Archive August 1, 2025

Forced back from Iran, Afghans face drought, poverty and repression

Fatima exits the bus and enters Islam Qala’s transit camp in western Afghanistan amid the blazing heat and uncertain future. She is one of the 10, 000 Iranians who have arrived that day and the 800, 000 who have over the past six months. She rushes her three children to a parking lot, slumps onto the sand, and covers her family with bed linens. When questioned about where she might go from here, she claims a brother might visit her hometown.

The camp receives hot food and medical care from the Afghan Red Crescent Society in the form of donations from the IFRC. Some money is provided by UN agencies. However, it’s time to depart after a day. Afghan cities and towns are called out by bus drivers. Fatima transports her cases to a bus to Owbeh, in the province of Herat. Her three children follow her closely. She claims that she was forbidden from traveling with any materials or tools despite having studied carpet weaving in Iran. She enquires as to how she can start from scratch without any funding. And who, in her village, would purchase her carpets anyway? They are in charge. not even food.

Although her exit from Iran was painful, the real challenges lie ahead. There won’t be any jobs for her in the public sector when she arrives in her hometown. Due to the laws and rules governing hiring women, men will be reluctant to hire her. Her only chance of surviving will be to launch her own business. She will require start-up funding for that. She might also need brother’s assistance with accessing markets. There will be a challenge, but more Afghan women are stepping up to the plate. Fatima could, too. She’d be better off having access to credit.

Will anyone able to purchase her goods, though? Her neighbors will largely depend on agriculture, which will depend on irrigation and rain, like most Afghans. Because of the drought, irrigation is becoming impossible in a large portion of Herat province and throughout the nation. Dust accumulates in rivers. Water sources in the ground are drying up. Men travel to cities in search of daily work when there is no farmland, only to discover that there is also a raging battle for water there. According to Mercy Corps, the city could run out of accessible groundwater in five years because half of Kabul’s boreholes have dried out. Only significant investment in water conservation, rain vats, storage dams, and check dams could slow down or stop this trend. Just the kind of money Afghanistan is trying to raise.

If Fatima can focus on her children’s education if she can make a little money and reside close to the water. A madrassa will be required for her daughter. She will experience a significant decline in her Iranian education. However, it might be one of the many madrassas that is already offering classes through the 12th grade and introducing more varied subjects. There might also be other options, such as vocational training and online courses, if she is resourceful and willing to put some money into action. Although she will face extreme odds of maneuvering, she will also have some old ones. They represent a long-running conflict between patriarchy and the cities, between self-realization desires and deep rooted patriarchy. Foreign aid may be able to aid in quietly promoting multiple and flexible opportunities for learning and exchange while acknowledging that the ideological battles will take place among Afghans themselves and will take time. Some organizations are attempting to accomplish this, but they don’t have a scale.

For Fatima to have access to clean drinking water, education for her children, and investment in her social enterprise will require a lot of luck. Unfortunately, it is much more likely and the outcome is grim. She’ll likely be without food in a few weeks, like most new arrivals. She won’t have access to the exclusive business support opportunities. The villages she touches will disappear if there is no water. Her health will suffer if she persists. Too expensive or too far away will be medical care. She might be forced to marry her daughter early and force her boys to do daily, cheap work. This is taking place throughout the nation. She will try to return to Iran if she can to prevent such a terrible fate.

Can international aid assist Fatima and the millions of people who depend on her? In spite of all the reservations, humanitarian funding has been generous over the past four years. Assistance has been allocated more than $7 billion. Enough to support the creation of small businesses by tens of thousands of women. Enough to have water stored across the nation, deepened boreholes, and irrigated farms. Enough to have provided children with thousands of alternative learning options. Humanitarian organizations have tried to assist in all of these areas, but the majority of the funds have been used for emergency relief, and many donors have been reluctant to invest in anything more substantial because they fear it will come off as a deceitful figure in the eyes of those in power.

