Archive November 26, 2025

Racing avoids betting tax rises in Budget

Images courtesy of Getty

British racing was spared from the tax increase that it feared would result in thousands of job losses.

The rate paid by bookmakers on racing bets was not increased in Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ budget.

British racing held an unprecedented one-day strike in September as a result of reports of a proposed rise.

However, other gambling tax increases could have a positive impact on the sport if the Treasury does not increase the 15% rate paid by bookmakers to racing.

From April 2026, the percentage of remote gaming fees imposed on online casino games will increase from 21 to 40%.

General betting duty, which is due on other sports betting activities, will remain at 15% in bookmakers, but it will increase from 15% to 25% online starting in April 2027.

Prior to Reeves’ statement in the Commons, the Office for Budget Responsibility erroneously provided details of the government’s plans.

By 2031, the measures are anticipated to bring in £1.1 billion from the gambling industry, and shares of major companies immediately fell following the announcement, though some recovered afterward.

Bookmakers warned of closing betting establishments if Reeves raised taxes on gambling companies before the Budget.

Through the media rights payments and levy, each shop offers thousands of pounds to racing.

    • September 10th

With more than 1,400 matches played annually, horse racing is the second-largest spectator sport in the world after football.

The British Horseracing Authority changed the schedules for four matches at Lingfield Park, Carlisle, Uttoxeter, and Kempton Park in order to support its industry-wide Axe The Racing Tax campaign.

Leading jockeys, trainers, and owners converged on Westminster to lobby lawmakers and demonstrate their opposition to potential changes, marking the first time the sport has voluntarily refused to race in its modern history.

The organization’s leadership was pushing against the possibility of the Treasury enacting a single remote gambling tax, which would have increased the 15% rate paid by bookmakers for racing and matched it with the 21% rate for online gaming.

related subjects

  • Horseback riding

More on this story.

Kate Garraway and Jenni Falconer twin in matching pinstripe high street suits

Kate Garraway and Jenni Falconer match in River Island’s pinstripe blazer and trousers, showcasing how to style high street tailoring

Kate Garraway and Jenni Falconer proved that great minds definitely think alike, after stepping out in matching pinstripe suits earlier this week.

The pair showcased the same sleek navy pinstripe blazer and trousers from Olivia Attwood’s River Island collection, an edit focused on sharp tailoring and modern cool-girl style.

The suit in question includes the Navy Pinstripe Cocoon Sleeve Blazer, currently £55 down from £64, and the matching Navy Pinstripe Low Waist Trousers, priced at £46.

Collarless, cocoon sleeve blazers have been a huge trend this autumn, with River Island largely leading the way. They offer a contemporary, cool twist on classic suiting, and when paired with low-waist trousers, deliver a chic, polished look that doesn’t feel overly formal.

READ MORE: REFY has 25% off everything for Black Friday – here’s what a beauty expert recommends

READ MORE: Stacey Solomon says she’s ‘so impressed’ with her new affordable Christmas decorations

Both presenters styled the look in their own way, with Jenni keeping it simple with some minimalist silver jewellery. While Kate teamed an on-trend silk blue neck scarf with her look.

With January around the corner and back-to-work wardrobes on everyone’s mind, this is the kind of versatile suit that is the perfect addition to any collection. And it could even work for the upcoming party season by teaming the suit with a pair of platform heels, a sequin clutch and a longline wool coat.

Kate and Jenni aren’t the only presenters nailing the style game, as Ranvir wowed Good Morning Britain viewers last week with her ‘flattering’ jumpsuit.

Article continues below

Drawing inspiration from the 1970s, Ranvir opted for a retro-style cord jumpsuit from Joe Browns. The Pixie Cord Jumpsuit is priced at £65 and has garnered Ranvir a lot of praise from GMB viewers. With its belted waist and bootcut-leg, this jumpsuit cinches in the waist to create a figure-flattering silhouette, while also elongating the legs.

India-China in new spat over Arunachal Pradesh: What’s it all about?

After a month of restraint in their relationship, the Indian government and China are at odds with one another over alleged harassment of a woman in Arunachal Pradesh, an eastern state of India.

China claims the territory of Arunachal Pradesh and calls the region southern Tibet, or Zangnan.

What transpired, why the tensions between the world’s two most populous countries are significant, and what are the causes of the tensions.

What happened?

