Archive June 7, 2025

‘We do this to survive’: Harvesting opium poppies in Myanmar’s Shan State

Tian Win Nang, from Southern Shan State, Myanmar, squats on the hard-packed earth while balancing a kilogram (2. 2 pounds) of chocolate-colored raw opium in each hand like a human weighs the scales.

“Each kilogramme is worth around $250”, said Tian Win Nang, wearing worn white flip-flops and a black T-shirt.

Tian Win Nang, the son of poppy farmers, appears to be just about to enter adulthood.

He said, “Chinese traders pay us in advance for the harvest,” while displaying three dinner-plate-sized opium mounds to Al Jazeera.

“We don’t know what happens after”, he says of the journey that will see the opium go “north to the labs” where it will be processed into morphine and eventually refined into heroin.

He continues, “We do this to survive.”

In southern Shan State, a single day of opium resin extraction [Fabio Polese/Al Jazeera]

The sun is high and the air is still in the poppy fields blanketing the hills in this part of southern Shan State in eastern Myanmar.

As hands work quickly to score green poppy pods, both young and old, before silently moving on to another plant, their faces are shielded by scarves and straw hats.

The wound that was inflicted on the pod gradually releases milky fluid. When it has dried to the consistency of gum, the same hands will scrape off the sticky substance, gather it together and leave it to dry in the sun until it reaches the toffee-like consistency of raw opium.

Many farmers in this area of Shan State, where drug shipments have been flogging along these mountain roads for decades, practice this daily. The routes lead to China, Laos, and Thailand, respectively.

Armed conflict between Myanmar’s military and ethnic armed organisations in these regions has fuelled opium farming and drug production for generations, but the trade has surged in step with the country’s intensifying civil war.

– A poppy field stretches across the hills of Pekon District, where cultivation continues despite the armed conflict that began in 2021.
In the southern Shan State of Myanmar, in the form of [Fabio Polese/Al Jazeera], a poppy field crosses the hills.

According to experts, there have long been alliances between senior Myanmar military officers, ethnic armed groups, local criminal organizations, and transnational syndicates that deal with the logistics, refining, and distribution of drugs.

“Drug trafficking in Myanmar has been facilitated by the military since the 1990s”, said Mark Farmaner, director of the London-based Advance Myanmar charity and an expert on Southeast Asia. He claimed that “many officers profit personally, and the institution as a whole reaps political benefits.”

Sam Gor, a sprawling network of rival Chinese triad gangs that are active in China, Myanmar, Laos, Thailand, Cambodia, and other regions, is one of the region’s most powerful syndicates.

Despite the 2021 arrest and extradition to Australia of Tse Chi Lop – a Canadian national of Chinese origin widely believed to be the leader of Sam Gor – the network remains largely intact.

The Sam Gor syndicate, which controlled between 40 and 70% of the Asia Pacific region’s wholesale methamphetamine market in 2018, is thought to have generated at least $ 8 billion in revenue in 2018, and possibly as much as $ 17.7 billion, according to the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).

– Local women harvest poppies under the midday sun in southern Shan State, one of Myanmar's main opium-producing regions.
In southern Shan State, one of Myanmar’s main opium-producing regions, local women cultivate poppies in the shade of the midday sun.

Despite the high-profile arrest of Tse Chi Lop, the regional drug trade is flourishing with more than 1.1 billion methamphetamine pills seized across Southeast Asia in 2023 – a historic record, according to UNODC.

We oppose the use, production, and distribution of narcotics.

The “Golden Triangle,” or “lawless territory encompassing the shared borders of Myanmar, Thailand, and Laos, is where the majority of the methamphetamine comes from laboratories hidden in the mountains of northern Shan State and other areas on Myanmar’s eastern borders, which have become the region’s epicenter of synthetic drug production.

But before the explosion in methamphetamine production, the Golden Triangle was infamous for its opium crops and the heroin it produced while under the rule of the self-styled drug lord Khun Sa – the undisputed drug kingpin of the 1980s and 1990s regional drug trade.

According to legend, Khun Sa commanded a personal army of about 15, 000 men, and that region became the world’s heroin producing hub. He died in Yangon in 2007 while being guarded by the same generals who had provided him with security for years after giving in to the military government of Myanmar in 1996.