It is compelling to need a new strategy. Due to aid cuts, there is currently less money available, but what is still available can be used to fund locally developed initiatives in areas of livelihoods, water infrastructure, health, and education. This might give those like Fatima a sense of hope for the future. As much as its resources allow, IFRC will concentrate on this.

If the moral justification for that isn’t compelling enough, it’s worthwhile to consider that the historic repatriation to Afghanistan that took place this year is likely to be the start of a much bigger exodus in the years to come. It would be far wiser to invest now and give people in their home countries a chance to prosper than to invest significantly more in anti-trafficking projects and refugee camps.

United’s famous names ‘dealing with the craziness’ at SuperCupNI

Eye-Press

Rooney and Carrick’s team name appears on a Manchester United team sheet frequently to give the Red Devils fond memories, but this week in Northern Ireland it has provided a glimpse into the possible future.

At the SuperCupNI, Kai Rooney and Jacey Carrick have been gaining attention rather than Wayne or Michael.

The junior tournament’s predecessor, the Milk Cup, is a rich match between the Premiership giants, and this year’s crop of under-16s has once again reached the Premier Division final.

On Friday night, they will take on Southampton in Coleraine in a game that will be live streamed on the BBC Sport website (20:00 BST).

Some of the stars who have excelled at the tournament before resuming their appearances at Old Trafford include David Beckham, Ryan Giggs, Nicky Butt, the Neville brothers, Danny Welbeck, and Marcus Rashford.

Local favorites Jonny Evans and Keith Gillespie, who will appear on Friday in BBC coverage, are also notable graduates.

Their coach, Tom Curtis, does not believe the pair are under any excessive pressure, despite their famous fathers and subsequent media attention to Rooney and Carrick on the way to the final.

There is a little pressure on the young people, but I don’t think they feel it, according to Curtis, who is Manchester United’s head of player development for the 13-16 age group. “Wayne and Michael were top, top players, world class players,” said Curtis, who is head of player development at Manchester United.

“They have been fantastic in their work ethic, application, and approach to the tournament, which is by the way very difficult, especially given how we play,” they said.

Wayne Rooney and Michael CarrickEye-Press

This week, both Wayne Rooney and Michael Carrick have been interested in speculating on the north coast of Northern Ireland.

The parents’ support of their sons through their Manchester United journey is fantastic, according to Curtis.

I don’t think the boys feel any pressure because of how they as parents play the boys’ football, in all seriousness, they have been doing it top-notch.

“Any time I’ve ever spoken to them, I’ve always said, they’re level-headed, very composed, and don’t anticipate too much from the boys; they just let them get on and enjoy their football,” the way they conduct themselves is really reflected in their behavior.

Local Manchester United fans have been clamoring all week for a sight of potential stars of the future because so many of their former teams have had professional careers.

Curtis believes that his young children’s benefit from the week is being able to deal with the furore.

It’s really nice practice for these young players because they’ll have to deal with the pressure, he added.

related subjects

  • Manchester United
  • Football
  • Irish Football

Man Utd’s Rooney and Carrick in U16s final – live on BBC Sport

Eye-Press

Rooney and Carrick’s team name appears on a Manchester United team sheet frequently to give the Red Devils fond memories, but this week in Northern Ireland it has provided a glimpse into the possible future.

At the SuperCupNI, Kai Rooney and Jacey Carrick have been gaining attention rather than Wayne or Michael.

The junior tournament’s predecessor, the Milk Cup, is a rich match between the Premiership giants, and this year’s crop of under-16s has once again reached the Premier Division final.

On Friday night, they will take on Southampton in Coleraine in a game that will be live streamed on the BBC Sport website (20:00 BST).

Some of the stars who have excelled at the tournament before resuming their appearances at Old Trafford include David Beckham, Ryan Giggs, Nicky Butt, the Neville brothers, Danny Welbeck, and Marcus Rashford.

Local favorites Jonny Evans and Keith Gillespie, who will appear on Friday in BBC coverage, are also notable graduates.

