‘No offer has been made’ to Farrell – Saracens

Saracens have rejected “disrespectful” reports that they have offered Ireland head coach Andy Farrell a coaching role for after the 2027 Rugby World Cup.

The club said “no offer has been made” after the Irish Independent reported that Farrell has been approached with a deal worth more than £1m per year to return to Sarries following next year’s tournament in Australia.

Brendan Venter will return to the director of rugby role at the Premiership club when long-serving Mark McCall steps down at the end of the season.

“Andy has not discussed his future with anyone on the board or ownership group of Saracens and we can categorically state, despite numerous reports to the contrary in the press, that no offer has been made to Andy,” the club statement read.

“The misguided reporting is disrespectful to Brendan Venter who will be assuming the DOR [director of rugby] responsibilities from Mark McCall at the end of the 25-26 season. It is also disrespectful to Andy and the IRFU.”

Farrell was a Saracens player between 2005 and 2009, also winning eight England caps, having switched to union after a long and successful career in rugby league with Wigan, during which he also captained Great Britain. After retiring as a player, he took his first steps into coaching with Saracens.

The 50-year-old – whose son Owen rejoined the Premiership outfit last summer after a season in France with Racing 92 – took over as Ireland head coach in 2019 from Joe Schmidt, stepping up from an assistant role he took up in 2016.

In 2023, he led Ireland to a Six Nations Grand Slam and the championship title the following year.

He then turned his attention to the British and Irish Lions, guiding them to a 2-1 series victory over Australia last year, before returning to the Ireland role.

Related topics

  • Irish Rugby
  • Saracens
  • Rugby Union

US-Iran talks conclude with claims of progress but few details

Tehran, Iran – Another round of indirect talks between Iranian and United States officials ended with a mediator claiming “significant progress” but still no clear evidence that either side was willing to concede enough on their positions to avoid war.

After the conclusion of the talks in Geneva on Thursday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said further technical talks would be held next week in Vienna and progress had been “good”.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“These were the most serious and longest talks,” Araghchi said.

Omani Foreign Minister Badr bin Hamad Al Busaidi, who mediated the talks, said Iranian and US diplomats would consult with their governments before the Vienna talks.

Few details have emerged about the discussions, but Araghchi was reported to have met US envoy Steve Witkoff – if only briefly, according to Iran’s Tasnim news agency.

The Iranian team, led by Araghchi, handed over on Wednesday night Tehran’s written proposals to Al Busaidi, who also mediated previous rounds of talks in Geneva and Muscat.

The Omani diplomat then met with the US delegation on Thursday, led by Witkoff and US President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner. Al Busaidi mediated between the two teams throughout the day, and the US delegation also held separate talks over Ukraine.

Also taking part in the talks was Rafael Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which will have to undertake nuclear monitoring and verification duties in Iran in case of any agreement.

The UN watchdog will hold several days of board meetings starting on March 6, which is around the 10- to 15-day deadline floated by Trump last week for Iran to reach a deal.

Western media outlets have suggested the board could once again consider a move to censure Iran depending on the results of the Geneva talks. Iran has accused Grossi of taking politicised action and criticised the IAEA after Israel attacked Iran in June, one day after the agency passed a resolution saying Tehran was not complying with its commitment to nuclear safeguards.

Gerald Ford carrier
The US Navy aircraft carrier USS Gerald R Ford departs Souda Bay on the island of Crete on February 26, 2026, for the coast of Israel, leading a second US carrier strike group to take up positions against Iran [Costas Metaxakis/AFP]

Fundamental differences

The two sides have been at odds over key issues, including uranium enrichment and missiles.

Washington has repeatedly emphasised, in lockstep with Israel, that it will not accept any nuclear enrichment taking place on Iranian soil, even at civilian-use levels agreed during the 2015 nuclear deal that Iran agreed with world powers. Trump unilaterally abandoned that deal in 2018.

In the days leading up to the Geneva talks, US officials increasingly focused on Iran’s ballistic missile programme, saying the missiles threaten US military bases across the Middle East as well as Israel. Iran has refused to entertain any talks on its conventional weapons. Iranian officials, including President Masoud Pezeshkian, have repeatedly said they will never develop nuclear weapons.

Speaking to local officials during a provincial visit, Pezeshkian also shot back at Trump’s assertion during a lengthy State of the Union speech that Iran was “the world’s number one sponsor of terror”.

Pezeshkian said numerous Iranian officials and nuclear scientists have been assassinated over the decades, particularly in the immediate aftermath of the country’s 1979 Islamic revolution.