On Friday, Prema Wangjom Thongdok traveled from the United Kingdom to Japan using her Indian passport. She stopped at Shanghai Pudong International Airport in China for what was supposed to be a three-hour layover.

Thongdok claimed that Shanghai airport authorities unlawfully held her and harassed her for 18 hours because her passport listed Arunachal Pradesh as her birthplace.

She added that the Chinese authorities at the airport said her Indian passport was “invalid”, claiming that Arunachal Pradesh was actually part of China.

I actually crossed the immigration gate. It was e-gate, so I put my passport through and went to the security gates”, Thongdok told the India Today news magazine over videolink from Thailand’s capital, Bangkok.

“India! One of the officials screamed as he arrived and screamed. India! ‘ with my name in her blatant rant,” she continued.

When Thongdok asked the official why she was being taken out, she said the official told Thongdok that her Indian passport is not valid because she was born in Arunachal Pradesh. The official continued, “Arunachal is a part of China,” according to Thongdok. Your passport is invalid”.

Thongdok responded, “Arunachal is an Indian state. I’ve never heard of it being part of China”.

Without knowing when the authorities would let her leave the airport, she continued, adding that she was kept there.

Other Indian media outlets reported that Thongdok said she was pressured by airport authorities to buy a new ticket on China Eastern Airline and hinted that her passport would be returned only when she complied. She lost money on hotel reservations and flight cancellations as a result.

She added that with help from a friend in the UK, she eventually got in touch with the Indian consulate in Shanghai. Later, Indian authorities led her to a late-night flight out of the city.

The Indian Express newspaper reported that Thongdok had passed through Shanghai Pudong International Airport in October without any issues. What changed this time is unclear.

Have similar incidents happened before?

People from Arunachal Pradesh who arrived in China were issued stapled visas in Beijing in 2005. Other Indian residents receive a stamped Chinese visa on their passports.

China’s argument: If someone from Arunachal Pradesh is first-class citizens, they cannot issue regular visas.

But India has never accepted stapled Chinese visas on its passports. According to the report, doing so would mean accepting that Arunachal Pradesh residents are not Indians.

In 2013, two archers from Arunachal Pradesh were issued stapled visas&nbsp, to travel to Wuxi in eastern China for the Youth World Archery Championship. They were prohibited from visiting China by India.

In July 2023, three martial arts athletes from Arunachal Pradesh were issued stapled visas for the World University Games, which took place in China’s Chengdu. In the end, the entire Indian Wushu team did not participate in Chengdu’s games.

In September 2023, the same three wushu athletes from Arunachal Pradesh were unable to compete in the Hangzhou Asian Games because they were unable to download their accreditation cards, which were to serve as visas to visit China.

Anurag Thakur, the Indian sports minister, protested by canceling his trip to Hangzhou to inaugurate the games.

What is the Arunachal Pradesh dispute about?

According to Raj Verma, a nonresident scholar at George Washington University’s Sigur Center for Asian Studies, the India-China border dispute over Arunachal Pradesh is a legacy of the British Empire.

In March 1914, the McMahon Line was established during the Simla Convention in India, which involved negotiations between Tibet, China and the British Empire. Henry McMahon, the country’s top negotiator, is the line’s name. While Chinese delegates attended the convention, they did not sign the main agreement and did not recognise the McMahon Line.

McMahon, however, chose to follow Tibet’s path. China has held that Tibet did not have the authority to unilaterally decide on the border with India, especially after China sent troops into Tibet and annexed it in 1951. Beijing has also relied on outdated maps, including those from the British, that depicted China as a sovereign state along the McMahon Line.

Since gaining independence from Britain in 1947, India has treated the McMahon Line as the border with China.

Instead of relying on the McMahon Line, Beijing has argued that India and China should negotiate and draw their borders.

For decades, China claimed only a part of Arunachal Pradesh known as Tawang. However, its claim has expanded to the entire state of northeast India in recent years.

Verma said tensions have intensified since Chinese President Xi Jinping came to power in 2012 and adopted a much more muscular approach to Beijing’s territorial demands.

“We take a firm and unwavering position on China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. … We cannot lose one inch of territory passed down by our ancestors. We also want nothing from other people,” Xi said in 2018.

China’s relations with many of its other neighbours have also soured over the past decade due to territorial disputes, including Beijing’s claims over all of the South China Sea.

Verma said, “That’s why it’s becoming increasingly difficult for the dispute to be resolved, and it’s going to be very difficult for this issue to be resolved in the future,” citing China’s position.

