Prince Harry’s US visa should remain private, according to a judge’s major update, which is likely to be “worrying” for the Duke of Sussex.
A US judge made the most recent hints in the two-year legal battle regarding the possibility of disclosing some of the Duke of Sussex’s visa application’s sealed documents. The judge stated at a hearing in Washington, DC, that they wanted “maximum disclosure as long as it doesn’t violate privacy.”
They also stated that they were “not foreclosing the possibility that there might be some possible relief” and that Donald Trump’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had requested redaction requests or “continued withholdings.”
Following questions about Prince Harry’s acceptance of drug use in his memoir Spare, the controversy arises. The Heritage Foundation, a think tank, argued that the US government should make available information about his visa application to check whether his drug use was disclosed after the Heritage Foundation filed a lawsuit.
After President Trump previously warned that the royal could face consequences if he lied about taking drugs on his visa application, according to royal expert Jennie Bond, the most recent update is likely to be “worrying” for Prince Harry.
“This is squeaky bum time for Harry, without a doubt, because President Trump’s return to the White House.” The president appears to have a plan to make numerous threats, and he occasionally takes them personally. He has previously said that Harry is on his own and has criticized him for “traiving the late Queen,” she told the Mirror.
The Prince must be concerned about the judge’s decision to decide whether his visa application can remain private. Basically, I think Harry is now pretty much on a yellow card.
Because the president is a man who may seek retribution, he will have to make sure he behaves himself and that he and Meghan don’t cause any trouble for Trump or openly criticize him.
The former BBC royal correspondent also considered the potential effects on Sussexes. Apart from that, there’s not much he can do – except sit tight and hope for the best. However, in my opinion, the visa application appears to have a lot of room to go forward.
“The judge’s remarks were quite guarded…. he is” not foreclosing the possibility of some relief”. However, this is the first time a legal opinion has suggested that “maximum disclosure” within the bounds of maintaining privacy might be required. And Harry and Meghan must find that to be enthralling reading, she said.
She continued: “I think they just have to keep their nerve now and hope for the best. However, Harry must regret making such a public admission to taking marijuana in his book.
Following the rejection of a Freedom of Information Act request, the Heritage Foundation filed the lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). According to the think tank, it served an “immense public interest”.
The Heritage Foundation’s lawsuit argued that US law “generally renders such a person inadmissible for entry” to the country. Additionally, it recommended that Prince Harry’s previous drug use should have been disclosed because it might raise questions about the integrity of the US government.
Responding to the legal claim, the DHS said: “Much like health, financial, or employment information, a person’s immigration information is private personal information”.
No “publicly available information” has been found to indicate that Prince Harry ever received a drug-related conviction, according to previous statements made by attorney John Bardo on behalf of DHS. He continued, stating that any accusations of wrongdoing by the US government were “purely speculative” from the Heritage Foundation.
Source: Mirror
Leave a Reply