Archive July 18, 2025

How the ‘greatest and worst shootout of all time’ unfolded

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

  • 71 Comments

Lucy Bronze scored the penalty that mattered and her feelings after England’s win over Sweden summed up the Lionesses’ performance – and the penalty shootout – perfectly.

It was both “overwhelming and underwhelming,” a shootout fraught with nervy moments but lacking in quality.

One goalkeeper saving four penalties. The other keeping out two. Three players missing the target. A keeper blasting one over the crossbar.

After England dramatically restored their hopes when a Euro 2025 exit looked a near-certainty, a “stressful” shootout victory over the Swedes earned them a spot in the semi-finals.

“I think it was just a rollercoaster, both overwhelming and underwhelming,” Bronze told BBC Sport. “It was just a crazy game”.

Goalkeeper Hannah Hampton echoed Bronze’s thoughts, saying it made for “stressful watching, stressful playing”.

Getty Images

How the shootout unfolded

Sweden 0-1 England (penalty one)

England won the toss, benefitting from a shootout in front of their own fans and took the first penalty.

Up stepped Alessia Russo, the Lionesses’ trusty goal threat. Jennifer Falk dived the right way, but her powerful effort never looked like being stopped.

“Russo has left nothing on the pitch so to strike that as sweetly as she did – Falk went the right way, nowhere near it,” former England goalkeeper Rachel Brown-Finnis said on BBC One.

Sweden 0-1 England (penalty two)

Hampton stood on the line, her nose bloodied from a collision in the final moments of extra time.

Filippa Angeldahl took the first kick for Sweden and sent it towards the right but Hampton got her hands to it.

“She’s done her homework,” reacted Brown-Finnis. Hampton knew exactly where to go.

Sweden 0-1 England (penalty three)

England couldn’t make the most of their advantage.

Lauren James tried to place her effort in the bottom left corner but Falk palmed it away.

Sweden 1-1 England (penalty four)

Sweden issued the perfect response. “Emphatic, beautifully struck,” said Brown-Finnis.

Julia Zigiotti Olme showed no nerves and left Hampton with no chance. Her well-struck spot-kick went into the top corner and Sweden levelled.

Sweden 1-1 England (penalty five)

Were emotions not already running high enough, England fans were soon made even more anxious.

Beth Mead went for the same place as James and faced the same result – Falk saved. “It’s a cushty height for the goalkeeper,” said Brown-Finnis.

Sweden 1-1 England (penalty six)

From a moment of agony to sudden hope.

Magdalena Eriksson had the chance to put Sweden in front. Instead, her effort bounced off the far post.

Sweden 1-1 England (penalty seven)

By this point, Falk was beginning to look like Sweden’s saviour.

Alex Greenwood sent her penalty down the middle. Falk dived, the ball hit her and it bounced back out.

Three of the Lionesses’ four penalties saved.

Sweden 2-1 England (penalty eight)

Nathalie Bjorn put Sweden on the verge of victory, beating her Chelsea team-mate Hampton.

England had to score their next.

Sweden 2-2 England (penalty nine)

Who better than the player who had netted the winning kick in each of England’s other two shootouts under Wiegman to deliver when needed?

Chloe Kelly produced her trademark run-up, with a hop and a skip before firing past Falk.

“What a night she is having,” said BBC commentator Robyn Cowen.

Kelly had delivered the assist for England’s first goal, then the vital cross which led to their second. Now, she’d kept their hopes of a shootout victory alive.

Sweden 2-2 England (penalty 10)

Stepping up to take Sweden’s fifth penalty, to put them into the semi-finals, was none other than keeper Falk.

She had already saved three, taking one as well was “just being greedy,” said Brown-Finnis.

The Sweden goalkeeper could not produce another moment of jubilation for the her supporters and skied her kick over the bar.

Sweden 2-2 England (penalty 11)

Surely, after yet another miss, England would respond?

Not this time. Grace Clinton’s weak effort rolled to the left which Falk easily saved.

By this point, it looked like the shootout might never end. “I can’t believe how many penalties we’ve missed,” said Brown-Finnis.

Sweden 2-2 England (penalty 12)

Sweden once again had the opportunity to win the match. Sofia Jakobsson placed the ball on the spot with just four of the 12 penalties before her having been scored.

She also went to the left, but Hampton tipped it onto the post with her outstretched hand.

“These are cats with nine lives, the Lionesses,” Brown-Finnis said.

Sweden 2-3 England (penalty 13)

England’s most decorated player stepped up for the big moment.