002 – A farmer scores a poppy pod to collect its sap.
A farmer scores a poppy pod to collect its sap]Fabio Polese/Al Jazeera]

After Khun Sa’s passing, Australian lecturer Kelvin Rowley wrote in response to the United States Drug Enforcement Administration’s estimate that the US drug enforcement agency made up 70% of the heroin produced in the US.

According to Rowley, “The US government placed a $2 million bounty on] Khun Sa’s head, which is reportedly less than what he earned in a single month.”

Opium has now made a comeback in the Golden Triangle.

Myanmar became the world’s top producer of opium in 2022 after the Taliban outlawed poppy cultivation there.

By 2024, some 995 tonnes of raw opium had been produced in Myanmar, up 135 percent from the military takeover in 2021, according to UNODC estimates. The gross value of the opium and heroin trade in Myanmar last year was estimated to be between $589m and $1.57bn, according to UNODC.

According to UN reports, Myanmar’s civil war is now in its fourth year, and the volume of drug production is related to it.

People have traditionally relied on poppy cultivation as a means of survival because Myanmar’s economy has collapsed since the military coup in 2021, and options are narrowing.

The UN notes that opium poppy cultivation in Southeast Asia has long been linked to poverty, lack of government services, economic challenges and insecurity.

According to the UN, “Households and villages in Myanmar that cultivate poppy and the wider opium economy do so to supplement their income or because they lack other legitimate opportunities.” &lt, /p &gt, &lt, p &gt,

But now parts of Pekon, long a military stronghold and a key drug trafficking corridor, are under the control of the Karenni Nationalities Defence Force (KNDF) and other Karenni armed groups fighting the ruling military.

They claim to be interested in making changes.

We oppose the use, production, and distribution of narcotics, according to Maui, the KNDF’s deputy commander.

“When we capture Burmese soldiers, they’re full of meth”, Maui said.

They immediately tell us that it is distributed by their superiors to push them to the front lines, he said, “we ask where it comes from and they tell us without a doubt.”

We’ll pursue the opium as soon as the war is over. We want it to be used only for medical purposes”, he added.

017 – Karenni police officers search a motorbike at a checkpoint in Pekon District.
[Fabio Polese/Al Jazeera] Karenni police officers search a motorcycle at a checkpoint in Pekon, southern Shan State.

In the areas of Shan State, which they now control, Karenni police forces stop and search motorcycles and other vehicles on the roads.

“We are stopping cars and motorbikes we don’t recognise to search for drugs”, said Karenni police commander Win Ning Thun, standing at a checkpoint just outside a village in Pekon district.

Win Ning Thun, who uses the local name for methamphetamine pills, said, “We’re looking for yaba pills.”

This region was formerly under the control of the military and pro-junta militia, according to Win Ning Thun.

“Meth was moving freely under their supervision. He claimed that they reclaimed a portion of the profits from each shipment that transited.

I was supposed to earn a lot of money, I thought.

Deep in the forests surrounding Pekon, a small prison holds rows of detainees arrested by Karenni police.

“Everyone here has been detained for drug trafficking,” the statement read. Some people traveled to the Thai border with yaba pills. Others were internal couriers”, a Karenni police official told Al Jazeera.

He remarked, “These are the pills we confiscated just this past month,” pointing to a plastic bag full of small, inexpensive red yaba pills that he claimed represent a lucrative trade worth millions of dollars.

Anton Lee, one of the prisoners, had a calm, unassuming appearance and wore glasses.

“They stopped me at a checkpoint with 10, 000 pills”, Lee said.

023 – Young Karenni officers pose in front of the seized drugs.
[Fabio Polese/Al Jazeera] Young Kareni police officers posing in front of a table displaying the drugs seized during their checkpoint operations

They were traveling to the Thai border, I said. I was supposed to make a lot of money”, he said, offering no further details, only to say that the profit he hoped to earn would have fed his family for a year.

He is currently facing a lengthy prison sentence.

The military regime’s purchase of more sophisticated weapons and the rebel forces’ attempts to hold out and advance continue are just a few kilometers away from the prison.

The military’s air raids, drone strikes and artillery fire hammer schools, hospitals, homes and religious sites, turning entire villages into targets.

Yet some people in southern Shan State appear to be trying to stop the flow of drugs, even when they are under fire.

Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 1,199

On Saturday, June 7, 2018, this is how things are going.

Fighting

    Russian missile and drone strikes on the Ukrainian capital Kyiv and throughout the nation on Friday left at least six people dead.

