Five UN food aid workers killed in Sudan ambush as hunger crisis deepens

At least five people have been killed in an ambush on a UN food aid convoy in Sudan, preventing desperately needed supplies from reaching el-Fasher, a city in the country’s war-torn Darfur, to receive aid.

The 15-truck convoy, which was attacked overnight, was carrying essential humanitarian supplies from Port Sudan to North Darfur, according to aid organizations.

“The convoy had five members killed and several others were hurt. According to a joint statement from the World Food Programme (WFP) and the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF), multiple trucks were burned, and important humanitarian supplies were harmed.

The organizations described the incident as a violation of international humanitarian law and demanded an immediate investigation. Both parties involved in fighting knew the strategy in advance.

When it started to fire, the convoy was about to enter al-Koma, a town that the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) controlled. According to local activists, the area was the site of a drone attack earlier this week that claimed the lives of civilians.

More than half of Sudan’s population has been suffering from acute hunger as a result of fighting between the RSF and the Sudanese army that has raged for more than two years. One of the region’s most vulnerable regions is El-Fasher, the capital of North Darfur.

The UN statement warned that “hundreds of thousands of people in El-Fasher are at risk of starvation and malnutrition.”

The attack was blamed on both sides. The army claimed RSF fighters tore the trucks, while the RSF claimed the army launched an air attack on the convoy. No one could independently verify either account.

The most recent assault on humanitarian operations comes at a clip.

US factory orders slump in April as spending on tariff anticipation fades

In April, orders from American factories decreased after a rise in March, when businesses began making purchases in anticipation of tariffs.

According to Census Bureau data released on Tuesday, new orders for US manufactured goods decreased by 3.7 percent each month, which is worse than economists had anticipated.

A 3.1 percent decline was anticipated by Reuters news agency polled economists. Dow Jones predicted a decline of 3.3 percent. Factory orders increased by 2 percent annually, though.

The increase in April’s report is in stark contrast to the increase of 3.4% in March, which had the highest increase for five consecutive months.

President Donald Trump’s aggressive tariffs have put pressure on manufacturing, which accounts for 10.2% of the US economy. Trump sees the tariffs as a way to raise money to make up for his previously announced tax cuts and to revive a long-declining industrial base, which economists claimed was impossible in the short term due to labor shortages and other structural issues.

hardest-hit areas

Orders in the transportation sector decreased by 17.1%, primarily due to the decline in commercial aircraft. In April, aircraft orders decreased by 51.5%. Orders for parts for cars, trucks, and trailers decreased by 0.7%.

Manufacturing of electrical equipment, appliances, and components decreased by 0.3%. However, the percentage of manufacturing computers and other electronic goods increased.

Orders for machinery increased by 0.6%. Orders decreased 0.5%, matching March’s decline in non-transportation goods, excluding transportation, which was the source of the increase in March orders.

Additionally, according to the government, orders for non-defense capital goods, excluding aircraft, decreased by 1.5% in April from the government’s estimate of 1.3% last month, compared to orders that were expected to decline.

Shipments of these so-called “core capital goods” decreased by $ 1.8 billion, or a wholly unreported 0.1%.

Two suspected Ugandan rebels killed in Kampala explosion

As people gathered to celebrate Martyrs’ Day in Uganda’s capital, Kampala, two suspected Allied Democratic Forces (ADF) rebels, including a female suicide bomber, were killed in an explosion close to a well-known Catholic shrine.

The Munyonyo Martyrs’ Shrine, where Ugandans were gathered to honor the 19th-century Christians who had been convicted of their faith, was the scene of the explosion on Tuesday in the upscale suburb of Munyonyo. No reports of injuries to civilians.

According to army spokesman Chris Magezi on X, “a counterterrorism unit intercepted and neutralized two armed terrorists in Munyonyo this morning.” He confirmed that a female suicide bomber was one of the assailants and was “laden with powerful explosives.”

A destroyed motorcycle and debris were seen in footage captured by an independent outlet called NBS Television. The explosion occurred while “two people were riding,” according to police chief Abas Byakagaba, adding, “The good thing is that there were no people who were hurt in the vicinity.”

No immediate responsibility claims have been made.

Magezi suggested that the suspects were connected to the ADF, a rebel group that was established in Uganda in the 1990s but later moved to the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, despite Ugandan authorities’ efforts to piece together the details.

The ADF is associated with ISIL (ISIS) and is responsible for a number of deadly bombings in Uganda in 2021.

The UN has accused the organization of carrying out numerous atrocities, including the massacre of tens of thousands of people in the area.

Inzaghi leaves Inter Milan amid Saudi Pro League interest

Simone Inzaghi has announced that he will leave Inter Milan following the Italian club’s defeat in the Champions League final, and amid heavy interest in his services from the Saudi Pro League.

The 5-0 rout by Paris Saint-Germain (PSG) in the final of European football’s premier club competition on Saturday was Inzaghi’s final game in charge of the Serie A runners-up.

“The time has come for me to say goodbye to this club after a run of four years during which I gave everything”, Inzaghi wrote in a letter to Inter fans on the club’s website on Tuesday.

The loss to PSG on Saturday marked the most lopsided defeat in the 70-year history of major European finals.

Saudi Arabian club Al-Hilal is reportedly trying to lure Inzaghi with an offer of more than 20 million euros ($23m) per season.

Inzaghi coached Inter to the Serie A title last year, and was also in charge when the Nerazzurri lost the 2023 Champions League title to Manchester City.

He was at Inter for exactly four years and had one more season remaining on his contract.

It’s unclear now who will coach Inter at the FIFA Club World Cup in the United States starting June 14.

