Archive September 3, 2025

Electric New York energy reignites etiquette debate

Images courtesy of Getty

US Open 2025

Dates: August 24 through September 7 in Flushing Meadows, New York

the horn-honking taxis and sirens’ constant roar. The impressive skyline of Manhattan. The City That Never Sleeps is a crazed “city that never sleeps” with millions of people visiting it.

New York has a unique, pulsing energy unlike any other.

Therefore, it might not surprise that the US Open this year had a tense atmosphere.

American fourth seed Jessica Pegula said, “New York City typically produces a lot of drama.”

“The crowds are pretty crazy,” he said. They kind of rile up everyone.

Your last chance to deepen your skills for a while, according to the statement.

With net cords, underarm serves, and body shots all under scrutiny, there have been debates over whether or not to use on-court etiquette.

Net cords: a “faux-pology” or a “honest”?

The perceived lack of etiquette, as well as Ostapenko’s response, escalated when former French Open champion Jelena Ostapenko accused Taylor Townsend of not saying sorry for a net cord that went in her favor.

When a player wins a point when their shot hits the net’s tape and reaches their helpless opponent, they become the net-cord winner.

The player who gained usually receives an apologetic raise of the hand.

According to Chanda Rubin, a former world number six and BBC Radio 5 Live analyst, “there were actually a couple more shots that happened before the end of the point.”

So, even if you only take common courtesy into account, I don’t believe it was Taylor’s biggest faux pas.

Jelena Ostapenko argues with Taylor Townsend at the 2025 US OpenImages courtesy of Getty

In the United States, it is not considered a big deal to apologize for net cords.

When Jenson Brooksby, an American, didn’t apologize during an Auckland Open match in 2022, Italy’s Fabio Fognini discovered that.

Brooksby later chuckled, “I was taught that it wasn’t really luck-based.”

Britain’s Cameron Norrie, who has spent his entire life in the competitive US college system, finds it egalitarian to refuse an apology.

The world number 35 told BBC Sport, “I don’t care, but even just acknowledging a little bit is the proper etiquette,” but for him, to be honest.

What data are gathered from this quiz?

Underarm serves: are they a proper tactic or disrespectful?

The underarm serve is another ruse that is offensive to many but is offensive to many.

The move is backed by notable names like Alexander Bublik and Nick Kyrgios. They view it as a legitimate strategy for a rival who is firmly rooted behind the baseline.

Some claim that it disrespects and lacks professionalism, especially when used against ailing opponents like France’s Corentin Moutet and home favorite Alexei Popyrin at this year’s Australian Open.

Stefanos Tsitsipas, a native of Greece, is oblivious to them.

The Germans’ victory in the second-round resulted in a terse handshake and lively discussion after the two-time major finalist was angered by their opponent, Daniel Altmaier, who served underarm in the first round.

Arthur Rinderknech winces during his 2025 US Open matchEPA

When Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz lost their respective one-sided fourth-round matches, Bublik and Arthur Rinderknech lost favorably, a portion of the Arthur Ashe Stadium crowd jeered.

The men’s world number one, Sinner, said, “Sometimes there are off-days when certain things don’t work.

We make the most of the sport’s interest possible at the end of the day.

What data are gathered from this quiz?

Body shots: a good or bad move?

Another frequent flashpoint is throwing a warm-up short ball at a net-bound opponent.

Following his opponent’s underarm serve, Tsitsipas, who frequently finds himself in the limelight, decided to tag Altmaier.

“Next time, don’t ask me why I struck you, okay,” If you serve underarm, I just want to say that,” Tsitsipas told Altmaier online.

Tsitsipas has tried this tactic before, and this is not the first time.

The incident, which happened in Rome earlier this year, did not pay off, as the Frenchman was fueled by the victory.

Andrea Vavassori, a doubles player from Italy, was less happy when his American opponent, Ben Shelton, struck him in the ribs, causing him to be called “soft” in Monte Carlo.

Norrie considers it polite to direct a ball at an opponent.

You apologised, of course, but I believe that was a perfectly good play because going middle is typically the best course of action, he said.

“Man, it’s good to acknowledge what you’ve done but you move on.”

What data are gathered from this quiz?

related subjects

  • Tennis

Djokovic to play Alcaraz in US Open semifinal after defeating Fritz

Kevin Costner breaks silence on Dances With Wolves co-star Graham Greene’s death

Graham Greene, 73, was sadly passed away in the company of Kevin Costner, who also co-starred in Dances With Wolves.

Kevin Costner penned an emotional tribute to his late co-star Graham Greene(Image: Getty)

Academy Award-winning actor Kevin Costner has spoken out following the death of his co-star Graham Greene, sharing an emotional tribute to the late performer on Instagram.

The 70-year-old actress shared a clip from Dances With Wolves, the movie that brought the two actors together, as a tribute to Graham’s passing.

