Archive August 5, 2025

In light of Israel’s devastating war on Gaza and the rise of Palestinian violence in the occupied West Bank, Australian Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong has told the country’s media that there is a “risk there will be no Palestine left to recognise.”

Wong responded to questions about a large-scale protest in Sydney that drew the attention of hundreds of thousands of people, noting that Australia plans to change its stance and recognize Palestinian statehood in an interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) on Tuesday morning.

According to organizers, between 200 and 300,000 people showed up at the protest on Sunday across Sydney Harbour Bridge. Initial estimates for the police indicated that about 90 000 people participated.

Wong claimed that the Australian government shared the protesters’ “desire for peace and a ceasefire” and that the large turnout “reflected the general Australian community’s horror” and “the distress of Australians, on what we are seeing unfolding in Gaza, the catastrophic humanitarian situation, the deaths of women and children, the withholding of aid.”

Wong responded to a question about whether Australia was considering imposing any more serious measures, such as imposing sanctions on Israel, saying, “We don’t speculate on sanctions because they have an obvious effect if they aren’t flagged.”

She noted that Australia had already imposed sanctions on “extremist” Israeli settlers and two far-right ministers in Netanyahu’s government in June of this year.

Wong remarked on Australia’s position on the status of Palestinian statehood, saying that “in terms of recognition, I’ve said it’s a matter of when, not when.”

In response to the protest on Sunday, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is reportedly attempting to speak with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Albanese said he would once more declare his support for a two-state solution in response to questions about what he planned to talk about with Netanyahu.

The “only business” that Albanese and Netanyahu should be discussing is the suspension of the “two-way arms trade between Australia and and Israel, new sanctions measures, and Netanyahu’s one-way trip to the [International Criminal Court] to face crimes against humanity, according to Rawan Arraf, the executive director of the Australian Centre for International Justice.

In a post on X, Arraf wrote that Albanese “must not grant legitimacy to an accused war criminal.”

Australia has yet to follow other nations, including France and Canada, in announcing their plans to recognize Palestinian statehood, and joins the majority of nations that have already done so, despite Albanese and Wong’s continuing emphasis on the importance of a two-state solution.

The first conversation between Albanese and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas since November 2023, according to the ABC, took place on Tuesday.

In response to inquiries about the protest in Sydney, Albanese responded, “It’s not surprising that so many Australians have been affected because they want to express their concern about people being denied access to essential services like food and water.”

However, the state government in New South Wales, which is led by Albanese’s Labor Party, attempted to stop the march from crossing the Sydney Harbour Bridge in the week leading up to the protest.

The protest only continued after Supreme Court Justice Belinda Rigg’s ruling that “the march at this location is motivated by the belief that the world’s people must respond urgently and extraordinaryly to the horror and urgency of the situation in Gaza.”

According to Rigg, “the evidence indicates significant support for the march.”

In an effort to bridge the party’s growing party gap, several state and federal Labor ministers also took part in the march.

According to independent journalist Antony Loewenstein, the march on Sunday demonstrated how frustrated Australians are that our government is currently only speaking in terms of rhetoric.

Loewenstein, who spoke at the march on Sunday, said, “People are so outraged, not just by what Israel is doing in Gaza, but also by the Australian government’s complicity.”

Sinthia Mehrin Sokal recalls the head-punch she received on July 15, 2013, when she marched in Bangladesh’s capital, Dhaka, in protest of a contentious quota system in government jobs.

The attack by an activist belonging to the student wing of the then-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League party left Sokal – a final-year student of criminology at the University of Dhaka – with 10 stitches and temporary memory loss.

When the police shot another 23-year-old student at Begum Rokeya University in the Rangpur district, about 300 kilometers (186 miles) north of Dhaka, the next day, he was protesting. A video of him, with his arms outstretched and collapsing on the ground moments later, went viral, igniting an unprecedented movement against Hasina, who governed the country with an iron fist for more than 15 years before she was toppled last August.

Students defied a brutal crackdown and marched to the streets as students from schools, colleges, universities, and madrassas. Soon, the young protesters were joined by their parents, teachers and other citizens. Important support was provided by opposition parties, including the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami, making it unlikely to form a coalition against Hasina’s government.

