Category World News

A vote on the UNSC (UNSC) vote is expected, which could lead to Iran’s resumed nuclear-related sanctions.

On Friday, the UNSC will vote on a resolution that China and Russia have proposed putting a stop to the punishments’ reimposition. After the United Kingdom, France, and Germany accused Tehran of breaking a 2015 agreement that would stop it from developing nuclear weapons, UN “snapback” sanctions are scheduled to be triggered at 00:00 GMT on Saturday.

The resolution will allow the international community to reimpose an arms embargo against Tehran and a punishing global asset freeze if the council declines to approve it. The resolution seeks a six-month delay to allow for further discussions.

Additionally, Iran’s citizens and entities are prohibited from selling materials that could be used in uranium enrichment and reprocessing, as well as for the development of ballistic missiles and travel.

The UNSC’s recommendation to pass the Russian/Chinese resolution is backed up by diplomats.

Hostile behaviors

After Israel and the United States bombed the sites in June, the UN’s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), had been attempting to rebuild cooperation with Tehran and resume inspections of its nuclear facilities.

Iran has threatened to retaliate by ending its cooperation with the IAEA in the event of sanctions being imposed prior to the vote.

Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi stated in a Telegram post that no hostile actions against Iran would be possible without the IAEA’s earlier statement that the country’s nuclear cooperation would remain in effect.

Otherwise, he continued, “The Islamic Republic of Iran will consider its practical commitments terminated.”

He also criticized the “European Troika,” which consists of France, Germany, and the UK, for pushing for the reimposition of sanctions, according to an article from the Iranian Students’ News Agency.

UN nuclear inspectors have been pressing Iran to grant them full access to its nuclear sites.

Araghchi met with Yvette Cooper on Thursday to talk about the disagreement, which he “strongly criticized the position of the three European countries as unjustified, illegal, and irresponsible,” according to the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The resolution that would postpone the lifting of sanctions until April 18th, 2014, is expected to be presented to the UNSC later on Friday.

The draft resolution would direct “immediate resume negotiations” for all the initial parties to the deal, including the US.

The UNSC’s 15 members did not anticipate giving the resolution the nine votes needed to pass, diplomats told the AFP news agency.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian reiterated his statement at a meeting with Bolivian President Luis Arce Catacora on Thursday, saying Tehran is “fully prepared for any scenario” in the event that the UN General Assembly is reinstated.

Pezeshkian reiterated in his first UN address on Wednesday that Tehran will “never attempt to build a nuclear bomb.”

Iran has long argued that it is not seeking nuclear weapons, citing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s edict, and that US intelligence has not determined whether Iran has chosen to develop nuclear weapons.

Israel already has de facto control over the West Bank, according to the statement.

The scheme, which the government announced on Friday, will require British citizens and residents’ digital IDs to be stored on phones. The government stated that while it will be “mandatory” for employees, it will not be required for people to carry their ID or be required to produce it.

Immigration, which populist groups claim is uncontrolled, is being pushed by Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour government, despite the UK’s long opposition to identity cards, which were abolished after World War II.

A person’s name, date of birth, and photo would be included in the free digital ID, along with details about their nationality and residency status.

According to a government statement, it will be “mandatory as a means of proving your right to work.”

One of the biggest “pull factors” for people who enter the UK illegally is that it will prevent those with no right to work from being able to find employment.

The statement added that streamlining access to tax records will be made simpler with the introduction of the digital ID, as well as simplifying applications for services like driving licenses, childcare, and welfare.

According to Starmer, “digital ID is a huge opportunity for the UK.” It will also provide countless advantages to regular people. Making our borders more secure, it will make it harder to work illegally in this nation.

“Digitally excluded”

The government’s earlier statements that it was considering were met with mixed reviews of the proposals.

The liberal Democrats, who are centrist, said they would not support “mandated digital ID” for those who are “forced to turn over their private information just to go about their daily lives.”

Liberal Democrats oppose digital IDs that are required. People shouldn’t be subject to criminal law simply because they don’t want to give out their personal information. pic. twitter.com/mEzV7s9vUf

The Conservative Party’s leader, Kemi Badenoch, stated on X that her party would not support the government’s or this organization’s efforts to require law-abiding citizens to wear ID cards.

We will not support any system that British citizens must adhere to, or that deprives those of us who choose not to do so from our citizenship’s rights, she added.

The far-right Reform UK party referred to the plans as a “cynical ploy” meant to “fool” voters into believing immigration measures are being implemented.

Additionally, it sought to dispel long-standing British suspicions about widespread national ID schemes across most of Europe.

According to Reform leader Nigel Farage, “It won’t affect illegal immigration, but it will be used to control and punish the rest of us.”

I oppose @Keir_Starmer’s digital ID cards vehemently.

It won’t affect illegal immigration, but it will be used to impose rules and sanctions on the rest of us.

This much authority should never be in the hands of the state.

An identity card was attempted by the Labour Party, which was then led by Tony Blair, in the 2000s, but it was later dropped by Gordon Brown, Blair’s successor, after opposition called it a civil liberties violation.

The government appears to be betting that populist viewpoints will outweigh the long-standing opposition, given that immigration is currently rife.

The announcement, which comes as Labour is holding its annual conference, seems to have come at a time that is not coincidental.