Archive November 10, 2025

Caroline Flack’s heartbreaking response to ‘unhinged’ body cam footage from night of row

In the new Disney+ documentary, Caroline Flack’s friend Mollie said: “Throughout this whole thing, Caroline’s worst nightmare was that the body cam footage was going to be released”

Caroline Flack’s “nightmare” fear was that police body cam footage from the night of her fight with Lewis would be shown in court where she appeared “half naked and unhinged”.

On the night of December 12, 2019, Caroline and boyfriend Lewis Burton had both been on night’s out separately enjoying some drinks.

Once they got home they went to bed laughing and joking but after Lewis fell asleep his phone went and it was messages from another woman.

The pair then got into a row and Caroline hit Lewis with a phone before he called 999.

Very sadly, Caroline also told best friend Mollie Grosberg at that moment she felt her boyfriend was “gone” and her career could also be over and so she deliberately self-harmed before the police arrived. This meant there was blood in the room and on their bed.

Police video footage picks up on some of this and the Crime Prosecution Service intended to use the footage in court as evidence, where Caroline would have been facing an assault charge.

In the new Disney+ documentary, friend Mollie said: “Throughout this whole thing, Caroline’s worst nightmare was that the body cam footage was going to be released. It wasn’t because she was scared of what she’d done to Lewis. She was scared because she looks completely and utterly unhinged in this body cam footage.”

Her Lawyer Paul Morris also agrees the body cam footage was a big issue for Caroline.

He said: “This was a snapshot into her private life at its worst. She was covered in blood. She was half naked. She was in a really dark place.”

And her mum Christine said: “It showed her mental health, if you like. She knew it wasn’t going to make her guilty of abuse, but it was going to show her to the outside world how she sometimes felt.”

Her agent Louisa Booth becomes tearful when she thinks about it. Looking back, Louise said: “She kept saying to me, I just can’t have people see the body cam footage. I can’t have my family know that that’s out there. And I just think she was not thinking of herself. I think she’s thinking of other people actually.”

Caroline was clinging to the idea the court case would still be dropped. But she found out it would definitely go ahead on Feb 13.

She messaged her friend: “They won’t drop the case. My life is over. The bodycam. My head is throbbing.”

Her Lawyer Paul Morris said: “This case was prosecuted because, in my view, it would have been more difficult to stop the snowball rolling than it would be to just let it continue. Saving face, I think adequately describes the stance that I think was taken.”

Former head of CPS crown prosecutor Nazir Afzal studies the police documents gathered by Christine and is in no doubt she should only have received a caution.

He tells the documentary: “Having looked at all your evidence I can’t understand why they rushed the judgement. This was a case where there is no previous history, no coercive behaviour. Mr Burton never wanted this case and was adamant. This was a one off occasion where she lost her temper and did what she did, which she accepts. For all of those reasons, the very worst thing that should have happened was a caution.”

He added: “I have prosecuted thousands of these cases, none of this makes sense. Almost immediately in the cold light of day, prosecutors would have formed a view that this case is going nowhere and they should have stopped the case. They are required to stop the case where there is insufficient evidence. I can’t think of any reason to proceed, unless they were scared of what the media were going to say about them. It is not about losing face, this is about justice. My take on it is Caroline would still be with us if certain decisions weren’t taken in that month or two.”

Caroline went into a meltdown after receiving the news, trashing her flat and friends including Mollie rushed there and had to call for an ambulance, but she eventually calmed down and managed to go to sleep.

However she then urged friends to go home the next morning as her sister would be coming to the flat later on February 15.

But her sister Jody arrived at a locked door and the sounds of Caroline’s dog barking. Once inside she learned that Caroline had died.

Caroline’s mum Christine ends the documentary by saying: “I want to stress to anyone feeling that bad, that scared and tired of life, there’s always a way forward.

