News

Love Island fans confused as Jess apologises to Charlie after love triangle drama

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article36592658.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/0_ITV.jpg

Love Island: All Stars viewers were left confused over Jess Harding’s behaviour on Wednesday’s edition of the ITV2 dating show as she told Tommy off and then apologised to Charlie

Love Island: All Stars fans were left confused when Jess Harding apologised to Charlie Frederick over their love triangle drama. The reality star, 31, is back in the villa looking for love after previously winning the 2023 edition of the hit ITV2 dating reality show.

Over the last few days, fans have watched as Charlie started up a romance with Millie Court but then shared a kiss with Jess. It seemed as if Jess had been expecting Charlie to couple up with her, but he chose Millie. Jess was then left furious with Tommy, despite his decision to couple up with her.

On Wednesday’s episode, she raged at Tommy: “It’s publicly shaming and I’m not gonna lie, it’s so f******* rude. The whole thing. I’m standing up there on my own and you’re throwing shade at me and you made me look like an absolute fool, darling!”

READ MORE: Love Island’s Charlie Frederick leaves fans outraged after dramatic recouplingREAD MORE: Love Island: All Stars fans predict ‘heartbreak’ exit for Millie Court amid love triangle

Tommy pleaded: “You’ve been ghosting me, you’ve not even looked at me. I haven’t felt much!” but she hit back: “I’m overwhelmed with a lot of situations that are going on in my head so for me to stand there and feel like I’m being publicly shamed because you’re embarrassing me. Fair play to me because I took that straight on the chin.”

He replied:”I wasn’t saying anything nasty about you personally, I was speaking my mind and how I feel. Every time, I vote from my heart and my mind.”

“Charlie would never do that, go to speak to Charlie, go speak to one of the other boys. Do you not understand where I’m coming from? “Not really, no! I apologise for upsetting you but I’m just speaking from my point of view.” It was what Jess did next that riled viewers as she immediately went to apologise to Charlie.

She said: “I will say sorry, I am actually really sorry, especially after that whole Tommy situation. But this is the problem you’re exploring two connections. You’ve got to know that you’re gonna come to some sort of consequences.”

He replied: “Everyone likes to make it deep, what am I meant to do? Not kiss you, then recouple with Mills and then not wanna kiss you? I don’t wanna lose that spark with you but I can’t be a***** with this drama from either of you.” It was then that Jess declared that she was removing herself from the situation, but fans were left wondering what her game was given her initial conversation with Charlie.

One fan wrote: “They needed to focus on that more because Jess is basically confessing she likes him more but also how does she know that? Charlie does not give that impression especially after picking Millie!” and another said: “Jess is upset because Charlie didn’t pick her at the re coupling, not because of what Tommy said (who stated facts anyway)”

A third wrote: “jess needs to get out of charlie’s a**** he literally picked someone else babe wake up,” whilst a fourth wrote: “jess why are u apologising to charlie u absolute bird brain. dont think i dont notice how u keep bringing whitney and belle just incase they try blaming you”

Last night, AJ picked Shaq, Sammie picked Ciaran, Scott picked Leanne, Sean picked Helena, Konnor picked Whitney and Jack picked Belle. Charlie then reasoned his choice was down to the fact that she was a “good kisser” and chose Millie. Following this, Tommy chose Jess but there was an undeniably frosty atmosphere on set.

Fans instantly took to social media to question Charlie’s decision, with one writing: “Charlie just kissed Jess talking bout thank God can’t wait to sleep in the same bed with you Mils??” Another fumed: “This show is a genuine psychological experiment… why do they act like this?!”

A third said: “So Charlie lipsed Jess just for him to choose Millie, he is such a loser,” and another wrote: “Is Charlie suffering from some sort of mental illness or what cos I’m so confused right now.” Another fumed: “This recoupling is such a f****** mess, like what is this season actually!”

Jess was later in tears again over the way things had turned out, but some fans didn’t exactly take her side. One wrote: “I’m with Tommy tbf. Jess decided after 5 days to start talking to Charlie and then said to Tommy… You live with your mom, we are at different times in our lives… U knew that from the beginning.”

Another said: “I don’t understand why Jess is surprised when she’s the one whose literally dropped him the second Charlie gave her attention!” The Islanders later urged Charlie to tell Millie that he had kissed Jess prior to choosing her.

Before the recoupling had taken place, it had all kicked off with Scott getting involved in the drama. Millie was then seen telling her fellow Islanders to “drop it” and insisting that she, Charlie, and Jess were all “moving on”.

