Not Such An Innocent Girl by Victoria Beckham is the number one single on the Billboard Hot 100 this week, almost a century after its first commercial success.
3 images to be seen
Victoria Beckham makes a chart-topping comeback following Brooklyn’s explosive statement (Source: AFP via Getty Images)
Following her son’s nuclear post claiming she “hijacked” his wedding and was “controlling”, Victoria Beckham has become the best-selling solo artist of the week.
According to the Official Charts Company Download Chart, Victoria’s solo single Not Such An Innocent Girl was the best-selling and most downloaded song of the week, a whole 25 years after the song was first released. It has not only re-entered the singles sales chart but topped it.
This comes only a few days after she and her husband, David, were blasted in a bombshell statement released by their son, Brooklyn. The statement made hefty claims about the pair, alleging that they had been “controlling” him and spread “countless lies to the media” in an attempt to protect “Brand Beckham”. In one particularly viral allegation, Brooklyn claimed his mother “hijacked” his first dance at his 2022 wedding and danced “very inappropriately on me”.
READ MORE: Mel B’s ex shares embarrassing Beckham family secret over BrooklynREAD MORE: ‘She spent the whole day glaring at me’: People share wedding dramas to rival the Beckhams
His statement divided the internet into teams Beckham and Brooklyn. The latter half appears to have savored Victoria’s single from 2001.
Although it did not make it to the top of the sales chart, which features Dave/Tems Raindance at the top, only passing Djo’s End of Beginning.
The sales chart tracks the top 40 singles based on downloads, CDs, vinyl and other formats across a week. It does not track streams on apps such as Spotify and Apple Music.
Nt Such An Innocent Girl did not previously have a sales success, but it did have a singles top six in 2001. Her solo career came after her enormous success with the Spice Girls as a girl.
Victoria rose to fame alongside Geri Halliwell-Horner, Melanie “Mel B,” Brown, Melanie “Mel C,” Chisholm,” Emma Bunton, and Melanie “Mel B” Brown.” Emma and Geri were Baby and Ginger, respectively, while Mel B was Scary Spice and Mel C was Sporty Spice.
The group, which was founded in 1994, had nine top-sellers, including 2 Become 1, Say You’ll Be There, and Wannabe. Additionally, their debut albums, Spice and Spiceworld, received two top-fives. The albums chart for Victoria’s eponymous album from 2001 reached number 10.
Victoria left the music business for fashion in 2008. Brooklyn’s explosive post claimed that his mother was supposed to make Nicola Peltz’s wedding dress and that she had “at the eleventh hour” because her brand, also known as Victoria Beckham, was associated with the incident.
Continue reading the article.
However, Vogue reported that Nicola’s bridal stylist had been telling them that the Valentino dress she wore had been in development for a year. The article also details how Nicola and her mother “travelled to the Valentino atelier in Rome” several times during the year-long design process.
Victoria and David’s parents, Posh and Becks, are known as, but they haven’t publicly commented on their son’s assertions. They have two more children, Harper and Cruz’s daughter.
Not Such An Innocent Girl by Victoria Beckham is the number one single on the Billboard Hot 100 this week, almost a century after its first commercial success.
3 images to be seen
Victoria Beckham makes a chart-topping comeback following Brooklyn’s explosive statement (Source: AFP via Getty Images)
Following her son’s nuclear post claiming she “hijacked” his wedding and was “controlling”, Victoria Beckham has become the best-selling solo artist of the week.
According to the Official Charts Company Download Chart, Victoria’s solo single Not Such An Innocent Girl was the best-selling and most downloaded song of the week, a whole 25 years after the song was first released. It has not only re-entered the singles sales chart but topped it.
This comes only a few days after she and her husband, David, were blasted in a bombshell statement released by their son, Brooklyn. The statement made hefty claims about the pair, alleging that they had been “controlling” him and spread “countless lies to the media” in an attempt to protect “Brand Beckham”. In one particularly viral allegation, Brooklyn claimed his mother “hijacked” his first dance at his 2022 wedding and danced “very inappropriately on me”.
READ MORE: Mel B’s ex shares embarrassing Beckham family secret over BrooklynREAD MORE: ‘She spent the whole day glaring at me’: People share wedding dramas to rival the Beckhams
His statement divided the internet into teams Beckham and Brooklyn. The latter half appears to have savored Victoria’s single from 2001.
Although it did not make it to the top of the sales chart, which features Dave/Tems Raindance at the top, only passing Djo’s End of Beginning.