“If the realities are seen fairly, it will become clear that Iran is not only not a supporter of terrorism, but one of the main victims of terror in the region and across the world,” he said.

The Iranian government’s IRNA news agency said Tehran’s proposal was expected to gauge US “seriousness” in the talks because it contained “win-win” offers.

Iranian officials have not publicly discussed all the details of their proposals, but they are believed to include diluting part of the country’s 60-percent enriched uranium and keeping the uranium inside the country. Iranian authorities envisage that could be paired with economic opportunities for the US related to Iranian oil and gas and the purchase of airplanes.

TEHRAN, IRAN - FEBRUARY 21: People are shop at Tajrish bazar in Tehran on February 21, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. In recent weeks, the United States has moved vast numbers of military vessels and aircraft to Europe and the Middle East, heightening speculation that it intended to strike Iran. (Photo by Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)
People shop at Tajrish bazar in Tehran on February 21, 2026 [Majid Saeedi/Getty Images]

Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has maintained his tough rhetoric against the US as well, casting doubt on the chances of any agreement. He also said Trump would be unable to overthrow Iran’s government after the US president said regime change would be “the best thing that could happen” in Iran.

Araghchi said during an interview on Wednesday that even if Khamenei is killed, the theocratic establishment in Iran would carry on because it has legal procedures in place to appoint a successor. Pezeshkian added on Thursday: “They can eliminate me, eliminate anyone. If they hit us, a hundred more like us will come up to run the country.”

Double-digit inflation as Iran braces for war

Iranian and US officials have been hailing supposed “progress” in the indirect talks this month, but many Iranians continue to prepare for war.

In Tehran and across the country, people are buying bottled water, biscuits, canned foods and other essentials in case of a war.

“A few days ago, I bought a power bank to keep the electronics charged. Now I’m looking for a short-wave radio so we can hear the news if the state shuts down the internet and electricity infrastructure is bombed,” said a 28-year-old resident of the capital who asked not to be named.

As bombs fell during the 12-day war with Israel in June, Iranian authorities cut off almost all internet access for several days, followed in January by an unprecedented 20-day total blackout imposed on about 92 million people as thousands of people were killed during nationwide protests.

The Iranian government, which blames “terrorists” armed and funded by the US and Israel for the protests, has rejected Trump’s claim that 32,000 Iranians were killed during the demonstrations. It said more than 3,000 people were killed, and rejects documentation by the United Nations and international human rights organisations that its security forces were behind the killings.

As the threat of war intensifies, not all Iranians are capable of stocking up on food and other necessities due to rising inflation that has gripped the country for more than a decade as a result of a mix of chronic local mismanagement and US and UN sanctions.

According to separate reports by the Statistical Centre of Iran and the Central Bank of Iran released on Thursday, inflation has now shot beyond 60 percent.

The Statistical Centre put annual inflation in the Iranian month of Bahman, which ended on February 19, at 68.1 percent, while the Central Bank said it was 62.2 percent.

Food inflation was by far the strongest driver at a whopping 105 percent. That included a 207-percent inflation rate for cooking oil, 117 percent for red meat, 108 percent for eggs and dairy products, 113 percent for fruit and 142 percent for bread and corn.

Kenyan man charged with duping people to fight for Russia in Ukraine war

A Kenyan man has been charged with human trafficking for allegedly recruiting people to fight for the Russian army in Ukraine.

Kenya’s Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) said on Thursday that Festus Omwamba is accused of sending 22 “Kenyan youths to Russia for exploitation by means of deception” as the director of a recruitment agency.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

The DPP said the victims were rescued in an operation from an apartment complex in Athi River, a town in Machakos County, last September, before they could leave the country. But three others who had allegedly already left Kenya ended up on the front line of the Russia-Ukraine war and later returned with injuries, it said.

Omwamba pleaded not guilty to the charges in an appearance at the Kahawa Law Courts in Kiambu.

His lawyer, Bonaventure Otieno, said, “There’s no case,” and described it as being based on “speculations”, the AFP news agency reports.

The Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) said Omwamba was believed to be a “key player in a more extensive human trafficking syndicate that exploits vulnerable individuals by promising them legitimate employment opportunities in European countries.”

He was arrested in Moyale, near the Ethiopian border in the north of the country, earlier this month.

