a salvo of drones into Pakistan, followed by ballistic missile strikes on at least three major airbases.

The Pakistani bases India targeted are:

  • Nur Khan airbase:  Located near Chaklala, Rawalpindi, it serves as a key operational and training hub. It houses important Pakistan Air Force commands, and supports transport, logistics and VIP flight operations.
  • Murid airbase: Located in Chakwal, roughly 120km (75 miles) from Islamabad. It is a vital forward-operating base for the Pakistan Air Force. It plays a crucial role in air defence and combat readiness.
  • Rafiqui airbase: Located in Shorkot, Punjab, the base hosts fighter squadrons.

Pakistan said that in response, it launched aerial attacks against multiple Indian military bases. The bases known to have been targeted are:

  • Udhampur airbase: Located in Indian-administered Kashmir, Udhampur is also the headquarters of the Indian Army’s Northern Command.
  • Pathankot airbase: The base in Indian Punjab is a central part of India’s frontline air force operations and was targeted by armed fighters in a 2016 attack in which six Indian soldiers were killed. India blamed that attack on the Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammad.
  • Drangyari artillery gun position: Drangyari is in Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir.
  • Uri field support depot: Uri, in Indian-administered Kashmir, is also home to a major Indian Army base that was attacked in 2016 by armed fighters who killed 19 Indian soldiers. India, which blamed Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammad for the attack, launched what it described as “surgical strikes” in Pakistan-administered Kashmir.
  • Nagrota: The town in Indian-administered Kashmir is home to a storage site for the Brahmos missiles jointly designed and made by India and Russia.
  • Beas: Located in Indian Punjab, the site is a storage facility for the Brahmos missile.
  • Adampur air base: Located in Indian Punjab, the base is home to an S-400 missile defence system that India bought from Russia.
  • Bhuj air base: The base is located in Gujarat, the home state of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

What has India said?

At a media briefing, Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri accused Pakistan of provocations and escalations, claiming that New Delhi was only responding to its neighbour’s actions.

He was joined by Colonel Sofia Qureshi of the Indian Army and Wing Commander Vyomika Singh of the Indian Air Force, who shared New Delhi’s version of events.

Pakistan, Qureshi said, used “drones, long-range weapons, loitering munitions and fighter aircrafts to target civilian areas and military infrastructure”.

“Pakistan military also resorted to air intrusions using drones and firing of heavy calibre weapons along the Line of Control,” she said. Loitering munitions, also known as suicide drones, are remote-controlled and designed to crash into their targets. The Line of Control is the de facto border between Indian and Pakistani-administered Kashmir.

While India said it had shot down most incoming missiles and drones, Qureshi and Singh conceded that the air force bases in Udhampur, Pathankot, Adampur and Bhuj did suffer “limited damage”.

India, however, rejected suggestions that any bases had suffered any significant damage, with the military releasing time-stamped photos of the facilities in support of its assertion. Pakistan’s military had on Thursday claimed that the Udhampur and Pathankot bases had been “destroyed.”

Indian officials said at least five people had been killed by Pakistani missile fire on Saturday.

What else happened on May 10?

As the neighbours traded missile fire and allegations, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke with General Syed Asim Munir, Pakistan’s army chief and widely regarded as the country’s most powerful figure, as well as with the Indian foreign minister, S Jaishankar.

According to the US State Department, Rubio urged both parties to seek ways to “deescalate” and offered American assistance in launching constructive dialogue to avoid further conflict.

How did India and Pakistan get to the brink of war?

Pakistan’s military response on Thursday followed four days of consecutive Indian attacks inside its territory and came two weeks after a deadly assault on tourists in the scenic town of Pahalgam in Indian-administered Kashmir on April 22.

The attack killed 26 men, all civilians. India blamed armed groups it alleges are backed by Pakistan, a charge Islamabad has denied, calling instead for an “impartial, transparent” investigation that New Delhi has rejected.

Multiple witness accounts suggest the gunmen segregated the men from the women, then selected and killed non-Muslims.

India initiated strikes on May 7, targeting areas inside Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir. It claimed to have destroyed “terrorist infrastructure” and eliminated at least “100 terrorists”.

It called its attacks Operation Sindoor, a reference to the vermilion – sindoor in Hindi – the red pigment many married Hindu women apply to their foreheads. The mission’s name was an allusion to the manner in which gunmen killed tourists in Pahalgam.

Pakistan reported that the Indian strikes killed 33 people, including several children, and injured more than 50. It denied that any of the dead were fighters, as India claimed.

As the attacks unfolded, Pakistan deployed its air force in response, engaging in a battle with the Indian Air Force (IAF). Pakistan’s military claimed it downed five Indian jets, including three Rafales, the French-made aircraft considered the IAF’s most advanced assets. India has neither confirmed nor denied the losses.

