Archive November 5, 2025

San Siro demolition – can futuristic rebuild help Milan clubs rival English giants?

Getty Images
  • 540 Comments

AC Milan and Inter have finalised the purchase of their San Siro stadium and confirmed plans to demolish and replace it with a 71,500-capacity arena.

The demolition of San Siro, widely regarded as one of the world’s most prestigious football stadiums, has been mooted for years as its condition has deteriorated over time.

Now the two clubs, who have shared the stadium since 1947, have paid €197m (£173m) to the city council to take control of the structure and surrounding land, which they say is a sign of “shared ambition for long-term success”.

The new stadium will have a capacity of roughly 4,000 fewer seats than the current San Siro and will be designed by firms operated by Sir Norman Foster and David Manica, who played crucial roles in the planning of the new Wembley Stadium.

Why do Milan and Inter want a new stadium?

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

“For us, this a historic moment,” says Milan chairman Paolo Scaroni. “It has taken five or six years to reach this point and we had great support from our owners RedBird.

“San Siro has been excluded by Uefa as a stadium for Euro 2032 – it simply doesn’t have all the facilities that are needed for modern football. We badly need a new stadium.

“We have always had a good relationship with Inter, so it makes sense to continue sharing the new stadium and split the costs of building and running it.”

Though designs will only be published in the first half of 2026 and no completion date has been set, the purchase of the stadium is a crucial step as both clubs aim to return to past glories.

In the late 1990s and early 2000s, Serie A was the world’s pre-eminent football league. Its clubs spent the most money, bought the best players and attracted the attention of fans around the globe.

But over the past 20 years, the division has undergone a steady decline. Its clubs’ performances have dwindled at the elite European level, average attendances at stadiums have dropped significantly and even its most illustrious teams are typically spending less each summer than lower and mid-table Premier League teams.

The long-term drop-off can be tracked by glancing at Milan and Inter’s results in the Uefa Champions League since it was rebranded in 1992.

But what has been behind those diminishing results?

Finance has played a key role. There have been 12 changes of prime minister in Italy since 2000 and its economy has endured regular turmoil.

Milan and Inter have also undergone a series of destabilising ownership changes, both passing from Italian businessmen to Chinese ownership before being bought by respective American investment vehicles in the past few years.

“The political and financial crises that have hit Italy have weakened the country’s business fabric and the ownership structures that made Serie A prestigious and successful,” says Marco Bellinoza, business journalist at Il Sole 24 Ore.

“Economic and political weakness has impeded the growth of top-level football. Only with the transition to the current US ownership is the transformation from non-self-sufficient sports clubs to fully-fledged businesses taking place.”

“Serie A is €4bn (£3.5bn) behind the Premier League in terms of total cumulative revenue for its clubs and that is principally down to the broadcast contracts,” explains Dan Plumley, sport finance professor at Sheffield Hallam University.

“That’s a gap you can’t really catch up, so they’ve got to look to grow revenue in other ways.”

According to Uefa, Milan and Inter ranked 13th and 14th respectively for revenue earned by European clubs in 2024. Each brought in just over £350m, around half as much as the likes of Manchester City and Manchester United, and only a few tens of million more than Newcastle, Aston Villa and West Ham.

In the 2020s so far, 12 Premier League clubs have spent more on transfers than Milan and 14 have spent more than Inter.

What does demolishing San Siro mean for legacy?

Il Duomo might be Milan’s most popular tourist attraction but San Siro is a football cathedral in its own right, steeped in a century of history having played host to some of the most celebrated players of all-time.

Previous reports of its demise have been met with anguish from players and fans around the world.

“Playing at San Siro is full of challenge, emotion and history”, says Andriy Shevchenko, who won the Ballon d’Or during the seven years he played for Milan.

“My relationship with San Siro started when I was 14 and played a youth tournament there with Dynamo Kyiv. As soon as I walked in there I had a special feeling.

“I love San Siro. The fans make the stadium so special. But I think this is a very important step for the future of Milan and Italian football.

“The design is going to be very important because if you respect the tradition and legacy of San Siro and the legends who played there to the maximum, you’re not going to lose it. You can do something really positive because nothing lasts forever.”