Bronze had no intention of wasting her chance and delivered the perfect penalty, thrashing it down the middle as Falk dived to the right.

The Lionesses have talked throughout this tournament about producing “proper English” performances – and Bronze’s penalty was an “old school Stuart Pearce type” of kick, said Brown-Finnis.

She added: “Full of passion, full of heart, no nonsense penalty right into the roof of the net. Great strike, great player, great time.”

Sweden 2-3 England (Smilla Holmberg misses, England win)

Sweden had to score to keep their hopes alive. The job fell to 18-year-old Smilla Holmberg to try to level.

Holmberg didn’t even hit the target. She sent her strike soaring over the crossbar. The English players ran off in celebration.

‘Terrifying watching’ – What the pundits said

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

England’s record goalscorer Ellen White, who was part of the team that won Euro 2022, said the shootout made for “terrifying watching”.

She said: “I think you’ve got to give full credit to Falk as well and the way she saved a lot of those penalties for Sweden. I’d never say a bad word about a player who’s missed a penalty.”

England displayed “character” in an “amazing” show of resilience to turn it around from 2-0 down, added former England goalkeeper Karen Bardsley.

“Honestly that was incredible, such tension,” she said. “The way the game went, the substitutions, the doubt, the gameplan. So much drama.

“The saves from Hampton and the authority from Bronze. What a fantastic game and what character England showed. Such self-belief to bring them back into the game.”

It was only a game in the last eight, but Brown-Finnis said the “magnificent finish” was “worthy of any final”.

Former England captain Steph Houghton added that she thinks the Lionesses have what it takes to get to the final.

‘Greatest and worst of all time’ – fans’ reaction

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Maverick: After all these years we have finally found a team who where so diabolical at taking penalties that we managed to win one. Other than that massive praise to Lucy Bronze who was and absolute star tonight her performance was outstanding in every way a ture leader.

NB22: “This must have been the greatest penalty shootout ever – and worst penalty shootout ever at the same time.”

Frankie: “Bronze was immense all game and Kelly’s introduction was the turning point

“Sweden could and probably should have had it sewn up by half time

“Surprised Bronze didn’t take one of the first 5 pens though she did have strapping on her leg

“Her penalty reminded me of Stuart Pearce’s all those years ago”

Kyle: “The penalty shootout was a comedy of errors for the most part. There were a couple of good penalties, but they were mostly dreadful- underpowered and too near the keepers.

“Both teams look like they could do with a lot of practice in that area.

Related topics

  • England Women’s Football Team
  • UEFA Women’s EURO
  • Football
  • Women’s Football

How the ‘greatest and worst shootout of all time’ unfolded

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

  • 72 Comments

Lucy Bronze scored the penalty that mattered and her feelings after England’s win over Sweden summed up the Lionesses’ performance – and the penalty shootout – perfectly.

It was both “overwhelming and underwhelming,” a shootout fraught with nervy moments but lacking in quality.

One goalkeeper saving four penalties. The other keeping out two. Three players missing the target. A keeper blasting one over the crossbar.

After England dramatically restored their hopes when a Euro 2025 exit looked a near-certainty, a “stressful” shootout victory over the Swedes earned them a spot in the semi-finals.

“I think it was just a rollercoaster, both overwhelming and underwhelming,” Bronze told BBC Sport. “It was just a crazy game”.

Goalkeeper Hannah Hampton echoed Bronze’s thoughts, saying it made for “stressful watching, stressful playing”.

Getty Images

How the shootout unfolded

Sweden 0-1 England (penalty one)

England won the toss, benefitting from a shootout in front of their own fans and took the first penalty.

Up stepped Alessia Russo, the Lionesses’ trusty goal threat. Jennifer Falk dived the right way, but her powerful effort never looked like being stopped.

“Russo has left nothing on the pitch so to strike that as sweetly as she did – Falk went the right way, nowhere near it,” former England goalkeeper Rachel Brown-Finnis said on BBC One.

Sweden 0-1 England (penalty two)

Hampton stood on the line, her nose bloodied from a collision in the final moments of extra time.

Filippa Angeldahl took the first kick for Sweden and sent it towards the right but Hampton got her hands to it.

“She’s done her homework,” reacted Brown-Finnis. Hampton knew exactly where to go.

Sweden 0-1 England (penalty three)

England couldn’t make the most of their advantage.

Lauren James tried to place her effort in the bottom left corner but Falk palmed it away.

