Archive May 9, 2025

Love Island’s Olivia Bowen shares ‘complicated’ emotions after ‘VTS’ diagnosis

Vanishing Twin Syndrome is a type of miscarriage estimated to happen in 36% of twin pregnancies, where the affected baby is absorbed by the surviving twin or the mother’s body

Olivia Bowen suffered from Vanishing Twin Syndrome(Image: Jeff Spicer/BAFTA/Getty Images for BAFTA)

Olivia Bowen has opened up about her devastating experience of losing a child to mark Maternal Mental Health Week. The 31-year-old and her husband, Alex, discovered they were pregnant with twins at six weeks, before suffering Vanishing Twin Syndrome (VTS) a fortnight later.

This heartbreaking condition occurs when one twin in a multiple pregnancy vanishes, leaving a single embryo behind. It is a type of miscarriage estimated to happen in 36% of twin pregnancies, where the affected baby is absorbed by the surviving twin or the mother’s body.

Olivia and Alex, parents to two-year-old Abel Jacob, are expecting the surviving twin and their second child this summer. Reflecting on the ordeal, Olivia said she’d felt the ‘most complicated batch of emotions’ she’d ever known.

Content cannot be displayed without consent

“I have battled with depression and anxiety for most of my teen years onwards, and when I felt its ugly head rising stronger than I’d ever felt when I was pregnant with Abel, I was absolutely terrified,” the former Love Island contestant said on Instagram yesterday.

“I felt like that darkness was taking over and pulling me down with both paws. I felt it again after giving birth, have felt it intermittently throughout motherhood. It’s not just the hormones, it’s the whole expectation, the change, and the world feeling different to what you have experienced your whole life.

Article continues below

“Then fast forward to this year, losing one of our precious babies to Vanishing Twin Syndrome and going through the most complicated batch of emotions I’ve ever felt.” Despite these hardships, Olivia said she was utterly astounded by the responses of other women who had suffered similar experiences. She continued: “Never be ashamed of your emotions. It is the most incredible thing about you – being able to feel so deeply.

READ MORE: Eamonn Holmes issues new health update after an accident saw his muscles ‘flare up’READ MORE: Chef Tom Kerridge lost ’11 stone in three years’ with one weight loss diet

“It is so scary to be so vulnerable, isn’t it? This is a crazy ride and sometimes it’s beautiful and rewarding and sometimes it’s cruel and confusing. I’m here for you all. Please look after the women and mothers in your life.”

Earlier this year, Olivia also spoke about her VTS ordeal on Loose Women. While Olivia experienced no VTS symptoms at all, the Cleveland Clinic suggests that light bleeding, cramps, and pain in both the back and pelvis can be a cause for concern.

The condition is usually caused by abnormalities in one twin’s DNA, which hinder its growth. Unfortunately, these are typically present at conception and cannot be altered or controlled. “If the embryo disappears in the first trimester, neither you nor your surviving foetus will likely experience any complications,” the clinic explains.

Olivia Bowen and Alex Bowen attend the Nordoff Robbins Boxing Dinner 2019 on November 18, 2019 in London, England.
Olivia Bowen and her husband, Alex, suffered Vanishing Twin Syndrome (VTS) at the eight-week mark(Image: Getty Images)
Article continues below

“Your pregnancy will continue as usual… It’s possible to be pregnant with multiples and to miscarry one or more of the embryos before your first pregnancy ultrasound. In this case, neither you nor your provider will know you were pregnant with twins or triplets.”

Although Olivia’s pregnancy has caused her a great deal of stress, she shared a poignant thought that brings some comfort. On Loose Women, she explained: “The one beautiful part of it that I try to hold on to is that they do absorb into your body.

Romeo Beckham makes cryptic statement as ‘family feud’ rumours spiral

As rumours fly that the Beckham family is feuding – following Brooklyn’s absence from all of his dad’s 50th birthday activities – Romeo has made his opinion known on social media

Romeo Beckham shared a cryptic post following his brother’s absence from family events over the last week

Romeo Beckham has shared a cryptic post following rumours of a family feud – after Brooklyn was notably absent from his father’s birthday celebration last week.

On Saturday night, David threw a birthday dinner to celebrate his 50th birthday at a Michelin-star restaurant in Kensington, London. His wife, Victoria, and their children, Romeo, 22, Cruz, 20, and Harper, 13, were all in attendance. However, 26-year-old Brooklyn and his wife, Nicola Peltz, 30, were not seen at the dinner or David’s earlier birthday events, including celebrations in Paris and the Cotswolds. Brooklyn also failed to wish his dad a happy birthday on social media.

