Archive June 30, 2025

The Beatles song that was banned for lyrics – but John Lennon thought reason was ‘crazy’

One of John Lennon’s most well-known songs for the band was banned for a very different reason than the others, which included the Beatles’ and other songs that were banned by radio stations.

John Lennon pictured in 1966(Image: Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

The Beatles, known for stirring the pot, certainly did so when John Lennon’s bold statement in 1966 that they were “more popular than Jesus” sparked outrage among American Christians, contributing to the band’s cessation of touring later that year.

Their knack for pushing boundaries also saw several of their songs slapped with bans by radio stations. The BBC censored ‘A Day in the Life’ over alleged drug references, while ‘The Ballad of John and Yoko’ faced bans from some US stations for its mention of Christ.

After John, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr started acting as solo artists after 1970, the controversy persisted. For instance, the ECHO examined how the BBC rejected Paul McCartney and Wings’ “Hi, Hi, Hi” due to alleged nods to sex and drugs.

READ MORE: Noel Gallagher’s hilarious Meg Mathews jibe to daughter that broke Oasis reunion newsREAD MORE: Glastonbury viewers fume as The Searchers’ final ever live performance ‘snubbed’ by BBC

One particularly infamous song from John’s Beatles career, “Happyness Is a Warm Gun,” was written by him in 1968 and released under the Lennon-McCartney songwriting banner, just like the rest of the Beatles’ compositions.

The title, which kick-started the song, was lifted straight from the May 1968 issue of American Rifleman magazine, where an article by Warren W. Herlihy depicted his experience teaching his son shooting skills, reports the Liverpool Echo.

Regarding his initial impression of it, John said, “I just thought it was a fantastic, insane thing to say. You just shot something with a warm gun, right?

Continue reading the article.
John Lennon, Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr and George Harrison at the home of manager Brian Epstein, in London 1967
John Lennon, Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr and George Harrison at the home of manager Brian Epstein in 1967(Image: Jeff Hochberg/Getty Images)

The Beatles’ infamous “White Album” was released in November 1968, a turbulent period for the band as creative disagreements started to develop. They worked together to create this complex track despite their differences.

The final piece, which dealt with various themes, was created by John after combining “three sections of different songs.”

Some of the lyrics in the song were interpreted as sex and drug references upon its release. The BBC and commercial radio stations banned the “warm gun” in the title because it represented John’s desire for Yoko Ono.

Some people also made the claim that “I need a fix” was a reference to heroin. John, however, refuted this, pointing out that “Happyness Is A Warm Gun” was another radio show that was prohibited because it involved drug shooting. However, they were selling guns, and I concocted a song out of it because I thought it was crazy. It was completely unrelated to “H” (heroin).

John’s longing for Yoko prompted the lyrics to “Mother Superior jumped the gun.” He was not overly concerned that censors would pick up on the song’s sexual undertones.

Continue reading the article.

By the time that I’m into double meanings, John continued, “Oh, well, by then I’m into double meanings. The magazine cover served as the initial inspiration. However, that was when my relationship with Yoko began, and I had a strong sexual orientation at the time. We were in bed when we weren’t in the studio.

Although ‘The White Album’ garnered mixed reviews and radio stations boycotted ‘Happiness Is A Warm Gun’, critics commended the song, which all Beatles members proclaimed their favourite on the album. A Record Mirror magazine review described it as “a serene ballad, but is soon taken over in the true vein of this foremost stylist”.

Obama, Bush decry ‘travesty’ of Trump’s gutting of USAID on its last day

In a touching video farewell address to US Agency for International Development (USAID) staff, former US Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush delivered a eminently open rebuke of the Donald Trump administration.

Obama referred to the Trump administration’s failure to dismantle USAID as “colossal mistake.”

The six-decade-old humanitarian and development organization, founded by President John F. Kennedy as a soft power, peaceful way to advance US national security by strengthening goodwill and prosperity abroad, had its last day as an independent agency on Monday.

USAID will be absorbed into the US State Department on Tuesday, according to Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

In a videoconference that was intended to be a closed-press event, the former presidents and U2 singer Bono&nbsp spoke with members of the USAID community, who cried as he recited a poem.

They expressed gratitude for the thousands of lost their jobs and daily lives to USAID employees. Their organization was one of Trump’s and his billionaire ally Elon Musk’s initial and most aggressively targeted for government cuts, with staff members abruptly locked out of offices and systems and sent mass emails terminating.

Trump asserted that the organization was plagued by “radical left lunatics” and rife with “tremendous fraud.” It was described as “a criminal organization” by Musky.

Obama gave assurances to the aid and development workers, some of whom were overseas, in a recorded statement.

He declared, “Your work has mattered and will matter for generations to come.”

Obama avoided criticizing Trump’s profound changes to US priorities and programs both domestically and abroad, largely retaining a low public image during Trump’s second term.

It’s tragic and a travesty to be a fugitive to USAID. Because it is among the most significant projects currently being done around the world,” Obama said. He attributed USAID’s role in rescuing lives as well as being a major contributor to the growth of the US economy, which has helped some aid-receiving nations become US markets and trade partners.