Inter opens against Monterrey on June 17 — a day before Al-Hilal opens against Real Madrid.

There has been speculation that Inter would go after Cesc Fabregas, who coached Como to a 10th-place finish in Serie A.

Inter finished second in the Italian league last month, one point behind champion Napoli.

The Milan-based football club was in the running for a treble until it lost to city rival AC Milan in the Italian Cup semifinals in April. Having also been beaten by Milan in the Italian Super Cup final in Saudi Arabia in January, the Nerazzurri didn’t win a trophy this season.

South Korea election results 2025: Who won, who lost, what’s next?

Lee Jae-myung, the candidate for the opposition Democratic Party, is poised to become South Korea’s next president after provisional results of a snap election showed him on course for a comfortable win.

The election was triggered by former President Yoon Suk-yeol’s short-lived imposition of martial law in December.

The 61-year-old Lee is expected to be sworn in on Wednesday, becoming the country’s 14th president after defeating Kim Moon-soo of the conservative People Power Party (PPP). The South Korean president serves a single five-year term without the possibility of re-election.

The PPP’s Yoon was impeached and removed from office in early April for his martial law debacle. The shock move sparked weeks of protests and investigations and made Yoon South Korea’s shortest-serving president.

Here is what you need to know about Tuesday’s election and its impact:

Who won South Korea’s presidential election?

With 85 percent of the ballots counted, the National Election Commission (NEC) said provisional results showed Lee winning more than 48 percent of the votes with Kim at 42.9 percent.

Although the NEC is yet to formally declare a winner, Kim has conceded defeat and congratulated Lee on his win.

Shortly before Kim’s concession, Lee emerged outside his house in Seoul, where throngs of supporters had gathered. Lee told them he was “highly likely to become the president”.

Nearly 80 percent of the country’s 44.4 million eligible voters cast ballots – the highest turnout since 1997, according to the NEC.

Earlier, exit polls by South Korea’s three major TV stations – KBS, MBC and SBS – projected a comfortable win for Lee. The exit polls projected more than 50 percent of the vote for the opposition candidate and 39 percent for Kim.

Trailing behind them was Lee Jun-seok of the conservative New Reform Party. Analysts said Kim underperformed, hurt by his ties to Yoon and his failure to persuade Lee Jun-seok to unify the right-wing vote. By late on Tuesday, Lee Jun-seok also had conceded defeat.

Who is Lee Jae-myung, South Korea’s new president?

Lee – who served as governor of South Korea’s most populous province, Gyeonggi, and mayor of Seongnam near the capital, Seoul – is a divisive figure. This election marked the human rights lawyer-turned-politician’s third attempt to secure the presidency.

Lee lost the last presidential election to Yoon by the slimmest margin in the country’s democratic history. He went on to lead the Democratic Party to a landslide victory in last year’s legislative elections and was the driving force behind the opposition-led campaign to remove Yoon from office.

During the six-hour martial law period, Lee scaled the National Assembly walls to bypass military blockades, livestreamed his entry and urged citizens to protest. Nearly two-thirds of the lawmakers ultimately made it past the barricades to vote unanimously to end the emergency measures.

Despite his critics calling him a dangerous populist, Lee has promised to pursue pragmatic diplomacy: calling South Korea’s alliance with the United States the foundation of its foreign policy and promising to solidify a Seoul-Washington-Tokyo partnership, a stance that is not much different from the position held by the conservatives.

He has preached patience over US President Donald Trump’s tariff policy, arguing it would be a mistake to rush negotiations in pursuit of an early agreement with Washington.

Lee has also pledged to improve relations with rival North Korea, including reopening dialogue, restoring military hotlines and reviving denuclearisation talks.

The East Asian country’s deep-seated economic inequality is another issue Lee has promised to fix. He has advocated for a four-and-a-half-day workweek in a country known for its demanding work culture.

Lee is facing five ongoing trials related to corruption and other criminal charges. Most of these cases have been delayed until after the election. He denies any wrongdoing and says the charges are politically motivated.

How did Lee win?

Lee capitalised on his role as an opposition member by standing against Yoon’s martial law bid and promising to guide the country out of its political and economic turmoil.

Experts said Yoon also left the PPP in crisis as infighting plagued the party when it tried to choose his successor.

Although Kim won the party primary, PPP leaders tried to replace him with former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo. On the eve of the party’s campaign launch, they cancelled Kim’s candidacy, only to reinstate him after party members opposed the move.

Youngshik Bong, research fellow at Yonsei University in Seoul, said the infighting as well as divisions in the conservative camp over Yoon’s decree cost it support.

“Kim Moon-soo has not set his position clearly on the martial law declaration,” Bong said. “He has not distanced himself from the legacy of Yoon, but at the same time, he has not made it clear whether he believes the declaration of martial law was a violation of the constitution. So the PPP has not really had enough energy to mobilise its support bases.”

What were the key issues in the election?

The botched martial law cast a shadow over the election. It put Lee, after his loss to Yoon in 2022, back on track for the presidency.

“This election would not have happened if not for the declaration of martial law by Yoon Suk-yeol and his impeachment,” Bong said. “These issues have sucked in all others like a vortex. Everything else is marginal.”

On the campaign trail, Lee pledged to bring to justice anyone involved in Yoon’s failed martial law bid and to introduce tighter controls on the president’s ability to declare martial law.

A slowing economy, challenges posed by Trump’s America First policies and worsening ties with North Korea were other topics that mattered to the voters.

What is the significance of Lee’s win? What’s next?

Lee is to take his oath of office on Wednesday morning. The certification process is expected to take no more than 10 minutes.