The festivities have continued, with Romeo and Cruz joining their dad on a lads fishing trip in Scotland to mark the milestone birthday. David shared snaps from the trip, including a selfie of him with his two sons, in which he tagged Brooklyn and wrote: “You were missed @brooklynpeltzbeckham”.

David, Victoria, Cruz, Harper, Nicola Peltz and Brooklyn. Paris Fashion show
The family together at Victoria’s Paris Fashion Week show(Image: VictoriaBeckham/Instagram)

READ MORE: Beckhams’ last happy family photo before Brooklyn and Nicola feud has emerged

Romeo then shared a post of one of his tattoos, which some have read as him commenting on the family ‘drama’. His tattoo spells ‘Love’ on his right hand – and was inked back in 2022 by a Miami-based artist. His other tattoos include a lion’s face on his arm with the words “Do it afraid” and a bird carrying a rose in its mouth with the phrase “Everything passes.”

Younger brother Cruz is also inked, and famously debuted his Three Lions tattoo in support of the England football team ahead of the Euros final last year.

Article continues below

Earlier this week, one of Brooklyn’s ex-girlfriends, Lexi Wood, shared her insight on the Beckham family. On an episode of The Viall Files podcast, she said: “That mindset is that your family has your back, period. I do feel like those families are great.”

Brooklyn and Nicola
Brooklyn and Nicola tied the knot in 2022(Image: (Image: Getty))

When asked what it was like dating the son of “one of the sexiest men alive”, she revealed: “I feel like he was just always Brooklyn’s dad. I feel like immediately I didn’t think anything of it. And then he just was his dad. They’re a beautiful family. Victoria, she’s the style icon. They’re the coolest family.”

Article continues below

Rumours have also started to fly that Brooklyn and his brother Romeo were not on speaking terms as Brooklyn reportedly had a past relationship with Kim Turnbull, his younger brother’s current girlfriend. Kim is a model and DJ from London who has been spotted at many family events recently. However, Romeo’s younger brother Cruz was quick to shut down the rumours that she had also dated Brooklyn in an Instagram comment.

In a now-deleted post, a fan reportedly mused underneath a photo of Romeo and Kim about whether it was “appropriate” to date his brother’s ex. According to Grazia, Cruz responded with: “Brooklyn and Kim never dated.”

Love Island icon rushed to A&E and shares distressing photo – ‘I can’t cope with this hell’

The Love Island: All Stars legend has been rushed to A&E and told her fans that she ‘can’t cope’ as she updates them on her health woes

Love Island star rushed to hospital sparking concern with selfie from A&E

Love Island legend Hannah Elizabeth has sparked concern amongst her fans after sharing a distressing A&E picture and telling her social media followers from the hospital: “This is hell.”

The Scouse star, who appeared on the very first series of the ITV2 dating series before returning for the All Stars version in 2024, took to Instagram, with an image of a hospital entrance featuring an ambulance, captioning the worrying scene: “Now back in A&E this is so bad I can’t cope with this HELL.”

In a worrying subsequent post, the 35-year-old former Playboy model uploaded a selfie from her hospital bed, showcasing only her arm. Her caption read: “Back here ppl,” accompanied by an emoji expressing worry.

hannah in the love island villa in 2024
Hannah Elizabeth is currently in hospital (Image: REX/Shutterstock)

The reality TV star has yet to reveal to her 613,000 followers the reason behind her hospital visit. However, earlier this week she did tell her Instagram followers concerns related to her bum surgery.

And last month, the mum-of-one told fans: “I am in hospital atm for a few days. Had last minute surgery today as not been well. Just wanting to let brands know as I have not been able to work or post or respond to messages. Hate to let down but soon as I’m on the mend I can get back to work.”

Article continues below

Speaking to the Mirror in February, Hannah opened up about creating adult content on OnlyFans, her thoughts on further cosmetic enhancements, and the day she’ll have to explain her adult-oriented career to her son, five-year-old Reggie.

“I’ve always done glamour modelling with my boobs out, and that’s what I do on OnlyFans, I do implied nude,” she shared. “And you know, you used to be able to walk into the supermarket and open a magazine and see my boobs, so it’s the same!”

