Slider1
Slider2
Slider3
Slider4
previous arrow
next arrow

Archive May 1, 2025

David Beckham’s bitter fallout with Prince Harry and how he exacted his revenge

Prince Harry and David Beckham once had a close relationship, but it is thought that this relationship ended shortly after Harry wed Meghan Markle.

David and Harry used to be firm friends(Image: PA)

Prince Harry and David Beckham once had a close relationship, but things quickly got sour. It appeared that the pair had been friends for a while, but things suddenly got wrong.

It was claimed in Tom Bower’s book that David Beckham and Prince Harry had fallen out when Meghan Markle made an “exclusion order” at the Invictus Games. David and his wife Victoria attended Harry and Meghan’s wedding alongside a string of famous faces including Serena Williams, Oprah Winfrey, and George Clooney.

Meghan’s expulsion from the 2018 Games, just five months after their marriage, was suggested by royal commentator Tom Bower, who claimed the snub had caused him to demand “revenge” against Prince Harry.

David and Victoria attended Harry and Meghan's wedding
David and Victoria attended Harry and Meghan’s wedding(Image: Getty Images)

Tom Bower claimed in his book House of Beckham that it was forbidden to photograph the two people together. According to David Beckham, why Harry wouldn’t meet him puzzled him. Later, it became apparent that Meghan was the author of the exclusion order. She opposed Beckham’s media presence, and especially his wife Victoria.

However, David has a good friendship with Prince Harry’s brother Prince William. He was invited to Boston for the Earthshot Prize amid the 2022 World Cup. He travelled half way across the world to be there for the special event, which supports raising awareness and combatting climate change and was David’s way of “getting his revenge for the Sydney snub”.

Continue reading the article.

When the Prince of Wales messages me and says, “I need you to do this” or “be there,” he had previously said, “Over the years, I’ve done a lot with the Prince of Wales, and I’ve always been there whenever he’s asked me to get involved with things,” he had said, “I’ve done a lot with him, and I’ve always been there whenever he’s asked me to get involved.”

David describes himself as a royalist and has been supportive of the Royal Family his whole life.

David and William are firm friends
David and William are firm friends(Image: Getty Images)

He stated in a recent interview that speaking with our Royal Family always makes him feel emotional. I was raised in a family that cherished and cherished the Royal Family.

David acknowledged that his mother sobbed when asked to represent the King’s foundation.

She is aware that my grandparents would have been pleased that I had contributed so much to the Royal Family and their charitable organizations. He continued, “Our King is a fantastic man.”

Continue reading the article.

Prince William was also present when the two new helicopters’ launch party, the London Air Ambulance Charity’s “Up Against Time” appeal, was concluded. David, who serves as the London Air Ambulance Charity’s ambassador, was present. He claimed, “I was very honored to be involved by Prince William when I was asked to in all honesty.

He praised the “unfathomable work that the pilots and the medics do and the millions of lives saved by them,” and added that he was “very proud to be invited to be a part of it.

What is behind the violence in Syria?

Clashes have erupted in Jaramana and Ashrafiyat Sahnaya on the outskirts of the Syrian capital, Damascus, this week.

The violence, which initially involved local armed men from the Druze religious minority and unknown gunmen from other towns, has killed at least 30 people.

Syrian security forces intervened to restore calm, but then Israel attacked Syria, claiming it was “defending the Druze”.

The unrest comes as the Syrian government, in power since the fall of former President Bashar al-Assad in December, tries to assert its control over the whole country.

So, what’s going on in Syria?

How did the latest unrest in Syria start?

Observers agree that the unrest seems to have started when a voice recording of a man cursing the Prophet Muhammad circulated, with claims that a Druze leader was speaking. The authenticity of the recording is questionable.

But it provoked the fury of many Syrians, and on Tuesday, a group of unknown gunmen attacked the mostly Druze town of Jaramana.

The Syrian Ministry of Interior says that its forces went to break up the clashes, before being attacked themselves.

The dead on Tuesday included at least two members of Syria’s General Security Services, the authorities said, while the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) said six Druze fighters and three “attackers” were also killed.

Then, on Wednesday, fighting spread to Ashrafiyat Sahnaya, another town in the Damascus suburbs with a significant Druze population.

A source in the Syrian Interior Ministry told Al Jazeera that 16 members of the security forces were killed in an attack on a security checkpoint in Sahnaya. That prompted more fighting, and six Druze fighters were killed, according to the SOHR.

Israel then launched air attacks on Sahnaya, targeting security personnel, according to the Interior Ministry, while Israel said it had attacked “extremists”.

The Syrian authorities have since announced that calm has been restored in both Jaramana and Ashrafiyat Sahnaya.