“You know, you’re not strange. If you have depression, you’re not strange. If you’ve got mental health problems, you’re normal. That’s life, and it’s just helping deal with that and making you feel okay about it, because you know, you should just feel okay about it.”

*Both episodes of Caroline Flack: Search For The Truth premiere on Disney+ today.

In the UK and Ireland, Samaritans can be contacted on freephone 116 123, or email jo@samaritans.org or jo@samaritans.ie. Refuge is the largest domestic abuse organisation in the UK and can be Contacted free 24/7 on 0808 2000 247

Article continues below

.

READ MORE: Caroline Flack documentary ‘Search for the Truth’ release date and how to watch

Hansen returns to Ireland squad but Osborne out

Getty Images

British and Irish Lion Mack Hansen has been recalled to the Ireland squad for the side’s remaining autumn Tests, but Jamie Osborne will miss out with a shoulder injury.

Ireland are back in action against Australia on Saturday in Dublin (20:10 GMT) before taking on world champions South Africa at Aviva Stadium on Saturday, 22 November (17:40 GMT).

Connacht’s Hansen has rejoined the squad despite initially being considered out for the autumn series because of the foot injury he picked up in his side’s United Rugby Championship loss to the Bulls last month.

Hansen has never started at full-back for Ireland, although his past four Connacht appearances have been in the position, but with usual starter Hugo Keenan also out the former Brumbies player gives head coach Andy Farrell another option in his back three.

Osborne wore the 15 jersey against New Zealand and Japan to start the month but was replaced by Jimmy O’Brien in the second half of the 41-10 win over the latter on Saturday and Farrell said afterwards that his shoulder injury did not “look good”.

Hansen’s club-mate Darragh Murray has also been called into the squad with the second row capped during the summer tour to Georgia and Portugal.

Leinster pair Garry Ringrose and Josh van der Flier remain doubts for this weekend’s game against the Wallabies with hamstring strains and their progress will be monitored before the team is announced on Thursday.

Related topics

  • Irish Rugby
  • Rugby Union

Boots shoppers ‘always get compliments’ on £105 perfume cut to £49

The better-than-half-price deal is part of the beauty store’s huge Black Friday selection

When it comes to perfumes, few brands are as widely recognised as Yves Saint Laurent. Now, shoppers at Boots can get their hands on a massively reduced bottle of one of the designer fragrances as part of the Black Friday sale.

The Yves Saint Laurent Black Opium Eau de Parfum Over Red has been cut in price and, at the time of writing, was one of the best deals in terms of discount on the Boots website. Originally, the 50ml perfume bottle should cost shoppers £105, but the Black Friday deal cuts that down by more than half to £49, saving shoppers a huge £56.

The Boots website described the perfume as being “captivating, unparalleled in provocation, deliberatively seductive”. It uses notes of black coffee, orange blossom and vanilla from the original YSL Black Opium with a twist of cherry accord and jasmine flower.

READ MORE: Boots reduces £70 ‘Luxury Beauty Bauble’ filled with high-end brands to £20

READ MORE: Christmas gift guide 2025: Presents for her, him and kids from £5

There are similar perfumes on offer during Black Friday at other stores. For example, Superdrug has a range of deals, including the Calvin Klein Euphoria for Her (was £82, now £31 for 100ml), and The Perfume Shop has slashed the price of Vera Wang’s popular Princess scent (was £66, now £19.99 for 100ml).

However, dozens of shoppers were pleased with the Boots deal and have been praising the perfume for years. One said: “I always get compliments whilst wearing it.” Another wrote: “Amazing, luxurious and smells divine! This scent is my all-time favourite.”

A third put in their review: “I have fallen in love hard and fast with this perfume. I’ve always been a fan of the original YSL Black Opium and this takes the classic scent to a new level. On my initial wear I thought the cherry in the scent faded quickly on my skin, but hours later a co-worker asked me if I was wearing a new, fruity perfume. I was surprised he could still smell it!”