Sweden 1-1 England (penalty four)

Sweden issued the perfect response. “Emphatic, beautifully struck,” said Brown-Finnis.

Julia Zigiotti Olme showed no nerves and left Hampton with no chance. Her well-struck spot-kick went into the top corner and Sweden levelled.

Sweden 1-1 England (penalty five)

Were emotions not already running high enough, England fans were soon made even more anxious.

Beth Mead went for the same place as James and faced the same result – Falk saved. “It’s a cushty height for the goalkeeper,” said Brown-Finnis.

Sweden 1-1 England (penalty six)

From a moment of agony to sudden hope.

Magdalena Eriksson had the chance to put Sweden in front. Instead, her effort bounced off the far post.

Sweden 1-1 England (penalty seven)

By this point, Falk was beginning to look like Sweden’s saviour.

Alex Greenwood sent her penalty down the middle. Falk dived, the ball hit her and it bounced back out.

Three of the Lionesses’ four penalties saved.

Sweden 2-1 England (penalty eight)

Nathalie Bjorn put Sweden on the verge of victory, beating her Chelsea team-mate Hampton.

England had to score their next.

Sweden 2-2 England (penalty nine)

Who better than the player who had netted the winning kick in each of England’s other two shootouts under Wiegman to deliver when needed?

Chloe Kelly produced her trademark run-up, with a hop and a skip before firing past Falk.

“What a night she is having,” said BBC commentator Robyn Cowen.

Kelly had delivered the assist for England’s first goal, then the vital cross which led to their second. Now, she’d kept their hopes of a shootout victory alive.

Sweden 2-2 England (penalty 10)

Stepping up to take Sweden’s fifth penalty, to put them into the semi-finals, was none other than keeper Falk.

She had already saved three, taking one as well was “just being greedy,” said Brown-Finnis.

The Sweden goalkeeper could not produce another moment of jubilation for the her supporters and skied her kick over the bar.

Sweden 2-2 England (penalty 11)

Surely, after yet another miss, England would respond?

Not this time. Grace Clinton’s weak effort rolled to the left which Falk easily saved.

By this point, it looked like the shootout might never end. “I can’t believe how many penalties we’ve missed,” said Brown-Finnis.

Sweden 2-2 England (penalty 12)

Sweden once again had the opportunity to win the match. Sofia Jakobsson placed the ball on the spot with just four of the 12 penalties before her having been scored.

She also went to the left, but Hampton tipped it onto the post with her outstretched hand.

“These are cats with nine lives, the Lionesses,” Brown-Finnis said.

Sweden 2-3 England (penalty 13)

England’s most decorated player stepped up for the big moment.

Bronze had no intention of wasting her chance and delivered the perfect penalty, thrashing it down the middle as Falk dived to the right.

The Lionesses have talked throughout this tournament about producing “proper English” performances – and Bronze’s penalty was an “old school Stuart Pearce type” of kick, said Brown-Finnis.

She added: “Full of passion, full of heart, no nonsense penalty right into the roof of the net. Great strike, great player, great time.”

Sweden 2-3 England (Smilla Holmberg misses, England win)

Sweden had to score to keep their hopes alive. The job fell to 18-year-old Smilla Holmberg to try to level.

Holmberg didn’t even hit the target. She sent her strike soaring over the crossbar. The English players ran off in celebration.

‘Terrifying watching’ – What the pundits said

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

England’s record goalscorer Ellen White, who was part of the team that won Euro 2022, said the shootout made for “terrifying watching”.

She said: “I think you’ve got to give full credit to Falk as well and the way she saved a lot of those penalties for Sweden. I’d never say a bad word about a player who’s missed a penalty.”

England displayed “character” in an “amazing” show of resilience to turn it around from 2-0 down, added former England goalkeeper Karen Bardsley.

“Honestly that was incredible, such tension,” she said. “The way the game went, the substitutions, the doubt, the gameplan. So much drama.

“The saves from Hampton and the authority from Bronze. What a fantastic game and what character England showed. Such self-belief to bring them back into the game.”

It was only a game in the last eight, but Brown-Finnis said the “magnificent finish” was “worthy of any final”.

Former England captain Steph Houghton added that she thinks the Lionesses have what it takes to get to the final.

‘Greatest and worst of all time’ – fans’ reaction

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Maverick: After all these years we have finally found a team who where so diabolical at taking penalties that we managed to win one. Other than that massive praise to Lucy Bronze who was and absolute star tonight her performance was outstanding in every way a ture leader.