Festus Omwamba sits on the day of his appearance at the Kahawa Law Courts to hear charges of recruiting Kenyans into the Russian armed forces, in Kiambu, Kenya, February 26, 2026. REUTERS/Monicah Mwangi
Festus Omwamba at the Kahawa Law Courts in Kiambu, Kenya, February 26, 2026 [Monicah Mwangi/Reuters]

The prosecutor, Kennedy Amwayi, told the court the case “has attracted public interest both locally and internationally; therefore, the public demands accountability following the loss of life in Russia.”

Hundreds of Kenyans join Russian army

More than 1,000 Kenyans have joined the Russian army in recent months, according to a National Intelligence Service (NIS) report released last week. In many cases, they were promised jobs in Russia before being forced to sign army contracts and sent to fight in Ukraine.

MP Kimani Ichung’wah, who presented the NIS findings in parliament, said 89 Kenyans are still on the front line, 39 have been hospitalised and 28 are missing in action. He accused Russian embassy officials of working with recruitment agencies and trafficking syndicates.

The Russian embassy in Nairobi denied the accusations, saying they were a “dangerous and misleading propaganda campaign”. It said no tourist visas were given to people intending to fight in Ukraine, adding that Russian law does not “preclude citizens of foreign countries from voluntarily enlisting in the armed forces.”

In July last year, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree allowing foreigners to serve in the army during draft periods.

Separately on Thursday, South Africa reported that two of its citizens were killed on the front lines. The foreign affairs ministry said in a statement that these were separate from the 17 South Africans tricked into fighting for Russia, who have largely been repatriated.

Minister of International Relations and Cooperation Ronald Lamola said that while the details surrounding their recruitment were under investigation, “circumstances that led to this situation were highly irregular”.

After State of the Union, Trump’s agenda faces new political reality

Washington, DC – United States President Donald Trump has hailed the first 13 months of his second term as nothing short of “transformative” during his State of the Union address, a message of victory the White House says he will continue to take on the road as he seeks to build support for his Republican Party before the midterm elections in November.

But the speech on Tuesday also underscored uncomfortable political realities for Trump, laying bare the vulnerabilities of a president who has relied on a flood of executive orders, unilateral actions and emergency declarations to build his agenda.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The Supreme Court’s ruling against his signature tariff policy – just days before the speech – underscored just how quickly Trump’s most brazen and signature actions could disintegrate amid a mountain of legal challenges.

“It was a speech to shore up his base of supporters,” said Aaron Kall, a professor at the University of Michigan who studies presidential messaging, “as opposed to extending olive branches to Democrats or trying to attract new supporters”.

It is a potentially constraining approach for a president who will need congressional support – including from vulnerable Republican lawmakers facing punishing re-election campaigns and centrist Democrats – to achieve many of his objectives in the months ahead.

“In some ways, Trump’s political fate and future relies upon getting some kind of buy-in or cooperation,” Kall said.

Another ‘Big Beautiful Bill’?

Trump’s most substantial legislative victory of his second term came in the form of a sweeping bill passed by the Republican-controlled Congress in July. He gave it top billing in his speech on Tuesday.

The legislation, dubbed by the president his “Big Beautiful Bill” and by critics as Trump’s “Big Ugly Bill”, codified several of Trump’s top agenda items from his campaign, including populist economic pledges to alleviate taxes on tips, overtime and Social Security benefits.

The bill included a raft of other top Trump agenda items: temporarily extending certain tax cuts that had been set to expire; deeply cutting funding for welfare, healthcare and foreign aid programmes; raising the national debt ceiling; rolling back clean energy incentives; and surging billions of dollars to both increase enforcement at the southern border and support Trump’s mass detention and deportation drive.

“Last year, I urged this Congress to begin the mission by passing the largest tax cuts in American history, and our Republican majorities delivered so beautifully,” Trump said during the speech although fact checkers have challenged his historic characterisation of the cuts in what they have assessed as one of several misleading claims the president made about his record and the economy.

“Thank you, Republicans,” he said.

Polls have shown the US public is not noticing a major change in their lived experience. Trump’s approval rating has slumped in the months since the bill was passed with views of his handling of the economy sliding as he entered the second year of his second nonconsecutive term in office.

“Trump takes credit for what he says are improvements that have been made, telling people why their lives are better or why they’re saving money from taxes or why costs are lower for gas,” Kall noted.

“But clearly there’s a disconnect between a good portion of the public vs the kind of story Trump’s telling.”

Trump on affordability

Trump on Tuesday did not call for another sweeping bill like the one passed last year but instead pitched several pieces of legislation broadly aimed at addressing the high cost of living.