Someone else said: “This scent is similar to the regular black opium but the cherry adds a fun twist. I get compliments on it all the time.” A fifth shopper suggested: “This is a perfect perfume for winter.”

However, a few shoppers did share some issues they had, with one shopper putting online that the scent was “overpowering and instantly gave [them] a headache”. Someone else warned that they “can’t smell it anymore after 10 minutes”, and a third said: “This reminds me of a cough medicine. If you like this, you will probably love this perfume.”.

Article continues below

However, many people were praising the perfume and claiming that its scent reminded them of an even more expensive one, which is priced at £290 for the 50ml version in Boots. One claimed: “Compared to Tom Ford Lost Cherry, it is slightly sweeter and lasts way longer!”

Why VAR gets involved in some penalties but not others

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

  • 216 Comments

It was a weekend of video assistant referee penalty decisions in the Premier League, with spot-kicks awarded, cancelled and ignored.

VAR is always going to face accusations of being inconsistent, because its role is not to create consistency of decision-making but judge individual incidents based upon the on-field call.

So it can be helpful to understand what VAR is looking for and why similar situations can have opposing outcomes.

From the penalty awarded to Manchester City against Liverpool, to Dan Burn’s challenges on Dango Ouattara and Brighton’s overturned spot-kick at Crystal Palace, we saw a whole range.

Why a small touch on Doku was enough

Jeremy Doku skipped into the penalty area in the ninth minute and stumbled as he looked to move the ball past Liverpool goalkeeper Giorgi Mamardashvili.

Referee Chris Kavanagh waved for play to continue, but was sent to the monitor for a penalty review by VAR Michael Oliver. It was awarded, with Mamardashvili making a save from Erling Haaland.

When sliding, Mamardashvili only made a small amount of contact on Doku. We are often told this is not enough for a VAR penalty, so why was this any different from what we have seen before?

One of the key considerations for VAR is how the attacker goes to ground, which the Premier League refers to as “contact with consequence”. Does the contact from the challenge fit the way a player has gone down or has it been embellished?

That Doku attempted to stay on his feet, and was trying to balance to shoot rather than look for a penalty, gives an indication to the VAR that the contact had a natural impact on the forward’s ability to continue with the ball.

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Why Ouattara did not get a penalty

If Doku gets a penalty, what is the difference with Burn’s challenge on Ouattara, which was not given and meant the Brentford player was booked for a dive?

It comes back to “contact with consequence” and guidance which asks the VAR to consider the motivations of the attacker and how they go to ground.

Doku went down in a way which would be expected for the contact, but Ouattaro threw himself theatrically to the floor. That counts against an attacker on a VAR review.

We can look at a penalty Arsenal were given against Leeds by the on-field referee in August when Max Dowman had his foot touched by Anton Stach.

The Premier League’s key match incidents (KMI) panel voted 3-2 that this should not have been a spot-kick, noting: “There is slight contact made by Stach on the toe of Dowman’s foot, with the significance and impact of the contact debated by the panel. The panel felt that the referee’s call of a penalty was incorrect (but) unanimously agreed that VAR was correct not to intervene.”

The wording is part of the reason fans cannot get fully on board with VAR. So was the Stach decision an error? Yes, but not enough to be corrected.

In basic terms, Ouattara and Dowman are very similar, so the KMI panel is unlikely to feel it was a mistake not to give the penalty on the field.

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

When can VAR review a yellow card?

We often hear that yellow cards cannot be reviewed by VAR, but there are a handful of exceptions.

On Sunday Brighton’s Georginio Rutter was correctly booked for simulation after initiating contact with Palace’s Jaydee Canvot.

There was no challenge by the Palace player, and Rutter’s only intention was to deceive the referee and win the spot-kick, which was overturned on review.

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Fulham’s Josh King suffered the same fate at Aston Villa earlier this season. The KMI panel supported no penalty 3-2 on field, and 5-0 on the VAR call.