The sales chart tracks the top 40 singles based on downloads, CDs, vinyl and other formats across a week. It does not track streams on apps such as Spotify and Apple Music.
Nt Such An Innocent Girl did not previously have a sales success, but it did have a singles top six in 2001. Her solo career came after her enormous success with the Spice Girls as a girl.
Victoria rose to fame alongside Geri Halliwell-Horner, Melanie “Mel B,” Brown, Melanie “Mel C,” Chisholm,” Emma Bunton, and Melanie “Mel B” Brown.” Emma and Geri were Baby and Ginger, respectively, while Mel B was Scary Spice and Mel C was Sporty Spice.
The group, which was founded in 1994, had nine top-sellers, including 2 Become 1, Say You’ll Be There, and Wannabe. Additionally, their debut albums, Spice and Spiceworld, received two top-fives. The albums chart for Victoria’s eponymous album from 2001 reached number 10.
Victoria left the music business for fashion in 2008. Brooklyn’s explosive post claimed that his mother was supposed to make Nicola Peltz’s wedding dress and that she had “at the eleventh hour” because her brand, also known as Victoria Beckham, was associated with the incident.
Continue reading the article.
However, Vogue reported that Nicola’s bridal stylist had been telling them that the Valentino dress she wore had been in development for a year. The article also details how Nicola and her mother “travelled to the Valentino atelier in Rome” several times during the year-long design process.
Victoria and David’s parents, Posh and Becks, are known as, but they haven’t publicly commented on their son’s assertions. They have two more children, Harper and Cruz’s daughter.
The Mirror examines the 2026 deadline, which could change everything for the conflicting family, as Brooklyn Beckham attempts to reshape himself beyond “Brand Beckham.”
8 Images View
Brooklyn Beckham has a crucial deadline of December 2026.
As his recent bombshell statement made clear, Brooklyn Beckham is looking to establish himself as an individual in his own right, away from the glittering shadow of ‘ Brand Beckham’.
No matter how publicly you might display your dirty laundry, such breakaways aren’t always as straightforward as cutting ties and running. Even Brooklyn’s name cannot be regarded as his own, with mother Victoria Beckham claiming to be the sole proprietor of the trademark “Brooklyn Beckham.”
It looks as though this year could mark a significant turning point, however, with the 26-year-old’s bombshell Instagram story reportedly coming less than one year before this trademark expires.
READ MORE: Brooklyn Beckham’s wedding brunch guests snubbed as Victoria ‘stole show’ again
Documents seen by the Daily Mail reportedly show that in December 2016, the Spice Girl turned fashion mogul took out the trademark in her eldest son’s name. The deadline for expiration is said to be December 2026, after which point Brooklyn will be free to renew using his own lawyers.
Although this ownership may seem to fit into Brooklyn’s narrative of being “controlled” by his famous parents, those who are aware that their children are destined for a life in the public eye are aware of this.
Peter Vaughan, Associate Professor at Nottingham Law School, told the Mirror: “Where the parents are famous, and it is likely that their children will have their own high profile, following in their parents’ footsteps, then securing early trade mark protection for those children can make sense in allowing them to develop their own brand.
A registration creates a space for the growth of the name “Brooklyn.” It would potentially allow him to stop others from using the same or a similar name for the same or similar products as listed in the registration. Although Victoria Beckham is currently her owner, the name itself refers to her as his “parent and guardian.”
Registrations were also conducted for the three younger Beckham children, Romeo, 23, Cruz, 20, and Harper, 14, who were also referred to as being owned by mum Victoria in her capacity as a “parent and guardian.”
A BBC News from April 2017 noted that Victoria trademarked the names of her four children with intellectual property authorities in Britain and Europe to allow the release of branded products while protecting the Beckham name from use by other celebrities or businesses. Both she and football legend husband David Beckham had previously trademarked their names in 2002 and 2000, respectively.
Mr Vaughan remarked: “This is a family aware of the value of a brand and the methods available to protect it. It wouldn’t be a surprise to see Brooklyn and Nicola seek to file their own trade marks to protect their names and branding opportunities, even if they also seek to gain control of the existing Brooklyn Beckham registration.
A trade mark registration like this could well prove to be the real gift that keeps on giving, despite not being the kind of thing that most teenagers would want. It may not even be as unusual as it first appears. As an example, it appears that there is a registration for “BLUE IVY CARTER.” Perhaps it’s just savvy future planning that famous parents are now looking to do for their children (seeing in the same way as applying for their passport or birth certificate, just another certificate to add to the list).