What led to the violence?

Syria’s new administration is trying to stabilise the country, but fallout from 12-plus years of war, the many armed groups in the country and the instability that comes with big changes have made for a volatile environment.

The worst unrest was in early March when hundreds were killed in Syria’s coastal region.

Fighters loyal to the Assad regime attacked security forces, setting off the violence as fighters from other areas came in to fight, and widespread attacks were reported against civilians, many from the former president’s Alawite sect.

There is fear in Syria that al-Assad’s supporters will keep trying to overthrow the new authorities, who have not yet been able to exert power and provide security across the whole country.

Some of that fear has morphed into suspicion of minorities such as Alawites and Druze.

The minorities, in turn, fear this suspicion and worry about the fact that there are still armed fighters with backgrounds in groups such as al-Qaeda.

The new government has emphasised that all are equal in the new Syria, but that has yet to quieten these fears.

Add to this mix the potential for fake news to spread on social media, and the country is rife with the tensions that led to the most recent fighting in Jaramana and Ashrafiyat Sahnaya.

Why is Israel involved?

Israel seems to have stepped up its attacks on Syria and is occupying more and more land since the fall of al-Assad.

It already illegally occupied part of the Syrian Golan Heights along the border, and regularly bombed sites in Syria it claimed belonged to pro-Iranian groups like Lebanon’s Hezbollah.

When al-Assad fled, Israel saw an opportunity, analysts say, and stepped up its attacks, claiming that the new government is “extremist” and cloaking itself as a defender of the Druze in Syria, part of whose community lives under Israeli control.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said “he would not allow” Syrian government forces to operate in Syrian territory south of the capital, Damascus, calling for the “full demilitarisation” of the area.

Some Israelis have called for taking control of Druze-majority areas in southern Syria, claiming that would create an alliance of minorities across the Middle East.

On Wednesday, after the fighting in Ashrafiyat Sahnaya, the Israeli military said that it had taken three Syrian Druze to Israel to receive medical treatment.

Who are the Druze, and who do they support?

The Druze, an ethnoreligious Arabic-speaking group that grew out of Ismaili Shia Islam, live in Jordan, Lebanon and Syria as well as Israel, especially the occupied Golan Heights.

Nobody can claim to know who “all the Druze” support. Individuals or sub-groups within each national community will have differing opinions.

The Druze population in Israel is estimated at 150,000, and Israel conscripts their young men into the army, whereas it does not conscript Palestinian citizens of Israel.

The Druze in Jordan, Lebanon and Syria are openly supportive of the Palestinian cause, while Syrian Druze leaders have vehemently rejected the idea of friendlier ties with Israel.

The communities are important players in their countries’ politics, particularly in Lebanon, where Druze leader Walid Jumblatt has been influential for decades.

This May Day, workers unite to make big polluters pay for climate damage

As extreme weather events become the new normal, informal workers across South Asia are bearing the growing brunt of intersecting crises. Labour rights violations and poor social protections are worsening under the climate crisis. In India, amid the ongoing heatwave, we may have come to a boiling point as street vendors, waste pickers, and other informal workers rise in defiance, coming together in solidarity.

Their demands for compensation for losses and other damages are aimed squarely at the coal, oil and gas corporations. In 2023 alone, climate disasters prompted by oil and gas corporations have affected more than 9 million people in Asia, while Big Oil continues to block climate action and spread disinformation, amassing immense wealth.

This International Workers ‘ Day, a new coalition is forming in Delhi. Informal workers, trade unionists and climate justice campaigners like Greenpeace India, supported by counterparts in Sri Lanka, Nepal and Bangladesh, have launched the Workers ‘ Collective for Climate Justice – South Asia. Along with the Collective, groups have signed the Polluters Pay Pact, a global campaign to hold billionaires and polluting corporations accountable for the climate crisis, by demanding that the governments introduce new taxes on fossil fuel corporations to help communities rebuild from climate disasters and invest in inclusive adaptation solutions.

Informal workers on the front lines

Informal workers in South Asia are no strangers to crises. They have been on the front lines of social marginalisation, and increasingly, the effects of climate change. South Asia, with more than 80 percent of its labour force in the informal sector, is seeing rising temperatures and erratic weather events that are drastically affecting people’s ability to work and survive.

In 2024, Greenpeace India documented how street vendors face financial loss and health risks during peak summer months, with vendors in cities like Delhi reporting more than a 50% decline in income due to heat waves. Yet, workers remain largely absent in policymaking. While just five oil majors earned more than $102bn in 2024, informal workers are left to bear the brunt of the crisis.