Article continues below

On the verge of tears, Jess raged: “Everyone is putting their f****** two pence in! I don’t get it. At the end of the day, I’m here for myself, and I do carry some guilt on my shoulders. It’s just the way that I’ve spoken to every single boy, and they all agree. Scott is supposed to be my f****** friend.”

US begins transferring ISIL-linked detainees from Syria to Iraq

Palestinians deny reports Israel halted refugee football pitch demolition

A youth organization in the Palestinian Aida refugee camp in Bethlehem, occupied West Bank, has refuted reports that Israel has suspended plans to destroy a nearby football pitch, claiming that it has not been given any formal notice to do so.

The Aida Youth Centre’s head, Munther Amira, stated on Wednesday that no formal document had been provided to confirm reports that Israel had responded to international pressure and had suspended the demolition order.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Reports suggested that Israel had acted in response to international football associations FIFA and UEFA, which oversee the country’s football stadium, to prevent the planned demolition of the pitch, which is near Israel’s border with Bethlehem.

Amira stated that neither the court nor the Israeli government have provided any official confirmation of this information. These remain unconfirmed media reports with no official basis for Aida camp, the youth center, and the Aida sports team.

Palestinian children and boys play football on Friday, December 26, 2025, at a pitch in the West Bank city of Bethlehem next to Israel’s separation wall.

“Save the Pitch,” please.

In an effort to stop Israel from imposing the demolition order on the refugee camp’s only sporting facility, the Aida Youth Centre launched a global campaign called “Save the Pitch” in recent weeks.

The pitch’s manager, Amira, claimed uncertainty has plagued the area since November.

After storming the camp and placing the notice on the pitch’s main gate, Israeli occupation forces issued the first demolition order against the football pitch on November 3.

According to him, the first demolition order referenced “security concerns,” claiming that the pitch posed a threat because it was close to the camp’s illegal separation wall.

Amira said, “We’ve been living on edge since we’ve had to demolish the pitch, which represents hope for more than 250 camp children and young people,” repeatedly.

He added that Israel, which holds the leasehold to the pitch and issued a second demolition order on December 31 before the refugee camp’s Popular Committee for Services petitioned an Israeli court, decided to postpone the demolition until January 18.

Amira explained that the center was given an additional seven days to carry out the demolition themselves by the Israeli army.

Amira claimed that this would not occur because they told us to either destroy the pitch ourselves or to force us to do it.

A deal with the Bethlehem Municipality, according to Saeed al-Azzha, the head of Aida’s Popular Committee for Services, allowed the use of the land to construct a football field, a theater, and a public garden. Israel prevented the construction of the garden and the pitch, according to him, but the committee constructed both the pitch and the theater.

Al-Azzha emphasized that the pitch was constructed legally on leased land held by the Armenian Church.

Palestinian youth attend a soccer practice session at a pitch next to Israel's separation wall in Aida Refugee camp, in the West Bank city of Bethlehem, Friday, Dec. 26, 2025, weeks after Israeli authorities issued a decision to demolish the field. (AP Photo/Mahmoud Illean)
Palestinian youths practice football on a field close to the Israeli-occupied separation wall [Mahmoud Illean/AP Photo]

Palestinian sport is being targeted.

The demolition order violates the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which Israel has ratified, and prevents hundreds of children from exercising their right to play sports and develop in a safe and healthy environment, according to the Palestinian Football Association (PFA).

The PFA claimed that the decision is a result of what it called an Israeli-style Israeli policy that targets Palestinian sports, which has resulted in the total or partial destruction of almost 300 sports facilities.

The demolition order caused deep sadness in the AOD football team from the Aida Youth Centre.

Rimas Sarhan, 18, said, “I started my sporting life and playing football on this pitch.”

“I can’t believe that Israel has chosen to destroy it,” I said. Why is it asked? What danger does this pitch present?” she stated.

Mohammed Jadou, a 10-year-old, also has issues with the choice. During a training session, he said, “I don’t understand why the Israeli army wants to destroy the pitch.” We don’t hurt anyone, they say. Where will we play if they don’t demolish it, I hope?

There is still a lingering concern that Israel will be motivated to target more sports facilities in the occupied West Bank, where it has conducted nearly daily military raids for the past three years.

Anan Shehadeh, a journalist for Palestinian sport, told Al Jazeera that Israel has long seen Palestinian sport as a vehicle for political expression and national identity, able to show the world the Palestinian story.

He recalls that Israel had threatened to destroy it before the opening of Majed Asad Stadium on April 14, 2011, which was attended by Sepp Blatter, the then-President of FIFA.