While Trump has generally preferred a go-it-alone approach, his statements underscored that he still needs Congress for many of the policy initiatives he touted on Tuesday, even as he blamed Democrats and the administration of former President Joe Biden for the stubbornly high cost of living in the US.

For example, on healthcare, Trump hailed the 16 “most favoured nations” agreements his administration has struck with pharmaceutical companies. While full details of those agreements have not been released, they generally involve pegging prescription drug prices to the typically lower rates negotiated by foreign countries.

The deals have been the basis of the White House’s “TrumpRX” medication marketplace, an entity that the administration has pitched as a cheaper alternative for Americans willing to bypass insurance and pay cash for drugs. But Trump hinted at concerns over the staying power of the scheme.

“So now I’m calling on Congress to codify my most-favoured nation programme into law,” Trump said, although it remains unclear under what legal mechanism the deals could be legislated.

Trump then pointed to an executive order he signed last month that seeks to ban investment firms from buying single-family homes to rent. The phenomenon has contributed to a housing access and affordability crisis in the country and has become a particularly salient issue as the midterm elections approach.

“And now I’m asking Congress to make that ban permanent because all this for people, really, that’s what we want,” Trump said during the State of the Union, which came hours after Democrats pitched their own version of legislation aimed at the practice. “We want homes for people, not for corporations.”

Finally, Trump pitched a plan to boost retirement accounts for seniors by providing federal contributions to retirement savings programmes, known as 401(k)s. After the speech, his Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, told NBC News that the plan could likely be achieved only through legislation.

Tariffs

The largest question mark over Trump’s economic initiatives has been on his tariff policy.

Trump has long framed aggressive tariffs on trade partners as part of his America First vision, saying it would lead to a hard reset on global trade that would incentivise US domestic industry growth.

During the State of the Union, he hailed his tariff policy as “one of the primary reasons for our country’s economic turnaround”, even as he lamented the Supreme Court’s “unfortunate ruling” deeming illegal large portions of the tariffs he announced last year.

Trump has since used a new authority to impose 10 percent tariffs on global trading partners, which he hopes to increase to 15 percent, saying on Tuesday that the plan would remain as is under “fully approved and tested alternative legal statutes”.

“Congressional action will not be necessary,” he said.

Still, the new measures will expire in 150 days, just months before the midterm elections, unless Congress acts. Some trade experts have questioned the legality of the programme with analysts at the libertarian CATO Institute think tank among those arguing the new tariffs “almost certainly violate the law”, opening the door to further legal challenges.

Meanwhile, refunds for levies collected from US businesses under the recently deemed illegal tariffs have not yet been addressed, leaving another potential political vulnerability for Republicans in the months ahead.

Trump on DHS standoff

Standing at the podium in the House of Representatives at the US Capitol, Trump showed little departure from the hardline approach to immigration that has defined the first year of his second term, even as the issue has become an increasingly political liability for Republicans.

Trump hailed what has been in effect a closure of the US border to asylum seekers, which he enacted under an emergency declaration that continues to face legal challenges likely bound for the Supreme Court. He used several guests to tie undocumented people to high rates of crime, a premise that has been challenged by several studies.

In one particularly theatrical moment aimed at Democrats in attendance, Trump asked lawmakers who agreed that “the first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens” to stand up. He did not mention two US citizens killed by immigration enforcement agents in Minnesota in January.

Exit polls showed Trump’s 2024 victory was, in part, buoyed by his hardline immigration stance, but more recent opinion polls have shown increased dismay over the tactics used. The issue is considered particularly fraught for Republicans facing strong Democratic challengers in the months ahead.

In the short term, Democrats have seized on the politically potent issue, holding up annual funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to press for greater oversight and reform. DHS oversees the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency and US Border Patrol as well as the Secret Service, Coast Guard, Transportation Security Administration and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

“Tonight, I’m demanding the full and immediate restoration of all funding for the border security, homeland security of the United States and also for helping people clean up their snow,” Trump said during his speech as he appeared to suggest that FEMA – which rarely aids in snow removal – has been unable to respond to a recent storm that struck the US Northeast in light of the shutdown.

SAVE Act

Trump also revisited a defining message of his 2024 election campaign, his repeated claim that the US elections, including his 2020 loss to Biden, are marred by high rates of fraud and other forms of malfeasance.

Despite repeated studies, including from conservative organisations, finding tiny and largely inconsequential rates of voting fraud across decades of elections, Trump maintained during the address that “cheating is rampant in our elections”.

He called on Republicans to pass the so-called Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, a bill that would create higher documentation requirements when registering to vote and arriving at the polls as well as requiring states to hand voter rolls to DHS to identify noncitizens.