“Even students in remote areas came out in support. According to Sokal, “real change was about to happen.”

On August 5, 2024, as tens of thousands of protesters stormed Hasina’s palatial residence and offices in Dhaka, the 77-year-old leader boarded a military helicopter and fled to neighbouring India, her main ally, where she continues to defy a Bangladesh court’s orders to face trial for crimes against humanity and other charges.

By the time Hasina fled, more than 1, 400 people had been killed, most when government forces fired on protesters, and thousands of others were wounded, according to the United Nations.

On August 8, 2024, the protesters installed an interim government led by Muhammad Yunus, the nation’s only Nobel laureate. Hasina fled. In May this year, the interim government banned the Awami League from any political activity until trials over last year’s killings of the protesters concluded. The Chhatra League, the party’s student organization, was outlawed in October 2024 due to anti-terror laws.

Yet, as Bangladesh marks the first anniversary of the end of Hasina’s government on Tuesday, Sokal said the sense of unity and hope that defined the 2024 uprising has given way to disillusionment and despair.

They are “selling the revolution,” she said, referring to the various political parties currently contesting positions of power ahead of the upcoming general elections that are scheduled for next year.

“The change we fought for remains out of reach”, said added. The uprising is no longer the property of the interim government.

What did my son give up for, you ask?

Yunus, the 85-year-old Nobel Peace Prize winner presiding over Bangladesh’s democratic overhaul, faces mounting political pressure, even as his interim government seeks consensus on drafting a new constitution. The way forward for Bangladesh is currently being fought between the rival factions that staged shoulder-to-shoulder during anti-Hasina protests.

On Tuesday, Yunus is expected to unveil a so-called July Proclamation, a document to mark the anniversary of Hasina’s ouster, which will outline the key reforms that his administration argues Bangladesh needs – and a roadmap to achieve that.

Not many people are optimistic, though.

“Our children took to the streets for a just, democratic and sovereign Bangladesh. Sanjida Khan Deepti, whose 17-year-old son Anas was fatally shot by the police during a peaceful march near Dhaka’s Chankharpul area on August 5, 2024, said, “But that’s not what we’re getting.” Witnesses said Anas was unarmed and running for cover when a police bullet struck him in the back. He was still holding a national flag when he passed away on the spot.

“The reforms and justice for the July killings that we had hoped – it’s not duly happening”, the 36-year-old mother told Al Jazeera. We marched for a more just, peaceful, and peaceful nation. If that doesn’t happen, then what was my son’s sacrifice for”?

Others, however, continue to put their trust in the interim administration in tact.

“No regrets”, said Khokon Chandra Barman, who lost almost his entire face after he was shot by the police in the Narayanganj district.

He told Al Jazeera, “I am proud that my sacrifice helped to end a system that is based on prejudice.”

Barman feels the country is in better hands now under the Yunus-led interim government. The old evils won’t vanish overnight, according to the saying. But we are hopeful”.

Atikul Gazi agreed. On Sunday, Gazi told Al Jazeera, “Yunus sir is capable and doing his best. “If the political parties fully cooperated with him, things would be even better”.

The 21-year-old TikToker from Dhaka’s Uttara region managed to survive being shot point blank range on August 5, 2024, but he lost his left arm.

A selfie video of him smiling, despite missing an arm, posted on September 16 last year, went viral, making him a symbol of resilience.

“I’m not afraid; I’m back in the field.” One hand may be gone, but my life is ready to be offered anew”.

‘ Instability could increase ‘

Others are less optimistic. “That was a moment of unprecedented unity”, said Mohammad Golam Rabbani, a professor of history at Jahangirnagar University on the outskirts of Dhaka.

On July 29, 2024, Rabbani had recited a poem during a campus protest. Speaking at an event last month to commemorate the uprising, he said: “Safeguarding that unity should have been the new government’s first task. But they slipped it.

The coalition of students, professionals and activists, called Students Against Discrimination, that brought down Hasina’s government, began to fragment even before Yunus took charge.

Since the uprising, the main opposition BNP has been demanding immediate elections in an effort to capitalize on the strong anti-Awami League sentiment. But parties like the National Citizens Party, formed by student leaders of the 2024 protests, and Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami want deeper structural reforms before any vote is held.

