Archive July 5, 2025

Olay’s ‘anti-wrinkle’ moisturiser that’s ‘better than high end brands’ is currently 63% off

Amazon has slashed the price of Olay’s anti-ageing moisturiser by 63% in an early Prime Day deal and shoppers say it’s ‘better than high end brands’

Amazon’s early Prime Day Deal sees Olay’s day cream slashed by 63%(Image: Amazon)

Amazon Prime Day is on the horizon, and in the lead up the online retailer has been slashing prices on hundreds of products. And one that caught our attention was the amazing discount on Olay’s Regenerist Whip Moisturiser.

Originally priced at £38, this hydrating face cream is now £14 – that’s a huge 63% discount. Whipped face products have been a popular beauty trend over the past few years, with products like Drunk Elephant’s Lala Retro Whipped Cream and Bondi Sands’ Daydream Whipped Moisturiser around.

So what exactly is a whipped moisturiser? It’s a cream that’s been whipped up to incorporate air, resulting in an ultra-lightweight, fluffy consistency.

And that’s exactly the texture of Olay’s highly rated moisturiser. This anti-wrinkle cream features 99% pure Niacinamide, which helps to promote skin cell renewal and anti-ageing peptides that are proven to reduce fine lines and wrinkles.

On top of this, the cream features SPF 30 making it the ideal base for the summertime.

READ MORE: Best early Amazon Prime Day sales according to shopping experts with new deals dropping

READ MORE: Stacey Solomon launches new ‘spa day’ bodycare range and it’s currently 20% off

Olay's Regenerist Moisturiser
Shoppers have praised the non-greasy feel and lightweight texture of Olay’s Regenerist moisturiser(Image: Amazon)

Shoppers can’t get enough of this cream praising its non-greasy feel, lightweight texture and hydrating results that feel comparable to luxury brands.

One reviewer wrote: “I have always used various Olay products all my adult life and I’m in my 60s. Have tried other brands but always come back to Olay This particular one is very creamy but sinks into the skin quickly and feels light I apply it in the morning and my skin feels moisturised all day. It has a touch of luxury when using it and lasts well”

A second added: “As an older person I have used Olay products for years (since called Ullay) and found them to be value for money especially with spf. I steered away from spending the extra on this but when my skin was looking sallow and make up didn’t sit well I decided to give it a go I was nor expecting miracles (I am almost 70! ). I saw a difference after a couple of uses my skin felt tighter and hydrated giving back a dewyness. ”

The main criticism came from shoppers who think the product is too expensive for the amount you receive. A shopper said: “Bit pricey considering it is whip, meaning there is slightly less actual product than original. ”

Article continues below

Kartal wants your help picking her next tattoo – what should she get?

Getty Images
  • 50 Comments

British number three Sonay Kartal has said she wants help picking a new tattoo after reaching the fourth round of Wimbledon.

The 23-year-old booked her place in the last 16 with a 6-4 6-2 victory over France’s Diane Parry on Friday.

Kartal will face Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova in the next round on Sunday, but has made no secret of her desire to add to the 14 tattoos she already has.

“I’m not one to say no to a tattoo,” she said after her win over Parry. “I think I can easily be persuaded.

“I’m just lacking on a few creative ideas myself so if people have any ideas let me know and I’m sure that I will definitely get one. “

Kartal was ranked 298th in the world before Wimbledon last year but is now 51st and is the only Briton left in the women’s singles draw.

Her run at this year’s tournament is her best ever performance at a Grand Slam, beating her appearance in the third round in 2024.

Of her 14 tattoos, Kartal includes the year ‘2022’ to mark the first time she played in all four Grand Slams.

Related topics

  • Tennis

England’s Sciver-Brunt out of rest of T20 series

Getty Images

England captain Nat Sciver-Brunt has been ruled out of the remainder of the T20 series against India with a groin injury.

The 32-year-old suffered the injury in Tuesday’s second T20 defeat and missed Friday’s third match.

She will miss the games at Old Trafford on Wednesday and Edgbaston on 12 June, with Tammy Beaumont continuing to lead the side.

However she is expected to be fit for the three one-day internationals that follow from 16 July.

Those matches will be England’s last in the format before the 50-over World Cup in the autumn.

Related topics

  • England Women’s Cricket Team
  • Cricket

Radar festival acts boycott event after Bob Vylan sacked from line-up

Bob Vylan were dropped from the festival due to their controversial Glastonbury set which criticised the BBC

Bob Vylan have been axed(Image: AFP via Getty Images)

Two bands are boycotting Radar festival after Bob Vylan were sacked from the line-up. The band were removed from the list of performers following their controversial gig at Glastonbury last week.