  • In a missile and drone attack on Kyiv, the country’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, claimed three of the victims were emergency responders who were killed, and another 80 people were hurt nationwide.
  • In Chernihiv, in northern Ukraine, two people were killed, and Lutsk, in the city’s northwestern region, one more.
  • One of the largest numbers ever recorded in a single attack, according to the Ukrainian air force, which included 45 cruise and ballistic missiles.
  • In addition to striking at least three fuel reservoirs, the Ukrainian military announced overnight that it had launched a preemptive strike against the Engels and Dyagilevo airfields in Saratov and Ryazan, Russia.
  • Andrii Sybiha, the country’s foreign minister, claimed that Russia “reacted” to Kyiv’s audacious drone attack, which targeted Ukrainian civilians and infrastructure by attacking Ukrainian civilians and infrastructure.
  • In response to what it called Ukrainian “terrorist acts,” Russia’s Ministry of Defense claimed that its forces had carried out the strikes, which targeted military and military-related targets.
  • Russian replacement bombers, which were hit by Ukrainian drone strikes on Siberia, will take years, according to experts from the Western military aviation community.
  • A man was killed trying to launch a drone attack on a military installation in the southeast of Moscow, according to the Russian National Guard.
  • Russian air defense units intercepted and detonated 82 Ukrainian drones over Russian territory, including the Moscow region, according to the Russian Defense Ministry early on Saturday.
  • Six drones headed for Moscow were destroyed or downed, according to Moscow’s mayor, Sergei Sobyanin.
  • According to the Russian Defense Ministry, 174 Ukrainian drones were shot down over 13 different regions by air defenses overall. Over the Black Sea, three Ukrainian Neptune missiles were also shot down.
  • According to regional governor Vyacheslav Gladkov, a locomotive train was derailed in the Belgorod region of Russia after the track was destroyed.

Regional security

    After a meeting with US President Donald Trump, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said some US lawmakers have no idea how large Russia’s military rearmament campaign is. “They clearly have no idea what is happening there right now,” he said.

  • Merz claimed that President Trump’s “resounding no” to a question about US plans to leave NATO had given him some comfort.

diplomacy and politics

    Trump made furious remarks about the conflict in Ukraine and the park, which the Kremlin compared to a bitter dispute between young children.

  • Trump might have believed his own statements, according to Dmitry Peskov, a spokesman for the Kremlin. However, according to Peskov, the conflict in Ukraine was “existential.”
  • According to Peskov, “for us, it is an existential issue, an issue that affects our national interest, safety, our future, our children’s future, and our country,” he said to reporters.
  • Russia has requested mediation with Moscow and Washington regarding the use of US nuclear fuel stored at the Ukrainian Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, which is under Russian control.
  • Russian nuclear energy chief Alexei Likhachev said that Russia was willing to either use the fuel, which was provided by US company Westinghouse, or to completely remove it and return it to the US.

Sanctions

  • President Trump claimed that the US Senate is considering whether to impose sanctions on Russia.

Economy

  • The Russian central bank made a surprise cut in the country’s key interest rate by reducing it by a full percentage point, which it justified by pointing to a stronger rouble and a declining inflation pressure. The bank, which has been under pressure from business leaders and senior government officials, began cutting rates after it eased its balance since September 2022.

Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa Draw World Cup Warm-Ups

In preparation for the crucial 2026 World Cup qualifiers starting in September, African powerhouses Nigeria, Senegal, and South Africa all drew on Friday.

In the second half, Tolu Arokodare scored his first goal for Nigeria, who lost to Russia in Moscow.

Senegal drew 1-1 with the Republic of Ireland in Dublin after winning the FA Cup with Crystal Palace last month.

In northern Polokwane, South Africa had to settle for a 0-0 draw in order to maximize their home advantage over Tanzania.

In a crucial World Cup qualifier in September, South Africa and Nigeria finished second and third overall in the 2024 Africa Cup of Nations, while Senegal won the previous year’s edition.

Russia opened the scoring in the 27th minute with an own-goal from Semi Ajayi, who deflected a low cross past goalkeeper Maduka Okoye in Moscow.

Before a mistake by goalkeeper Matvey Safonov, who studied Gianluigi Donnarumma at Champions League winners Paris Saint-Germanin, gave Nigeria an equalizer, there were no more goals.

Safonov’s short pass to his teammate was intercepted by Belgium-based Arokodare, who scored the final goal after 71 minutes.