NB22: “This must have been the greatest penalty shootout ever – and worst penalty shootout ever at the same time.”

Frankie: “Bronze was immense all game and Kelly’s introduction was the turning point

“Sweden could and probably should have had it sewn up by half time

“Surprised Bronze didn’t take one of the first 5 pens though she did have strapping on her leg

“Her penalty reminded me of Stuart Pearce’s all those years ago”

Kyle: “The penalty shootout was a comedy of errors for the most part. There were a couple of good penalties, but they were mostly dreadful- underpowered and too near the keepers.

“Both teams look like they could do with a lot of practice in that area.

Related topics

  • England Women’s Football Team
  • UEFA Women’s EURO
  • Football
  • Women’s Football

What’s the real motive behind Israel’s involvement in Syria?

Israel has repeatedly bombed Damascus, claiming to be protecting the Druze minority.

As part of a string of cross-border attacks that have pinned the area, Israeli warplanes have struck Damascus.

Israel claims that the Druze minority in Suwayda, in the southern city, is the target of the attacks.

However, Ahmed al-Sharaa, the president of Syria, warns that Israel is attempting to cause conflict and division within the Syrian population for its own gain.

He has ordered the government’s withdrawal from Suwayda and promised to protect the Druze community as part of a ceasefire reached with Druze religious leaders.

But how will Syria’s future be affected by Israel’s intervention?

Presenter: Adrian Finighan

Guests:

Author of Lords of the Land: The War for Israel’s Settlements in the Occupied Territories, 1967-2007: Akiva Eldar

Gamal Mansour, a lecturer and political scientist at Toronto University.

Suffocation, stampede, death: Tragedy at Gaza’s aid centre

Hani Hammad, 18, was never anticipated that his daily search for flour would lead to him suffocating and being trampled.

He and his seven siblings have been displaced from Rafah and are now living in a tent in the al-Mawasi area of southern Gaza’s Khan Younis, where he has been heading to a food distribution point run by the much-criticized, United States-backed GHF.

“We left at dawn and sat among the gathered crowds.” People rushed forward after US staff and Israeli army signaled to open the gate about 5am, Hani told Al Jazeera.

After arriving at Nasser Hospital gasping and barely conscious, he said, “The gate was open, but people were packed into a very narrow corridor leading to it.

“I had a difficult time joining the crowd.” People began to flee through the corridor as a result of American guards spraying pepper spray and firing gas bombs, he continued.

After a stampede near a controversial GHF site, Hani Hamad was taken unconscious to Nasser Hospital.

I fell asleep. My face was trampled by them.

I was in agony, like I was going to die. I was unable to move forward or backward. I fell asleep. My face and side were trampled. I couldn’t be pulled out by anyone. But “God gave me another chance,” Hani remarked.

He was taken unconscious to Khan Younis’ Nasser Hospital on a tuk-tuk and then placed next to the bodies of several people who had died, some from suffocation and others from bullet wounds.

“I couldn’t see or hear because I was unconscious.” I snuck in and out. I was positioned next to the deceased. I assumed I was one of them.

21 Palestinians died early on Wednesday while attempting to collect food aid, of which 15 were suffocated.

In western Khan Younis, an incident occurred close to a gate managed by the GHF. More than a dozen people were reportedly injured, some of whom are still in intensive care.

Hani is the oldest of eight siblings who reside close to their uncle’s tent. Their parents are still in Jordan after visiting them for medical care a month before the war broke out.

“I feel a lot of burden,” I thought. Without our parents’ assistance or their support, he claimed, “we’ve endured the pressures of displacement and war.”

He adds, “Our intense hunger pushes me every day,” despite acknowledging that waiting for aid from the GHF poses a significant daily risk.

There is “no other choice,” the statement read. I am unable to purchase the excessively priced goods on the market. The young man says, “My only option is to try my luck with aid distributions.”

“Every time is a near-death experience,” says one author. Gunfire, tanks, drones, and attacks are all present. What kind of aid distribution is this? We are truly and truly exhausted.

“We’re shot like animals,” the saying goes.

Gaza
After the stampede, Mohammed Abedin suffered a broken leg. [Abdullah Attar/Al Jazeera]

After visiting the same aid facility in Khan Younis early on Wednesday, Mohammed Abedin, 24, now sleeps in a hospital bed with a leg wound.

He claims that after sensing the danger of the crowd surge, he made the decision to turn back for the first time.