In India, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in power since 2014, has also adopted a more assertive foreign policy, including on border disputes. He once promised to show China “red eyes,” a Hindi metaphor for firmness and strength.

How has the Arunachal Pradesh dispute played out historically?

The least-populated state in India, Arunachal Pradesh, has long been a source of tension between New Delhi and Beijing.

In October 1962, present-day Arunachal Pradesh became one of the two theatres of the Indo-China War, and Beijing’s troops attacked Indian positions on both sides of the Namka Chu river. Even though the Chinese People’s Liberation Army won the war, Indian soldiers escaped from Tawang.

In October 1975, another skirmish broke out at the Tulung La pass, which connects Tibet and Arunachal Pradesh. Each side alleged that another was attacking its soldiers. Four Indian soldiers were killed in what was the last deadly border clash between the neighbours until the 2020 crisis in Ladakh, in which at least 20 Indian soldiers and four Chinese service members were killed after hand-to-hand combat.

The conflicting claims made by India and China over the region have had other effects, despite the region’s largely peaceful past 50 years.

In 2012, China objected to the Dalai Lama’s scheduled visit to Arunachal Pradesh. Jiang Yu, the spokeswoman for China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs at the time, “we firmly oppose Dalai visiting the so-called “Arunachal Pradesh.” The Dalai Lama did not visit the state in 2012.

Tawang experienced a few minor border scuffles in December 2022. Both sides blamed each other. China claimed that Chinese soldiers had spied on Indian territory and attempted to “change the status quo” while India accused Indian forces of obstructing a routine patrol.

In January, China approved the construction of a dam in Medog County, Tibet, near the Indian border. In response, India reacted by approving the Arunachal Pradesh’s Siang Upper Multipurpose Project to stop flooding and reduce the effects of the Chinese dam. However, the Indian reservoir project risks submerging dozens of Indigenous villages in India and Bangladesh.

What makes Arunachal Pradesh significant?

The state is strategically important to India because it links the country with Southeast Asia and is also a military district, Verma said. The state is close to Bhutan in the west and shares international borders with Myanmar in the southeast. Myanmar, in turn, connects India to Thailand, Laos and beyond via the India-Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Highway project.

Verma claimed that China also holds religious significance for the state. In 1683, the sixth Dalai Lama, Tsangyang Gyatso, was born near Tawang.

China maintains that Arunachal Pradesh is an extension of Tibet, which is a source of tension between the neighbors. Beijing has long viewed India’s decision to grant the current Dalai Lama sanctuary after he fled Lhasa during a Chinese crackdown as a provocation.

In September 2024, India named a previously unnamed mountain peak in Arunachal Pradesh after the sixth Dalai Lama.

China’s concern about this choice was expressed. “Let me say more broadly that the area of Zangnan is Chinese territory, and it’s illegal and null and void for India to set up the so-called Arunachal Pradesh in Chinese territory. This is China’s consistent position, according to Lin Jian, a spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry at the time.

“Beijing would be extremely reluctant to give up Arunachal Pradesh and the Tawang issue”, Verma said.

What has the Chinese and Indian government done?

In response to a reporter’s question about Thongdok’s experience at the Shanghai airport, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said on Tuesday: “Zangnan is China’s territory. The so-called Arunachal Pradesh, which India has illegally established, has never been recognized by the Chinese side.

She insisted that Chinese officials had dealt with Thongdok “in accordance with laws and regulations”.

“The law enforcement was fair and unaccountable,” the statement read. The lawful rights and interests of the person concerned were fully protected. No allegedly detained or harassed woman was taken, and no other measures were taken against her. The airline provided her with resting facilities and meals”, Mao said.

In response to his Chinese counterpart’s statements, the Indian Ministry of External Affairs’ spokesperson, Randhir Jaiswal, stated on Tuesday: “Arunachal Pradesh is an integral and inalienable part of India, and this is a self-evident fact. No amount of denial by the Chinese side is going to change this indisputable reality”.

Jaiswal continued, “The Chinese side has been very interested in the detention issue. Chinese authorities have still not been able to explain their actions, which are in violation of several conventions governing international air travel. The Chinese government’s actions also go against their own rules, which forbid nationals from all nations from getting a visa-free transit for up to 24 hours.

What does this mean for India-China relations?