The Super Eagles won the Unity Cup in London last week by defeating Ghana 2-1 and Jamaica on penalties after drawing 2-2. This was their final warm-up game.

FIFA and UEFA have since 2022 forbid Russia from international competitions, including Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

After thrashing Zambia 5-0 in Moscow three months ago, this was their second friendly game against African opposition.

Senegal, however, lost the game in the Irish capital midway through the first half thanks to Kasey McAteer’s rebound into the net after his header struck the woodwork.

Sarr scored the winning goal in the 82nd minute after Caoimhin Kelleher’s weak clearance caused the 2022 Africa Cup of Nations to level.

In September, Senegal will visit the Democratic Republic of Congo to decide which nation will automatically qualify for the United States, Canada, and Mexico’s World Cup.

South Africa had the largest piece of the army in Polokwane, but they were unable to dismantle a well-organized Tanzanian defense.

When Relebohile Mofokeng’s audacious lob landed on top of the net in added time, South Africa was on pace to score.

Due to the national squad’s boycott of a game against Sudan in Morocco over unpaid allowances, Zambia were unable to play the game in Russia.

Understated Dawson shows England magic they’ve been missing

JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to play this video.

  • 26 Comments

either short or tall. Left or right-arm. Dan Mousley’s darts, off-spin, or leg-spin.

Between Liam Dawson’s 20th and 21st international caps, there were 11 men who bowled in spin for England.

Since Dawson’s last Test, Seam bowler Ollie Robinson has even slammed his arm against him with some offies in Adelaide’s miserable defeat.

However, Dawson gave an indication of what England had been lacking by taking the hosts’ 21-run victory over West Indies 4-20.

The 35-year-old told BBC Test Match Special, “I haven’t played international cricket in three and a half years.”

Even that sentence provides some information.

Dawson would be forgiven for thinking that his most recent appearance in the United Kingdom had been longer, even though it had been two years and six months since then.

When an England squad was named or lost a test, Dawson’s absence was a contentious subject.

County fans were initially offended by the fact that the leading English spinner in the County Championship in 2023 and 2024 were frequently overlooked, giving the county a culture-war status.

After excluding him from a Test squad, England’s managing director Rob Key famously declared that Dawson was not “a person who wants to travel around India as the 15th or 16th man.”

Dawson had since agreed that England would never make another call.

When questioned about whether he anticipated this global revival, he responded, “Probably not,” on Friday.

“For a while, I didn’t anticipate playing.”

Who I am playing for wants me to go out and enjoy my cricket. I’m very proud and pleased to return and do well.

Dawson has demonstrated his reliability when he is not playing international cricket, from Lord’s to Lahore, Dubai to Durban. He has won numerous franchise awards in the past, and he was named April’s Wisden Cricketer of the Year.

England finally realized that dependable was no longer a criticism but a strength as a new era under captain Harry Brook, who was in need of victories to stop an 18-month slide.

“I have played a lot of Daws,” said Brook. I had a few games with him in England.

“He’s a really good bowler,” he said. He also has a good body, which is advantageous.

Although it is significant that the Yorkshireman’s first T20 series came back, Brook’s decision to recall Dawson was significant.

JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to play this video.

Dawson, on the other hand, acknowledges that he doesn’t try to “flash” anything.

Dawson is a throwback, the old-fashioned magician who can deceive you with two hands and a pack of cards without the need for saws, fire, or flashing lights, while Tom Hartley and Shoaib Bashir have their high release points and Rehan Ahmed have their googly.

With that understated trick routine, he outwitted West Indies in Chester-le-Street.

Dawson scored in his second over after giving up only four runs in the opening.

He found the match’s sharpest turn by dropping 10 mph from his previous delivery with an extra loop. Johnson Charles hurriedly and unprepared before stranding him.

After two opening overs that only cost seven, Dawson rested and West Indies rebuilt.

The dangerous Sherfane Rutherford hit the left-hander as the left-hander hit long-on, and Dawson made a comeback.

Two balls later, Dawson’s next scalp had another pace drop and, crucially, a wider line, if that one was given credit.

Roston Chase made England once more a major favorite after giving Ben Duckett another catch from the deep.

Dawson was not hit the rope until his fourth over as boundaries drew nearer to him (young men Jacob Bethell, Will Jacks, and Matthew Potts were some of the punished).

Rovman Powell, a dangerous player, struck him four times before changing his ball once more.