Leaders on both sides of the aisle will soon realize how much you are needed, according to the former Democratic president.

The State Department announced this week that it would introduce its foreign assistance successor to USAID, known as America First, when it was contacted for comment.

Every tax dollar spent will benefit our national interests, according to the department, thanks to the new process.

In addition to funding the “Green Revolution,” which revolutionized modern agriculture and ended starvation and famine, USAID oversaw programs around the world that provided water and life-saving food to millions of refugees who had been displaced by conflict in Sudan, Syria, Gaza, and elsewhere. The organization aimed to stop disease outbreaks, promote democracy, and support development that made it possible for people and countries to escape poverty.

Bush, who also made a recorded message, immediately addressed the cuts to his Republican administration’s landmark AIDS and HIV program, which is credited with saving 25 million lives worldwide.

Significant funding for the program was saved by the popular President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, PEPFAR, which received bipartisan support from Congress. However, less people are receiving the life-saving care because of regulations and cuts.

Bush addressed USAID staffers, “You’ve demonstrated the great strength of America through your work. Are 25 million people who would have passed away now living in our country’s best interests? He said, “I believe it is, and I think it is,” and so do you.

A third of the world’s most vulnerable, including young children, are likely to pass away as a result of the Trump administration’s actions, according to a study released on Tuesday in the Lancet journal.

The resulting shock, according to study co-author Davide Rasella, a researcher at the Barcelona Institute for Global Health, would be “comparable in scale to a major armed conflict or a global pandemic,” according to a statement from the report.

Bono, a seasoned humanitarian advocate in Africa and other countries, was named the “surprise guest.”

he recited a poem about the agency’s gutting that he had written. He made reference to the millions of people who Boston University researchers and other analysts believe will die as a result of US funding cuts for health and other programs abroad.

Putintseva asks umpire to eject spectator over safety fear

JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to play this video.

During her first-round match at Wimbledon, world number 33 Yulia Putintseva asked for a spectator to be ejected because she had security concerns.

The 30-year-old immediately complained to the umpire about a spectator she described as “crazy” and “dangerous” during her match against Amanda Anisimova on court 15.

The issue has been resolved, according to a club spokesperson.

Putintseva, from Kazakhstan, first expressed her concerns during a change of ends when the game was tied 3-3.

I won’t play until he leaves, so can you take him out? These people are crazy, she said, and dangerous.

The person was later identified as wearing green and pointed her way into a section of the crowd.

Three members of the security staff were speaking with the chair umpire as they entered the court.

Putintseva was allegedly told that the play would resume, but she was later told that she would wait until security had handled it.

She urged people to take him out because they might have knives.

Later in the match, Putintseva became upset, going down 6-0, 6-0, in 45 minutes.

After that, she avoided speaking with the media.

The All England Lawn Tennis Club (AELTC) spokesman told BBC Sport: “The chair umpire informed security and the issue was resolved.

Meanwhile, Anisimova claimed to believe the audience was speaking to him “when Putintseva] was about to serve” and that “we were protected” when she told the BBC.

related subjects

  • Tennis

Tinubu Approves Scholarship Scheme For Caribbean Students To Study In Nigeria

Beginning with the upcoming academic year, President Bola Tinubu has approved a new scholarship program for Organization of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS) students.

President Tinubu stated at a joint press conference in Gros Islet on Monday that the program had already begun and that it would be implemented by a joint committee made up of Nigeria and OECS member states along with Saint Lucian Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre.

“We are very close to the Organization of Eastern Caribbean States in Africa,” says the statement. We are working toward expanding opportunities for business and education, building capacities, and looking into agriculture and food security. Tinubu remarked, “We won’t let the ball go.”

He explained that the initiative is a component of a larger plan to promote greater cooperation in development, trade, and education.

He also confirmed that discussions were raging about granting diplomatic and official passport holders from OECS nations waivers.

Read more about Tinubu’s proposal to enact visa waivers as Nigeria and Saint Lucia establish diplomatic ties.

Tinubu responded to questions about difficulties in bilateral cooperation by saying, “I don’t look at difficulties. I focus on resolving issues. We achieve our objective if we move in a straight line, and problems don’t arise.

The scholarship program, which Prime Minister Pierre described as “a timely and practical expression of solidarity,” was welcomed.

He continued, adding that during discussions with President Tinubu, visa facilitation, air connectivity, and tourism were also priorities.

Students should begin their studies in Nigeria in the upcoming academic year, according to us. The people-to-people exchange will be crucial, according to Pierre, who has established a joint committee to address issues relating to education, trade, and travel.

Jacqueline Jossa slams In The Style for ‘not paying her for five figure deal’

Jacqueline Jossa, the star of EastEnders, criticized the fast-fashion label In The Style for allegedly not paying her for their allegedly five-figure collaborations.

Jacqueline Jossa opened up on her financial issue with In The Style(Image: Tiktok/@jacjossa)

Jacqueline Jossa has returned to her TikTok account, where she hit out at fashion company In The Style following reports she was considering legal action against them. The TV star, 32, gave an update on her ongoing issue with the brand that she used to work with.

