Are tech companies using your private data to train AI models?

Users in the United States are constrained by how much personal information they can extract from their data to train AI tools because leading tech companies are rushing to release and improve artificial intelligence (AI) products.

Meta (which owns Facebook, Instagram, Threads and WhatsApp), Google and LinkedIn have all rolled out AI app features that have the capacity to draw on users ‘ public profiles or emails. Google and LinkedIn provide users with ways to opt out of AI features, whereas Meta’s AI tool doesn’t offer a way for them to say “no, thanks.”

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

In a November 8 Instagram post, it was stated that “99% of Gmail users have no idea that Gmail just flipped a dangerous switch on October 10, 2025.”

Posts warned that the platforms’ rollouts of AI tools make the most sensitive data available for tech company harvesting. “Every conversation, every photo, every voice message, fed into AI and used for profit”, a November 9 X video&nbsp, about Meta said.

Technology companies are rarely fully transparent when it comes to the user data they collect and what they use it for, Krystyna Sikora, a research analyst for the Alliance for Securing Democracy at the German Marshall Fund, told PolitiFact.

Unsurprisingly, this lack of transparency can lead to a lot of misinformation, Sikora said, which in turn can cause fear mongering and the dissemination of false information.

The best way for people to learn about and respect their privacy rights is to read the terms and conditions, which frequently specify how the data will be used and whether it will be shared with third parties, Sikora said. The US doesn’t have any comprehensive federal laws&nbsp, on data privacy for technology companies.

What we discovered about how the AI on each platform handled your data:

Social media claims that Meta will begin reading your DMs, photos, videos, voicemails that are fed into AI and used for profit starting on December 16th. – November 9 X post with 1.6 million views as of November 19.

Facts: On December 16, &nbsp, Meta&nbsp announced a new policy, but that alone does not mean that its AI tool will receive your direct messages, photos, and voice messages. The policy relates to how Meta will customize users’ advertisements and content based on their interactions with Meta AI.

For example, if a user interacts with Meta’s AI chatbot about hiking, Meta might start showing that person recommendations for hiking groups or hiking boots.

Your data is still being used for AI purposes, though. Meta does collect user content in “public” mode, even though it doesn’t train its AI on Instagram, WhatsApp, or Messenger. This can include photos, posts, comments and reels. According to Meta&nbsp, the system is designed to prevent translating these conversations into ads if the user’s Meta AI conversations involve religious viewpoints, sexual orientation, and racial or ethnic origin. Meta&nbsp, the AI tool, says&nbsp, will only use the microphone if users grant permission to use it to ask questions of users to Meta AI using its voice feature.

There is a caveat: The tech company&nbsp, says&nbsp, its AI might use information about people who don’t have Meta product accounts if their information appears in other users ‘ public posts. In a public image caption, a Meta user might mention a non-user, which could be used to train the AI.

Can you change your mind? No. Your data might be used by Meta AI if you are using Meta platforms in these ways, including using the chatbot and making some of your posts public. In Instagram, Facebook, or Threads, Meta AI cannot be deactivated. WhatsApp users can deactivate the option to talk with Meta AI in their chats, but this option is available only per chat, meaning that you must deactivate the option in each chat’s advanced privacy settings.

People were incorrectly advised to fill out the X-post’s opt-out form. However, Meta’s AI only provides a way for users to report an answer that contains a person’s personal information.

David Evan Harris, who teaches AI ethics at the University of California, Berkeley, told PolitiFact that because the US has no federal regulations about privacy and AI training, people have no standardised legal right to opt out of AI training in the way that people in countries such as Switzerland, the United Kingdom and South Korea do.

It’s frequently challenging to locate the settings when social media platforms offer opt-out options for US customers, according to Harris.

According to Meta’s spokesperson, deleting your Meta accounts does not prevent Meta AI from using your previously publicly available data.

Google

Social media claim: “Did you know Google just gave its AI access to read every email in your Gmail – even your attachments”?&nbsp, – November 8 Instagram post with more than 146, 000 likes as of November 19.

Facts: Google makes a number of products that interact with private information in a variety of ways. Google made the announcement on November 5 that Gemini Deep Research, its AI product, can connect to users’ Gmail, Drive, and Chat accounts. But, as Forbes reported, users must first give permission to employ the tool.

Users can choose which data sources, including Google search, Gmail, Drive, and Google Chat, to allow Gemini Deep Research to access personal information across products.

Google also gathers people’s data in other ways:

  • Through searches and prompts in Gemini apps, including its mobile app, Gemini in Chrome or Gemini in another web browser
  • Any photos or videos that a user has uploaded to Gemini.
  • If users give permission to use apps like Spotify and YouTube, they can do so through interactions.
  • Through message and phone calls apps, including call logs and message logs, if users give permission.