Dawson had his best T20 international performances, Powell was bowled, and he moved quicker and flatter.

A left-arm spinner for England’s format, his 4-20, also, was their best. Key could not have asked for more.

The T20 World Cup that will take place next year serves as the backdrop for England’s victory. Before traveling to India and Sri Lanka, where spin is expected to be crucial, they have only 12 matches in this format.

When asked if he had any intention of making that World Cup squad, Dawson replied, “That’s not even come into my mind.”

“I’m just happy to be back playing this,” he said, “play one game at a time and enjoy every second.”

When England won the 50-over World Cup in 2019, Dawson didn’t play for the team.

related subjects

  • England Men’s Cricket Team
  • Cricket

Reforms Will Fail Without Restructuring, Agbakoba Tells Tinubu

A former president of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Olisa Agbakoba, believes the restructuring of the country is the key to reaping the dividends of the Federal Government’s reforms.

Agbakoba said this in a statement he issued tagged, “Two Years Assessment of President Tinubu: The Political Governance Fundamental”.

While commending President Bola Tinubu for his reforms, including the removal of fuel subsidy, the Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) says such moves cannot make headway without the right political structure.

“I believe the challenge with Tinubu’s economic reforms lies in their execution within a dysfunctional governance framework,” Agbakoba wrote.

“Fuel subsidy removal was intended to free up resources for productive investment, but if state and local governments lack capacity and autonomy to deploy them effectively, reform benefits remain unrealized,” Agbakoba wrote.

Two Years Assessment of President Tinubu: The Political Governance Fundamental.

Redirecting Nigeria’s Development Agenda Beyond Economics.

Introduction: The Misdiagnosis Problem

President Bola Tinubu was elected on May 29, 2023. His first term in office will end on May 28, 2027. We are now at midterm. Many midterm performance assessments have been conducted, most based on economic factors: inflation rates, employment, exchange rate stability, GDP growth figures, poverty levels, and similar metrics.

A midterm assessment is generally based on economic performance, but in the case of Nigeria, I am not sure this approach is appropriate, given the underlying structural problems. The country suffers from a flawed federal system where power is excessively centralized, creating inefficiencies and bottlenecks that economic policy cannot resolve.

Wrong diagnosis leads to wrong treatment that produces wrong results. Nigeria must confront its structural political deficit otherwise, economic interventions will continue to yield suboptimal results, regardless of their technical soundness. I will therefore depart from assessing President Tinubu’s midterm based on economic factors alone. Let me explain.

The Structural Reality: 90% Dysfunction

Everyone knows that Nigeria operates a deeply flawed, over-centralized political system that cannot be characterised as a federal system. The result is 774 local governments and 36 states (90% of Nigeria’s governance architecture) fully depend on the Federal Government. Local and state governments are primarily collection points for federal allocations rather than centres of productive governance. The result is that economic activity is artificially concentrated at the federal level while the natural drivers of bottom-up economic growth (local governments and states) remain dormant and excluded.

The administrative governance structure is a huge hindrance to economic development. The administrative system is not designed to enable optimal economic performance but rather to control and regulate economic policy by layers of bureaucratic interference. Private sector is stifled by lack of innovation and entrepreneurship. The bureaucracy is simply too unwieldy to deliver optimal results to drive investment and economic growth.

More critically, this centralized economic planning excludes majority of Nigerians from economic participation. Over 200 million Nigerians are trapped in an informal sector that is unproductive and disconnected from formal economic opportunities. The political system allows the extraction of enormous economic value by rent-seekers and plutocrats who position themselves at the centralized chokepoints of resource allocation.

The Economic Implications of Political Over-Centralization

Economies grow from the bottom up, not top down. This fundamental principle explains why countries with robust local governance structures consistently outperform highly centralized systems. When local governments cannot effectively manage local resources, local challenges, and local opportunities, the entire economic ecosystem suffers.

Consider the agricultural sector, which employs majority of our people. Agricultural productivity is inherently local—soil conditions, climate patterns, market access, and farming techniques vary significantly across Nigeria’s diverse geography. Yet agricultural policy is mostly formulated and implemented from Abuja, creating a one-size-fits-all approach to an inherently localized economic activity.

This centralized approach excludes smallholder farmers, local traders, and community-based enterprises from accessing credit, technology, and markets, trapping Nigeria’s largest economic sector in subsistence patterns while well-connected agribusiness interests capture the formal value chains.