Rights groups have said the legislation would disenfranchise untold voters, noting, for example, that about half of US citizens do not have a valid passport.

The bill has passed the Republican-controlled House, but passage in the Senate would almost surely involve changing rules on the filibuster, a tool used by the opposing party to scuttle bills that do not meet a 60-vote threshold in the 100-seat chamber.

Changes to filibuster rules have long been viewed as a “nuclear option” by both parties.

Shifting priorities

The annual State of the Union address is an opportunity for presidents to make the case for their leadership and vision for the months ahead. They also reveal an administration’s shifting priorities.

For example, as Kall explained, with the US on the brink of escalation with Iran, uncertainty still lingering after the US abduction of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro and Trump recently pledging $10bn in support of his Board of Peace, launched to address rebuilding in Gaza and other conflicts around the world, the president chose not to dive into foreign policy until more than 90 minutes into his speech.

Critics have seen Trump’s foreign adventurism as a direct contradiction to his campaign promises to end US intervention abroad.

Trump’s desire to take control of Greenland was another major point in his March address to a joint session of Congress. But after a so-far unsuccessful pressure campaign beginning in January against European countries, the self-governed Danish territory was not mentioned in this year’s speech.

Meanwhile, while marquee themes like the economy, immigration and trade remained constant from Trump’s last address to a joint session of Congress, other areas received no mention, including the formerly Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which made cuts to the federal government workforce, leading to agency disruptions but falling far short of savings pledges.

Sutton’s predictions v Oli Fox of Good Neighbours

  • 70 Comments

AI is still leading the BBC Sport predictions table, but could Albert Einstein be the unlikely inspiration to help Chris Sutton hit back this week?

“Einstein used to live in a hut across the field from my house,” said BBC Sport football expert Sutton. “He would have gone for a walk in my garden, I’m sure, so I’m literally following in his footsteps most days.

“I don’t know what he was like at predicting football results, but that kind of genius rubs off, even years later.

“So, AI should beware – for this week’s predictions I’ve been gazing at where his hut used to be and thinking ‘what would Albert do?'”

Sutton is making predictions for all 380 Premier League games this season, against AI, BBC Sport readers and a variety of guests.

His guest for week 28 is Oli Fox from indie band Good Neighbours, who supports West Ham.

An expanded version of Good Neighbours’ debut album, Blue Sky Mentality (Complete Edition), is out now.

Do you agree with their predictions? You can pick your own below.

The most popular scoreline selected for each game is used in the scoreboards and tables at the bottom of this page.

Good Neighbours musicians Oli Fox and Scott VerrillGetty Images

Oli is the younger brother of Wigan’s former Wales Under-21s defender Morgan Fox, and his early dreams were to follow him into the professional game.

He told BBC Sport: “I played a bit myself growing up, and had trials here and there, but I was never as close as my brother to being a pro – so I sacked it off pretty quickly.

“I don’t think I’ll get away with saying I was better than him. Morgan always had the natural ability when we were kids, even at the age of four or five, and he was scouted by Ipswich by the age of seven.

“Our dad’s Welsh so he was very proud when Morgan played for their under-21s. He got called up for the senior team as well, against Turkey, which was awesome. That was a fun away day.

“It’s been awesome going to watch him down the years – even when I am away on tour I get a link to tune in wherever I am in the world. I’ve not really missed a game, visually anyway.

“It’s been harder for him to come and watch me, but we had our first UK tour in more than a year the other week, and he came to see me in Manchester. That was brilliant too.”

The pair have both featured in the past two editions of best-selling video game EA FC – Good Neighbours songs are on the soundtrack of EA FC 25 and 26, while Morgan is in both as a player.

“We grew up playing it, so that was really cool,” Oli added.

Chris Sutton and Oli Fox were speaking to BBC Sport’s Chris Bevan.

Wigan's Morgan Fox battles Arsenal's Noni Madueke for possessionGetty Images

Premier League predictions

Friday, 27 February

What information do we collect from this quiz?

I keep hearing people say that, mathematically, Wolves still have a chance of staying up, but let me just tell them straight – there is no chance of that happening.

There is no doubt Wolves have improved under Rob Edwards, but this is still a game I’d expect Aston Villa to win.

Unai Emery’s side have slipped up a few times in recent weeks, however, and it has cost them.

They have only won one of their past four league games and I am a bit gutted they haven’t managed a couple more wins to really be in the title race.