The young man, a first-year student majoring in accounting, arrived at the distribution center at around 3 a.m. (GMT), but he noticed that things had changed. Prior to reopening, the same location had been closed for two days.

“We used to enter through a number of access points, and the entryway was large.” We were instead sucked into a long, narrow corridor, he claims, filled with metal.

“Everyone rushed forward as the gates opened, and people started to fall.”

As American guards and quadcopters above fired pepper spray and gas bombs, Mohammed described a harrowing scene of people screaming and gasping for help as they were crushed against the metal barriers.

“I was watching my cousin as I stood near her. Because of the overwhelming numbers, we made a decision to avoid entering. I witnessed young people screaming, choking, and trapped youth. No one was able to go back or forward.

He claims that the fenced corridor, where gas bombs were poured down and people were shoved through, turned into a death trap.

Mohammed and his cousin attempted to leave, but a quadcoptor shot him in the leg just as he believed he had made the right decision. His cousin also suffered injuries.

“Quantum captors, tanks, or soldiers are constantly firing at random throughout the area.” He claimed that I had the unfortunate experience this time. “But I survived, thank God.”

Mohammed examines the tragic circumstance in which Palestinians who are forced to risk their lives to obtain food are caught between starvation and death. He pays for the nine members of his displaced family, who are currently residing in al-Mawasi.

“We have bread in our dreams every day. I almost always go to the doctor and usually leave empty-handed. However, the days I brought home just a few kilograms of flour resembled “an eid” [a celebration] for my family.

Given that Israel has blocked humanitarian and commercial goods and Gaza has been under siege for four months, the borders have been sealed, and fleeing is Mohammed’s top priority, especially with flour.

“Bread is what puts me at risk of dying.” He waited for surgery at Nasser Hospital to remove a bullet from his leg, saying, “There is no other choice.” Has there been no reliable means of providing aid delivery?

There are no organized relief, police, or UN interventions, the statement goes. We are viciously attacked like animals. If hunger and stampedes are not the only causes of death, we will also perish.

Following an Israeli-imposed nearly-total blockade, which is still in place and has impeded the entry of humanitarian supplies, the GHF began its aid distribution efforts in Gaza in late May 2025.

At least 798 Palestinians have died since then in an effort to reach or receive aid from the organization’s distribution points, according to UN statistics.

UN organizations and human rights organizations have voiced widespread opposition to the operation’s political and human rights violations. The UN’s assertions that the GHF’s operations are inherently unsafe and violate humanitarian neutrality are highlighted by the hundreds of fatalities reported at their sites.

Either we bring flour back, or we don’t even bring it back.

GAZA
According to Ziad Masad Mansour, “more than 20 people died for a bag of flour.”

Another frequent visitor to the aid lines is Ziad Masad Mansour, 43, who moved from central Gaza to al-Mawasi in Khan Younis with his wife and six children after their home was destroyed during the war.

“I go there at ten in the morning and spend the rest of my days there.” Mansour, who was struck in the head on Wednesday, remarked, “We endure the dust and humiliation.”

“Sometimes I get some cans of flour.” I do it occasionally with nothing. In exchange for some food, I even assist others in carrying their bags.

“Yesterday, the narrow corridor was filled with gas bombs and bullets, and we were crowded into a horrifying crowd. When I was shot in the head and lost consciousness while attempting to escape the crush, I was unconscious.

US House sends crypto ‘GENIUS Act’ to Trump, in win for industry advocates

Three bills relating to cryptocurrency have been passed by the US House of Representatives, one of which is sent to US President Donald Trump and the other two to the US Senate.

The Republican-controlled chamber’s votes come as part of the Trump administration’s wider campaign to declare the United States the “crypto capital of the world” (crypto week) in the president’s lexicon.

Concerns that the largely unregulated crypto industry may be used to cover up corruption and foreign influence have also been raised by Trump and his family.

The GENIUS Act is the name of the bill that will directly benefit Trump. It establishes consumer protections and initial security for a cryptocurrency known as stablecoins, which are tied to “stable” assets like the US dollar to lessen volatility.

During the debate on Thursday, House Financial Services Chair French Hill stated that the bill will “secure American competitiveness and strong guardrails for our consumers.”

Payment systems are experiencing a revolution, he said, “all over the world.”

The bill was approved by the Senate and the House, which passed it by a 308-122 vote. In both chambers, it won bipartisan support.

A new cryptocurrency market structure would be created by a second bill. It was defeated by a slimmer margin of 294 to 134, and it will now have to go to the Senate to be revised.