The power of collectivising

From the struggles of jute mill workers in Bengal to the tea plantation workers ‘ resistance across the region – labour organising has secured fundamental rights and labour protection for millions. They were never just about wages, but about dignity, recognition, and power.

Today, that legacy is more important than ever. The climate crisis is fundamentally altering the nature of life and work. These effects are set to worsen under a carbon-intensive scenario, with projections of more than 800 million South Asians living in locations that will become climate hotspots by 2050.

In a strong response, workers are reclaiming the power of collectivising. When workers unite across sectors, castes, genders, religions and ethnicities, they challenge systems of both exploitation and environmental degradation. This movement refuses to flatten their diverse experiences into a single narrative. By connecting the strength of past labour struggles with the urgency of the climate crisis, this collective is not merely reacting, it’s forging a new path forward.

Centering communities in climate policy

Communities on the front lines of climate effects such as fisherfolk and waste pickers are agents of knowledge and lived experience. They witness real-time ecological changes, gaining an understanding of the risks to their livelihoods that policy briefs are often too slow to capture. Yet, both domestic and global climate policy spaces continue to remain distant, dominated by elite institutions and exclusionary technocratic jargon.

Further, it is well established that in the Global South, non-economic losses such as the loss of culture and community far exceed economic ones. Addressing these losses requires the meaningful involvement of affected communities. Particular attention must be paid to ensuring that Loss and Damage financing is equitable and just, without deepening the existing debt burden or imposing unfair conditions on the very countries already bearing the brunt of the crisis.

Addressing loss and damage cannot wait

Loss and damage from climate change in South Asia are already running into the billions of dollars annually. By 2070, this number could jump to $997bn. Despite the promises made at UN Climate Change Conferences, climate finance has been sluggish, fragmented, and insufficient. Wealthy nations and polluters have under-delivered while continuing to drill for new oil and gas.

The adaptation needs of workers must be met now. They urgently require shade and paid breaks for livelihood and survival. While global climate finance talks stall, adaptation costs and urgency are mounting. This is why the Polluters Pay Pact is so vital. It’s not just a gesture – it demands enforceable commitments. As workers gather in Delhi this May Day, they send a clear message: A just, sustainable future must be led by the working class. By holding oil and gas corporations accountable, climate resilience becomes a right – not a privilege.

Kenya MP’s killing appears ‘targeted and premeditated’, police say

The fatal shooting of an opposition MP in Kenya appears to have been a targeted killing, police have said.

Charles Ong’ondo Were was shot dead on Wednesday evening after his vehicle stopped at a traffic light on Ngong Road, in the capital Nairobi, according to police.

Police said bystanders witnessed the passenger of a motorcycle open fire on the MP’s car while it was stopped at the junction.

“The nature of this crime appears to be both targeted and premeditated”, National Police Service spokesperson Muchiri Nyaga said in a statement.

“At this stage, it is too early to provide further details”, Nyaga added.

Were served as a legislator for the constituency of Kasipul, in western Kenya, under the banner of the centre-left Orange Democratic Movement, which arose out of opposition to a 2005 proposal to replace the constitution with a text that critics said placed exorbitant power in the presidency.

Kenya’s Daily Nation newspaper reported that Were had “openly complained his life was in danger”.

Kenyan President William Ruto, allied with the centre-right United Democratic Alliance, expressed his condolences to Were’s family and the people of Kasipul.

“We urge the police to conduct a thorough investigation into this incident”, Ruto said on X.

“Those responsible must be held to account”.

Former Prime Minister Raila Odinga, who founded the Orange Democratic Movement, said Kenya had lost a “gallant son of the soil”.

Odinga challenged the results of the 2022 election after losing to Ruto, claiming in a petition to the Supreme Court that the poll had been tainted by “premeditated unlawful and criminal subversion”.

Why more than £100m rests on Man Utd winning Europa League

Getty Images
  • 281 Comments

It says everything about the current state of Manchester United that the storyline around their undefeated Europa League campaign is not about finals, trophies and glory, but more the estimated £100m+ cost of not winning the competition.

United travel to Bilbao on Thursday for their semi-final first leg. On the line is the prospect of only their second season without any European football in 35 years.

Because of their league form – United currently sit 14th and will record their lowest ever Premier League points tally – winning the Europa League is their only route back into Europe.

Supporters – and players – have got used to a lack of Champions League football in recent times, and 2025-26 could be their sixth campaign from the past 13 without a place in Europe’s top club competition.

United’s co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe recently put an estimated price on Champions League qualification of between £80-£100m, while he said Europa League qualification was worth £40m.