Asked if she was happy with her appearance at the moment, Hannah – who speaks proudly of her multiple cosmetic procedures – admitted: “I wouldn’t say I’m thrilled, because we all have days when we feel s**t!

Hannah posing in a black outfit
Hannah is proud of her body(Image: @hannahelizinsta/Instagram)

“But I’ve literally had everything done and everybody knows it. I’m still obsessed with the Playboy, Pamela Anderson look, and I know that isn’t ‘in’ at the minute, but I love it.

“With my surgeries I don’t think I’ve ever done something that hasn’t suited me. But I think I’m done. Maybe when I’m older I might get a bit of a nip and a tuck, but at the minute I’m fine.”

Article continues below

Discussing the rise in celebrities using weight-loss medications and jabs, Hannah mused: “I’m just not into that look – I love the Kardashians’ big-booty look. I’m trying to gain big curvy hips, and I’m in the gym trying to get my thighs more muscly. I love curves. I also love my food, I’m never dieting.

“I don’t like it when someone compliments my body and someone else says, ‘Yes, but she’s had surgery,’ because, yes, I might have had that, but I also work really hard in the gym five times a week with a personal trainer.”

Tommy Fury’s ‘very valid reason’ for snubbing Molly-Mae Hague’s series despite reunion

Former Love Island star Tommy Fury is not seen in Molly-Mae Hague’s new show Behind It All as he is banned from making an appearance and even filming alongside his girlfriend

The “very valid” real reason Tommy Fury doesn’t feature in Molly-Mae Hague’s Amazon Prime reality TV series has been revealed – and it has nothing to do with the on-off couple’s relationship status.

Tommy and Molly-Mae, who met in the Love Island villa back in 2019 and share two-year-old daughter Bambi together, see their romance under the spotlight in the latest offering of the docu-series Behind It All after reuniting following a brief split last year.

However, despite the couple being very much back on, Tommy only makes his presence known via FaceTime or phone calls during the six-episode Prime Video series, which stars Molly-Mae and baby Bambi.

Audiences can tune into the final three episodes of season one on Friday but won’t catch even a fleeting glimpse of Tommy, who steers clear of filming entirely. Tommy is no stranger to cameoing in reality TV shows, previously appearing in his brother Tyson Fury’s Netflix series At Home With The Furys.

Tommy Fury appears in the Amazon series via FaceTime calls and snaps like this one(Image: Molly-Mae: Behind it all/Amazon Prime)

However, when it comes to Molly-Mae’s series, Tommy is AWOL. The reason for Tommy’s on-screen absence is reportedly due to the boxer’s contractual agreement with the BBC who hold the exclusive rights to his forthcoming documentary Tommy: The Good. The Bad. The Fury.

Article continues below

This arrangement means Tommy is unable to film for streaming platform Prime Video as his series, being recorded for BBC Three and iPlayer, pledges to track his life as he battles his issues with alcohol and backlash from his split with Molly.

An insider disclosed that although Tommy would have preferred to feature in Molly’s series, he simply couldn’t due to his work obligations elsewhere. “There’s a very valid reason why Tommy doesn’t appear on Molly’s series,” the source told the Daily Mail.

“He isn’t able to film a scene or even show his face because of his contract with the BBC. Tommy is involved with his own documentary, The Good. The Bad. The Fury, and the BBC has the exclusive rights to his story.”

Molly tommy and bambi
Tommy is delighted to be reunited with Molly-Mae and baby Bambi(Image: instagram.com/mollymae)

On Wednesday, Tommy said he is “happy mentally” following what he called the worst year of his life, which included his break-up with his fiancée Molly-Mae and hand surgery. On his birthday, the boxer told ITV’s Good Morning Britain that he had “always thought, breathed boxing”, until “all of a sudden, you’re sat in hospital bed”.

“You fall into a little bit of a dark place,” he added. “I couldn’t get out of bed in the morning, do what I wanted to do and live and do what makes me happy.”

He said that had “consequences”, but “2024 was worst year of my life, and this year is going to be the best year of my life, and it starts on Friday”, when he fights Bosnian Kenan Hanjalic. This marks his first bout since 2023, when he defeated YouTube personality KSI.

“I’m happy mentally now,” he added. “(You’ve) got to go through these challenges in life, no one’s life’s hard. Everyone’s got a hard life. So at the end of the day, it’s all about I come through this, and I’ve come through, I’m on the other side, and I’m back doing what I do best.”