She revealed her most recent purchases on her social media updates, which were uncommon. The mother-of-two revealed her glowing tan while wearing a buttery yellow halter neck top.

Jacqueline, who has rekindled her relationship with on-off husband Dan Osborne, added a pair of light blue jeans that hugged her figure and a white handbag. Filming the clip in her lavish kitchen, she went barefoot and admitted her nerves about creating the content.

Jacqueline Jossa
The actress returned to filming fashion videos(Image: Tiktok/@jacjossa)

She admitted, “I feel shy. I want to resume making videos, such as “get ready with me.” I want to visit Zara, River Island, New Look, Primark, and other high-street brands, pick a few pieces, and show you what I get. because I really, really miss making videos.

After that, Jacqueline made the decision to criticize In The Style by accusing them of not paying her the money she claims she owes for working with them. She told her fans, “I used to do my collections with ‘you know who’ that hasn’t yet received my money!”

Continue reading the article.

However, I miss watching the videos. Because they had been going on for more than four years, it did get a little dry, so I feel like I’ve got my mojo back a little bit. “It’s nice to not have the collections,” I said.

Earlier this year, it was reported that the EastEnders star was considering suing the company, which was facing administration. She previously worked with the fast fashion brand on a string of collections, including a swimwear collection last year.

According to sources, the business has been allegedly denying its employees for some time. Some on social media made outrage over the brand’s once-huge $ 100 million valuation and vehemently opposed their association with it.

While others have previously threatened legal action against In The Style. A source told The Sun at the time that Jacqueline is owed tens of thousands of pounds, most likely a five-figure sum, so she is consulting lawyers about how to proceed.

“They’re still selling clothes online, including items from Jacqueline’s collection,” says one woman. Five years ago, Jacqueline joined the company as its face, and it is said that she will make a rumored £1 million deal.

Carys Whittaker, a social media influencer, claimed that the company had purposefully withheld money from her in February. She wrote, “In my 8 years online, I have never spoken out about a brand, but I can’t stay quiet about this,” in a statement shared with her followers.

“I’ve worked with InTheStyle for the past four years, and some of you were aware of my imminent collection launch.” I’m now aware that I’m no longer employed by InTheStyle because they resisted paying me money from the last year’s collections.

Other InTheStyle employees have positions in the same league as me, according to the statement I made. Revenues for In The Style decreased from £45.9 million to £30.4 million for the year to March 31, 2024.

After taking “significant steps to reduce operational overhead by investing in automation, clear strategic priorities, and the elimination of duplication of task,” they also took a “significant step to reduce operational overhead by investing in automation, clear strategic priorities, and the removal of duplication of task.

The board at the time approved a statement that read, “This fiscal year was a year of realignment and resetting operating practices for In the Style with a focus on developing robust unit economics to support the business, right-sizing the overhead, and developing efficiencies as a result of the wider group integration.

To provide the right sources of information for making sound trading decisions, we have invested a significant amount of time into our business intelligence and reporting suite. Despite a drop in toppling sales, the company has been able to significantly improve its margins as a result of the business shifting its focus from top line sales to a relentless obsession with net contribution margin.

The Mirror has contacted In The Style for comment.

Continue reading the article.

The Fluminense history maker, 44, with his eyes on Peter Shilton

Images courtesy of Getty
  • 35 Comments

He made his club world cup debut in 1997, making 1, 378 senior appearances, and is the club’s oldest player.

Brazilian goalkeeper Fabio Deivson Lopes Maciel, who has already had a promising career, is not letting down.

The 44-year-old scored twice against Inter Milan on Monday to advance to the Club World Cup quarter-final, facing either Man City or Al-Hilal.

The 2023 Copa Libertadores champions stunned this year’s Champions League runners-up before celebrating in style with four saves, including a crucial late block with his legs.

Even though both made fun of their years in the 33C heat, he even makes his 40-year-old teammate Thiago Silva seem young in comparison.

Just four days prior, he set a new record for the 507th clean sheet, surpassing Gianluigi Buffon, an international from Italy. Right now, the record is 508.

He will now be looking forward to recording the most appearances in international football, which is even more impressive.

Peter Shilton, a former England goalkeeper, currently holds the Guinness Book of Records record with 1, 390 appearances. Shilton asserts that he has played 1, 387 games.

Even so, Fabio’s actual tally is still questioned.

In his club career, Shilton is credited with having made 1, 249 starts and a record-setting 125 England starts, which equals his total appearances of 1, 374.

So why isn’t Fabio, who won the Under-19 World Cup in 1997 and has spent his entire career there already the record holder? He has never played for his country.

Although it is up for debate whether or not that qualifies as a senior appearance, Fluminense and Fabio are obviously being safe rather than sorry because they passed the 1, 374-foot mark without much fanfare.

It will only be a matter of time, regardless of whether they are pursuing 1, 387 or 1, 390. The record looks certain to be his even though he turns 45 in September and has a new contract up until 2026.

However, that is another thing: how long the record stays with him.

Cristiano Ronaldo, 40, is still playing for the club and country, and he has played in 1, 281 senior games as a professional.

related subjects

  • Football