Verma described the most recent conflict as “a minor blip in the bilateral relationship” between China and India. “It should not be an issue when it comes to improving India-China relations”.

Over the past year, New Delhi and Beijing’s relationship has thawed, especially as of 2020-2024. Both have been battered by heavy tariffs imposed by United States President Donald Trump, which analysts said have forced them to cooperate.

Following the clash in Ladakh’s Galwan Valley in 2020, India-China relations began to deteriorate. This marked the first deadly border incident in 40 years and resulted in India banning 200 Chinese apps, including TikTok. The “most challenging phase” in recent years was described as the “most challenging phase” for India’s foreign minister.

Since late 2024, both nations have sought to reset ties. During a troop withdrawal along the Line of Actual Control, Modi and Xi met in Kazan, Russia.

In August, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi visited India, leading Modi to praise their “respect for each other’s interests” and “steady progress” in relations. Modi and Xi met for talks later that month in China for the first time in more than seven years.

Still, Verma pointed out, despite the thaw in ties, “the overall strategy of both countries towards each other has not changed”.

British and Irish Lions join ban on R360 recruits for 2027

Images courtesy of Getty
  • 40 Comments

Any player who participates in the R360 competition will be exempt from their infamous first women’s tour in 2027, according to the British and Irish Lions.

R360, which has a series of events starting in October 2026, wants to find the stars of four women’s teams to compete in its globetrotting series.

However, only England, Ireland, and Scotland are among the eight leading Test nations that have outlawed the selection of R360 players for their men’s and women’s teams.

The Lions’ statement claims they “fully support” the unions’ move, which includes both genders, but does not specifically mention men’s tours, the next of which is scheduled for 2029 in New Zealand and is still in the planning stages.

The British and Irish Lions “firmly support the position of our governing unions in relation to the proposed competition” and “will be advising that any player who chooses to play in R360 will not be selected for the 2027 tour to New Zealand,” read a statement.

We want the Lions Women’s Tour to be the best it can be because it is the first time it has ever taken place, making it a historic moment for women’s rugby.

We think it’s important that potential players who are chosen are playing in established leagues with certainty regarding their schedule and schedule given that the tour is only a year and a half away.

The Lions’ playing pool has been restricted for the first time.

Prior to the 2025 trip, they had selected players from abroad like Blair Kinghorn of Toulouse and Scotland.

In January 2024, chief executive Ben Calveley stated that “we don’t have a policy that prevents anyone from being selected… we don’t have any restrictions on selection.”

The Daily Telegraph reported in October that a sizable number of “Red Roses” had signed pre-contract agreements to play at R360.

Ellie Kildunne scores against CanadaImages courtesy of Getty

A number of recent and current Test players have already been formally committed, making it clear that the organizers are filling out their men’s roster, which they claim to have close to the 200 names needed.

R360 hasn’t yet received official sanction from World Rugby, which requests more information about the series’ production and player signings for international competitions.

Emily Scarratt, one of the most prominent women’s players in the sport and the all-time top scorer for the Red Roses, claimed she had received no offers to extend her career with R360.

Other reported targets, including 2025 Lions tourists Finn Russell and Fin Smith, have also extended their contracts with their existing clubs, as did Sale and England fly-half George Ford, who turned down an approach in the men’s game.

The NRL of Australian rugby league has threatened to expel any player who switches to R360 and will do so for the duration of their 10-year bans.

In the meantime, Rugby Football Union CEO Bill Sweeney claims he has never met any England player who plans to give up their Test career in order to pursue a lucrative new career.

He told Rugby Union Weekly, “I haven’t heard of any players yet, and that doesn’t mean that I haven’t heard of them.” “I haven’t heard of any England players, either male or female, who has actually signed,” he said.

related subjects

  • Rugby Union

More on this story.

British and Irish Lions join ban on R360 recruits for 2027

Images courtesy of Getty
  • 40 Comments

Any player who participates in the R360 competition will be exempt from their infamous first women’s tour in 2027, according to the British and Irish Lions.

R360, which has a series of events starting in October 2026, wants to find the stars of four women’s teams to compete in its globetrotting series.

However, only England, Ireland, and Scotland are among the eight leading Test nations that have outlawed the selection of R360 players for their men’s and women’s teams.

The Lions’ statement claims they “fully support” the unions’ move, which includes both genders, but does not specifically mention men’s tours, the next of which is scheduled for 2029 in New Zealand and is still in the planning stages.