A Google spokesman told PolitiFact that the company doesn’t train AI when registered users are under the age of 13.

When Google activates smart features in its Gmail and Google Workplace settings, which are automatically enabled in the US, Google can access users’ data to help them create emails or suggest Google Calendar events. With optional paid subscriptions, users can access additional AI features, including in-app Gemini summaries.

Google’s smart features can be disabled by turning off Gmail’s smart features, but that doesn’t stop the Gemini app from being downloaded or accessed in a browser.

Gemini is accused of spying on users’ private communications in a lawsuit filed in California. The lawsuit says an October policy change gives Gemini default access to private content such as emails and attachments in people’s Gmail, Chat and Meet. Users had to manually enable Gemini to access the private content in October; now, they must go to their privacy settings to disable it. The lawsuit contends that the updated Google policy violates the unapproved wiretapping and recording of confidential communications without permission under California’s 1967 Invasion of Privacy Act.

Can you change your mind? People can use “temporary” chats or chats without logging into their Gemini accounts if they don’t want their conversations used to train Google AI. A Google spokesman said that doing so would prevent Gemini from saving a person’s chat history. Otherwise, opting out of having Google’s AI in Gmail, Drive and Meet requires turning off smart features in settings.

LinkedIn

According to social media, “LinkedIn will begin using your data to train AI starting November 3.” – As of November 19, there were more than 18 000 likes for the November 2 Instagram post.

The facts: &nbsp, LinkedIn, owned by Microsoft, &nbsp, announced on its website that starting November 3, it will use some US members ‘ data to train content-generating AI models.

Details from people’s profiles and public posts are among the data the AI gathers.

According to LinkedIn, the training does not utilize private messages of recipients.

LinkedIn also said, aside from the AI data access, that Microsoft started receiving information about LinkedIn members – such as profile information, feed activity and ad engagement – as of November 3 in order to target users with personalised ads.

Can you change your mind? Yes . Autumn Cobb, a LinkedIn spokesperson, confirmed to PolitiFact that members can opt out if they don’t want their content used for AI training purposes. Additionally, they have the option to reject personalized, targeted advertisements.

To stop using your data for training purposes, go to data privacy under “Data for Generative AI Improvement,” and then uncheck the option that reads “Use my data for training content creation AI models.”

Deadly floods and landslides continue to plague Southeast Asia

Far-right politician prompts fury with burqa antics in Australian parliament

No, there is no ceasefire in Gaza

Many Palestinians sigh of relief when a “ceasefire” was declared in Gaza on October 10. They had just endured two years of constant bombardment, which was estimated to have been equivalent to roughly six times the explosive force of the 1945 bombing that hit Hiroshima, concentrated on a region less than half the size of the Japanese city.

The destruction was extensive. Critical infrastructure, including the sewage system and electricity lines, had been severely damaged, most of which had been destroyed, and all hospitals and universities had been bombed. At least 10,000 Palestinian bodies who had been killed in bombardments and who were still unaccounted for had reportedly been scattered across the strip, which is estimated to have contained 50 million tons of rubble.

The respite, however, never materialized that the people of Gaza had hoped would arrive. The Israeli regime began bombing the strip again shortly after the “ceasefire” announcement. Since then, it hasn’t stopped.

Israel has violated the “ceasefire” nearly killed-hundreds”>500 times in 44 days, killing 342 civilians, according to Gaza’s Government Media Office. The Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) killed 109 Palestinians, including 52 children, on October 29. More recently, on Thursday, a bomb dropped on a building they were sheltering in in the Zeitoun neighborhood of Gaza City claimed the lives of 32 Palestinians, including an entire family.

However, the bombardment is not the only thing that is still going on. The hunger hasn’t either.

According to the “ceasefire” agreement, Israel was supposed to be allowed to bring in 600 trucks of aid each day, but that has been refused. The IOF only permits 150 trucks a day to enter the strip, according to Al Jazeera’s correspondent from Gaza, Hind al-Khoudary. Additionally, they restrict the entry of much-needed medicine, tents, and other shelter-related supplies, such as meat, dairy, and vegetables.

According to a coalition of Palestinian relief organizations, the current level of aid doesn’t even meet the population’s basic needs.

UNRWA, which claims to have enough food in its warehouses to feed everyone in Gaza for months, is still prohibited from bringing any of it in. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) advised the Israeli regime in October that it has a duty to not impede the flow of aid by UN agencies, including UNRWA, in direct conflict with this.

The court also refuted Israeli claims that the organization lacks impartiality and emphasized its significance as a key player in the humanitarian community. The Israeli government, however, has rejected the advisory opinion and continues to stymie UNRWA’s activities by preventing distribution of aid and denying its international staff visas.