The Yunus administration established a National Consensus Commission on February 12 this year to reconcile these demands. Its mandate is to merge multiple reform agendas outlined by expert panels into a single political blueprint. Any candidate who wins the following general election must formally commit to implementing this charter.

But so far, the meetings of the commission have been marked by rifts and dissent, mainly over having a bicameral parliament, adopting proportional representation in both its houses, and reforming the appointment process for key constitutional bodies by curbing the prime minister’s influence to ensure greater neutrality and non-partisanship.

Analyst Rezaul Karim Rony warned that “instability may increase” if political forces don’t come to a consensus on reforms.

But Mubashar Hasan, adjunct fellow at Western Sydney University’s Humanitarian and Development Research Initiative, thinks a political deadlock is “unlikely”, and that most stakeholders seem to be moving towards elections next year.

Hasan, however, continues to be skeptical of the reforms itself, calling them a “cosmetic reset.”

“There’ll be some democratic progress, but not a genuine shift”, he told Al Jazeera. He made it clear that the Awami League, which once had millions of members, is still banned, which some analysts fear could undermine Bangladesh’s electoral democracy’s legitimacy. &nbsp,

Political parties are fighting for power, according to Deepti, who lost her teenage son during the protests. They are not fighting against those who facilitated Hasina’s brutal repression during the protests last year.

“Most of the officials and law enforcement members involved in the violence are still at large, while political parties are more focused on grabbing power”, she told Al Jazeera.

Inquilab Manch (Revolution Front), a non-partisan cultural organization inspired by the uprising, warned that elections without justice and reforms would “push the country back into the jaws of fascism.”

His group, with more than 1, 000 members in 25 districts, organises poetry readings, exhibitions and street performances to commemorate the 2024 uprising and demand accountability, amid widespread concerns over deteriorating law and order across the country.

A “city of demonstrations”

While the police remain discredited and are yet to recover from the taint of complicity in perpetuating Hasina’s strong-armed governance, military soldiers are seen patrolling Bangladesh’s streets, armed with special power to arrest, detain and, in extreme cases, even fire on those breaking the law.

In a recent report, the rights organization Odhikar reported that between April and June this year, there were at least 72 fatalities and 1,677 injuries. The group also documented eight alleged extrajudicial killings during this period involving the police and notorious paramilitary forces like the Rapid Action Battalion.

Other crimes have also surged.

Between January and May this year, police found 1,587 murders, an increase of 25% from the same time last year. Robbery nearly doubled to 318, while crimes against women and children topped 9, 100. There has also increased kidnapping and robbery.

“Mob justice and targeted killings have surged, many with political links”, Md Ijajul Islam, the executive director of the nonprofit Human Rights Support Society, told Al Jazeera. A demoralized police won’t be able to contain it unless political parties rein in their activists.

The demoralisation within the police stems mostly from the 2024 uprising itself, when more than 500 police stations were attacked across Bangladesh and law enforcement officials were missing from the streets for more than a week.

Ijajul remarked that the force had to start over after being morally broken.

Several police officers Al Jazeera spoke to at the grassroots level pointed to another problem: the collapse of what they called an informal political order in rural areas.

A senior police officer at the Roumari police station in the Kurigram district near the Indian border said, “During the Awami League era, police frequently worked in tandem with the ruling party leaders to resolve local disputes.”

“That structure is gone. He claimed on condition of anonymity that he was not authorized to speak to the media and that currently several factions, including those from the BNP, Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami, and others, are attempting to control markets, transportation hubs, and government tenders.

Things aren’t getting any better in Dhaka.

“Every day, managing street protests has become one of our major duties”, Talebur Rahman, a deputy commissioner with the Dhaka Metropolitan Police, told Al Jazeera.

“People break into government offices just to make their demands heard,” Rahman said, “feeling like Dhaka has become a city of demonstrations.”

Still, Rahman claimed the city’s law and order situation was better than immediately after the 2024 uprising. Shafiqul Alam, Yunus’s spokesperson, claimed in a televised interview on July 15 that “if you take overall statistics into account, things are stabilizing,” referring to law and order in Dhaka.