They were dropped as headliners for the Manchester event after starting chants of “free, free Palestine” and “death, death to the IDF [Israel Defence Forces]” during their controversial Glastonbury performance last weekend. They also projected a message onto the screen behind them which said: “Free Palestine – United Nations have called it a genocide – the BBC calls it a ‘conflict’.”

READ MORE: Cat Deeley’s chic This Morning linen Bermuda shorts are on sale for less than £25

Bob Vylan performed at Glastonbury 2025
Bob Vylan performed at Glastonbury 2025(Image: AFP via Getty Images)

Bob Vylan have been dropped from shows in Germany and France as a result, with their set currently being assessed by police. Bob Vylan’s agent United Talent Agency have dropped them and they have also had their US visas revoked.

Radar organiser Catherine Jackson-Smith told NME that the festival did not want to remove Bob Vylan from the line-up. However, she said they felt pressured so then the event could still go ahead.

Two other acts have now dropped out of the festival due to Bob Vylan being axed. The Scratch shared a statement with their fans as they announced they were withdrawing from Radar.

Article continues below

They said they wanted to show “solidarity” with other artists. They wrote: “The censorship and de-platforming of artists speaking out against the ongoing genocide in Gaza is greasy, dangerous and must be challenged.

“To be clear, this decision is not a criticism of Radar Festival. We understand it was an incredibly difficult and complex situation. This is about showing solidarity with Bob Vylan and any artist who may face similar treatment in the future.

“Shadowy government influence and wealthy lobbying groups should not be allowed to dictate who is given a platform and what can be said on it. This situation will only worsen unless we, as artists, support one another and take action. “

GENN shared their own statement as they also said they wouldn’t be playing at Radar. They said: “As a minority on pretty much every line-up, and with a relatively modest platform, we considered whether we could use our physical presence to speak against the bullying, censorship, and strong-arming demonstrated towards the likes of both Bob Vylan and Radar.

“For our safety and sanity, we’ve made the final decision to pull out from performing at Radar this weekend. We are devastated to do so after the time, money, and excitement we put towards this performance and can only apologise to anyone who was going to be there to see us.

“Our fight should not be focused on the policing of those who are trying to spread awareness within their means. This is a distraction from a wider picture. Pressure needs to be placed on those who are instigating the censorship of a genocide happening in real time. “

Article continues below

Bob Vylan have since defended their performance at Glastonbury. They have said that they are “not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race of group of pepole” and that they are wanting the “dismantling of a violent military machine”.

Iran has not agreed to inspections or given up enrichment, says Trump

United States President Donald Trump has said Iran has not agreed to inspections of its nuclear programme or to giving up enriching uranium.

He told reporters on board Air Force One on Friday that he believed Tehran’s nuclear programme had been “set back permanently”, although he conceded Iran could restart it at a different location.

Trump said he would discuss Iran with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu when he visits the White House on Monday, where a potential Gaza ceasefire is expected to top the agenda.

Trump said, as he travelled to New Jersey after an Independence Day celebration at the White House,  “I would think they’d have to start at a different location. And if they did start, it would be a problem. ”

Trump said he would not allow Tehran to resume its nuclear programme, adding that Iranian officials wanted to meet with him.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said on Friday it had pulled out its inspectors from Iran as a standoff deepens over their return to the country’s nuclear facilities that were bombed by the US and Israel.

The US and Israel say Iran was enriching uranium to build nuclear weapons. Tehran denies wanting to produce a nuclear bomb, reiterating for years that its nuclear programme has been for civilian use only. Neither US intelligence nor the UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said they had found any proof that Tehran was building a nuclear weapon.

Israel launched its first military strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites in a 12-day war with the Islamic Republic three weeks ago, with the US intervening on the side of its staunch ally by launching massive strikes on the sites on June 22.

The IAEA’s inspectors have been unable to inspect Iran’s facilities since the beginning of the conflict, even though Grossi has said that it is his top priority.

Grossi stressed “the crucial importance” of holding talks with Iran to resume its monitoring and verification work as soon as possible.

Distrust of IAEA

In the aftermath of the US and Israeli attacks, Iran, which has said it is still committed to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), made painfully clear its burgeoning distrust of the IAEA.

