Archive May 12, 2025

Prince Harry’s cutting remark about Meghan Markle’s family that ‘intensified rift’

The Duchess of Sussex’s half-sister, Samantha Markle, confirmed that a comment made by Prince Harry ahead of his 2018 royal wedding had hurt the Markle family, saying ‘something was not right’

Prince Harry’s comment about Meghan and family did not go down well with the Markles

Meghan Markle has been estranged from her father for many years now; the 80-year-old has never met his grandchildren, Archie, six, and three-year-old Lilibet, nor his son-in-law, in person.

Prince Harry is famously no longer in contact with his family, either. And he was previously accused of widening the rift between Meghan and her loved ones when he sat down for an interview in 2017.

While speaking to Radio 4 ahead of the couple’s 2018 wedding, Harry was asked if there were family traditions he needed to explain to his future wife. “Plenty,” he said, “We’ve got one of the biggest families that I know of and every family is complex as well. She’s done an absolutely amazing job.”

He added: “She’s getting in there and it’s the family, I suppose, she’s never had.”

READ MORE: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry ruthlessly mocked on TV show in brutal joke about the couple

His remarks did not sit well with Meghan’s family. Writing in their book, Finding Freedom, Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand, noted: “Harry’s comment only heightened the already tenuous family dynamic and foreshadowed what was to come.”

In response to Harry’s remarks, Meghan’s half-sister Samantha took to X (formerly Twitter ), writing: “Actually she has a large family who were always there with her and for her. Our household was very normal and when dad and Doria divorced, we all made it so it was like she had two houses. No one was estranged, she was just too busy.”

Article continues below

Samantha later confirmed in the 2019 Channel 5 documentary Meghan And The Markles: A Family At War that Harry’s comment had hurt the family. She said: “The first thing I thought was, ‘I don’t think Harry has been given the full story’. Something was not right. Though we weren’t the classic family together on schedule for every holiday, we were family.

“Then we questioned why… why would she be embarrassed about her family? Why would you need to set the stage differently? It was starting to feel like she wasn’t reaching out to the family.”

READ MORE: Prince Harry has ‘two different problems’ that have left him ‘broken’

It comes after it was revealed that Thomas is now living in a £500-a-month high-rise flat on the densely populated island of Cebu in the Philippines. The 80-year-old former Hollywood lighting director now resides more than 7,000 miles away from his daughter.

He is being cared for by Meghan’s older half-brother, Thomas Jr, 58, as he adjusts to life in his new tropical home. But he is said to be ‘struggling’ to cope in Cebu’s punishing climate, where temperatures this week reached 33C with humidity levels approaching 90 per cent.

“There are only two types of weather in Cebu: hot and humid, and hot and humid and raining. It’s brutal even for men half his age, but it’s still sad to see him looking as though he’s struggling,” a source told The Mirror.

Thomas has been spotted using a walking stick to navigate the area’s uneven roads and paths, and he was photographed on the day after Archie’s sixth birthday sitting alone in blistering heat, outside a supermarket near his new home.

Thomas Jr, meanwhile, revealed to the Mirror that he is working on a book of his own, which will include his memories of Meghan’s childhood. He said: “When my book is finished, ooh it’ll be swooped up real quick cos it’s getting there. I’m working on it. It’s coming out.

“It’s gonna be good. I really want to maybe spin off the book, then when the book gets read, the documentary will follow. I’m not a greedy person, it’s not about the money, it’s about the principle.

“Of course it would be nice to have a nice little cushion from selling a book, sure.” Referring to his new life to the Philippines with his father, Thomas added in an online video: “Everybody wants the book. I now have dedicated time. It’s not easy moving.”

Article continues below

A winner as boy and man – what it was like playing against Kohli

  • 37 Comments

The thought of watching an India Test team without Virat Kohli in it will take some getting used to.

I first played a full international against Kohli in an ODI at Lord’s in 2011, then in Test cricket in India the following year, when England famously won the series 2-1.

But my first encounter with him came some time before, in an Under-19 series in the UK in 2006. We played three four-day ‘Test’ matches, with some recognisable names on both teams: Moeen Ali, Adil Rashid, Adam Lyth and Ishant Sharma. Kohli and I were both 17, so playing a couple of years above our age group.

Even then, as a youngster a far cry from the supreme athlete he turned into, the competitiveness and fire that has characterised Kohli’s career shone brightly.

In the first game at Canterbury he made 123 in the first innings. It was full of trademark Kohli shots: clips through mid-wicket and punches through the covers with a checked drive.

What I remember most vividly is how keen he was to engage in a battle with us. In age-group cricket, some players are there to score their runs so they progress through the system. Not Kohli. He was there to win. It was this trait that elevated him above his peers and served him so well throughout a Test career that has carried the hopes of 1.4bn people.