International Perspectives: Learning from Successful Models

European economies offer instructive examples. Countries like Spain built significant portions of their economies around simple agricultural products—olive oil, grapes, and apples. The key difference lies not in the products themselves but in the governance structures that support their production and commercialization.

In Spain, regional governments have substantial autonomy over agricultural policy.  Local governments manage rural development programmes, and municipalities coordinate directly with farming communities. This multilevel governance approach allows for responsive, adaptive policies that reflect local conditions whilst contributing to national economic objectives.

Nigeria’s fixation on oil and gas reflects the centralized governance model where complex resources are managed from the centre. Meanwhile, simple crops that could drive broad-based economic growth—tomatoes, rice, yam, beans, cassava—remain underdeveloped precisely because the governance structures needed to support them are dysfunctional.

Tinubu’s Economic Reforms: Necessary but Insufficient

President Tinubu deserves credit for implementing long-overdue economic structural reforms. This is known as market correction. The removal of fuel subsidies and deregulation of the foreign exchange market were courageous decisions that previous administrations avoided due to political costs. These reforms are economically sound and necessary for long-term stability.

However, the critical question is not whether these reforms were correct—they were—but whether they can achieve their intended impact in the context of Nigeria’s governance structure. Economic reforms operate within political systems, and when those systems are fundamentally flawed, even the best economic policies produce suboptimal results.

Also, these federal-level reforms do not address the fundamental exclusion of majority of Nigerians from formal economic participation. Without complementary governance reforms that empower local institutions, these macroeconomic adjustments may worsen inequality by concentrating benefits among those already connected to formal economic networks.

The Missing Follow-Through

I believe the challenge with Tinubu’s economic reforms lies in their execution within a dysfunctional governance framework. Fuel subsidy removal was intended to free up resources for productive investment, but if state and local governments lack capacity and autonomy to deploy them effectively, reform benefits remain unrealized. Similarly, forex deregulation aimed to improve market efficiency will not happen if the regulatory environment remains centralized and unresponsive to local business conditions.  Efficiency gains cannot translate into broad-based economic growth.

The Foundation Problem: Building on Unstable Ground

Nigeria’s development challenge resembles building a 20-storey edifice on a cracked foundation. No matter how impressive the superstructure—federal economic policies, national development plans—the underlying cracked foundation will limit what can be achieved.

When local governments are not allowed to register births and deaths, and also not allowed to manage basic education, water, sanitation, health, when municipalities cannot issue driving licenses, the entire system operates below capacity. Local governments are the building blocks of economic development because they create the institutional environment within which businesses operate.

The Capacity Trap

Nigeria is in a capacity trap.  The federal government is overburdened with responsibilities it cannot effectively manage. Subnational governments are underpowered to handle functions they are best positioned to execute. This misalignment creates inefficiency at every level.

Federal ministries attempt to manage local issues from Abuja, creating bureaucratic delays and contextual mismatches. Meanwhile, local governments with intimate knowledge of community needs, lack resources and authority to address them. The result is governance that satisfies no one and develops nothing.

This administrative dysfunction manifests as excessive bureaucratic interference in private sector operations. Businesses face multiple layers of approvals, permits, and regulatory compliance that are designed more for control than facilitation. The unwieldy bureaucratic machinery creates bottlenecks that slow economic activity and discourage investment, while the distance between decision-makers and implementers ensures that even well-intentioned policies are poorly executed.

Without functional local institutions to provide basic services, regulate markets, enforce contracts, and facilitate access to credit and technology, informal enterprises remain trapped in survival mode rather than growing into productive businesses.

The Path Forward: Political Governance as Economic Strategy

Achieving Nigeria’s ambitious target of becoming a one trillion-dollar economy requires growth rates of 7-8% sustained. Such growth rates are impossible within the current governance structure because economic energy across all levels of society cannot be unleashed.

A revolution in political governance will admit a rush of new economic actors currently trapped, useless and unproductive in the informal sector. When local governments can effectively support local businesses, when communities can organize their own development initiatives, and when state governments can create enabling environments for regional economic clusters, Nigeria will witness an explosion of entrepreneurial energy that has been suppressed for decades.

Restructuring as Economic Imperative

The solution requires restructuring, rebalancing, or devolution. Regardless of terminology, the imperative is clear: Nigeria must transition from its current unitary system disguised as federalism to genuine multilevel governance where each tier has meaningful autonomy and responsibility.