Drone warfare intensifies

India responded by deploying drones and loitering munitions on May 9 and 10, hitting at least a dozen targets across Pakistan, including major urban centres such as Karachi, Lahore and Rawalpindi.

India said the drone strikes were in response to Pakistan’s use of drones, a claim Islamabad continues to reject.

“There is no credence to their claims. They continue to lie. Their allegation is false. Otherwise, where is their evidence?” Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, Pakistan’s military spokesperson, told Al Jazeera during a news briefing in Rawalpindi on Friday.

He added that Pakistan’s response to “Indian aggression” would come at a “time, method, and place of our choosing”.

That time came on the morning of May 10.

What does Operation Bunyan Marsoos mean?

Pakistan’s operation is titled Bunyan Marsoos, an Arabic phrase that translates as “a structure made of lead”.

The phrase originates from the Quran: “Truly God loves those who fight in His cause in battle array, as if they were a solid cemented structure.”

In its Quranic context, the phrase symbolises unity and strength among believers fighting for a righteous cause.

What comes next?

Experts have repeatedly warned of the need for immediate de-escalation between the nuclear-armed neighbours before the situation becomes “irreversible”.

India said on May 10 that it was willing to stop the cycle of escalation if Pakistan reciprocated.

But Kamran Bokhari, senior director at the New Lines Institute for Strategy and Policy, said Indian strikes on Pakistani airbases had dramatically escalated the conflict.

“With Pindi being hit and other airbases such as the one in Sargodha, the war has taken a turn for the worse,” he told Al Jazeera. “We are now looking at a much bigger-scale war.”

Muhammad Faisal, a South Asia security analyst at the University of Technology Sydney, said Pakistan was left with little choice but to respond forcefully.

Retinol capsules that leave ‘skin looking younger’ praised for noticeable results ‘in a day’

By in Entertainment News, News

If you’re looking for a way to battle stubborn fine lines, wrinkles and crow’s feet, or want to restore your skin’s radiance in a matter of days, these retinol capsules may be just the ticket

This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more

Retinol capsules that leave ‘skin looking younger’ hailed for results ‘in a day’(Image: Getty)

Banishing pesky signs of ageing like fine lines may seem like a difficult task, one that may require expensive products or procedures, but skincare shoppers may have found an inexpensive serum that works wonders on wrinkles and restores radiance to dull, ageing skin in just a short period of time.

These RoC Retinol Capsules are available at iHerb for £30.43. They come with 30 capsules designed to be used nightly. From a leading French skincare brand, RoC, these capsules are clinically proven to deliver visible and lasting results.

READ MORE: Best-selling tummy control swimsuit with over 800 reviews hailed as ‘the most flattering ever’

READ MORE: Expert reveals best ways to save water while keeping gardens green and lush this summer

RoC Retinol Correxion Line Smoothing Night Serum Capsules
These RoC Retinol Correxion Line Smoothing Night Serum Capsules comes with 30 doses(Image: RoC)

Also available from Sephora, Lookfantastic and Amazon, these retinol capsules house the RoC Retinol Correxion Line Smoothing Night Serum, which is specially formulated to smooth and renew the appearance of collagen-depleted skin.

Sealed tight in single-use capsules for optimal potency, this serum combines a high concentration of pure RoC Retinol with a bio-derived antioxidant. On application, it promises a silky, lightweight fluid that drenches skin in hydration while helping to plump the appearance of fine lines and wrinkles.

The exclusive formula accelerates the removal of old, dull skin cells, supporting more even-toned and radiant-looking skin. It is perfect for use as the first step in your evening skincare routine. While 97% of users declared smoother skin in one night, others declared that elasticity appeared restored after just one night. Within a week, the complexion is set to appear more hydrated and firmer.

These capsules boast over 1100 reviews, with an impressive 75% bestowing a 5-star rating. One happy shopper shares: “I use this almost every night and absolutely love how it leaves my skin feeling. The capsules are convenient, and the serum itself is top quality. Over time, I’ve seen a noticeable improvement in my skin’s texture and smoothness. Compared to others my age, my skin looks more youthful and radiant, which makes me believe this product truly delivers. It’s definitely become a staple in my nighttime routine.”

Further adoration comes from this customer who gushes: “I use this almost every night, and I love how it makes my skin feel. The capsules are easy to use, and the quality of the serum is excellent. Over time, I’ve noticed a real difference in my skin’s texture and smoothness. Compared to my peers, my skin looks more youthful and radiant, which makes me think this product is really working. Definitely a great addition to my nighttime routine!”

Article continues below

A third raves: “I am not sure how it works, but it appears to be effective. My husband and I both noticed an improvement within a day. It is interesting that I could not find any information about the amount of retinol in this product. This may be due to the very small amount present. I will definitely buy it again! It’s very convenient to use and looks aesthetic in my medicine cabinet. It doesn’t have a strong scent. p.s. My age is 30+.”