From then on, we crossed paths regularly. At the 2008 Under-19 World Cup in Malaysia, we even crossed paths on a nightclub dancefloor. These days he would have too much of an image to uphold, and too much security required, to be seen in the same dodgy establishments as yours truly.

Kohli captained the India team that won that tournament. His expression on lifting the trophy, screaming in delight, was one that became familiar when he celebrated an India wicket in a Test.

Even at that age he was the prized wicket in the India team, the one you’d phone home to tell your parents about. It was no surprise he made his full one-day international debut later that year, immediately looking at home.

Virat Kohli arrives back in India after leading his side to the 2008 Under-19s World Cup titleGetty Images

Bowling to Kohli was tough. You never wanted to engage him too much, because you knew that it would bring out the best in him. At the same time, you never wanted to back down so much that he didn’t respect you.

If you bowled too full, he could punish you on both sides of the wicket. Drop short and he played off the back foot just as well. You knew you couldn’t miss.

He walked to the crease with his shoulders pushed back. You could sense an anticipation in the stands, even when Kohli was playing outside of India. It was intimidating, and you just had to stay in control of your own emotions.

There was an intensity about everything he did, and that extended off the field.

In 2016, we played a five-Test series in India. It was a long, gruelling tour that turned out to be Alastair Cook’s last as England captain.

As you move around the country, tourists typically stay in the same hotels as the India team, so you see them quite a lot away from the ground.

Two things stood out. Firstly, if Kohli even set foot in the hotel lobby, it was pandemonium. There were people just trying to catch a glimpse of their hero as he made his way to the team bus. Living with that level of stardom and pressure is like nothing any English cricketer can imagine.

Secondly was the way in which the India team had changed their attitude to training. On the previous Test tour, four years earlier, we would generally be the only team using the hotel gym. We would have free rein to use whatever equipment we pleased.

By 2016, these hotel gyms had now become boutiques to Kohli’s fitness regime, and the rest of the team followed on his coattails. There were Olympics lifting bars, weights and an on-call fitness trainer. It was obvious we were dealing with a very different India team, one that became formidable as a result.

That Kohli intensity was always going to be hard to sustain and I don’t think it’s surprising his Test batting numbers tailed off towards the end of his captaincy, then again as he fell back into the ranks.

That does not detract from his status as a great of the game. In terms of the Fab Four, he is the first to retire from Test cricket and his numbers do not match those of Kane Williamson, Joe Root and Steve Smith.

On a personal note, he is responsible for one of my few moments of cricket badgerism.

I liked getting shirts from players in the opposition and I wanted one from Kohli.

At the end of an ODI at Dharamsala in January 2013, we swapped shirts. We didn’t sign them, but I kept hold of his.

When we next played against each other, at Edgbaston in August 2014, I took my shirt along and asked the dressing room attendant if Kohli could sign it. He did, addressing me as ‘Steve’, a name only my mum uses. Funnily enough, Kohli did not ask for me to sign his Finn shirt.

I always found him to be polite, interesting and someone who would be a very good team-mate. I was never lucky enough to experience him as that.

I don’t think it’s hyperbole to say that Kohli has done more to maintain the primacy of Test cricket than any other player in the modern era.

It would have been so easy for him to walk away from the grind much sooner than this. He could have basked in the financial prosperity of the Indian Premier League, influenced his 271m Instagram followers (three times more than David Beckham) and used his image to secure his family’s future.

Steven Finn celebrates dismissing Virat Kohli in a one-day international in 2011Getty Images

Related topics

  • India
  • Cricket

Growing up alongside Kohli – why India legend was special on and off field

  • 6 Comments

The thought of watching an India Test team without Virat Kohli in it will take some getting used to.

I first played a full international against Kohli in an ODI at Lord’s in 2011, then in Test cricket in India the following year, when England famously won the series 2-1.

But my first encounter with him came some time before, in an Under-19 series in the UK in 2006. We played three four-day ‘Test’ matches, with some recognisable names on both teams: Moeen Ali, Adil Rashid, Adam Lyth and Ishant Sharma. Kohli and I were both 17, so playing a couple of years above our age group.

Even then, as a youngster a far cry from the supreme athlete he turned into, the competitiveness and fire that has characterised Kohli’s career shone brightly.

In the first game at Canterbury he made 123 in the first innings. It was full of trademark Kohli shots: clips through mid-wicket and punches through the covers with a checked drive.

What I remember most vividly is how keen he was to engage in a battle with us. In age-group cricket, some players are there to score their runs so they progress through the system. Not Kohli. He was there to win. It was this trait that elevated him above his peers and served him so well throughout a Test career that has carried the hopes of 1.4bn people.

From then on, we crossed paths regularly. At the 2008 Under-19 World Cup in Malaysia, we even crossed paths on a nightclub dancefloor. These days he would have too much of an image to uphold, and too much security required, to be seen in the same dodgy establishments as yours truly.