The value placed on such trademarks allegedly came to light shortly before his 2022 wedding to actress Nicola Peltz, with Brooklyn claiming that parents Victoria and David attempted to “bribe” him mere weeks before the ceremony in Palm Beach, Florida, with a “payday” being “affected” by his refusal to cooperate.
Brooklyn claimed in a jaw-dropping Instagram statement that “we had my parents repeatedly pressured and attempted to bribe me into signing away my name, which would have affected my wife and our future children. They were adamant on me signing before my wedding date because then the terms of the deal would be initiated. The payday was affected by my holdout, and they haven’t treated me similarly since.
Although it’s not known what Brooklyn means by payday, the Beckhams, whose fortune is estimated to be in the billions, are diligent about protecting their family’s hard-earned legacy, and experts warn that this counternarrative could cause the glossy “Brand Beckham” to suffer.
Now, speculation is rife as to what exactly Brooklyn will do with his separate identity once the trademark expires, with some sources claiming he could be set to follow in Prince Harry’s footsteps, with a tell-all book akin to the explosive 2023 bestseller, Spare.
Warning that the Instagram story could be just “the beginning” of the battle cry against Beckingham Palace, a source told the Mail: “This wasn’t a final cry for help. If people think it’s the end, it’s actually the beginning.” They added: “He’s always said he wasn’t interested. Maybe one day. Maybe in the future. But not now. This is the first time he’s seriously considered telling his side of the story to clear the air. He’s sick of others rewriting it for him.”
Much like Prince Harry, to whom he is often compared, Brooklyn’s name was known across the world from the day he was born, with the youngster quickly becoming a feature in his parents’ countless photoshoots and media appearances. It’s perhaps understandable that he, too, wants his voice to be heard, as an adult with his own opinions and perspectives. But while Brooklyn and Nicola, 31, may be looking to strike out on their own, Mayah Riaz, a PR to the stars, has predicted that the young couple will need more than a “victimhood” narrative to sustain their brand in the long term.
Brooklyn and Nicola can use this to establish their own brand, according to Ms Riaz in a statement to the Mirror. “But only if they change their minds quickly. Victimhood may open the door, but it doesn’t help a brand. To steal the throne, which I’m not sure is what they want, they’d need a clear identity that is not defined by attacking his parents. Otherwise, they continue to be the “anti-Beckhams,” which is not a strong position in the long run.
Whether they live in a palace or a semi-detached, many families have endured the pain of estrangement and vows made in anger, only for reconciliations to unfold once tempers cool. Is there a way to rekindle the relationship between the conflicting family members despite Brooklyn’s making it clear that he is currently opposed to the Beckhams?
On this note, the Mirror heard from Lucy Theobald, Specialist Family Lawyer and Director at The Family Law Company, who advises high-net-worth families. The legal expert reflected: “The very public fallout between Brooklyn Peltz Beckham and his parents has become more than celebrity gossip. It shines a harsh light on what happens when family life, wealth and brand collide, and how quickly private pain can turn into public spectacle.
When personal relationships start to deteriorate, celebrity families are subject to special pressures. For wealthy families, disputes are rarely just emotional, they are also reputational. Damage from a relationship breakdown can have a direct impact on a brand’s worth and the businesses it supports, making family conflicts emotionally and economically conflicted. Parents and children are frequently subjected to more severe pressure, which frequently leads to family legal representation regarding control, autonomy, and identity, issues that are increasingly intimate and played out in public.
Social media has accelerated family disputes significantly. Tensions that were once private are now being watched live, provoking discussion, and making judgments. Once shared online, narratives are difficult, if not impossible, to regain control of, and already fragile relationships can harden beyond repair.
Ms. Theobald continued, “In my opinion, reconciliation depends on space, humility, and time,” drawing from cases she has personally witnessed. None of these are provided by social media. Instead, it rewards reaction, encourages point-scoring and entrenches positions, often undermining attempts to resolve matters through mediation or other forms of dispute resolution.
When used early, mediation can be very effective in high-profile families where identity, emotion, and reputation are tightly woven. A skilled mediator assists each person in hearing what is actually being said, not what they believe is being said. By slowing conversations down and removing the audience, mediation can disrupt cycles of escalation and shift focus away from image management and back towards understanding. Families can identify shared interests and look for ways to advance relationships and respect one another.