Their coach, Tom Curtis, does not believe the pair are under any excessive pressure, despite their famous fathers and subsequent media attention to Rooney and Carrick on the way to the final.

There is a little pressure on the young people, but I don’t think they feel it, according to Curtis, who is Manchester United’s head of player development for the 13-16 age group. “Wayne and Michael were top, top players, world class players,” said Curtis, who is head of player development at Manchester United.

“They have been fantastic in their work ethic, application, and approach to the tournament, which is by the way very difficult, especially given how we play,” they said.

Wayne Rooney and Michael CarrickEye-Press

This week, both Wayne Rooney and Michael Carrick have been interested in speculating on the north coast of Northern Ireland.

The parents’ support of their sons through their Manchester United journey is fantastic, according to Curtis.

I don’t think the boys feel any pressure because of how they as parents play the boys’ football, in all seriousness, they have been doing it top-notch.

“Any time I’ve ever spoken to them, I’ve always said, they’re level-headed, very composed, and don’t anticipate too much from the boys; they just let them get on and enjoy their football,” the way they conduct themselves is really reflected in their behavior.

Local Manchester United fans have been clamoring all week for a sight of potential stars of the future because so many of their former teams have had professional careers.

Curtis believes that his young children’s benefit from the week is being able to deal with the furore.

It’s really nice practice for these young players because they’ll have to deal with the pressure, he added.

related subjects

  • Manchester United
  • Football
  • Irish Football

Original Naked Gun creator David Zucker gives brutal verdict on Liam Neeson reboot

David Zucker, the director of the Naked Gun, revealed he had no plans to see the film because he was unimpressed by the Liam Neeson and Pamela Anderson reboot.

The Naked Gun, Zucker’s directorial film, is brutally remade.

David Zucker, the creator of the Naked Gun franchise, has no plans to watch the reboot featuring Liam Neeson and Pamela Anderson, and it’s not just because he wasn’t impressed by the film’s trailer.

After Paramount Pictures chose to reject his script and work with producer Seth MacFarlane, Zucker, who also directed the original 1980s police comedy, revealed that he wasn’t snubbed from the reboot but rather was rather left out.

The Naked Gun, which first hit cinemas in 1988 starring Leslie Nielson, Priscilla Presley, Ricardo Montalban and O.J. Simpson, was a box office hit. It comes after Liam and Pamela fuelled romance rumours with a cryptic social media post.

READ MORE: What is really going on with Liam Neeson and Pamela Anderson after romance rumoursREAD MORE: The Naked Gun release date as Liam Neeson gushes over Pamela Anderson

The Naked Gun poster
The reboot of The Naked Gun stars Liam Neeson and Pamela Anderson.

The spoof-comedy was followed by two sequels in the 1990s. Zucker, along with his brother Jerry Zucker and Jim Abrahams (otherwise known as comedy trio ZAZ), was also the creative force behind the 1980 cult classic Airplane! and he went on to direct films in the Scary Movie franchise.

Zucker told the Daily Mail, “I wrote the entire script for Naked Gun 4 on spec for Paramount.” I fully understand why Seth MacFarlane was chosen by the studio. Although he has a reputation and is a household name, Liam Neeson is not a novel concept.

During the early stages of the reboot’s development, Zucker said he was approached by MacFarlane – best known as the creator of the long-running animated series Family Guy – who praised his work and told Zucker he ‘idolised’ the original Naked Gun films.

Seth told me in a conversation that he had spent ten minutes idolizing Top Secret, Naked Gun, and Airplane, and that he had a conversation with him. How on earth can you be angry with someone who boasts of your accomplishments? However, just because the guy at my dry cleaners is a fan doesn’t mean he can’t do Naked Gun.

Based on the waning ABC television series Police Squad, the original Naked Gun movie! starred Nielsen as police detective Frank Drebin, whose portrayal directly spoofed the era’s well-known crime dramas. The movie earned $ 152. 4 million on a $12 million budget following its December 1988 release. The sequel Naked Gun 212-22: The Smell of Fear was released in 1991, followed by Naked Gun 33+13: The Final Insult in 1994.