Kohli captained the India team that won that tournament. His expression on lifting the trophy, screaming in delight, was one that became familiar when he celebrated an India wicket in a Test.

Even at that age he was the prized wicket in the India team, the one you’d phone home to tell your parents about. It was no surprise he made his full one-day international debut later that year, immediately looking at home.

Virat Kohli arrives back in India after leading his side to the 2008 Under-19s World Cup titleGetty Images

Bowling to Kohli was tough. You never wanted to engage him too much, because you knew that it would bring out the best in him. At the same time, you never wanted to back down so much that he didn’t respect you.

If you bowled too full, he could punish you on both sides of the wicket. Drop short and he played off the back foot just as well. You knew you couldn’t miss.

He walked to the crease with his shoulders pushed back. You could sense an anticipation in the stands, even when Kohli was playing outside of India. It was intimidating, and you just had to stay in control of your own emotions.

There was an intensity about everything he did, and that extended off the field.

In 2016, we played a five-Test series in India. It was a long, gruelling tour that turned out to be Alastair Cook’s last as England captain.

As you move around the country, tourists typically stay in the same hotels as the India team, so you see them quite a lot away from the ground.

Two things stood out. Firstly, if Kohli even set foot in the hotel lobby, it was pandemonium. There were people just trying to catch a glimpse of their hero as he made his way to the team bus. Living with that level of stardom and pressure is like nothing any English cricketer can imagine.

Secondly was the way in which the India team had changed their attitude to training. On the previous Test tour, four years earlier, we would generally be the only team using the hotel gym. We would have free rein to use whatever equipment we pleased.

By 2016, these hotel gyms had now become boutiques to Kohli’s fitness regime, and the rest of the team followed on his coattails. There were Olympics lifting bars, weights and an on-call fitness trainer. It was obvious we were dealing with a very different India team, one that became formidable as a result.

That Kohli intensity was always going to be hard to sustain and I don’t think it’s surprising his Test batting numbers tailed off towards the end of his captaincy, then again as he fell back into the ranks.

That does not detract from his status as a great of the game. In terms of the Fab Four, he is the first to retire from Test cricket and his numbers do not match those of Kane Williamson, Joe Root and Steve Smith.

On a personal note, he is responsible for one of my few moments of cricket badgerism.

I liked getting shirts from players in the opposition and I wanted one from Kohli.

At the end of an ODI at Dharamsala in January 2013, we swapped shirts. We didn’t sign them, but I kept hold of his.

When we next played against each other, at Edgbaston in August 2014, I took my shirt along and asked the dressing room attendant if Kohli could sign it. He did, addressing me as ‘Steve’, a name only my mum uses. Funnily enough, Kohli did not ask for me to sign his Finn shirt.

I always found him to be polite, interesting and someone who would be a very good team-mate. I was never lucky enough to experience him as that.

I don’t think it’s hyperbole to say that Kohli has done more to maintain the primacy of Test cricket than any other player in the modern era.

It would have been so easy for him to walk away from the grind much sooner than this. He could have basked in the financial prosperity of the Indian Premier League, influenced his 271m Instagram followers (three times more than David Beckham) and used his image to secure his family’s future.

Steven Finn celebrates dismissing Virat Kohli in a one-day international in 2011Getty Images

Related topics

  • India
  • Cricket

‘Farcical’ French Guineas demotion set for appeal

France Galop

An appeal is set to be launched after British runner Shes Perfect was demoted to second having finished first past the post in the French 1000 Guineas.

Jockey Kieran Shoemark finished a nose in front of favourite Zarigana in the Classic at ParisLongchamp on Sunday.

But French officials ruled the filly, trained by Charlie Fellowes in Newmarket, was guilty of interference.

Basher Watts, whose racing syndicate own the horse, called the decision “farcical” and questioned the ride on the promoted winner.

“The only interference that they have deemed worthy against Shes Perfect was just before the furlong marker, we drift to our left and that right there is the only thing she’s done wrong,” he said.

“We are appealing. Of course we’re appealing. In my opinion it’s a farcical decision. When they showed me what it was for, it was laughable.”

Watts initially celebrated enthusiastically with syndicate members.

But Mickael Barzalona, rider of Zarigana – owned by the Aga Khan’s family – lodged an objection after the race and following an inquiry the result was amended.

Barzalona appeared to drop his whip in the final furlong after using it twice, before using his right hand down his mount’s neck on multiple occasions to encourage Zarigana in the closing stages.

France Galop’s rules limit use of the whip more than four times and if a jockey strikes a horse nine times or more, it would trigger disqualification.

Watts said: “Any jockey exceeding nine strikes would receive instant disqualification. Zarigana was struck two times with the whip and 12 times by hand…14 strikes.”