A judge addressed children’s mothers directly in an unusual situation by writing them directly. While respecting their wishes, he reminded them they only have one mum and encouraged them to leave the door open for the future. No pressure was applied structurally. No court order or campaign can ever create enough breathing space for it. Whether a family is famous or not, forced reconciliation rarely heals. It more frequently causes the division to get wider.
Protecting the human relationships that underlie family becomes more important than just a brand. Control may protect an image in the short term. However, in the long run, a family is much more likely to be protected by respect, restraint, and quiet boundaries.
Continue reading the article.
Do you have a story to share?Contact me at julia@gmail.com. banim@reachplc.com Follow Mirror Celebs on Snapchat, Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Threads
READ MORE: British Travel Awards winning holiday parks offering up to £150 off half term breaks
The Mirror examines the 2026 deadline, which could change everything for the conflicting family, as Brooklyn Beckham attempts to reshape himself beyond “Brand Beckham.”
8 Images View
Brooklyn Beckham has a crucial deadline of December 2026.
As his recent bombshell statement made clear, Brooklyn Beckham is looking to establish himself as an individual in his own right, away from the glittering shadow of ‘ Brand Beckham’.
No matter how publicly you might display your dirty laundry, such breakaways aren’t always as straightforward as cutting ties and running. Even Brooklyn’s name cannot be regarded as his own, with mother Victoria Beckham claiming to be the sole proprietor of the trademark “Brooklyn Beckham.”
It looks as though this year could mark a significant turning point, however, with the 26-year-old’s bombshell Instagram story reportedly coming less than one year before this trademark expires.
READ MORE: Brooklyn Beckham’s wedding brunch guests snubbed as Victoria ‘stole show’ again
Documents seen by the Daily Mail reportedly show that in December 2016, the Spice Girl turned fashion mogul took out the trademark in her eldest son’s name. The deadline for expiration is said to be December 2026, after which point Brooklyn will be free to renew using his own lawyers.
Although this ownership may seem to fit into Brooklyn’s narrative of being “controlled” by his famous parents, those who are aware that their children are destined for a life in the public eye are aware of this.
Peter Vaughan, Associate Professor at Nottingham Law School, told the Mirror: “Where the parents are famous, and it is likely that their children will have their own high profile, following in their parents’ footsteps, then securing early trade mark protection for those children can make sense in allowing them to develop their own brand.
A registration creates a space for the growth of the name “Brooklyn.” It would potentially allow him to stop others from using the same or a similar name for the same or similar products as listed in the registration. Although Victoria Beckham is currently her owner, the name itself refers to her as his “parent and guardian.”
Registrations were also conducted for the three younger Beckham children, Romeo, 23, Cruz, 20, and Harper, 14, who were also referred to as being owned by mum Victoria in her capacity as a “parent and guardian.”
A BBC News from April 2017 noted that Victoria trademarked the names of her four children with intellectual property authorities in Britain and Europe to allow the release of branded products while protecting the Beckham name from use by other celebrities or businesses. Both she and football legend husband David Beckham had previously trademarked their names in 2002 and 2000, respectively.
Mr Vaughan remarked: “This is a family aware of the value of a brand and the methods available to protect it. It wouldn’t be a surprise to see Brooklyn and Nicola seek to file their own trade marks to protect their names and branding opportunities, even if they also seek to gain control of the existing Brooklyn Beckham registration.
A trade mark registration like this could well prove to be the real gift that keeps on giving, despite not being the kind of thing that most teenagers would want. It may not even be as unusual as it first appears. As an example, it appears that there is a registration for “BLUE IVY CARTER.” Perhaps it’s just savvy future planning that famous parents are now looking to do for their children (seeing in the same way as applying for their passport or birth certificate, just another certificate to add to the list).
The value placed on such trademarks allegedly came to light shortly before his 2022 wedding to actress Nicola Peltz, with Brooklyn claiming that parents Victoria and David attempted to “bribe” him mere weeks before the ceremony in Palm Beach, Florida, with a “payday” being “affected” by his refusal to cooperate.
Brooklyn claimed in a jaw-dropping Instagram statement that “we had my parents repeatedly pressured and attempted to bribe me into signing away my name, which would have affected my wife and our future children. They were adamant on me signing before my wedding date because then the terms of the deal would be initiated. The payday was affected by my holdout, and they haven’t treated me similarly since.
Although it’s not known what Brooklyn means by payday, the Beckhams, whose fortune is estimated to be in the billions, are diligent about protecting their family’s hard-earned legacy, and experts warn that this counternarrative could cause the glossy “Brand Beckham” to suffer.