He also said that he had spoken to his two-year-old daughter on his birthday just before going on air. “It is my birthday today, 26, I’m on the wrong side of 20,” he said. “It don’t really feel like a birthday, because I’ve got a job to do on Friday, but all the celebrations will begin after Friday night, once we bring home that win.”

Article continues below

Wilshere ‘not in contention’ for Norwich job

Getty Images
  • 32 Comments

Jack Wilshere will not be considered as a candidate for the Norwich City manager’s job despite seeing out the campaign as caretaker boss.

The former Arsenal and England midfielder stepped up from his role as Canaries first-team coach to take charge of Norwich’s final two Championship matches of the season after Johannes Hoff Thorup was sacked on 22 April.

Wilshere, 33, oversaw a goalless draw with Middlesbrough and a final-day win against Cardiff City.

Canaries sporting director Ben Knapper told BBC Radio Norfolk the club’s search for a permanent replacement will be “focussed externally”.

“Jack is a fantastic person, he and I have a big history together,” said Knapper, who worked at Arsenal when Wilshere was a player there.

“He’s a great coach and will be a fantastic head coach, but that’s not going to be here at this particular moment in time.

“Naturally he’s disappointed. He’s super-ambitious, and he should be, but for where we are right now and the context, we’re focussing externally.

‘We’ll take our time’ – Knapper

After just one of Wilshere’s matches in charge, full-back Jack Stacey said Norwich players wanted to see him given the role on a full-time basis.

Stacey, who played alongside Wilshere for former club Bournemouth, told BBC Radio Norfolk at a special Norwich City fans’ event: “Personally, and I think I can speak for all of the changing room, I think we’d be delighted for Jack to get it.

“The way he’s come in and instilled confidence into individual players, it makes you want to do well for him and feel you can perform to your best.”

Knapper added that the club will take its time in appointing a successor, saying: “That was one of the benefits of taking the decision when we did, but of course we want somebody in as soon as we can without compromising the quality of our process and of the candidate, and finding the right person.

“It’s not something we expect to wrap up in a week or two but we don’t want this to drag. We absolutely will have a head coach in place long before pre-season starts.”

On the decision to sack Thorup, Knapper said: “We consider the performance of the team, the performance and individual development of our players, and then of course results, all of those things were trending in the wrong direction.

“When that’s the case we need to take action because we’ve got big ambitions and big targets here and ultimately we need to move towards delivering those.

“This football club, regardless of context, regardless of head coach and where we are in our cycle, in the Championship will always target top six. That’s just how it is.

“Of course that’s not the reason we’ve taken the decision we have taken.

“If we felt like in those other areas we were really moving forward and seeing progress, and the team was getting stronger and looking better as the season went on, then even if we had missed out on top six we would have optimism.”

Knapper also admitted that the futures of top goalscorers Borja Sainz and Josh Sargent were still up in the air.

Related topics

  • Norwich City
  • Championship
  • Football

India-Pakistan tensions: A brief history of conflict

India and Pakistan are locked in a rapidly escalating military exchange that threatens to explode into a fully fledged war, triggered by a deadly attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir on April 22 in which 26 civilians were killed, but rooted in decades-old hostilities.

On May 7, India launched a wave of missiles into Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, striking at least six cities and killing at least 31 people – including two children – according to Islamabad. Since then, Indian drones have hit major Pakistani cities and military installations, and India has accused Pakistan to launching a barrage of missiles and drones at its cities and military facilities.

Alongside the missiles and drones, the nuclear-armed neighbours have also traded allegations and denials. India says its May 7 missiles only struck “terrorist infrastructure” while Pakistan insists civilians were killed. Pakistan denies that it launched missiles or drones towards India, and both claim to be victims of the other’s aggression.

Yet the origins of this latest crisis between India and Pakistan go back to their very formation as sovereign nation states in their current form. Here is a recap of the state of near-constant tensions between the South Asian neighbours.

1940s-50s: A tale of two countries

The Indian subcontinent was a British colony from 1858 until 1947, when British colonial rule finally ended, splitting the subcontinent into the two countries. The Muslim-majority Pakistan gained its independence on August 14 that year as non-contiguous and culturally distant zones, West Pakistan and East Pakistan. The Hindu-majority but secular India gained its independence on August 15, 1947.