Genuine multilevel governance is not merely a political preference—it is an economic necessity. Countries that achieve sustained high growth rates do so by mobilizing economic activity across multiple levels of governance. When only the federal level is truly functional, economic growth is artificially constrained by the capacity limitations of that single level.

More importantly, functional multilevel governance creates multiple entry points for economic participation, allowing entrepreneurs to access services and build businesses through local institutions rather than navigating federal bureaucracies in Abuja.

Implementation Framework: Executive Actions, Legislative Reforms and Administrative Restructuring

Implementing genuine multilevel governance will require constitutional amendment, but beyond constitutional amendment there are certain executive actions and administrative restructuring the President can undertake to redirect the country.

Executive Actions

The President can immediately transfer specific functions to state and local governments through executive orders. Issues like driver’s license, agriculture, microfinance banks, labor regulation, including minimum wage prescriptions, business incorporation, state taxes, trade within states, etc can be devolved administratively.

Legislative Reforms

The National Assembly can utilize Sections 4(1) and 315(1)(a) & (4) of the Constitution to replace the 1999 Constitution and prioritize devolution of powers and fiscal federalism. I recommend that the National Assembly create a new legislative list for Federal, State, and Local Government. Local Governments should have clearly defined legislative powers within the constitution.

Powers relating to infrastructure such as road construction and maintenance, street lighting, and waste management should be clearly assigned, along with primary healthcare, education, social welfare, business licensing, market regulation, tax collection (community tax, tenement rates), voter registration, conduct of local elections, and management of public facilities like cemeteries to local governments. Currently, State governments have largely usurped these functions and crippled the 774 local governments that are supposed to be a source of energy and economic activity. The same should apply to states.

Functions of state governments should be clearly set out by the constitution, as they are being usurped by the federal government. For example, is the Supreme Court suited to adjudicate chieftaincy, inheritance, and land matters from states? Should the Federal Government hold onto policing powers with one Inspector General of Police in Abuja overseeing policing of 200 million people? Should Federal Government control airports in the country, even when built by states?

The National Assembly must pass legislation that empowers subnational governments to take on more economic policy while providing the legal framework for intergovernmental cooperation. Revenue allocation formulae can be adjusted to match resources with responsibilities.

Administrative Restructuring

Federal ministries can be restructured to focus on policy formulation and standard-setting rather than direct implementation. This would free up resources and expertise to support subnational governments whilst reducing the federal government’s operational burden.

Most important, restructuring would transform the administrative governance approach from one of interference and control to one of facilitation and support. Rather than bureaucratic agencies, acting as gatekeepers that slow down economic activity, they should be enablers that help businesses navigate regulatory requirements efficiently.

Expected Outcomes: Multiplying Growth Centres

Proper political governance would create multiple centres of economic growth across Nigeria rather than concentrating activity in Abuja and a few commercial centres, unleashing the economic potential of over 200 million Nigerians currently marginalized in the informal sector and replacing rent-seeking extraction with broad-based economic participation.

Conclusion: The Imperative for Paradigm Shift

President Tinubu’s administration stands at a crossroads. The President must do a U-Turn and embrace fundamental governance restructure.

Without functional political governance at all levels, economic interventions will continue to produce disappointing results regardless of their technical merit. Nigeria’s challenge is not economic—it is political. The system of centralized economic planning has created a dual economy where a small elite captures enormous value through rent-seeking while over 200 million Nigerians remain trapped in unproductive informality.

A new scheme of political governance that recognizes that politics and economics is local will unleash a volcano of tremendous energy that will be unstoppable by anyone, to the ultimate benefit of economic development.

The wrong diagnosis has led to wrong results for too long. It is time for the right diagnosis and the right treatment: political governance reform is the foundation for sustainable economic transformation.

Dr. Olisa Agbakoba SAN

US Supreme Court grants DOGE access to sensitive Social Security data

In two cases involving access to government records and who should have access to them, the US Supreme Court has chosen to support President Donald Trump’s administration.

The six-member conservative majority overturned a lower court’s ruling on Friday that limited the types of data accessible by Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) through the Social Security Administration (SSA).

The majority also decided that DOGE was not required to provide documents under the government transparency law known as the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Sonia Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson, and Elena Kagan, the three left-leaning justices on the Supreme Court, disagreed with the majority’s decision in both cases.

Trump’s campaign focused on reimagining the federal government and reducing bureaucratic “bloat” in a key way.