He penned a moving tribute that stated: “A few things come to mind when I think of Graham Greene and our time together on Dances With Wolves.

I consider how eagerly he was to learn the language of the Lakota. I recall hearing that his filmmaking was recognized with a nomination for the @theacademy Awards, which was heartening.

“And I think of this scene in particular, when he was able to establish so much about the relationship between Dunbar and the natives with so few words. He was a master at work and a wonderful human being,” reports the Express.

Without prior authorization, content cannot be displayed.

READ MORE: ‘Heartbroken’ Yellowstone star pays powerful tribute to Graham Greene after death aged 73READ MORE: Graham Greene dead: Dances with Wolves and The Green Mile actor passes away at 73

Costner concluded his tribute with a poignant note, saying, “I’m grateful to have been a witness to this part of his lasting legacy. Please rest in peace, Graham.

The well-known actor had a distinguished career that included roles in significant films, TV shows, and stage performances for almost 50 years.

He is most notably credited with earning Kevin Costner’s Dances with Wolves nomination for Best Supporting Actor in 1990 for his role as Kicking Bird. His agent confirmed that he passed away on Sunday afternoon in a Toronto hospital.

Although no death cause was specified, it is believed that Greene had been ill for some time.

Greene had intended to speak with Costner as his final wish before he passed away, which only made things worse.

Graham Greene
Graham was best known for his role as Kicking Bird opposite Costner in Dances with Wolves(Image: Getty)

His representative, Michael Greene, revealed that the late actor’s last wish was to thank the Yellowstone star for his portrayal of native people in the media over the years, as reported by TMZ.

Regrettably, his team was unable to get in touch with Kevin despite efforts to speak with Costner’s representatives.

Greene made his acting debut in the 1983 sports drama Running Brave after working in television roles since 1976. In response, he took part in the British historical drama Revolution, which was released in 1985.

Continue reading the article.

His big break came with Costner’s directorial debut, one of the 1990’s highest-grossing movies, Dances With Wolves. The Western movie won seven Oscars in the same year and received a lot of praise.

However, Joe Pesci’s performance in Goodfellas did not earn him the Best Supporting Actor award.

Hundreds of US military lawyers to serve as temporary immigration judges

According to officials, hundreds of military and civilian attorneys working for the US Department of Defense (DOD) will temporarily serve as immigration judges as part of President Donald Trump’s administration’s latest move to involve the military in US domestic affairs.

By presiding on immigration hearings, these DOD attorneys will increase existing resources, according to Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell in a statement on Tuesday.

Military attorneys are not properly trained to act as immigration judges, according to a US official who told Reuters news agency.

Up to 600 military attorneys will be able to hire them as part of the plan, according to a memo that The Associated Press news agency reviewed.

According to the memo, the military will begin sending groups of 150 lawyers “as soon as practicable,” according to the memo, with the attorneys initially slated to serve as immigration judges for 179 days, according to Reuters.

The plan, according to the American Immigration Lawyers Association’s head, is comparable to having a “cardiologist perform a hip replacement.”

It is absurd to anticipate fair decisions from law-trained judges. According to Ben Johnson, the organization’s executive director, this careless action violates due process and further undermines the integrity of our immigration court system.

Defense Secretary Hegseth criticized military attorneys in his book The War on Warriors from the year 2024, claiming that most “spend more time prosecuting our troops than putting out bad guys.”

The Trump administration is turning to military support for its crackdown on illegal immigration, including the expansion of troops patrolling the US-Mexico border, the arrival of National Guard personnel in US cities, detaining prisoners at military installations prior to deportation, and using military aircraft to carry out deportations.

‘Lucky’ Djokovic to face Alcaraz after battling past Fritz and hostile crowd

Images courtesy of Getty
  • 707 Comments

US Open 2025

Dates: August 24 through September 7 in Flushing Meadows, New York

After defeating American Taylor Fritz in a brutal match, Novak Djokovic and Carlos Alcaraz met in the blockbuster US Open semi-final.

Fourth seed Fritz kept Djokovic’s serve under constant pressure, but the Serb surmounted to numerous break points and a hostile crowd to claim a 6-3 7-5 3-6 6-4 victory.

Djokovic said at times that he believed he was “lucky,” adding that “it was really anybody’s match.”

He was, in my opinion, the better player for the majority of the second and third sets.

If Djokovic wants to reach the final and fight off Alcaraz in the record-breaking 25th Grand Slam singles match, he must now defeat the second seed.

The 16-year-old Spaniard’s junior joined Djokovic in advancing to the last four earlier on Tuesday when he won 6-4, 6-2, 6-4 over Czech Jiri Lehecka.

After the dominating era of Djokovic, Roger Federer, and Rafael Nadal, Alcaraz and Sinner have taken the top spot in men’s tennis.