An aerial view of San Siro in Milan, ItalyGetty Images

Can a new stadium really be their saviour?

Only nine football stadium infrastructure and renovation projects have been undertaken in Italy in the past decade, according to data from PwC, compared to 24 in the Premier League, 19 in the German Bundesliga, 15 in Spain’s La Liga and 10 in French Ligue 1.

That has left Italy with outdated matchday facilities across the country and average attendances have dwindled to 81%, far less than the Premier League’s 99%.

Milan is not just a European fashion capital but the financial and industrial fulcrum of Italy, with most major banks and companies headquartered in the city.

Scaroni estimates that the project will cost around €1.5bn (£1.3bn) and says roughly one in seven tickets in the stadium will be for corporate hospitality, while there will be a greater focus on hosting non-football events.

“Building a new stadium is about what they can do with that stadium outside of the traditional match day – partnership deals with other sports, putting on concerts, turning the stadium into a 365-day-a-year venue,” Plumley says.

Related topics

  • Italian Serie A
  • Inter Milan
  • UEFA Champions League
  • Football
  • AC Milan

Demolition of iconic San Siro stadium confirmed

Getty Images
  • 19 Comments

AC Milan and Inter have finalised the purchase of their San Siro stadium and confirmed plans to demolish and replace it with a 71,500-capacity arena.

The demolition of San Siro, widely regarded as one of the world’s most prestigious football stadiums, has been mooted for years as its condition has deteriorated over time.

Now the two clubs, who have shared the stadium since 1947, have paid €197m (£173m) to the city council to take control of the structure and surrounding land, which they say is a sign of “shared ambition for long-term success”.

The new stadium will have a capacity of roughly 4,000 fewer seats than the current San Siro and will be designed by firms operated by Sir Norman Foster and David Manica, who played crucial roles in the planning of the new Wembley Stadium.

Why do Milan and Inter want a new stadium?

“For us, this a historic moment,” says Milan chairman Paolo Scaroni. “It has taken five or six years to reach this point and we had great support from our owners RedBird.

“San Siro has been excluded by Uefa as a stadium for Euro 2032 – it simply doesn’t have all the facilities that are needed for modern football. We badly need a new stadium.

“We have always had a good relationship with Inter, so it makes sense to continue sharing the new stadium and split the costs of building and running it.”

Though designs will only be published in the first half of 2026 and no completion date has been set, the purchase of the stadium is a crucial step as both clubs aim to return to past glories.

In the late 1990s and early 2000s, Serie A was the world’s pre-eminent football league. Its clubs spent the most money, bought the best players and attracted the attention of fans around the globe.

But over the past 20 years, the division has undergone a steady decline. Its clubs’ performances have dwindled at the elite European level, average attendances at stadiums have dropped significantly and even its most illustrious teams are typically spending less each summer than lower and mid-table Premier League teams.

The long-term drop-off can be tracked by glancing at Milan and Inter’s results in the Uefa Champions League since it was rebranded in 1992.

But what has been behind those diminishing results?

Finance has played a key role. There have been 12 changes of prime minister in Italy since 2000 and its economy has endured regular turmoil.

Milan and Inter have also undergone a series of destabilising ownership changes, both passing from Italian businessmen to Chinese ownership before being bought by respective American investment vehicles in the past few years.

“The political and financial crises that have hit Italy have weakened the country’s business fabric and the ownership structures that made Serie A prestigious and successful,” says Marco Bellinoza, business journalist at Il Sole 24 Ore.

“Economic and political weakness has impeded the growth of top-level football. Only with the transition to the current US ownership is the transformation from non-self-sufficient sports clubs to fully-fledged businesses taking place.”

“Serie A is €4bn (£3.5bn) behind the Premier League in terms of total cumulative revenue for its clubs and that is principally down to the broadcast contracts,” explains Dan Plumley, sport finance professor at Sheffield Hallam University.

“That’s a gap you can’t really catch up, so they’ve got to look to grow revenue in other ways.”

According to Uefa, Milan and Inter ranked 13th and 14th respectively for revenue earned by European clubs in 2024. Each brought in just over £350m, around half as much as the likes of Manchester City and Manchester United, and only a few tens of million more than Newcastle, Aston Villa and West Ham.