1988 saw the debut of the first Naked Gun.
1988 saw the debut of the first Naked Gun.

Neeson portrays bumbling cop Frank Drebin Jr., who has followed his father’s footsteps into law enforcement, in the reboot, and Anderson portrays femme fatale Beth Davenport. Akiva Schaffer, a former Saturday Night Live writer and co-writer, and Doug Mand, co-wrote the remake.

Zucker criticized the 2025 version for sticking to the same old formula and making jokes that matched the first installment. He made a funny point about Anderson’s Beth getting told to “take a chair” when she arrives in Drebin’s office, which she replies, “No thank you, I have plenty of chairs at home.”

Continue reading the article.

Before questioning Neeson’s casting, Zucker quipped, “We gave up doing those jokes in Police Squad 40 years ago.” He wasn’t required to be funny, OJ. Even Leslie Nielsen doesn’t need to be funny either. He simply needed to be an actor in a B-movie. That is what we did. Liam Neeson, for instance, is of Oscar quality, whereas we didn’t pretend to cast Lawrence Olivier or even Al Pacino. He might have won, in my opinion, for Schindler’s List. What is he making fun of, exactly?

Unfortunately, this isn’t the first time that Zucker has faced criticism from Paramount Pictures for a remake of one of his movies; instead, he was also cut out of the 1982 sequel Airplane II, which was directed and written by Ken Finkleman. Critics slated the follow-up, which only managed $ 27.2 million domestically and $ 83 million domestically, compared to the original’s $83 million box office success.

DR Congo and Rwanda hold first talks since signing of peace deal

The first joint oversight committee meeting between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is moving closer to implementing a peace agreement, despite other obligations that have not yet been fulfilled.

Qatar, the United States, Qatar, and the African Union all gathered on Thursday for the committee meeting in Washington.

According to a joint statement released by Rwanda and the DRC on Friday, the committee “discussed progress on implementing the agreement” among other things.

The Rwanda-DRC agreement in June marked a breakthrough in negotiations between US President Donald Trump’s administration, which aims to end fighting that has resulted in the deaths of thousands of people and attracted billions of dollars in Western investment.

The agreement specifies requirements for “respect for territorial integrity and halting hostilities” in eastern DRC, but they have not yet been put into effect.

It provides few details, but it also includes economic measures.

The two African nations pledged to put a 2024 agreement into place so that Rwandan troops could leave the eastern DRC in 90 days.

Additionally, the agreement stated that DRC and Rwanda would establish a joint security coordination system within 30 days and implement a strategy put forth last year to monitor and verify the withdrawal of Rwandan soldiers within three months.

The Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), an armed group based in the DRC and whose remnants were part of Rwanda’s former army and fighter groups that carried out a genocide in 1994, are expected to be the focus of Congolese military operations that will come to an end in the same year.

However, the joint security coordination mechanism hasn’t met in 30 days since the signing, and operations against the FDLR and the withdrawal of Rwandan soldiers haven’t yet begun.

Deal not off track, really?

The joint oversight committee was established as a forum to discuss the peace agreement’s implementation and resolution of disagreements.

The committee’s meeting was scheduled and was scheduled to occur 45 days after the signing.

Massad Boulos, Trump’s senior advisor for Africa, stated to reporters on Wednesday that the deal was on track and that a meeting of the security mechanism was set to be held soon.

When asked about the FDLR’s ongoing operations and the Rwandan soldiers’ withdrawal, Boulos responded, “There was no timeline for that. If you look at the chronology of what we’ve been able to do since April, it’s been very on point and very much in line with our aspirations.” Therefore, there is no deviation from the plan.

Sources with knowledge of the negotiations acknowledged the negotiations’ delays in passing the deal, but added that they were not yet threatening it as a whole.