Djokovic is the only active member of the iconic trio now that Federer and Nadal are no longer active, and as he searches for the 25th major to clear Australia’s Margaret Court, time is not on his side.

He exhibited some of the resilience that has frequently defined his distinguished career in opposition to Fritz.

Djokovic started off strong by breaking Fritz’s first service game on the way to a 3-0 lead. After missing a set point at 5-2, the Serb fought back and saved five break points before serving the opener.

In the second set, Fritz continued to threaten, but he eventually grew frustrated as he wasted opportunities before Djokovic made a 4-3 lead.

However, the Californian finally converted his first break point at the eleventh time of asking just as Djokovic was serving for a two-set lead.

In the following game, he dropped three double faults and an unforced error, but Djokovic continued to play as a winner by deciding to tie the game.

In the third set, Djokovic complained to the umpire about the yelling out of the crowd during his serve, which caused the atmosphere to elicit a little hostility.

Some members of the audience began booing the four-time champion as he took advantage of the disruption to take advantage of the 4-1 lead, and some even started jeering the four-time champion.

After a grueling three hours and 24 minutes, Djokovic regained his composure and hit the decisive blow at 5-4 with a double fault from Fritz sealing his place in the final four.

Taylor didn’t deserve that final game, Djokovic said, “he didn’t deserve that,” and it was nerve-wracking, honestly tough to end with a double fault.

“In many of my service games, I just wanted to play every ball and stay alive.”

Alcaraz says, “I’m here to entertain.”

Carlos Alcaraz celebrates victoryImages courtesy of Getty

Djokovic has triumphed over Alcaraz in their previous two matches, including the Olympic final last year, but Alcaraz has lost in their previous two matches.

After a brilliant 6-4, 6-2, 6-4 display against Lehecka, the five-time Grand Slam champion said he is “here to entertain.”

He kept a laser-like focus throughout the match while also finding time to showmanship during the victory, when he surprised the crowd with his incredible arsenal of shot-making skills.

Alcaraz, 22, told Sky Sports, “Sometimes I play a shot that I shouldn’t play at the time, but it’s the way I love playing tennis.”

I want to play solid, play well, and play smart, but why not when I have the chance to make a great shot, let’s say, or a hot shot?

“I’m here to entertain the people, my team, and myself.”

Alcaraz, who won the US Open in 2022, has made it to the semi-finals in New York for the third time.

related subjects

  • Tennis

OpenAI announces parental controls for ChatGPT after teen’s suicide

In response to growing controversy over how artificial intelligence is affecting young people’s mental health, OpenAI has announced plans to implement parental controls for ChatGPT.

The California-based AI company stated in a blog post on Tuesday that it would be rolling out the features in response to families’ requests for assistance “in setting healthy guidelines that fit a teen’s unique stage of development.”

Parents will be able to link their ChatGPT accounts with those of their children under the changes, modify certain features, including memory and chat history, and set up the chatbot’s “age-appropriate model behavior rules” to respond to queries.

According to OpenAI, parents will also be notified when their teen displays signs of distress, adding that the organization will seek expert advice before implementing the feature to “support trust between parents and teens.”

The changes, which were announced last week as part of a series of measures designed to improve safety for vulnerable users, were scheduled to take effect within the month.

The business claimed that “these actions are just the start.”

“We will keep getting better and better at using ChatGPT as much as we can, under the guidance of experts.” In the upcoming 120 days, we’re eager to share our progress.

A California couple filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging responsibility for the suicide of their 16-year-old son, a week after the company made the announcement.

In their lawsuit, Matt and Maria Raine claim that ChatGPT legitimated Adam’s “most harmful and self-destructive thoughts” and that his death was a “predictable outcome of deliberate design decisions.”

In its announcement on parental controls, OpenAI, which previously expressed its condolences over the teen’s passing, did not specifically mention the case.

In their lawsuit, Raine family attorney Jay Edelson criticized OpenAI’s planned changes as an attempt to “shift the debate.”

According to Edelson, “they say the product should just be more sensitive to people in crisis, be more helpful, and show a little more empathy,” according to a statement from Edelson.

We are aware, strategically, that OpenAI cannot respond to Adam’s actual circumstances. Because Adam’s case involves a product that actively coached a teenager to suicide, it is not about ChatGPT being “helpful” in any way.

In light of their widespread adoption as a substitute therapist or friend, people who suffer from severe mental distress have become more concerned about using AI models.

Researchers found that ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini, and Anthropic’s Claude adhered to best-practice guidelines when responding to questions about suicide with “intermediate levels of risk,” but that they did not when responding to queries with “intermediate levels of risk.”

These findings suggest that LLMs can be safely and effectively used for the distribution of mental health information, particularly in high-stakes scenarios involving suicidal ideation, according to the authors.