He claimed that “at the time, international and legal efforts prevented that demolition.” However, Israeli threats now cover almost every sports facility in Palestine.

Shehadeh continued, “Israel targets the Palestinian sporting spirit when it targets sport.” It aims to “push young people into dangerous environments and stop them from serving as ambassadors for their country.”

Shehadeh claimed that Israel’s genocidal war on the Strip had also devastated the Palestinian sport industry in Gaza.

He claimed that the sports infrastructure in Gaza has been almost completely destroyed over the past two years, while that in the West Bank have been heavily targeted through arrests and checkpoints.

Shehadeh cited the Palestinian national football team’s impressive recent performances as evidence that “despite all these measures, Israel has not yet abandoned sport.”

Rimas Sarhan
Rimas Sarhan, 18, is unable to comprehend why Israel wants to destroy the football field on which she practices in Aida [Monjed Jadou/Al Jazeera].

appeals to international sports organizations

Israeli athletics have been suspended since the start of the war, activities have been cut to a minimum, and there has been a significant decline in performance across many sports and national teams, according to Nader al-Jayousi, the technical director of the Palestine Olympic Committee.

According to al-Jayousi, “We are seeing growing engagement among Palestinian athletes.” Stopping sport would mean destroying hope, according to the saying, “We must preserve hope and continue it.”

He added that Palestinian authorities have reached out to international sporting organizations, providing evidence of Israeli violations of Palestinian sport in the hands of FIFA and other international organizations.

The Traitors stars Stephen and Matty ‘set to make big bucks’ after BBC show

https://i2-prod.ok.co.uk/incoming/article36590817.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/0_TraitorsGrabs12369_1JPG.jpg

When the 2026 cast concludes, Traitors legend Paul Gorton has predicted that Stephen and Matty will “have the best couple of years” in mind.

When the castle doors shut, we’ll soon be wondering what will happen to our Faithfuls and Traitors with only a few days left in the 2026 series. After Friday’s final, series two star Paul Gorton has predicted who will succeed in the series, tipping Matty Hyndman and Stephen Libby for even more fame.

Paul made it to the penultimate week of series two as a Traitor and has since appeared on Celebrity Antiques Road Trip, Celebrity Mastermind, Morning Live and will be teaming up with Vernon Kay for new BBC daytime show Do You Know Your Place. He’s not the only one, with Harry Clark, Mollie Pearce, Minah Shannon and Francesca Rowan-Plowden among landing gigs in TV and radio after the show.

Predicting who is set to lead careers in the spotlight after The Traitors, Paul said that he can see Stephen and Matty finding success in the content creator world – which is where stars are making big money. “If you look at their Instagram, they’re so aesthetically pleasing,” he told The Mirror in an exclusive chat.

READ MORE: Claudia’s fury as Matthew is banished from The Traitors and regrets ‘mistakes’READ MORE: Alan Carr and Amanda Holden eye up bizarre new career move after turning down Strictly

“I can’t see them going into presenting, but look at people like Angry Ginge because they have a lot of money and viewers,” said one viewer. He continued, noting that Matty and Stephen both speaking out against the ban on conversation therapy while Stephen was open about coming to terms with being gay on the Isle of Lewes.

“I believe they will both have documentaries produced because they have both experienced verytraumatic religious experiences, so there may be a point,” he said.

“I am aware that Matty founded a group about conversion therapy, and Stephen wanted to pray himself ‘normal’ just because he was gay when he was younger. So I can see them both getting on the air and telling stories about that.

He added, “This is one of The Traitors’ biggest shows yet,” which could make stars for a lot of contestants. “People are growing in size. Stephen, who I believe has nearly 200, 000 followers, started off with a very small following, he claimed.

Continue reading the article.

“They will have opportunities in front of them because they have big, beautiful personalities, whether or not they like it.” If all of them can have the same amount of success as me and Harry Clark did after their first season, then they’ll have the best couple of years.

Tonight, The Traitors airs on BBC One and BBC iPlayer at 8 p.m.

The Traitors stars Stephen and Matty ‘set to make big bucks’ after BBC show

https://i2-prod.ok.co.uk/incoming/article36590817.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/0_TraitorsGrabs12369_1JPG.jpg

The Traitors legend Paul Gorton has revealed what the 2026 cast have in store for them when the series ends, predicting that Stephen and Matty will “have the best couple of years”

With just a few days left of The Traitors’ 2026 series, we’ll soon be wondering what’s next for our Faithfuls and Traitors once the castle doors close. Now, series two star Paul Gorton has given his predictions as to who’ll find success after Friday’s final – tipping Stephen Libby and Matty Hyndman for even more fame.