Emery has always talked down their title hopes anyhow, and I understand why – he obviously doesn’t truly believe they can do it – but until this blip in form they were in with a real shout.

I still think they will have too much for Wolves, but they are going to have to work hard for the points. Villa won 1-0 at Villa Park earlier in the season, so I am going for the same scoreline here.

Sutton’s prediction: 0-1

Oli’s prediction: I don’t think either team is in particularly fine form. Wolves don’t have much to play for but they have got a few young players in the team now who are really good, and they can get a result here. 1-1

Saturday, 28 February

What information do we collect from this quiz?

Sunderland just seem to be fading a little bit.

They went fourth in the table when they beat Bournemouth 3-2 at the Stadium of Light at the end of November, but their results have tailed off recently and they have missed Granit Xhaka’s influence in recent weeks.

Xhaka came off the bench in last week’s defeat by Fulham and, if he starts this time, they will be better organised here.

I still fancy Bournemouth to win it, though. They always create chances and Rayan has done well since signing in January to replace Antoine Semenyo.

Sutton’s prediction: 2-0

Oli’s prediction: Bournemouth’s front three is frightening and West Ham did well to keep them out last week. Sunderland don’t really have the legs in midfield to cope. 3-1

What information do we collect from this quiz?

Burnley are still competitive, still scrapping and still picking up points. Their players are still playing for Scott Parker but, even so, it’s still not going to be enough to keep them up.

The Clarets’ draw at Chelsea last week was a good result and they could even have won that game, too, but they didn’t. That lack of wins has been their problem all season, not their performances.

They have only won four of their 27 games so far and I think they are going to need to win five of their final 11 to stay up from here – and that’s not going to happen.

I don’t think anyone saw Brentford’s home defeat by Brighton coming last week – I didn’t anyway – but I am still going to back them at Turf Moor.

It’s going to be another tight one but I can see Igor Thiago getting back on the scoresheet with the winner. That’s as exact as predictions can get.

Sutton’s prediction: 0-1

Oli’s prediction: I always kind of fancy Burnley to get something at home. Zian Flemming is in good form for them too. 2-2

What information do we collect from this quiz?

I keep hearing how West Ham have turned a corner, and they have improved recently, but I still thought last week’s draw at home to Bournemouth was a poor result.

The Hammers were helped by Nottingham Forest and Tottenham both being beaten, but a win would have been massive for them.

Liverpool were very unconvincing at Forest, but they did nick the win.

Some of their fans are still whinging about Arne Slot and he is always being compared to Jurgen Klopp, but they are actually on a decent run of results and showing a bit of spirit too.

They are right in the mix for the top four but now they need to keep winning – I expect them to do that on Saturday.

Sutton’s prediction: 2-1

Oli on why he’s a West Ham fan: All my family are from East Ham and Upton Park. They grew up watching them, so when I was a kid I didn’t really have a choice. I wouldn’t have it any other way, though – I love them to bits.

Oli’s prediction: The sensible prediction here is that Liverpool will win but I am not going with that. Instead, we will score inside the first 10 minutes because we always start well, but they will come back and then we will be fighting for an equaliser. I am not too hopeful, but I am going to say we will get one. 2-2

Will West Ham stay up? The end of last season and the beginning of this one have probably been the toughest times to be a West Ham fan, because of what was happening at the club from the top down – it kind of felt like a wasted effort to try and support them.

But I feel like good things are on the horizon for us now – it feels like there is more camaraderie within the team, and they are starting to get Nuno Espirito Santo’s methods more. Axel Disasi coming in has been game-changing too, when I didn’t think he would have that effect.

We’ve found another gear now and obviously Crysencio Summerville’s form has been excellent with Mateus Fernandes, but Tomas Soucek has been really key as well. I am feeling optimistic, because we’ve got a bit of grit.

What information do we collect from this quiz?

Everton’s inconsistency makes them an absolute nightmare to predict, and the fact their away form is much better than their home results doesn’t help me much here either.

Anthony Gordon looks sharp as anything up front for Newcastle, with Nick Woltemade playing just in behind.

The Magpies won 4-1 at Hill Dickinson Stadium in November and I’d usually back them in this kind of game at St James’ Park and be quite confident they would win.

But Everton won here last season and, given how good they are on the road, I just have a sneaky feeling they will get something this time too.

Sutton’s prediction: 1-1

Oli’s prediction: Everton had a few good chances against Manchester United but they just don’t have that end product. Newcastle are at home so I’ve got to go with them. 2-0

What information do we collect from this quiz?