Now, speculation is rife as to what exactly Brooklyn will do with his separate identity once the trademark expires, with some sources claiming he could be set to follow in Prince Harry’s footsteps, with a tell-all book akin to the explosive 2023 bestseller, Spare.
Warning that the Instagram story could be just “the beginning” of the battle cry against Beckingham Palace, a source told the Mail: “This wasn’t a final cry for help. If people think it’s the end, it’s actually the beginning.” They added: “He’s always said he wasn’t interested. Maybe one day. Maybe in the future. But not now. This is the first time he’s seriously considered telling his side of the story to clear the air. He’s sick of others rewriting it for him.”
Much like Prince Harry, to whom he is often compared, Brooklyn’s name was known across the world from the day he was born, with the youngster quickly becoming a feature in his parents’ countless photoshoots and media appearances. It’s perhaps understandable that he, too, wants his voice to be heard, as an adult with his own opinions and perspectives. But while Brooklyn and Nicola, 31, may be looking to strike out on their own, Mayah Riaz, a PR to the stars, has predicted that the young couple will need more than a “victimhood” narrative to sustain their brand in the long term.
Brooklyn and Nicola can use this to establish their own brand, according to Ms Riaz in a statement to the Mirror. “But only if they change their minds quickly. Victimhood may open the door, but it doesn’t help a brand. To steal the throne, which I’m not sure is what they want, they’d need a clear identity that is not defined by attacking his parents. Otherwise, they continue to be the “anti-Beckhams,” which is not a strong position in the long run.
Whether they live in a palace or a semi-detached, many families have endured the pain of estrangement and vows made in anger, only for reconciliations to unfold once tempers cool. Is there a way to rekindle the relationship between the conflicting family members despite Brooklyn’s making it clear that he is currently opposed to the Beckhams?
On this note, the Mirror heard from Lucy Theobald, Specialist Family Lawyer and Director at The Family Law Company, who advises high-net-worth families. The legal expert reflected: “The very public fallout between Brooklyn Peltz Beckham and his parents has become more than celebrity gossip. It shines a harsh light on what happens when family life, wealth and brand collide, and how quickly private pain can turn into public spectacle.
When personal relationships start to deteriorate, celebrity families are subject to special pressures. For wealthy families, disputes are rarely just emotional, they are also reputational. Damage from a relationship breakdown can have a direct impact on a brand’s worth and the businesses it supports, making family conflicts emotionally and economically conflicted. Parents and children are frequently subjected to more severe pressure, which frequently leads to family legal representation regarding control, autonomy, and identity, issues that are increasingly intimate and played out in public.
Social media has accelerated family disputes significantly. Tensions that were once private are now being watched live, provoking discussion, and making judgments. Once shared online, narratives are difficult, if not impossible, to regain control of, and already fragile relationships can harden beyond repair.
Ms. Theobald continued, “In my opinion, reconciliation depends on space, humility, and time,” drawing from cases she has personally witnessed. None of these are provided by social media. Instead, it rewards reaction, encourages point-scoring and entrenches positions, often undermining attempts to resolve matters through mediation or other forms of dispute resolution.
When used early, mediation can be very effective in high-profile families where identity, emotion, and reputation are tightly woven. A skilled mediator assists each person in hearing what is actually being said, not what they believe is being said. By slowing conversations down and removing the audience, mediation can disrupt cycles of escalation and shift focus away from image management and back towards understanding. Families can identify shared interests and look for ways to advance relationships and respect one another.
A judge addressed children’s mothers directly in an unusual situation by writing them directly. While respecting their wishes, he reminded them they only have one mum and encouraged them to leave the door open for the future. No pressure was applied structurally. No court order or campaign can ever create enough breathing space for it. Whether a family is famous or not, forced reconciliation rarely heals. It more frequently causes the division to get wider.
Protecting the human relationships that underlie family becomes more important than just a brand. Control may protect an image in the short term. However, in the long run, a family is much more likely to be protected by respect, restraint, and quiet boundaries.
Continue reading the article.
Do you have a story to share?Contact me at julia@gmail.com. banim@reachplc.com Follow Mirror Celebs on Snapchat, Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Threads
READ MORE: British Travel Awards winning holiday parks offering up to £150 off half term breaks
Who made it to the end of The Traitors’ final? Everything you need to know about The Mirror
Skip to the main article
Need to be aware
The Traitors final will be broadcast on BBC One at a later time, at 8:30 PM, where we will find out who will win the series four and receive the cash prize.