DOGE was created on November 13 to “dismantle government bureaucracy, reduce excessive regulations, reduce wasteful expenditures, and restructure Federal Agencies,” according to the release date.

At first, it was unclear whether DOGE would work with the executive branch, whether it would be a new department, a new department, or a private organization.

However, when Trump took the oath of office on January 20, he announced that DOGE, an initiative that was started by former president Barack Obama, would replace the existing US Digital Service.

Since then, the government efficiency panel has initiated extensive federal government reform, implementing widespread layoffs, and attempting to close organizations like the US Agency for International Development (USAID).

Although many of the claims were refuted or questioned by journalists and experts, it also promoted savings it had made or fraud it had allegedly exposed.

In addition, DOGE’s extensive reforms of the federal government caused it to face criticism and concern, particularly as it sought greater control over sensitive data and systems.

Elon Musk, a billionaire and tech entrepreneur who had been a prominent supporter of Trump’s re-election campaign, led DOGE up until last week. However, following the end of the billionaire’s term as a “special government employee” in the White House, Musk and Trump have a public disagreement.

Due to this conflict, DOGE’s future is uncertain.

Social Security data can be accessed.

In order to combat waste, fraud, and abuse, DOGE’s controversial initiatives have included a push to access Social Security data.

The president and Musk made fabricated claims that millions of people with addresses containing people who are at least 150 years old at the start of Trump’s second term were receiving Social Security benefits. However, fact-checkers quickly refuted that assertion.

Instead, they pointed out that a code has been put in place by the Social Security Administration to stop payments for those who are deemed to be at least 115 years old.

They also pointed out that the Trump administration’s confusion may be caused by COBOL’s programming language flagging incomplete birthdates in the Social Security system with birthdates dating back 150 years. A 2024 inspector general report found that less than 1% of Social Security payments were made erroneously.

Musk called for the Social Security Administration to be eliminated, while Trump officials also criticized it.

Due to the sensitive nature of such information, US District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander in March blocked DOGE from having unrestricted access to Social Security data.

Social Security numbers, for instance, are crucial for establishing a person’s identity in the US, and their release could compromise privacy.

According to Lipton Hollander, DOGE “never identified or articulated even a single reason” for the DOGE Team’s need for unrestricted access to SSA’s entire record systems. She questioned why DOGE didn’t try to be “more tailored.”

She wrote in her decision that the government simply reiterated its call to modernize the system and find fraud. Its method of doing so translates to using a sledgehammer to fly.

However, the judge’s ruling did allow DOGE to view anonymized data without providing any personally identifying information.

However, the Trump administration filed an appeal with the Supreme Court, alleging that Judge Lipton Hollander had overstepped her bounds by preventing DOGE’s access.

In an unsigned decision, the Supreme Court upheld Lipton Hollander’s temporary data restrictions on Friday.

However, Justice Brown Jackson wrote a sour dissent in the Supreme Court, claiming that the court was willing to uphold rules to support a president who was not willing to let legal disputes arise in lower courts.

This Court “puts on its emergency-responder gear, rushes to the scene, and uses its equitable power to fan the flames rather than to extinguish them,” Brown Jackson wrote.

She claimed that if DOGE were temporarily barred from accessing Social Security data, the Trump administration had not established that any “irreparable harm” would result.

However, she claimed that the court was “jettisoning careful judicial decision-making and seriously risking the privacy of millions of Americans” by granting the Trump administration’s emergency petition.

Do transparency laws apply to DOGE?

According to federal transparency laws, the second Supreme Court decision from Friday involved DOGE itself.

The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a government watchdog organization, filed the lawsuit as part of it.

It argued that DOGE’s broad powers suggested that it should be subject to FOIA-style laws, just like any other executive agency. CREW claimed, however, that DOGE’s structures had been shielded from outside inquiries by the ambiguity surrounding them.

The lack of clarity regarding DOGE’s authority, according to CREW, raises an open question in a statement despite the information that is readily available to the public.

The organization wanted DOGE to be required to provide details about how it operates.

The Supreme Court halted the lower court’s decision on Friday (PDF), after a US district judge had sided with CREW’s request for records in April (PDF). The court of appeals received the case’s request for a narrowing of the April order.

The conservative majority of the Supreme Court ruled that “any inquiry into whether an entity is an agency for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act cannot turn on the entity’s capacity to persuade.”