The legislation seeks to clarify how digital assets are regulated, most notably by defining which cryptocurrency types should be treated as commodities that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulates and which are securities-policed by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Securities, like stocks and bonds, typically refer to partial ownership of an asset, while commodities are typically regarded as goods that can be traded or sold.

A third bill, which was defeated by a narrow margin of 219 to 210, would essentially ban the US from offering a “central bank digital currency,” or “digital cash” in its purest form. Additionally, it will enter the Senate.

Trump’s crypto-related interests

Since 2009, the popularity of cryptocurrencies, which are unmoored from any central government authority, has soared.

However, experts claim that ambiguous laws have prevented US operations. Advocates have claimed that the bills that were passed on Thursday could encourage more widespread adoption.

Democrats who were critical of the GENIUS bill continued to criticize Republicans for passing the legislation without addressing Trump’s and upcoming presidents’ cryptocurrency interests.

For instance, a provision of the bill prohibits members of Congress and their immediate families from obtaining stablecoins. The president and his family are not subject to that prohibition.

Trump’s family owns a sizable stake in World Liberty Financial, a crypto project that just launched its own stablecoin, USD1. According to a public financial disclosure made in June, Trump claimed to have made $57.35 million in token sales for World Liberty Financial in 2024.

Although the profits are split between several investors, a meme coin that he coined has also generated an estimated $ 320 million in fees.

In the midst of the flurry of votes on Thursday, Representative Maxine Waters, the top Democrat on the House Financial Services panel, said, “No one should be surprised that these same Republicans’ next order of business is to validate, legitimise, and endorse the Trump family’s corruption and efforts to sell the White House to the highest bidder.”

Trump has also suggested creating a “national reserve” for cryptocurrency since taking office, and he has suspended Department of Justice investigations involving the subject.

Some Democrats also criticized the GENIUS bill for creating an “overly weak” regulatory framework that could put long-term financial risks.

County Championship should be cut to 12 games – PCA

Images courtesy of Getty
  • Comments

The Professional Cricketers’ Association (PCA) says that cutting the County Championship from 14 to 12 games is the “only reasonable option” to protect welfare and raise standards.

In the upcoming weeks, a review of the domestic game’s structure with the intention of making changes for the coming season will be completed.

A change in the current system, where two groups play 14 games, will be made to three groups play 12 games, is expected.

However, with a number of options open, the Championship’s future is less certain.

The top flight’s current status of 10 teams and eight second-tier teams may remain. In Division One, there might be a divisional switch, with eight to Division Two, and 10 to Division One. Each structure could have 14 or 12 games per year.

A 12-team top flight, broken up into six-team conferences, and a second tier of six teams would be another option.

One of the two promotion spots from the second tier would be determined by a play-off between the two top-tier conferences winners, with the winners of the second- and third-place finishes also determined.

For each county, there would be 12 games, and there would be a 13th for those competing in play-offs.

As long as either game is played more than 12 times per county, the PCA favors the conference model, but it would also support the traditional divisional structure.

It draws attention to research conducted among players, which found that 67% of players worry about their mental health while 83% say the current schedule makes them feel uncomfortable.

Olly Hannon-Dalby, the chair of the PCA and a seamer from Warwickshire, said, “The schedule has always been a contentious issue.”

The game has become more and more competitive as a result of the ever-increasing intensity of the fixtures, which has made it necessary to take positive steps right away and as a chance for the game to develop.

Twelve of the 18 first-class counties would have to approve any modifications to the domestic structure. The One-Day Cup, which takes place in August alongside The Hundred, is not expected to change.

Some counties have already made their preferred choices known in public.

Surrey and Somerset have both supported top flight teams of eight and ten, keeping 14 games each year.

Middlesex has supported the standings, with 14 games, 8 games, and 10 division one teams.

Worcestershire has supported the conference and 10-team first division while Durham and Lancashire have thrown their weight behind the 12-team top flight.

The Championship and Blast were both proposed to be reduced to 10 games each in a high-performance review led by former England captain Andrew Strauss in 2022. The counties overwhelmingly rejected the review.

The England and Wales Cricket Board conducted that review, but this latest investigation was led by the counties to determine the best setup for players and clubs.

Due to a number of factors, it was decided now is the right time to act: a new female professional structure has been established, and significant matches have been scheduled for foreseeable times.

Most importantly, The Hundred’s revenue from stake sales should relieve counties’ financial strain.

related subjects

  • Cricket