In the 2020s so far, 12 Premier League clubs have spent more on transfers than Milan and 14 have spent more than Inter.

What does demolishing San Siro mean for legacy?

Il Duomo might be Milan’s most popular tourist attraction but San Siro is a football cathedral in its own right, steeped in a century of history having played host to some of the most celebrated players of all-time.

Previous reports of its demise have been met with anguish from players and fans around the world.

“Playing at San Siro is full of challenge, emotion and history”, says Andriy Shevchenko, who won the Ballon d’Or during the seven years he played for Milan.

“My relationship with San Siro started when I was 14 and played a youth tournament there with Dynamo Kyiv. As soon as I walked in there I had a special feeling.

“I love San Siro. The fans make the stadium so special. But I think this is a very important step for the future of Milan and Italian football.

An aerial view of San Siro in Milan, ItalyGetty Images

Can a new stadium really be their saviour?

Only nine football stadium infrastructure and renovation projects have been undertaken in Italy in the past decade, according to data from PwC, compared to 24 in the Premier League, 19 in the German Bundesliga, 15 in Spain’s La Liga and 10 in French Ligue 1.

That has left Italy with outdated matchday facilities across the country and average attendances have dwindled to 81%, far less than the Premier League’s 97%.

Milan is not just a European fashion capital but the financial and industrial fulcrum of Italy, with most major banks and companies headquartered in the city.

Scaroni estimates that the project will cost around €1.5bn (£1.3bn) and says roughly one in seven tickets in the stadium will be for corporate hospitality, while there will be a greater focus on hosting non-football events.

“Building a new stadium is about what they can do with that stadium outside of the traditional match day – partnership deals with other sports, putting on concerts, turning the stadium into a 365-day-a-year venue,” Plumley says.

Related topics

  • Italian Serie A
  • Inter Milan
  • UEFA Champions League
  • Football
  • AC Milan

Selling Sunset’s Nicole defends ‘below the belt’ Chrishell jab in heated reunion

When she brutally addressed Chrishell Stause’s deceased parents, the Selling Sunset agent shocked her co-stars.

Nicole Young, who is selling Sunset, has doubled down on the statement that caused a flurry in season nine.

At Amanza Smith’s “girlsgiving” dinner party, the 39-year-old took a swipe at Chrishell Stause’s late parents, which left her co-stars baffled.

Nicole was upset when she learned about her alleged drug use during the meal.

She remarked to Chrishell, “Honey, you’re confusing me with your parents, okay. You appear to have a drug obsession.

Has Nicole reacted to the brutal remark made by the other O Group agents after being forced to leave dinner?

In the series reunion, now streaming on Netflix, Nicole makes a brief appearance and fights her corner.

When asked why she made the remark, Nicole responded to host Tan France, “Someone had attacked me about and accused me of]using drugs once more.” And I was demonstrating that projection has been proven. It’s enough, enough is enough.

The reality star then went on to say, “Dared parents, it’s been said repeatedly.” I want to make that very clear because it’s just one word difference, but it’s a very, very big difference from saying “dead parents””.

The phrase “dead parents” wouldn’t have changed because Nicole is aware that Chrishell’s parents are deceased, Amanza countered.

“I find that using that language to hit below the belt repulses me. When you realize that the person’s parents are no longer with us, there is no difference between saying “parents” and “dead parents,” she said.

“You could just as easily have just said it, because we all know,” you said.

The crew then banded together to demand an apology from Nicole, with presenter Tan repeatedly asking her if she thinks her statement is appropriate.

Nicole continued, “I was making it clear that I have no connection to this obsession and this circumstance.”

You can’t control how you hurt someone, says Sandra Vergara, a newcomer. That’s it, you just clean your side of the street. You apologize.

Nicole asked Chrishell directly about the impact of the jab, but she was noticeably quiet throughout the conversation.

Chrishell continued, “I’m glad you haven’t experienced a loss where you would realize that it’s just territory you don’t charter into.”

So I’m relieved that you didn’t actually receive it. Because I apprehensive about giving that club to anyone, and I hate to share it with them.