This will be a great game. I was at Etihad Stadium when these two teams met in November, and it was a real turning point in Leeds’ season.

City were 2-0 up at half-time but Leeds boss Daniel Farke put Dominic Calvert-Lewin on and had a real go.

They fought back to 2-2, and although they still lost to a last-gasp Phil Foden goal, that performance transformed them – they’ve been a different team in recent weeks compared with the way they started the season.

This is the sort of game where, if you are a City fan, you are thinking we have to go to Elland Road and win if we are going to win the title.

Leaders Arsenal did exactly that a few weeks ago, and blew Leeds away.

Can City do the same? I am not sure – especially if we class this Saturday evening kick-off as a night game, because Leeds’ record in those under Farke is extraordinary – out of 21 so far, they have won 18 and drawn three.

It’s hard to call, so this was one of the games I mentioned earlier where I was thinking, ‘What would Einstein say?’.

He was better at physics than he was at predictions but I reckon he would have calculated that the floodlights will inspire Leeds again – but City will still come out on top.

So, my theory is that City will win. They don’t have the same control in midfield any more, but they have so much firepower – as well as Erling Haaland, Omar Marmoush and Semenyo are both in good form.

Haaland is not exactly playing a different role now, but he is showing what an intelligent footballer he is. I don’t see Leeds keeping them out.

Sutton’s prediction: 1-3

Oli’s prediction: This should be a simple game for City, but Leeds at home is never straightforward. Elland Road is like a fortress and Leeds have got goals in them so I can see this being a bit of a scrap. 2-3

Sunday, 1 March

What information do we collect from this quiz?

Brighton badly needed last week’s win over Brentford, just to settle things down under Fabian Hurzeler. There had been a lot of talk about his future while they were on a poor run.

Nottingham Forest did not deserve to lose against Liverpool last week but scoring goals is still a problem for them, and I feel like it could haunt them again here.

Sutton’s prediction: 2-0

Oli’s prediction: I obviously hope Forest lose from a West Ham point of view but I’d take a draw here because you never know what you will get from Brighton. 1-1

What information do we collect from this quiz?

The Tudor times have not started well for Tottenham under Igor Tudor.

It’s been a classic case of a manager coming in and being bullish in his first press conference, saying he is 100% sure they will stay up – then losing his first game and letting loose on the previous manager, saying things like the players aren’t fit.

I thought it was an astonishing attack on Thomas Frank, because by saying Spurs’ players are “a good group with bad habits”, Tudor is totally blaming him for everything.

We know Tudor is a short-term specialist but what does that actually mean about him as a manager? It is OK going in and shoring clubs up for a few games, but why does he keep losing his job after that?

I don’t think this is an easy game for him after his side were outclassed in the north London derby.

Fulham won well at Sunderland last time out and they look full of confidence. Their home record is good and they’ve already beaten Spurs once this season – there’s a good chance they will beat them again.

Sutton’s prediction: 2-1

Oli’s prediction: Fulham will take this, 100%. That would be great if it happens. 3-1

What information do we collect from this quiz?

Manchester United have been very good under Michael Carrick and they are a team full of confidence – the way Benjamin Sesko is playing when he comes on is a great example of that.

Palace picked up a late win over Wolves last time out but it still feels like their manager Oliver Glasner should have left by now, because there is such a negative atmosphere around the whole club.

I don’t like to question anyone’s commitment but, in this scenario, I think you have no choice. Glasner wants to leave, and the whole situation has been handled very badly.

Palace have won away at Manchester United in the past two seasons but, the way things are going for both teams, you’d only ever go for a home win here.

Sutton’s prediction: 2-0

Oli’s prediction: The way United are playing, I can see them scoring a few. 3-0

What information do we collect from this quiz?

Arsenal have got to be careful they don’t warm up in the Chelsea half again, for starters. If I was playing in this game, I’d do it deliberately!

In terms of the game, I can’t see anything other than a Gunners win.

Chelsea can cause Arsenal a few problems because they have got players who can hurt anyone but, at the other end, I don’t see Liam Rosenior’s side keeping a clean sheet.

I liked the way Arsenal responded to their setback against Wolves by battering Spurs. Chelsea don’t like them much either, but this is going to end up with the same result.

Sutton’s prediction: 2-0

Oli’s prediction: Off the top of my head I want to say 2-2 for this one, it just feels right – we are going to see a few goals. 2-2

Oli on Declan Rice: I loved watching Kaka in the Champions League when I was a kid and I always wanted to play like him. But being able to watch Rice from when he broke into West Ham’s first team was incredible.