Since the start of the conflict, Iranian officials have sharply criticised the IAEA, not only for failing to condemn the Israeli and US strikes, but also for passing a resolution on June 12 accusing Tehran of non-compliance with its nuclear obligations, the day before Israel attacked.

On Wednesday, Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian ordered the country to cut ties with the nuclear watchdog. A bill to suspend cooperation had already been passed in the Iranian parliament and approved by the country’s Guardian Council.

Guardian Council spokesperson Hadi Tahan Nazif said the decision had been taken for the “full respect for the national sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Islamic Republic of Iran”.

The bill itself says the suspension “will remain in effect until certain conditions are met, including the guaranteed security of nuclear facilities and scientists”, according to Iranian state television.

While the IAEA says Iran has not yet formally informed it of any suspension, it is unclear when the agency’s inspectors will be able to return to Iran.

On Monday, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi summarily dismissed Grossi’s request to visit nuclear facilities bombed by Israel and the US. “Grossi’s insistence on visiting the bombed sites under the pretext of safeguards is meaningless and possibly even malign in intent,” Araghchi said.

The US claims military strikes either destroyed or badly damaged Iran’s three uranium enrichment sites.

‘I tried to stay away – but boxing found me’

Getty Images

After winning gold at the British Karate Championships, a 10-year-old Harlem Eubank went with his mother to the shop, where they bumped into his famous uncle.

“Harlem’s just won a British title,” his mum, beaming with pride, told Chris Eubank Sr.

She expected a hug or at least a smile… But the former world champion didn’t miss a beat.

“I have 19 world title defences,” he replied flatly, before carrying on with his day.

“That was it, he was gone,” Harlem says now, laughing. “My mum was probably fuming but even at that age, I understood what he was trying to say. He was planting the seed that it’s never enough, there’s always more to do. Aim higher. “

It was vintage Eubank Sr – dismissive yet full of purpose.

It’s a lesson Harlem still carries with him today as he prepares for the biggest fight of his professional career.

The 31-year-old welterweight will face fellow Briton and former world-title challenger Jack Catterall at Manchester’s AO Arena on Saturday.

“It’s a massive statement fight. That’s why I pushed for it. I believe I’ll be a world champion and this is the fight that proves it,” Harlem adds.

How boxing found its latest Eubank

Harlem Eubank poses with Chris Eubank JrGetty Images

The Eubank name is steeped in British boxing folklore with unforgettable nights and iconic rivalries.

A two-time world champion, the eccentric Eubank Sr was a boxing superstar who transcended the sport. And by the time Harlem turned professional in 2017, his cousin Chris Eubank Jr was already a British champion.

But Harlem – a noticeably less flamboyant and more reserved character than his uncle and cousin – never intended to follow in their footsteps.

“I tried to stay away from boxing at first because my family had already done it,” he explains.

“They’d been to the top of the mountain so what’s the point in me starting? “

In his early years, Harlem threw himself into karate and football. He earned a black belt by the age of 11 and later for signed for Brighton & Hove Albion’s youth set-up.

At 14, he walked into a boxing gym for the first time out of curiosity, but football coaches told him he had to choose. And so, boxing was put aside.

Four years later, though, something pulled him back.

Building a profile on free-to-air television

Harlem turned professional aged 23 but, much like his cousin, quickly realised that being a Eubank in boxing can be a double-edged sword.

“Everyone wants to beat you. They bring their best version into the ring every time because they think they’re fighting for a world title,” he says.

In an age of influencer boxing, Harlem could have arguably chosen an easier and more lucrative route rather than trading on his name.

Instead, he fought on small-hall shows and steadily honed his craft.

“I’ve done it the traditional way. There’s not a door I haven’t kicked down myself,” he says.

In a throwback to the ITV era when his uncle headlined to millions on free-to-air television, Harlem has spent the past few years as a regular headliner of Channel 5’s Friday night boxing cards.

Harlem globetrotter – targeting world honours

Harlem Eubank and Jack Catterall face offGetty Images

With his uncle and cousin watching from ringside, Harlem stopped Tyrone McKenna in the 10th round in March.

But Chorley’s Catterall is a different proposition.

A proven contender who has operated at world level, Catterall is regarded by many as the man who should have become England’s first male four-belt undisputed champion after a controversial points loss to Josh Taylor.

Harlem, though, is relishing the role of underdog.

“Time and time again, I’ve had to prove people wrong,” he says.

“But I think people are starting to take notice of me now.

Related topics

  • Boxing