Alam said that many people who were denied justice for years, including during the uprising, are now coming forward to register cases.

Some people concur.

“Things are slowly improving”, said 38-year-old rickshaw-puller Mohammad Shainur in Dhaka’s upscale Bashundhara neighbourhood.

For one, there are some encouraging signs in the economy. Bangladesh is the world’s 35th largest economy and the second in South Asia – mainly driven by its thriving garment and agriculture industries.

Foreign reserves increased from more than $ 24 billion in May of this year to nearly $ 32 billion in June, thanks to a global financial crisis, record-setting remittances, and new funding from the International Monetary Fund. Inflation, which peaked at 11.7 percent in July 2024, dropped to 8.5 percent by June this year.

The International Labour Organization claims that nearly 30% of Bangladesh’s youth are unable to get a job or go to school. Moreover, a 20&nbsp, percent tariff announced by the United States, the largest buyer of Bangladesh’s garments, also threatens the livelihood of 4 million workers employed in the key sector.

Gazi is determined to keep the protests of 2024’s alive in Dhaka.

“Let the people remember those martyred in the uprising, and those of us who were injured”, he told Al Jazeera. We want that freedom to continue as living representations.

According to the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the country is no longer bound by a moratorium on the deployment of short- and medium-range nuclear missiles, with former president Dmitry Medvedev blaming NATO’s “anti-Russian policy” and promising Moscow will “further steps” in response.

Medvedev, who has a verbal exchange with Donald Trump and the foreign ministry, made his most recent broadside on Monday.

Medvedev wrote in English on the X social media platform that the Russian Foreign Ministry’s decision to end the moratorium on the deployment of medium- and short-range missiles is the result of NATO’s anti-Russian policy.

“This is a brand-new reality that our adversaries must face.” He urged taking additional steps.

Medvedev, who is the deputy head of Russia’s powerful Security Council and has frequently criticized Russia’s nuclear arsenal, did not give any details on what “further steps” might entail.

In response to Medvedev’s comments about the potential for war between Washington and Moscow, Trump announced last week that he had ordered two US nuclear submarines to be relocated to “the appropriate regions.”

The Russian Foreign Ministry’s statement regarding the end of the NATO member states’ anti-Russian policy is the result of this.
All of our adversaries will have to face this new reality. Consider the following.

Russia’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement that it had to reevaluate its decision to deploy short- and medium-range missiles because of the changing circumstances in Europe and the Asia Pacific.

The Russian Foreign Ministry notes that the prerequisites for a unilateral moratorium on the deployment of similar weapons have been eliminated because the situation is evoking the actual deployment of US-made land-based medium and short-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.

Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, and Sergei Lavrov, the country’s foreign minister, said last year that Moscow might need to lift restrictions on missile deployment in response to what they termed provocations by the US and NATO.

Lavrov claimed in December that Moscow’s unilateral moratorium on the deployment of such missiles was “practically no longer viable and will have to be abandoned.”

According to Lavrov, “the United States haughtily ignored warnings from Russia and China and instead moved on to deploying weapons of this caliber in various regions of the world.”

Under the first Trump administration, the US withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty in 2019, citing Russian non-compliance, but Moscow had stated that it would not use such weapons if Washington didn’t.

An entire class of weapons had been completely eliminated by the INF treaty, which was signed in 1987 by Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev and US President Ronald Reagan. They were ground-launched nuclear missiles with a range of 500 to 5, 500 km (311 to 3, 418 miles).

The Kremlin downplayed Trump’s remarks and said it was not intending to get into a public dispute with the US president on Monday. That was its first public comment.

It is obvious that American submarines are already engaged in combat, according to the situation. The first thing Dmitry Peskov, a spokesman for the Kremlin, said to reporters that this is an ongoing process.

We would not want to get involved in such a controversy and would not want to make any comments on it, he said in general.

We do, of course, think that everyone should be very cautious with nuclear rhetoric, he continued.

Trump threatens to impose new sanctions on Russia and oil-importing nations like China and India unless President Vladimir Putin agrees to a ceasefire in Moscow’s conflict with Ukraine by Friday.