The partition was far from smooth, causing one of the largest and bloodiest human migrations ever seen, displacing about 15 million people. The process also sparked horrific communal violence and riots between Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs across the region, in which between 200,000 and two million people died. Border disputes and separatist movements sprang up in the aftermath.

What stuck out as a major sticking point between the neighbours was the question of where the Muslim-majority Himalayan region, Kashmir, would go. The monarch of Kashmir initially sought independence and the area remained disputed.

In October 1947, the first war over Kashmir broke out when armed Pakistani tribesmen invaded the territory. The monarch of Kashmir asked India for its assistance in driving out the tribesmen. In return, the monarch accepted India’s condition for help – that Kashmir join India.

Fighting continued until 1948, when it ended with Kashmir divided. Pakistan administers the western part of Kashmir, while India administers much of the rest, with China holding two thin slices of Kashmir’s north. India claims all of Kashmir, while Pakistan also claims the part that India holds but not what China, its ally, holds.

1960s: Failed Kashmir talks and the second war

The decade started with a promise of better ties. In 1960, India and Pakistan signed the Indus Waters Treaty, a World Bank-mediated deal under which they agreed to share the waters of the six Indus Basin rivers they both relied – and still rely – on.

The treaty gives India access to the waters of the three eastern rivers: the Ravi, Beas and Sutlej. Pakistan, in turn, gets the waters of the three western rivers: the Indus, Jhelum and Chenab. After the April 22 Pahalgam attack, India has suspended its participation in the treaty but until recently, the deal stood as a shining example, internationally, of a water-sharing pact that survived multiple wars.

One of those wars would take place in the 1960s.

In 1963, the then-foreign minister of India, Swaran Singh and his Pakistani counterpart, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, held talks over the disputed territory of Kashmir. These talks were mediated by the United States and the United Kingdom.

While exact details of the discussions were not made public, no agreement was reached. In 1964, Pakistan referred the Kashmir case to the United Nations.

In 1965, the two countries fought the second war over Kashmir after between 26,000 and 33,000 Pakistani soldiers dressed as Kashmiri residents crossed the ceasefire line into Indian-administered Kashmir.

As the war escalated, Indian soldiers crossed the international border into Pakistan’s Lahore. The war ended inconclusively, with a ceasefire. In 1966, Indian Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri and Pakistani President Mohammad Ayub Khan signed an agreement in Tashkent, mediated by the Soviet Union, restoring diplomatic and economic relations.

1970s: Bangladesh and the first step towards a nuclear race

In 1971, East Pakistan and West Pakistan went to war after then-president Zulfikar Ali Bhutto refused to let Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the leader of the East Pakistan-based Awami League, assume the premiership. This was despite the fact that the Awami League won the majority of seats in Pakistan’s 1970 parliamentary elections.

In March, the Pakistani military began a crackdown in East Pakistan’s Dhaka and in December, the Indian army got involved. The Pakistani army eventually surrendered. East Pakistan became the independent country of Bangladesh.

In 1972, Bhutto and Indian PM Indira Gandhi signed an agreement in the Indian town of Simla, called the Simla Agreement where they agreed to settle any disputes by peaceful means.

The agreement established the Line of Control (LoC) between the two countries, which neither side is to seek to alter unilaterally, and which “shall be respected by both sides without prejudice to the recognised position of either side”.

In 1974, Kashmir’s state government affirmed that it “is a constituent unit of the Union of India,” an accord rejected by Pakistan.

In the same year, India detonated a nuclear device in an operation codenamed “Smiling Buddha”. India deemed the device a “peaceful nuclear explosive”.

1980s: The rebellion in Kashmir

By the early 1980s, Kashmir was back at the centre of India-Pakistan tensions. A separatist movement took root, as popular sentiment started turning against the elected government of Indian-administered Kashmir, which many locals felt was betraying their interests in exchange for close ties with New Delhi.

A tipping point was the 1987 election to the state legislature, which saw the National Conference, a party committed to the Indian Constitution, win amid widespread allegations of heavy rigging to keep out popular, anti-India politicians.

By 1989, a full-blown armed resistance against India had taken shape in Indian-administered Kashmir, seeking secession from India.

New Delhi has consistently accused Islamabad of financing, training and sheltering these armed groups, who India describes as “terrorists”. Pakistan has insisted that it only offers “moral and diplomatic” support to the separatist movement, though many of those groups have bases and headquarters in Pakistan.