The British and Irish Lions “firmly support the position of our governing unions in relation to the proposed competition” and “will be advising that any player who chooses to play in R360 will not be selected for the 2027 tour to New Zealand,” read a statement.

We want the Lions Women’s Tour to be the best it can be because it is the first time it has ever taken place, making it a historic moment for women’s rugby.

We think it’s important that potential players who are chosen are playing in established leagues with certainty regarding their schedule and schedule given that the tour is only a year and a half away.

The Lions’ playing pool has been restricted for the first time.

Prior to the 2025 trip, they had selected players from abroad like Blair Kinghorn of Toulouse and Scotland.

In January 2024, chief executive Ben Calveley stated that “we don’t have a policy that prevents anyone from being selected… we don’t have any restrictions on selection.”

The Daily Telegraph reported in October that a sizable number of “Red Roses” had signed pre-contract agreements to play at R360.

Ellie Kildunne scores against CanadaImages courtesy of Getty

A number of recent and current Test players have already been formally committed, making it clear that the organizers are filling out their men’s roster, which they claim to have close to the 200 names needed.

R360 hasn’t yet received official sanction from World Rugby, which requests more information about the series’ production and player signings for international competitions.

Emily Scarratt, one of the most prominent women’s players in the sport and the all-time top scorer for the Red Roses, claimed she had received no offers to extend her career with R360.

Other reported targets, including 2025 Lions tourists Finn Russell and Fin Smith, have also extended their contracts with their existing clubs, as did Sale and England fly-half George Ford, who turned down an approach in the men’s game.

The NRL of Australian rugby league has threatened to expel any player who switches to R360 and will do so for the duration of their 10-year bans.

In the meantime, Rugby Football Union CEO Bill Sweeney claims he has never met any England player who plans to give up their Test career in order to pursue a lucrative new career.

He told Rugby Union Weekly, “I haven’t heard of any players yet, and that doesn’t mean that I haven’t heard of them.” “I haven’t heard of any England players, either male or female, who has actually signed,” he said.

related subjects

  • Rugby Union

More on this story.

Meghan Markle’s ‘painfully performative’ stunt ‘may damage public reputation MORE’

A PR expert has spoken out against the Duchess of Sussex over a “cringeworthy” assertion she made in a recent interview, and how this will have a significant impact on how the public perceives her.

A public relations expert has criticised Meghan Markle for a claim she made in a recent interview which has been dubbed as ‘cringeworthy’, as she added it is likely to harm her public reputation.

In an interview with Harper’s Bazaar, it was revealed by the journalist that upon entering the house where the interview was taking place, the house manager declared: “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” – despite it only being the three of them inside. The claim has since caused a stir online, with royal watchers and commentators alike slamming Meghan for the action, with one PR expert now claiming that the announcement could have a detrimental impact on how she is viewed by the public.

READ MORE: Prince William makes sweet comment about ‘supportive’ Kate during royal outingREAD MORE: Sarah Ferguson ‘abandons’ Andrew as she prepares to make her next move

Renae Smith, founder and director of PR firm The Atticism, told the Express that not only was the revelation ‘cringeworthy’, it was ‘painfully performative’ to those who witnessed it.

That would have been planned, she claimed to the journal. There is no universe where something like that occurs on its own. She either requested or approved. It is tone-deaf in any case.

She continued, “This is the thing that influences the public’s opinion of her.” not the book cover. It is messy and the most embarrassing from a PR standpoint. She consistently has problems. She appears to be completely disconnected from what she actually does, looking confused, and reactive at the moment.

According to Smith, “It’s the inconsistency that hurts her the most” in terms of Meghan’s public image.

The PR expert’s sentiment was echoed by royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams , who is also an etiquette expert, as he also confirmed that the announcement was a clear breach in royal protocol.

Mr Fitzwilliams told the Daily Mail the announcement as reported in the interview, “would make a wonderful skit in the South Park series”, adding: “It speaks volumes, in an interview calculated not to offend, about the importance Meghan attaches to her royal status.”

Mr. Fitzwilliams argued that this “breaks protocol” and that the journalist should be made to appear to her rather than Meghan being made known to her.

Continue reading the article.

Guidance from Buckingham Palace and etiquette guide Debrett’s suggests that it is the visitor who is normally announced, rather than the Royal Family member. Debrett’s adds that introductions to the royals are known as ‘presentations’, and it is only necessary to state the name of the person to be presented.