Everything you need to know about tonight’s The Traitors UK final (Image: BBC)
Everything you need to know about The Traitors UK Final
Although there were many fans at the beginning of the season, Rachel and Stephen were secretly chosen as Traitors, quietly swaying conversations, encouraging wrongdoing, and murdering players who came too close to the truth. Faithfuls vanished one by one, frequently just as suspicion began to mount.
As other Traitors were exposed or removed, Rachel and Stephen had to take more control of their own lives, subtly redirecting blame while pretending to be more stressed-out Faithfuls themselves.
The remaining group, which included Faithfuls Jack, Jade, James, Faraaz, and Roxy, was made up of Rachel and Stephen (both Traitors), a mix of cautious thinkers and emotionally driven voters who all felt they had “earned” their place.
The entire prize pot (currently 76, 750) is taken away if any Traitor is left undiscovered at the end. If they identify and eliminate all traitors in the correct way before making a final decision, Faithfuls prevail.
Roxy was murdered just before the end, which was a huge loss for the Faithfuls because she had growing suspicions that never fully surfaced. Her departure boosted the odds and increased the risk of a comeback.
When Rachel (Traitor) and James (Faithful) tied in votes at the roundtable, causing a decidedly random chance turn, everything exploded in the final episode. The season was perfectly summed up by that moment: luck versus logic, with severe consequences.
Whether the Faithfuls end their banishment right away will determine tonight’s outcome. The Faithfuls run the risk of destroying themselves if they vote too early and decide Rachel or Stephen will steal the entire prize.
Following fan outcry, the BBC releases an update on Roxy’s cutscene.
Mirror mirror follower
At Reach and across our entities we and our partners use information collected through cookies and other identifiers from your device to improve experience on our site, analyse how it is used and to show personalised advertising. You can opt out of the sale or sharing of your data, at any time clicking the “Do Not Sell or Share my Data” button at the bottom of the webpage. Please note that your preferences are browser specific. Use of our website and any of our services represents your acceptance of the use of cookies and consent to the practices described in our Privacy Notice and Terms and Conditions.
Who made it to the end of The Traitors’ final? Everything you need to know about The Mirror
Skip to the main article
Need to be aware
The Traitors final will be broadcast on BBC One at a later time, at 8:30 PM, where we will find out who will win the series four and receive the cash prize.
Everything you need to know about tonight’s The Traitors UK final (Image: BBC)
Everything you need to know about The Traitors UK Final
Although there were many fans at the beginning of the season, Rachel and Stephen were secretly chosen as Traitors, quietly swaying conversations, encouraging wrongdoing, and murdering players who came too close to the truth. Faithfuls vanished one by one, frequently just as suspicion began to mount.
As other Traitors were exposed or removed, Rachel and Stephen had to take more control of their own lives, subtly redirecting blame while pretending to be more stressed-out Faithfuls themselves.
The remaining group, which included Faithfuls Jack, Jade, James, Faraaz, and Roxy, was made up of Rachel and Stephen (both Traitors), a mix of cautious thinkers and emotionally driven voters who all felt they had “earned” their place.
The entire prize pot (currently 76, 750) is taken away if any Traitor is left undiscovered at the end. If they identify and eliminate all traitors in the correct way before making a final decision, Faithfuls prevail.
Roxy was murdered just before the end, which was a huge loss for the Faithfuls because she had growing suspicions that never fully surfaced. Her departure boosted the odds and increased the risk of a comeback.
When Rachel (Traitor) and James (Faithful) tied in votes at the roundtable, causing a decidedly random chance turn, everything exploded in the final episode. The season was perfectly summed up by that moment: luck versus logic, with severe consequences.
Whether the Faithfuls end their banishment right away will determine tonight’s outcome. The Faithfuls run the risk of destroying themselves if they vote too early and decide Rachel or Stephen will steal the entire prize.
Following fan outcry, the BBC releases an update on Roxy’s cutscene.
Mirror mirror follower
At Reach and across our entities we and our partners use information collected through cookies and other identifiers from your device to improve experience on our site, analyse how it is used and to show personalised advertising. You can opt out of the sale or sharing of your data, at any time clicking the “Do Not Sell or Share my Data” button at the bottom of the webpage. Please note that your preferences are browser specific. Use of our website and any of our services represents your acceptance of the use of cookies and consent to the practices described in our Privacy Notice and Terms and Conditions.