I understood he had to leave to reach the heights he has done and even the way he went to Arsenal, he did it really well. He’s up there with Frank Lampard and Steven Gerrard as one of the greatest all-round English midfielders, and to watch that as a West Ham fan, I am just so proud of him.

How did Sutton do last week?

The outcome of week 27 went down to the final game, Manchester United’s 2-1 win at Everton on Monday.

Chris wrongly predicted a 1-1 draw but his guest, Embrace bassist Steve Firth, correctly backed United to win 1-0 – and those 10 points handed him the weekly win.

Overall, Chris got five correct results from 10 Premier League games, including one exact score, for a total of 80 points.

That was enough for him to beat the BBC readers, who got five correct results with no exact scores for a tally of 50 points, and also get the better of AI, which managed six correct results with no exact scores for 60 points.

Related topics

  • Premier League
  • Football

More on this story

    • 16 August 2025
    BBC Sport microphone and phone

2027: If Nigerians Removed Jonathan Over Insecurity, APC Govt Can Be Cut Into Pieces — Galadima

A chieftain of the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), Buba Galadima, has warned that Nigerians could react strongly at the ballot box if current economic and security challenges continue, drawing parallels with the 2015 electoral defeat of former President Goodluck Jonathan.

Galadima spoke on Thursday while appearing as a guest on Channels Television’s political programme, Politics Today, where he criticised the policies of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) and dismissed claims that living conditions have improved.

Weighing in on political dissent and governance, Galadima said authorities should not underestimate public sentiment, citing incidents of arrests over public commentary.

“Look at young men in Kano who go to the radio to make an opinion. They have been arrested and sent to jail. Sometimes tried in the night by judges who are forced to jail them.

“This, now things start small, small. You don’t know how they can blossom and become something else. They shouldn’t play. They shouldn’t presume that Nigerians are gullible and that they cannot react,” he said.

READ ALSO: Atiku, Obi, Amaechi, Other Opposition Leaders Hold Joint Press Conference In Abuja

The NNPP chieftain argued that the 2015 election demonstrated Nigerians’ willingness to vote out an incumbent government over insecurity.

“They should remember, and they know better, that when things got to less than 10 per cent of the situation we find ourselves in in 2015, Nigerians rose to the occasion and removed that government.

“If you can remove Jonathan’s government for a simple insecurity in the Northeast, what would you be doing to the APC government? I think we have to cut them into pieces,” he said.

Economic Policies

Galadima also accused the government of undermining agriculture through import policies and rising production costs, particularly fertiliser prices.

“This government has killed agriculture deliberately, disenfranchising farmers who are 75% of the Nigerian population… You have to buy a bag of fertiliser for 60,000 naira to 70,000 naira.”

He rejected the administration’s position that hardship is easing, insisting that rural farming activity is declining.

“How can you disenfranchise 75% of your population for the interest of one contractor or one supporter? The massive importation of grains… Now this year I travelled to Maiduguri… there is nobody [who] is doing any dry farming.

“Let the government send researchers to find out now… If there is no famine… all the rice mills, over 1000 of them established during Buhari’s time, will be killed,” he said.

Political Backdrop

The transition from the Jonathan administration to the APC-led government was marked by what critics said was persistent insecurity and economic challenges.

In 2015, the APC campaigned to remove President Goodluck Jonathan, citing failures to contain Boko Haram and the Chibok girls’ abduction, which sparked the global “Bring Back Our Girls” movement.

Former President Goodluck Jonathan and the Chibok Girls.

APC leaders, including now President Bola Tinubu, argued that Jonathan lacked the capacity to secure the nation.

Since taking power, the APC, under Presidents Muhammadu Buhari and Bola Tinubu, has faced criticism over the economic differences, reforms, GDP, and insecurity.

Meanwhile, since Tinubu got into power in 2023, his administration has pursued some ‘hand-biting reforms’, including fuel subsidy removal and exchange rate unification, triggering record-high inflation and rising living costs.

President Bola Tinubu speaks at the State House in Abuja on February 23, 2026. Credit: State House

Protests and opposition calls for accountability have intensified, with recent arrests of military officers allegedly plotting a coup.

Ahead of the 2027 elections, Nigerians and opposition parties are mobilising for change, while the government pushes for constitutional reforms to strengthen security.

Galadima’s remarks also come amid intensifying political debates ahead of the 2027 general election cycle, with opposition figures increasingly criticising the economic reforms and security record of the APC administrations.