With Sky, you can use Netflix for nothing.

We may link to affiliate links in this article, but we will make money off of any purchases we make. more information
Content Image

from £15

Get the deal here.

With its new Sky Stream TV bundles, including the £15 Essential TV plan, Sky is offering a free Netflix subscription.

Nicole did not formally apologize despite the back-and-forth with her co-stars.

Tan gave her the floor once more just before she left.

However, Nicole apologized in a shaky manner, saying, “Well, I would like to let you know, and apologise for the intent that was taken from it.

Nicole’s lack of “accountability” clearly irritated the Netflix cast. Despite popular belief, Jason and Brett later confirmed that she wasn’t fired as a result of the comment.

Continue reading the article.

Selling Sunset’s Nicole defends ‘below the belt’ Chrishell jab in heated reunion

When she brutally addressed Chrishell Stause’s deceased parents, the Selling Sunset agent shocked her co-stars.

Nicole Young, who is selling Sunset, has doubled down on the statement that caused a flurry in season nine.

At Amanza Smith’s “girlsgiving” dinner party, the 39-year-old took a swipe at Chrishell Stause’s late parents, which left her co-stars baffled.

Nicole was upset when she learned about her alleged drug use during the meal.

She remarked to Chrishell, “Honey, you’re confusing me with your parents, okay. You appear to have a drug obsession.

Has Nicole reacted to the brutal remark made by the other O Group agents after being forced to leave dinner?

In the series reunion, now streaming on Netflix, Nicole makes a brief appearance and fights her corner.

When asked why she made the remark, Nicole responded to host Tan France, “Someone had attacked me about and accused me of]using drugs once more.” And I was demonstrating that projection has been proven. It’s enough, enough is enough.

The reality star then went on to say, “Dared parents, it’s been said repeatedly.” I want to make that very clear because it’s just one word difference, but it’s a very, very big difference from saying “dead parents””.

The phrase “dead parents” wouldn’t have changed because Nicole is aware that Chrishell’s parents are deceased, Amanza countered.

“I find that using that language to hit below the belt repulses me. When you realize that the person’s parents are no longer with us, there is no difference between saying “parents” and “dead parents,” she said.

“You could just as easily have just said it, because we all know,” you said.

The crew then banded together to demand an apology from Nicole, with presenter Tan repeatedly asking her if she thinks her statement is appropriate.

Nicole continued, “I was making it clear that I have no connection to this obsession and this circumstance.”

You can’t control how you hurt someone, says Sandra Vergara, a newcomer. That’s it, you just clean your side of the street. You apologize.

Nicole asked Chrishell directly about the impact of the jab, but she was noticeably quiet throughout the conversation.

Chrishell continued, “I’m glad you haven’t experienced a loss where you would realize that it’s just territory you don’t charter into.”

So I’m relieved that you didn’t actually receive it. Because I apprehensive about giving that club to anyone, and I hate to share it with them.

With Sky, you can use Netflix for nothing.

We may link to affiliate links in this article, but we will make money off of any purchases we make. more information
Content Image

from £15

Get the deal here.

With its new Sky Stream TV bundles, including the £15 Essential TV plan, Sky is offering a free Netflix subscription.

Nicole did not formally apologize despite the back-and-forth with her co-stars.

Tan gave her the floor once more just before she left.

However, Nicole apologized in a shaky manner, saying, “Well, I would like to let you know, and apologise for the intent that was taken from it.

Nicole’s lack of “accountability” clearly irritated the Netflix cast. Despite popular belief, Jason and Brett later confirmed that she wasn’t fired as a result of the comment.

Continue reading the article.

Isak in but no Gyokeres in Potter’s Sweden squad

Images courtesy of Getty

Alexander Isak and Viktor Gyokeres, both of whom Arsenal have signed for, are not included in Graham Potter’s first Sweden squad.

Due to concerns that Gyokeres injured his hamstring during the Gunners’ Premier League victory at Burnley on Saturday, he will undergo further tests this week.

The 27-year-old was unable to participate in Arsenal’s Champions League match against Slavia Prague on Tuesday.