Paul made it to the penultimate week of series two as a Traitor and has since appeared on Celebrity Antiques Road Trip, Celebrity Mastermind, Morning Live and will be teaming up with Vernon Kay for new BBC daytime show Do You Know Your Place. He’s not the only one, with Harry Clark, Mollie Pearce, Minah Shannon and Francesca Rowan-Plowden among landing gigs in TV and radio after the show.

Predicting who is set to lead careers in the spotlight after The Traitors, Paul said that he can see Stephen and Matty finding success in the content creator world – which is where stars are making big money. “If you look at their Instagram, they’re so aesthetically pleasing,” he told The Mirror in an exclusive chat.

READ MORE: Claudia’s fury as Matthew is banished from The Traitors and regrets ‘mistakes’READ MORE: Alan Carr and Amanda Holden eye up bizarre new career move after turning down Strictly

“I can’t see them going into presenting but in this day and age, the money and viewership is in the content creator world – look at people like Angry Ginge.” He added that he can also see them making documentaries, with Stephen being open about struggling with coming to terms with being gay on the Isle of Lewes and Matty advocating for the banning of conversation therapy.

“I think they’re both going to have maybe documentaries made because they’ve both gone through very traumatic experiences through religion so maybe there’s an angle there,” he said.

“I know Matty founded a group about conversion therapy and Stephen, when he was younger, he wanted to pray himself ‘normal’, just because he was gay. So I can see them both doing stories about that and getting on the telly.”

However, he added that with this series being one The Traitors’ biggest yet, it could make stars of lots of contestants. “People are getting massive. I think Stephen has nearly 200,000 followers and he started with a really low amount,” he said.

Article continues below

“Whether they like it or not, they will have opportunities put in front of them because they’ve got big, beautiful personalities. I want every success for all of them because if they can have half the ride that me and Harry Clark have had coming out of the show, then they’re going to have the best couple of years.”

The Traitors continues tonight at 8pm on BBC One and BBC iPlayer.

US House panel advances bill to give Congress authority on AI chip exports

Despite criticism from White House AI tsar David Sacks and a social media campaign against the legislation, the United States House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee overwhelmingly voted to advance a bill that would give Congress more authority over artificial intelligence chip exports.

After US President Donald Trump approved shipments of Nvidia’s potent H200 AI chips to China, Republican Representative Brian Mast of Florida, the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, introduced the “AI Overwatch Act.”

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

The legislation would allow the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the Senate Banking Committee to review and potentially halt permits issued to export advanced AI chips to China and other adversaries after passing the full house and Senate.

According to the bill, those “countries of concern” also include nations besides China, such as Venezuela, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and Iran.

Additionally, the US Department of Commerce is required to provide lawmakers with a detailed, thorough application that demonstrates that adversarial countries’ use of the chips will not be used for military, intelligence, or surveillance operations in the US.

According to one source, a coordinated media campaign last week increased the bill’s chances of passing.

At a session on Wednesday before the committee vote, Mast stated that “these advanced chips must fall under the same oversight as any other military-related system.” The future of military conflict is the subject, according to the author.

The act will “slow China’s progress in developing AI that could rival US capabilities,” according to the tech advocacy group Americans for Responsible Innovation, which has been pushing for it for a fact sheet.

When Mast first introduced the bill late last year, Mast stated in a release that “America must win the AI arms race.”

White House retaliation

Sacks and the White House’s press office declined to respond to requests for comment.

Sacks claimed in a post from an X account called “Wall Street Mav” that the bill was being orchestrated by “Never Trumpers” and former Joe Biden staffers, undermining Trump’s authority and his America First strategy.

Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic, claimed he had hired former Biden employees to raise the issue.

Sacks called it “Correct.”

The claims and the bill were not addressed by an Anthropic spokesperson. However, Amodei has been open about preventing China from receiving cutting-edge chips like the H200.

Amodei said at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Tuesday, that shipping these chips would be a big mistake. “I believe this is crazy,” she said. It’s similar to giving North Korea nuclear weapons.

Last week, conservative activist Laura Loomer, among others, wrote on X criticizing the bill, calling it “pro-China sabotage disguised as oversight.”

Mast and other committee members voted against the online threats before the vote.

Representative Michael McCaul, a Republican congressman from Texas, claimed that there are special interest groups that are currently raising millions of dollars with the very people who will profit from the sale of these chips and other companies that are “waging a social media campaign war” against this bill. Shame on them, I say.