1990s: More agreements, nuclear tests and the Kargil conflict

In 1991, both countries signed agreements on providing advance notification of military exercises, manoeuvres and troop movements, as well as on preventing airspace violations and establishing overflight rules.

In 1992, they signed a joint declaration banning the use of chemical weapons.

In 1996, after a series of clashes, military officers from the countries met at the LoC in order to ease tensions.

In 1998, India detonated five nuclear devices. Pakistan responded by detonating six nuclear devices of its own. Both were slapped with sanctions by many nations – but they had become nuclear-armed states.

In the same year, both countries tested long-range missiles.

In 1999, Indian PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee met with Pakistani PM Nawaz Sharif in Lahore. The two signed an agreement called the Lahore Declaration, reaffirming their commitment to the Simla Accord, and agreeing to undertake a number of “confidence building measures” (CBMs).

However, later in the same year, the Pakistani military crossed the LoC, seizing Indian military posts in the Kargil mountains, sparking the Kargil War. Indian troops pushed the Pakistani soldiers back after bloody battles in the snowy heights of the Ladakh region.

2000s: Tensions and the Mumbai attacks

Tensions across the LoC remained high throughout the 2000s.

In December 2001, an armed attack on the Indian parliament in New Delhi killed 14 people. India blamed Pakistan-backed armed groups for the attacks, that led to a face-to-face standoff between Indian and Pakistan militaries along the LoC. That standoff only ended in October 2002, after international mediation.

In 2002, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, amid Western pressure following the 9/11 attacks, pledged that Pakistan would combat extremism on its own soil, but affirmed that the country had a right to Kashmir.

In 2003, during a UN General Assembly meeting, Musharraf called for a ceasefire along the LoC, and India and Pakistan came to an agreement to cool tensions and cease hostilities. In 2004, Musharraf held talks with Indian PM Vajpayee.

But in 2007, the Samjhauta Express, the train service linking India and Pakistan, was bombed near Panipat, north of New Delhi. Sixty-eight people were killed, and dozens injured. Hindu extremists were charged by the Indian government at the time, but have subsequently been set free.

In 2008, trade relations began to improve across the LoC and India joined a framework agreement between Turkmenistan, Afghanistan and Pakistan on a $7.6bn gas pipeline project.

However, in November 2008, armed gunmen opened fire on civilians at several sites in Mumbai, India. More than 160 people were killed in the attacks.

Ajmal Kasab, the only attacker captured alive, said the attackers were members of Lashkar-e-Taiba. Kasab was executed by India in 2012. India blamed Pakistani intelligence agencies for the attacks.

In 2009, the Pakistani government conceded that the Mumbai attacks may have been partly planned on Pakistani soil, but denied that the plotters were sanctioned or aided by Pakistan’s intelligence agencies.

2010s: ‘Jugular vein’ and Pulwama

In 2014, Pakistan’s then army chief General Raheel Sharif called Kashmir the “jugular vein” of Pakistan, and that the dispute should be resolved in accordance with the wishes and aspirations of Kashmiris and in line with UN resolutions.

In 2016, armed fighters killed 17 Indian soldiers in Uri, Indian-administered Kashmir. As a response, India carried out what it described as “surgical strikes” against bases of armed groups across the LoC.

In 2019, a suicide bomber killed 40 Indian paramilitary soldiers in Pulwama in Indian-administered Kashmir. Jaish-e-Muhammad claimed the attack.

In the aftermath, the Indian Air Force launched an aerial raid on Balakot in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province, claiming it targeted terrorist hideouts and killed several dozen fighters. Pakistan insisted that Indian jets only hit a forested region and did not kill any fighters.

Later in 2019, India revoked Article 370, which granted Kashmir a special, semi-autonomous status and began a crackdown that saw thousands of Kashmiri civilians and politicians arrested, many under anti-terror laws that rights groups have described as draconian.

2020s: Pahalgam and the drones

On April 22 this year, an armed attack on tourists in Pahalgam, in Indian-administered Kashmir, killed 26 men.

An armed group called The Resistance Front (TRF), which demands independence for Kashmir, claimed responsibility for the attack. India alleged that TRF was an offshoot of the Pakistan-based LeT. Islamabad denied allegations of its involvement in the attack and called for a neutral investigation.

On May 7, India launched Operation Sindoor, carrying out missile strikes on multiple targets in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir. Pakistani authorities have claimed that at least 31 people were killed in six targeted cities.