Football finance expert Kieran Maguire told BBC Sport: “A good season in the Champions League can be worth far in excess of £100m. By the time you combine gate receipts, sponsor bonuses and the prize money available, the numbers involved are eye-watering.”

‘United would make £70m in Champions League – even losing every game’

Even with United’s patchy Champions League qualification, the lowest they earned from European football in five campaigns between 2019-2024 was about £52m – from last season’s group-stage exit in the Champions League.

Since then, Uefa’s major revamp of its three competitions has dramatically increased the prize pot, which Maguire says would guarantee United a minimum £70m from Champions League participation next season – even if they lost all of their eight league-stage fixtures.

This season Manchester City are estimated to have earned about £64m through their initial qualification, below-par results and eventual 22nd-placed finish in the table, then being knocked out of the play-offs by Real Madrid.

Factor 1. Broadcast income explained

A quick breakdown of how Uefa’s Champions League prize pot is distributed:

Maguire adds: “A modest set of results of three wins, three draws and two defeats, and a 10th-place finish, would therefore generate £13m. A perfect set of results in the group stage would earn £22m.

“The prize money is enhanced by Uefa’s ‘value pillar’ linked to a club’s European competition success over the past five years and the amount the domestic broadcaster (Amazon/TNT in the UK) pay for the rights.

“Manchester United are probably about 12th in the Uefa rankings and could therefore expect to earn at least £1m per position out of the 36 teams in the Champions League, so this could be worth another £24m.

“The rewards start to accelerate once a club reaches the knockout stage, with about an extra £20m, for example, for reaching the quarter-finals and £54m for the winners.

Factor 2. Matchday income

Manchester United supporters protestingGetty Images

Then there is the money made per matchday to add on.

Maguire explains: “According to Manchester United’s accounts for the first half of 2024-25, matchday revenues were an average of £5.2m per match, and this is likely to increase in 25-26 following the recent announcement of a 5% ticket rise for next season.

“Playing in the Champions League against more high-profile opponents would allow United to charge premium prices, as seen this season when Aston Villa hosted Bayern Munich and charged up to £97 for the fixture.

Factor 3. Commercial deals

There is also the £10m which would be lost from the Adidas kit manufacturing deal as a result of failing to secure Champions League qualification, albeit to be deducted across the full length of the 10-year contract.

It is not known whether United’s £60m-a-year shirt sponsorship deal with Qualcomm, £20m-a-year sleeve sponsorship deal with DXC or £20m-a-year training kit deal with Tezos have similar clauses.

Maguire says that it is “likely” other commercial deals are “incentivised” adding further “modest” losses, as well as missed bonuses from sponsors that are not disclosed.

So, if United do qualify for the Champions League – and even perform as relatively poorly as City did this season – they would pocket close to £100m with these three areas combined.

Anything else?

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

There are some ‘gains’. Without European football, most players would find themselves on lower wages, potentially by as much as 25%, so expenses should go down.

The club’s 2023-24 accounts showed wages fell £22m (12%) from £185m to £163m, mainly due to lower performance bonuses – and that was a season ending in an eighth-placed league finish, an FA Cup win and Europa League qualification.

Nevertheless, the figure United would miss out on is eye-watering and would be bound to impact on their transfer strategy, on top of reducing the attractiveness of joining the Old Trafford outfit in the first place.

“Champions League can change everything,” said Amorim last month. “If you look at this moment we are not ready to be really competitive in Premier League and cope with Champions League. If you are in Champions League you have a different budget to put a better team for next season.”

Amorim said United had a plan for what would happen if they missed out on Europe, just as chief executive Omar Berrada did last month.

Berrada said they would be “more efficient” and that they were “putting in place various financial measures” that would allow the club to “invest in the summer” even if they did not qualify for Europe.

And this comes with United’s overall debt hovering at about £1bn, including £331m in outstanding transfer fee payments, something minority owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe mentioned in his interview with BBC Sports Editor Dan Roan in March.

It would heighten an already worrying financial picture for a club that somehow has to try to navigate a way back into contention at the top end of the Premier League.

In March, Ratcliffe said the club would have gone “bust” by the end of the year if significant action had not been taken.

United’s losses over the past five years total more than £370m.

In order to stem the tide, the club have made 250 staff redundant and another 200 could lose their jobs in a second round of cuts announced earlier this year.

United’s second quarter revenues to 31 December 2024 dropped by 12%, with the club spending £14.5m to sack manager Erik ten Hag, his staff and former sporting director Dan Ashworth.

At the same time, United have unveiled plans to build a £2bn stadium, but have not specified how they will pay for this.

Ratcliffe assured fans in March the club would remain compliant with the Premier League’s Profit and Sustainability rules.

Related topics

  • Manchester United
  • Football