Additionally, the Israeli government does not adhere to the interim measures that were established in a ICJ decision in January 2024, which found that it was possible to commit genocide in Gaza. These included allowing humanitarian assistance into Gaza, preventing and punishing incitement to genocide, and preventing and allowing genocide. The court has since repeated its provisional measures since then. They are still being ignored by the Israeli government.

Because of its unmatched diplomatic, financial, and military cover, it continues to do so on a global level. The most recent instance of that was on November 17 when Resolution 2803, which approved President Donald Trump’s 20-point plan for Gaza, was passed.

The board of peace, which is led by Trump himself, and the international stabilization force, which are charged with ensuring security and putting pressure on Palestinian groups, are two of its provisions. Both organizations’ governing bodies are still undetermined, but they would cooperate with the Israeli government, giving the Palestinian people a new layer of control.

Additionally, the resolution makes it possible to use both domestic and international aid distribution channels. It doesn’t mention the genocide or suggest any mechanisms for holding accountable for war crimes. In essence, the resolution goes against international law and gives Gaza to the US, who is a co-perpetrator of the genocide.

All of this makes it clear that there is no ceasefire in any way. The Israeli government continues to attack Gaza, starve the Palestinian population, and obstruct its access to safe shelter and care.

Third states can claim progress on conflict resolution and even peace if the Palestinians’ fundamental genocidal reality on the ground is still largely unchanged by calling this agreement a ceasefire. The “ceasefire” serves as a cover for the Palestinian people’s ongoing extermination, displacement, and erasure in Gaza, and as a deterrent to the international press and media.

Sudan army chief rejects truce proposal citing UAE role

Due to the involvement of the United Arab Emirates, the head of the Sudanese Armed Forces has rejected a ceasefire proposal that was presented by the United States and other mediators.

The “Quad” – the moderator group that includes the US, UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt, has “the worst proposal” so far, Abdel Fattah al-Burhan told senior military commanders and security officials in a speech that was made public late on Sunday in his office.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The criticism suggests that the government-aligned army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have waged a bitter civil war that has caused at least 14 million to lose lives and caused a humanitarian crisis.

The commander criticized the proposal as “unacceptable,” claiming that it “effectively eliminates the existence of the armed forces and… the dissolution of all security agencies” while “maintaining the rebellious militia in its positions.”

He claimed that Sudan wanted a ceasefire and that the RSF had to retreat and be confined to specific locations.

Is the role of the UAE questioned?

Al-Burhan reiterated that Sudan believes the UAE’s role in the Quad is untrue.

He claimed that “the entire world has witnessed the support for rebels against the Sudanese state.”

We will consider the mediation to be biased if it goes on in this direction.

The UAE is frequently accused of arming and funding the RSF, aiding in regional interests advancement, and gaining access to Sudan’s gold and other minerals.

The charges are rejected by the UAE, who describes them as a “cynical publicity stunt.”

No one can threaten us or dictate terms, according to al-Burhan, who said, “We’re not warmongers, and we don’t reject peace.”

(Al Jazeera)

Al-Burhan also criticized the US for mentioning Massad Boulos, a Lebanese-born businessman who is serving as President Donald Trump’s senior advisor in regional affairs, in the proposal.

According to him, Boulos could become a barrier to peace as a result of the US ambassador’s claims that the army is using chemical weapons and preventing humanitarian aid.

The army chief, however, praised Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who both called for serious steps to end Sudan’s conflict while speaking to reporters in Washington last week.

“Catastrophic humanitarian consequences”

The RSF announced this month that the Quad proposal addresses the “catastrophic humanitarian consequences of the war.”

A three-month truce, according to the plan, could pave the way for a lasting political solution. In a nation where the ruling military commanders seized power after numerous coups, it would also establish a new civilian government.

However, the RSF continues to wreak havoc in Darfur, which was under the control of Sudan’s western region after last month’s army was forced to leave the city of El-Fasher.

RSF fighters have since been spotted burning and burying bodies in large numbers in an effort to conceal the existence of numerous mass killings, according to satellite images from the city.

Despite international organizations and witnesses reporting widespread rape, thousands of people still go missing after fleeing the area.

Part of the central Sudanese Kordofan region is still up for battles between the army and the RSF.

The army’s 22nd Division will soon be able to retake control of the strategic city of Babnusa in West Kordofan, according to the RSF on Saturday.

In Khartoum and other parts of Sudan in April 2023, a power struggle between the military and the RSF sparked open fighting in the capital.

More than 40, 000 people have been killed in the conflict, according to UN statistics, but aid organizations claim that this is an undercount and that the actual number could be much higher.