Isak has been chosen for the World Cup qualifiers against Slovenia (18 November) and Switzerland (15 November), but he hasn’t played for the Reds since 22 October because of a groin issue.

On October 20, less than a month after his dismissal, Sweden appointed him on a temporary basis.

Following Sweden’s 1-0 defeat to Kosovo on October 13, which resulted in automatic elimination from their World Cup group, former boss Jon Dahl Tomasson was fired.

With just one point from their four matches, they are at the bottom of Group B.

related subjects

  • Sweden
  • Football

More on this story.

    • 17 October
    A graphic of Premier League players from every team in the division in 2025-26 season, with the Premier League trophy in front of them.
    • August 16
    BBC Sport microphone and phone

Billie Eilish to donate £10million to climate causes and urges billionaires to do the same

Billie Eilish reaffirmed her commitment to giving away more than £10 million from her Hit Me Hard and Soft tour to environmental causes and exhorted billionaires to “give away your money.”

Grammy-winning artist Billie Eilish is no stranger to philanthropy and donating to charitable causes.

The Birds of a Feather singer announced on October 29 that she would be donating $11.5 million (£10 million) of her Hit Me Hard and Soft tour to climate causes as she accepted the Music Innovator Award at the Wall Street Journal Magazine Innovator Awards in New York City.

The money will go to The Changemaker Programme, an initiative to support organisations and projects to food equity, climate justice and reducing carbon pollution.

She also made fun of the room’s billionaires by apologizing for their misfortune as she accepted her award on the stage. She said, “I would advise using your money for good causes and perhaps donating it to some people who need it.”

She continued, “If you’re a billionaire, why are you a billionaire?” and continued, “No hate, but no, shorties, give your money away.”

READ MORE: Man buys ‘amazing’ charity shop find for £4.50 is surprised by what it’s truly worthREAD MORE: Charity shopper shares 9 secrets for finding designer clothes

She urged people to be empathetic and said: “We’re in a time right now where the world is really, really bad and really dark and people need empathy and help more than kind of ever, especially in our country,”

The singer recently donated money to a Howard County, Maryland, USA youth climate leadership program. She made a $11,000 (£8. 400) donation to the Youth Climate Institute (YCI) at the Howard County Conservancy.

The YCI Executive Director stated that Billy Ellish’s commitment to promoting youth voices and climate change “always goes against our objectives.” Our student ambassadors are thrilled to have Billie, who uses her platform for sustainability and climate justice, recognize their efforts.

More than 700 students and 50 active chapters are members of the high school program, which was established in 2020. They combine climate change education with practical application to encourage green jobs, combat the climate crisis, and inspire students to become effective environmental ambassadors.

For more stories like this subscribe to our weekly newsletter, The Weekly Gulp, for a curated roundup of trending stories, poignant interviews, and viral lifestyle picks from The Mirror’s Audience U35 team delivered straight to your inbox.

A YCI Certified Ambassador with Honors, Sarah KC, stated, “Billie Eilish supports our work is incredibly meaningful, she’s an icon for our generation, and her recognition shows young climate activists that we’re not alone in this fight,” and added, “It gives me hope that together we can create the change our planet needs.”

Billie Eilish has also used social media to raise awareness about the climate and went vegan in 2014.

The climate crisis was the subject of her 2019 song, All The Good Girls To Hell. She put the video’s subtitle: “As of right now, millions of people around the world are pleading with our leaders to take notice. Our planet is warming up at a rate unprecedented, and our forests are burning, icecaps are melting, oceans are rising, and wildlife is being poisoned.

She also shared in 2019 a viral video on the threat of the climate crisis saying: ““We cannot let this happen on our watch”.

The artist has opted for plastic-free concerts. For her 2020 world tour, she teamed up with a non-profit that helps musicians with sustainability, Reverb. She banned plastic straws, and fans were asked to bring their own water bottles and everything else was recycled.

She also created a video with scientists ahead of the 2021 climate summit and called out on world leaders saying: “We must stand together and speak up to save our planet, not just for us but for our future generations.”

Continue reading the article.

This donation adds to the singer’s long and impressive list, and she has consistently fought against climate change.