From next season, second yellow cards are set to be reviewable. That creates a two-tier situation whereby a player could get a caution for simulation revoked if it is their second booking, but not their first.

There are other situations when a yellow card can be rescinded or shown.

If a player is booked when giving away a penalty but the spot-kick is cancelled, that yellow can be scrapped. So if the penalty Burn conceded had been cancelled, he would have stayed on.

Related topics

  • Premier League
  • Football

More on this story

    • 17 October
  • Quiz logo

Maura Higgins reveals the secret to getting her amazing figure after Botox admission

Maura Higgins has said she ‘wants to be in the best shape of her life’ next year as she dropped big hints about what her next career move could be

Maura Higgins has shared the secret behind her amazing figure as she took part in an Instagram Q&A with fans over the weekend.

The 34-year-old former Love Island star has come a long way since her days as a Formula 1 grid girl. She is now a model, TV presenter and aspiring actress who recently made her film debut in the 2025 Irish comedy film The Spin that has reportedly got Hollywood film bosses talking.

Though she’s always had a good figure, Maura wasn’t shy about telling fans how she sustains it as she posed for her latest snaps in a festive-inspired red and white trim bikini while on holiday in Marrakesh.

Asked how what her ‘ab routine’ was, Maura replied: “I’ve honestly been working my (tiny) ass off in the gym the last few months!! It’s not been easy but this is the best I’ve felt in such a long time!!”

READ MORE: Olivia Attwood and ‘nemesis’ Maura Higgins’ awkward clash as they wear identical dresses to awards

Sharing what workouts she does, Maura continued: “I do a lot of power yoga & pilates!” Dropping a huge hint of what is next for her career wise, she added: “Next year is super super exciting for me so I want to be in the best shape of my life.”

In another question from fans, Maura finally admitted that she does get Botox – despite previously denying having the cosmetic tweakment.

Asked ‘Will you ever talk about skin treatments you have? You are glowing! Xx.’, Maura replied: “When I first got perioral dermatitis I stop getting facials altogether, now it’s just skincare and of course with the help of Botox from the best @drroshoffical.”

Back in 2020, Maura claimed she hadn’t had Botox, telling OK! magazine: “I probably will get Botox some day, but I’m afraid to right now. I don’t want to change myself. I did think about having a boob job a long time ago, but that went out the window.”

She also spoke about wanting a curvier bottom after complaining her bottom was “flat”. She said at the time: “I would like a bigger bum, but I’m never going to have that so there’s no point talking about it. I have a flat bum, but I can’t have everything.”

In 2022, she even joked how she gets compared to Michael Jackson because of her ‘perfect nose’. Speaking during a TV appearance on Shopping With Keith Lemon, Maura shared: “I get trolled. The main thing I get is that I look like Michael Jackson.”

An incredulous Keith replied: “Well you’re the fittest Michael Jackson I’ve ever seen” to which Maura said: “I think it’s because people think I’ve had a nose job. I will admit my nose is very perfect. People would pay a lot of money to have my nose.”

Before she impressed fans with her stint on I’m A Celebrity last year, one cosmetic surgery expert told the Mirror he thought Maura may have had facial contouring on her cheeks and jawline to add definition.

But Maura – who recently won praise for showing fans her grey hairs after revealing she went grey at 18 – has hit back at the speculation telling MailOnline: “I got my lips done three months after coming out of Love Island and lip fillers lasts five to six months. I haven’t had anything done since then, I just let it dissolve.

Article continues below

“But people still assume I’ve had my lips done, Botox, people are even saying I’ve had my nose done when I’ve not actually had any work.

“I had braces on for a long time and since my teeth have moved, they’ve actually pushed my lips out slightly and I feel like I don’t need it. If I were to get my lips down now with my straight teeth, it just wouldn’t be a good look.”

READ MORE: ‘Ninja’s Crispi airfryer transformed my everyday meals and now it’s £40 off for Black Friday’