Samuel Fargeat, spokesman for French governing body France Galop, said the stewards had assessed two incidents, the first involving Shes Perfect, fourth-placed Exactly and Zarigana, who all appeared to get close, before the last two fillies also came together towards the line.

The stewards decided the first incident had impacted the result but the second had not, and Zarigana’s trainer Francis-Henri Graffard felt his filly had been “unbalanced at the wrong time”.

Related topics

  • Horse Racing

Amber Heard’s new quiet life in ‘exile from Hollywood’ as she celebrates ‘completing family’

Following her explosive court battle with ex-husband Johnny Depp, actress Amber Heard has opted for a ‘life of isolation’ in Spain and has since welcomed twins to the ‘Heard gang’

Inside Amber Heard’s new life in Spain after Hollywood ‘exile’(Image: GETTY)

It’s been nearly three years since Amber Heard, 39, and Johnny Depp, 61, went head-to-head in a court case that captured huge amounts of attention worldwide. The details of the formerly married couple’s life together were pored over as allegations of defamation were heard in the civil case – and Amber in particular received a huge amount of hate from online trolls as Depp’s name was cleared.

These days, the Aquaman actress’s days look pretty different from the A-list lifestyle she was once embroiled in, with Amber now enjoying a quiet life pretty much under the radar in Spain – where she has just welcomed twin babies to her family.

In a post marking Mother’s Day in the US, the actress revealed the exciting news that she has now become a mum-of-three, with her eldest child Oonagh Paige, born in 2021 to a surrogate, now a big sister. “Mother’s Day 2025 will be one I’ll never forget. This year I am elated beyond words to celebrate the completion of the family I’ve strived to build for years.

“Today I officially share the news that I welcomed twins into the Heard gang. My daughter Agnes and my son Ocean are keeping my hands (and my heart) full,” Amber wrote in the post on Instagram.

“When I had my first baby girl Oonagh four years ago, my world changed forever. I thought I couldn’t possibly burst with more joy. Well, now I am bursting times three!!!

(Image: amberheard/Instagram)

Article continues below

“Becoming a mother by myself and on my own terms despite my own fertility challenges has been the most humbling experience of my life. I am eternally grateful that I was able to choose this responsibly and thoughtfully.

“To all the moms, wherever you are today and however you got here, my dream family and I are celebrating with you. Love always, A x”

The actress, who came out as bisexual in 2010, first moved to Mallorca, Spain, in the immediate aftermath of her court case with her ex-husband, which saw the jury award £12 million ($13m) to the Pirates of the Caribbean star in damages. Depp first brought a defamation claim against his ex-wife after she wrote an opinion piece for the Washington Post that claimed she had been a victim of domestic abuse, despite the fact she never named her famous ex-husband in the article.

Heard then countersued Depp – and was awarded £2 million for one of her three claims. Johnny Depp’s legal team later confirmed that his ex-wife had paid him £820,000 ($1 million) in a settlement for the defamation case.

Amber, who has kept her dating life underwraps since her court battle, has since moved to Madrid from Majorca, where she is said to have “integrated” and keeps a relatively “low profile” in her affluent neighbourhood that is said to be inhabited by a number of big names. A source is reported as telling the MailOnline: “She lives here and I often see her walking her daughter to school in the mornings.

“She wears a cap and sunglasses and normal clothes and keeps a low profile. She lives here in peace, this is a neighbourhood filled with famous people, including football players, but no one bothers each other, I think that’s why she likes it – she has completely integrated into the community.”

For her part, Amber told the press last year, “I love Spain so much,” and added when asked if she would like to remain living in her new home: “Yes, I hope so. Yes, I love living here.”

However, whilst she now feels so positive about her new life in Madrid, the circumstances of her exit from the US were less than ideal, even referred to as the actress being “exiled” in some reports, with a source saying – per Grazia – that the chaotic aftermath of the trial left Heard with no choice but to leave.

“Her isolation from the world in which she used to inhabit is quite jarring when you consider she’s taken that step back because of the trauma and distress her marriage, the divorce and the ensuing legal drama has caused her. Amber was once an A-list star, and this has all taken a lot out of her, to the point where she has lost passion for living that Hollywood life,” they explained.

Another insider told the magazine that the sheer level of Depp’s popularity has had a huge impact on Amber’s acting career, and the circles within which she would now be welcomed. “Depp has a lot of loyal friends and is hugely popular and powerful,” they explained, “Amber knows that there are certain franchises and studios where she won’t be welcome.”

A-list names like Penelope Cruz, Rod Stewart, Eric Clapton, and many more have not hesitated to throw their public support behind Depp, despite the myriad of controversial allegations that have followed him in recent years, with his career going from strength to strength.

Amber, on the other hand, has only acted in one independent movie since the trial concluded.

Article continues below